YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Puck Daddy

    Wild’s Marek Zidlicky drinks Lou’s Kool-Aid, waives no-trade for Devils (Update)

    138572035As we illustrated (literally) on Tuesday, Marek Zidlicky hasn't exactly been a positive influence on the Minnesota Wild this season.

    Including last night's loss to the Anaheim Ducks, they're 12-27 (including OT losses) with him in the lineup, 13-4 without him. They're averaging nearly a goal per game more when he doesn't play.

    So, perhaps, it's good news for the Wild that he'll no longer play for them.

    Whether or not this is good news for the New Jersey Devils remains to be seen.

    From Michael Russo of the Star Tribune, news of an impending deal:

    Zidlicky's agent, Larry Kelly, has confirmed to me this morning TSN Darren Dreger's tweet that Zidlicky has waived his no-trade clause to go to the Devils. No deal has been completed yet, but GM Chuck Fletcher and Devils GM Lou Lamoriello are working on it. No word yet on what the Wild may be getting back.

    Russo wrote that the Devils have been interested in Zidlicky for a while, but that the acquisition of right-handed shooting defenseman Kurtis Foster tempered that enthusiasm. Foster has 12 points in 27 games, but only two points on the power play. He's played well, however.

    If, or when, this trade goes through, it's an interesting investment from the Devils.

    He would join a team that's missing both rookie Adam Larsson and veteran Henrik Tallinder to injury; Larsson's due back soon from a back injury, but Tallinder isn't close.

    Zidlicky is 35 and has one more year on his deal at a $4 million cap hit. The Devils do have Foster ($1.8 million) and Bryce Salvador ($2.9 million) off the cap in the summer, so it's a bit of a wash; especially with Adam Larsson and Mark Fayne (who is an RFA) returning as cheap labor.

    (And hey, who cares: It's the NHL's money anyway!)

    For the Devils, this right out of the Lou Lamoriello playbook: Acquiring a veteran, puck-moving defenseman for a playoff run (see also: Shawn Chambers in 1995, Vladimir Malakhov in 2000). Zidlicky costs more than some alternatives like ex-Devil Johnny Oduya, headed to free agency with the Winnipeg Jets. But if he finds his game, he's an asset.

    Which is a big "if" at 35 years old. Zidlicky was at a philosophical impasse with Coach Mike Yeo, and that damaged relationship led to this apparent parting of ways. Now the only question is if a player who didn't feel his style matched the expectations of his previous coach and team will drink Lou's Kool-Aid and play Devils hockey.

    Well, along with whether this deal actually happens.

    UPDATE: From the Dept. of Hold Yer Horses, TSN's Darren Dreger: "Zidlicky has said he would waive to go to NJD, however, Wild hasn't asked him to...yet, and may not trade him until the summer says source."

    UPDATE 2: In case you were wondering if this trade was a complete cluster-eff, it is. From Russo:

    First of all, Fletcher said, nobody from Zidlicky's camp has told him he's willing to waive his no-trade to go to New Jersey.

    Why? Because the two sides have had only general conversations since Zidlicky, on Jan. 31, asked to be traded during a meeting moments after pulling me aside to complain about being scratched for the third in what would become four consecutive games.

    "I haven't asked Zid to waive his no-trade for any specific trade," Fletcher said by phone this morning. "I haven't called him and said anything's close. I can tell you for sure I'm planning on talking to other teams. We haven't traded Zid, we haven't made the decision to trade Zid at this point. I have not formally asked him to do anything because at this point I honestly don't have anything to take to him, I don't have anything for him to say yes or no too."

     

    10 comments

    • Neil  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
      If it's out there before it's done, Lou probably won't do it.
    • ThomasR  •  3 months ago
      Is waiving your no trade clause significant when then other team doesn't actually trade for you?
    • FleetingGame2000  •  Annandale, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
      Foster has NOT played well. His defensive coverage is atrocious.

      Unfortunately, Zidlicky is an upgrade for the Devils defense, but that's more of a statement about the Devils defense than it is about Zidlicky.
      • desey 3 months ago
        This. He's got a bomb from the point on the PP. Other than that, his defensive coverage has been awful
      • Griz O 3 months ago
        That he does. BUT he has trouble getting it on net. He either shoots it wide then it goes around and right out of the zone or he pegs the D in the feet.
      • Bern 3 months ago
        Foster has been terrible
    • Sean L  •  Tujunga, California  •  3 months ago
      Foster has been mind-bogglingly bad. Saying that "he's been playing well" shows you have no idea what you're talking about.

      Foster turns the puck over more often than the rest of the team combined, leading to a metric ton of odd-man rushes against the Devils (too many of which wind up in the Devils net). Trade Foster for any round draft pick and bring up Urbom or some other defenseman from the minors. There's no way they could be worse than Foster.
      • SCNicky 3 months ago
        Foster has a great shot, that's about it, he has been terrible on defense, the Devils have lost a bunch of games this year due to his blunders
    • Brian  •  Oakland, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
      If a player doesn't want to be somewhere he's not going to play at his full potential. He wants to get traded. I think he would be a great asset for the devils we need to improve our D if we want any kind of shot at the Stanley Cup.
    • Diehardnuck  •  3 months ago
      This is what is wrong with the NHL - somebody actually gave Zidlicky $4 million and still felt the need to add a no trade clause.
      • Ben 3 months ago
        Scoring from the blueline has always been valuable, and marek zidlicky has been a good offensive defensemen for a considerable amount of time. Limiting his 5 on 5 play and using him on the powerplay would be the goal. However I agree, 4 million was a poor assessment of skills.
    • Buffalo Soldiers  •  Minneapolis, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
      Zidlicky would be a good fit with a team NOT named the Wild. If he wants out so bad then he should open up his list of teams to more than just the Devils.
    • David  •  Asbury Park, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
      Could this be part of sending Parise out ? He's from Minny.
      • Thomas G 3 months ago
        Not gonna happen.. I'd love it to happen. but no way parise goes from a 6th place team in the playoff hunt and CAPT. of the team to the wild JUST because he's from MN.. I can see him maybe coming in the offseason, but not via trade THIS year.
      • ballgames 3 months ago
        sha right.
      • Bern 3 months ago
        Parise has said countless times that he wants to stay in Jersey. Does everyone involved with hockey think he's a liar? #9 and #17 will be skating with each other for years to come.
    • the immortal reg dunlop  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  3 months ago
      given how similar players they are i suspect daneyko will let him wear #3.
    • KJ  •  Mankato, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
      Heard the wild are getting back some guy named Parise?
      • Jeremy 3 months ago
        Why do wild fans keep saying "getting back" Parise? I am pretty sure he wants to win. Dontcha know?

    Yahoo! Sports Authors