YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Big League Stew

    Florida law would turn its publicly funded ballparks and stadiums into homeless shelters

    Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria tours Miami's new ballpark last February. (AP)Could the new Marlins ballpark or the Tampa Bay Rays' Tropicana Field serve as a homeless shelter for the 270 or so nights a year that they're not used for baseball?

    If two Florida lawmakers have their way, they might. As reported by the Miami Herald, state legislators have unearthed an obscure law that has not been enforced since it was adopted in 1988. It states that any ballpark or stadium that receives taxpayer money shall serve as a homeless shelter on the dates that it is not in use.

    Now, a new bill would punish owners of teams who play in publicly funded stadiums if they don't provide a haven for the homeless. Affected ballparks would include the Miami Marlins' new ballpark in Miami's Little Havana, the Tampa Bay Rays' Tropicana Field in St. Petersburg and several spring training facilities. It also includes the homes of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Tampa Bay Lightning, Miami Heat, Jacksonville Jaguars and Florida Panthers.

    The newspaper estimates that owners might have to return $30 million in benefits that were already bestowed if the bill passes and they can't prove they were running homeless shelters (to the newspaper's knowledge, no teams have been).

    From the Miami Herald:

    Senate Bill 816, which would make teams and stadium owners return millions of taxpayer dollars if they can't prove that they've been operating as a haven for the homeless on non-event nights,  passed its first committee in the Senate on Monday with a unanimous vote.

    "We have spent over $300 million supporting teams that can afford to pay a guy $7, $8, $10 million a year to throw a baseball 90 feet. I think they can pay for their own stadium,"  said Sen. Michael Bennett, R-Bradenton, who is sponsoring the bill.  "I can not believe that we're going to cut money out of Medicaid and take it away from the homeless and take it away from the poor and impoverished, and we're continuing to support people who are billionaires."

    With this being an election year, it's not too much of a surprise that state lawmakers might find a headline-grabbing way to show that they're concerned about the rights of the little people. And what better target than professional sports, where exorbitant salaries and construction costs are printed in the newspaper every day?

    I don't suspect that this bill will pass, though. The rich folk behind the ballparks have way too much lobbying power. The homeless advocacy does not. It's simple math.

    I have to admit that it's a pretty noble thought if the lawmakers are sincere, though. One of the biggest struggles that homeless shelters face is finding suitable real estate and it's not as if they'd be given the run of the ballparks or arenas. A simple corridor lined with cots each night could go a long way to helping a lot of people. I'd be interested to hear what Rays manager Joe Maddon — a big advocate for the homeless — thinks of all this.

    Also, the thought of Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria ladling soup and handing out bedrolls while worrying about someone messing with his giant fish tanks or art sculptures amuses me way more than it should.

    Big BLS H/N: Field of Schemes

    Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
    Seton Hall hoops player Herb Pope cheated death twice
    Basketball star Eric Gordon gets huge contract in bizarre fashion
    Y! News: Cops probe death of boy killed by toy cannon

     
    • Hetchinspete  •  Milwaukee, Wisconsin  •  3 months ago
      If the law included using most public buildings where the legislatures work daily if the law states that the building would be open to the homeless when no work is being done that would mean those building should be open pretty much 24/7. I don't seem much work being accomplished in the US Senate or House, just a lot of infighting.
    • Tim  •  3 months ago
      Why do they get government funding in the first place?
      • E and L 3 months ago
        Because a-holes voted for it!
      • Autiger2 3 months ago
        The stadiums usually belong to the city or county not the ball team.
      • jaydaba 3 months ago
        tourism
    • WM  •  Indianapolis, Indiana  •  3 months ago
      Why not use the state senate offices too, they are not being used at night
      • henry 3 months ago
        and most days
      • Cliff Curtis 3 months ago
        we had a past president that seemed to use them at night!
      • Tim A. 3 months ago
        I don't think they really ever get used, it's all smoke and mirrors, and of course 'taxayers dollars'
    • Allan  •  3 months ago
      There's no work being done in Congress - maybe those building could be used to house the homeless?
      • Joseph 3 months ago
        Not to mention the white house, or that 4 million we spent on Obama's vacation, that could have helped a lot of people.
      • S 3 months ago
        Hey now there is plenty of work in congress, like you know askin for birth certificates and ummmmmmmmm worrying they their kids may turn out gay if they let gays marry cause you know the worlds not collapsing we need to spend years argueing about people wanting to marry......
      • Bonnie 3 months ago
        You both sound like the azzzzhats in Tyler Tx. Their solution to their homeless problem was to shut down all the shelters in their town and offer the homeless a ride to the next town.
        So, while your posts may seem like cute political statements to YOU, you just come off looking like jerks.
    • jane  •  Tampa, Florida  •  3 months ago
      Pay for your own stadium and it won't be an issue. Problem solved.
      • Jeffrey C 3 months ago
        Definitely ideal but now since so many municipalities and states have given funds that idea will probably not be realistic.
      • RM 3 months ago
        Robert Kraft of the Patriots did just that. He was getting the runaround from Boston, Hartford, and Providence and finally decided to pay for the stadium with his own funds. The only concessions he got from Massachusetts was road infrastructure work on Rt 1.
      • T 3 months ago
        even if they pay for their own stadium, they usually obtain them from eminent domain clause which is a an intrusion of individual property ownership.

        now if they can buy their own stadiums without eminent domain then by all means do that.
    • KingTon  •  3 months ago
      Finally, the Marlins will have a decent crowd...
      • Blasphemer 3 months ago
        You beat me to it.
      • Mickey G 3 months ago
        Maybe if the Bucs open up to homeless people, they wouldn't have to black out their games.
      • Karl S 3 months ago
        That's gold, Jerry, GOLD!
    • Don  •  3 months ago
      I am a season ticket holder and I love this. I never thought hard working taxpayer money should be allowed to fund stadiums of any kind. They pay players millions of dollars a year, make millions themselves and then think a guy making $10.00 an hour should pay for their stadiums. If every state passed this it would end public funding of these stadiums and that would be FANtastic.
    • christopher  •  3 months ago
      I am all for these sports teams not getting public money for their enterprise. Why should taxpayers pay for these facilities?
    • erik  •  Denver, Colorado  •  3 months ago
      I cannot come up with any words that do justice to how much I support this bill. What I want to know is, why in the hell any professional teams get any public funding whatsoever? Ticket sales should dictate what these players and owners make, to use taxpayer money for this makes my blood boil.
    • Brian  •  3 months ago
      What about the other publicly funded buildings?? Could you use those on the weekends? No work is being done...
    • Dan  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
      why are we paying for these places when the owners make millions? this is insane!
    • John  •  Sunnyvale, California  •  3 months ago
      I'm not a liberal but I kind of like this idea....why should tax payers pay to build opulant workplaces for UBER-rich entertainers?
    • Unacceptable  •  Baltimore, Maryland  •  3 months ago
      It's it me, or does it just keep gettin weirder and weirder???
    • carol g  •  Middletown, New York  •  3 months ago
      it's about time. why should these owners be subsidized when money that should be ibvested in social programs is being taken away. now if ny would just use the yankee stadium which was built for $1B by he tax-payers for the same purpose...
    • Noreaster  •  Ithaca, New York  •  3 months ago
      Love it :) would serve Loria right and would be a great face-lift for all these money-hungry teams living off taxpayer dollars. Not everyone is a baseball fan, but everyone is paying taxes to support your baseball stadium. So let's do some good with it.
    • The Football God  •  3 months ago
      Why not, we used the Superdome.
    • mjb  •  Carson City, Nevada  •  3 months ago
      Seems to me if the law reads as quoted in the article, they also have to include all of the high school and college facilities as well.
    • Eric W  •  3 months ago
      Dolphin/Marlin stadium is only accessable by highway and the Panthers stadium is in an upscale area. Someone going to drive these homeless people to and fro?
    • John B  •  Dallas, Texas  •  3 months ago
      can any of them pitch?
    • Texas Gal  •  3 months ago
      Come to Jerry Dome in Texas.