YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Puck Daddy

    Hurricanes have made Tuomo Ruutu a $4.75 million forward for next 4 years

    137253611Impending free agency does some funny things.

    It makes you an object of desire around the NHL Trade Deadline, as pundits pump your tires until they're Gravedigger-sized in a sparse field of talent. It also increases your asking price before you actually reach freedom, as your current employer pays what the market will likely be in the summer, or enough to convince you not to test it.

    With that, the coveted Tuomo Ruutu signed a 4-year, $19 million extension with the Carolina Hurricanes on Wednesday, taking him off the market for Monday's deadline day.

    According to GM Jim Rutherford, via Chip Alexander of the News & Observer, the deal has a no-trade clause for the first three seasons.

    The $4.75 million cap hit is an increase on his $3.8 million hit this season. He remains the second-highest paid forward on the roster behind Eric Staal, at least until Jeff Skinner's off his rookie contract in 2014.

    The deal is no surprise. After Ruutu had been discussed as trade bait for the also-ran Hurricanes, the player and his team decided they wanted to extend their relationship.

    Why? As Rutherford said earlier this month: "Tuomo is a player we really like, and he said he likes being with the team." As he said today: "He's an important player to our team. He's the type of player that, long term, would be hard to replace."

    That type of player is one that can put the puck in the net, which Ruutu did 26 times four years ago. This contract tells you they see 20/60 potential from him.

    It also tells you the same thing that the Tim Gleason contract did: Rutherford likes this group, and believes they can contend with Kirk Muller behind the bench for a full season. Why else break his trend of never signing players during the season to retain two pending UFAs before the deadline?

    The money's impressive -- his contract is richer than the one signed by Erik Cole with Montreal last season -- and four years seem long given three of them allow him veto power over trades. But Rutherford didn't see a cheaper replacement, so why not bring back Ruutu?

    You know who doesn't mind this deal? Ales Hemsky. Because cha-ching

     

    22 comments

    • Top Gear Zamboni  •  3 months ago
      Wow, Eklund actually got this one right. That makes him 1 for 2318.
      • Diehardnuck 3 months ago
        A broken clock is right twice a day.
      • DARWINIUS 3 months ago
        You listen to that guy 2318 times ...?
    • jerry  •  Nashville, Tennessee  •  3 months ago
      Lil high but not as high as people are making. You can't just look at his stats and say yeah he's over paid. He puts up a hell of a lot of hits and brings a aggressive nature of play. His forechecking is the reason skinner did so well last year. JR is probably hoping to put them together again if he ever gets another first liner to play with staal.
      • Zach P 2 months ago
        THANK YOU! His forechecking did really help Skinner, Those two also have great chemistry. I never understand why the Finns nd Skin line isnt always together
      • Jamie 2 months ago
        +100 Zach
    • Geno  •  3 months ago
      P.A. Parenteau: "Cha-ching."
    • trav c  •  Hollywood, Florida  •  3 months ago
      I hate this for 2 reasons. First, he was one of the only interesting players thought to be on the trading block, so the boring trade deadline just got more boring. Second, deals like this are what cause lockouts. Tuomo Ruutu is a strong player, but not worth nearly 5M/yr. This is just fuel to the fire
    • Roswell survivor  •  3 months ago
      Typical small market signing for more money than should be allocated for this type of player.
    • Licker  •  Vancouver, Canada  •  3 months ago
      29 other GMs just collectively said "WHAT???"
      This is what gets professional athletes salaries all out of wack... This is going to be used as the comparison for every 2nd line winger with 60 point upside now.
      • Richard 2 months ago
        Ruutu is more than that...he's rugged and just came off a season with 300+ hits...its not always about stats roto geeks!
    • DUKE  •  3 months ago
      Not surprised by the Move Here.. Jim likes to over-pay for his wingers/D-men (excluding Stall) The leafs' Grabovski will ask for 5 now... Thanks Jim!
      • mlindsay77 3 months ago
        Leaf fans can't comment on overpayment... Jeff Finger.... for us Hab fans we have Gomez... but we didn't sign him to the contract!
    • Haak  •  Charlotte, North Carolina  •  2 months ago
      How many of the people commenting on Rutuu have even seen him play since he's been in Carolina?
    • Richard  •  Los Angeles, California  •  2 months ago
      supply and demand often determines $$$$, cole is the closest player to tuomo in like kind to be signed "last" year and the money is similar...no doubt rutherford tried to move him but the price to replace him was probably pretty steep at July 1....good re-up for ruutu, I bet he earns it!!!
    • Thor's Hammer  •  3 months ago
      Wow talk about over paid. Makes James Neal's contract look like a steal. With that contract just think of how much Skinner will want. Ruutu's point production has gone down the past few years.
    • Cuzziff  •  Vancouver, Canada  •  3 months ago
      burrows does way more for 2 million
      • Diehardnuck 3 months ago
        True but not really relevant - Burrows gave a huge discount.
      • Jordan Michelin 3 months ago
        Horrible comparison and selective memory. Your fans thought he was overpaid with that contract he signed 3 years ago as he averaged .35 pts per game up until that point. The only reason his numbers increased is because he played with two MVPs. He surely will demand more than 2 mil/year now. Even though he and everyone else that knows anything about hockey, knows his numbers are overinflated because of linemates.
      • Michael Ruperto 3 months ago
        I take it you've never watched the Canucks play
        As much as I hate Burrows, he's got talent and is easily worth more than his salary dictates. Anyone who "knows" hockey can see that
    • CYarby48  •  Austin, Texas  •  3 months ago
      That James Neal contract just looks better and better.

      In Shero we trust!
    • PotvinRocks  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
      Another great deal for Montreal!
    • BrettK  •  Denver, Colorado  •  2 months ago
      Holy over payment Batman!
    • Geoff D  •  Edmonton, Canada  •  3 months ago
      wow is this ever boring
    • Day-V  •  Toronto, Canada  •  3 months ago
      i still dont see what the deal is with all the media this guy gets.... he's not that good
    • Steven  •  3 months ago
      Vastly overpaid - and for what? The potential of 60 pts a year? Take a look at Burrows on the Canucks. Makes $2 million a year and is light years ahead of Ruutu on every square inch of both ends of the ice.
    • Woooo  •  3 months ago
      Lou 5.5mil cap hit per year - I'll take it
    • Henry  •  Detroit, Michigan  •  3 months ago
      The NHL is such a crappy, offensively-challenged league that a 50-point winger can earn $5M a year!
      And yet nobody who runs the league sees anything wrong with that?
      Every day my love for this league goes down the toilet.
    • Devin L  •  3 months ago
      Cole is better, woulda rather spent the money on him :(

    Yahoo! Sports Authors