YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Puck Daddy

    According to NHL, here’s why Dominic Moore escaped suspension for Fedotenko hit

    Getty Images

    The NHL's Department of Player Safety is nothing if not thorough. It analyzes every available camera angle before a decision. It has a collection of voices to debate the legality of hits. If the situation warrants it, they'll interview those involved.

    In the third period of Thursday night's 4-3 New York Rangers OT win over the Tampa Bay Lightning, Dominic Moore was whistled for an interference penalty on a play in which he appeared to connect shoulder-to-jaw with Ruslan Fedotenko. The Rangers forward hit the ice, left the game with an injury and will not play in Saturday's tilt with the Philadelphia Flyers.

    Yet for this incident, Moore only received a $2,500 fine from the NHL. The hell?

    Again, the NHL's thorough about these things. The image above was captured from an above the glass camera replay that might have been glanced over in initial viewings. But as the video shows (tm, Shanahan), Moore's back hits Fedotenko's gloves, which are carrying a stick that connects with the Tank's head. Moore doesn't actually connect with the head.

    So was a fine still enough?

    Here's the video the NHL used to determine the fine, rather than the suspension:

    Brendan Shanahan, senior VP of player safety, released the following on Twitter on Saturday:

    Moore/Fedotenko: Some of us thought this was direct contact to the head as well until we saw ALL replay angles. DM never makes contact to RF's head. One replay angle clearly shows his BACK making contact with RF's STICK causing it to hit RF in the face. Not a rule 48 but he was still fined for this intentional interference that caused an injury.

    So it's an interference call with an injury. Not a suspendable action in and of itself; just an illegal play that led to an injury …

    … which of course brings us back to the nadir of the Shanahan regime: The 2-game suspension of squeaky clean Pierre-Marc Bouchard for that "self inflicted" high stick on Matt Calvert.

    Remember that? Calvert initiated contact. Bouchard chopped across his body while facing Calvert, and Calvert's stick lifted Bouchard's lumber from its intended target (the hands) to his face.

    Sometimes, "hockey plays" go haywire, legal or illegal. Bouchard got two games for a slash gone bad, in which his stick connected with another player's face. Moore gets off with a fine for an interference gone bad, in which another player's stick connects with that player's face.

    As Shanahan told us in Ottawa last month: "The one or two decisions that I think I missed are the ones that people try to use as my precedent." He may not think he missed the Bouchard one, but in light of the Moore fine, it stands as unfortunate precedent.

     

    79 comments

    • hockeymanG23  •  Prince George, Canada  •  3 months ago
      I think it's fine PMB received two games, Never Swing Your Stick At Anyone. This is completely different, guys get in each others space all game long. Also, Fedotenko, Calvert, and everyone else, keep your stick down, Please! Nothing good ever comes of holding your stick at face level.
      • fatloserboi 3 months ago
        I begg to differ.. We all saw what Sean Avery did to Marty Brodeur.. but then NHL locked that #$%$ down... J/K Your correct, its not smart to have you stick near your face.. you begging for trouble..
    • radar  •  Montreal, Canada  •  3 months ago
      Sometimes Puck Daddy makes the stupidist comparisons. If he can't see the huge difference between these two plays then maybe he should go to writing about golf.
      • ken sutton 3 months ago
        Sometimes you need to stick to the poutine that you know best, chump...
        Unless Shanny had forensics determine that beyond a resonable doubt that his own stick inflicted the injury, Moore's intent & action to pop him in the head is deserving of same suspension sanction as with all the other similar ones dished out this year!
    • Nosferatu  •  Austin, Texas  •  3 months ago
      The precedent I'm most upset about is Wolski#$%$ on Alfredsson. THAT was a missed suspension that Wolski clearly deserved.
      • Mark S 3 months ago
        As a Ranger fan I agree. I would be a hypocrite if I said it was ok if we did it to opponents but not when it happens to us. As soon as I saw it I asked why it was necessary. I would like it out all together.
      • Greg 3 months ago
        Also a Rangers fan and agree, was surprised Wolski didn't get suspended for that. Don't think he's a dirty player, but was a blatant elbow.
      • Nosferatu 3 months ago
        I don't think Wolski is a dirty player either. I'd put him on my team. He just deserved it for that specific incident.
    • lmjiason  •  Toronto, Canada  •  3 months ago
      Throw away the instigator rule. Please. NHL.
    • concerned  •  3 months ago
      as temting and emotional as it is for the comentators to speak thier minds on the game they can have an influence on the fans and public that can portray the players and the game in a very bad light! I do not think this was a blatantly intentional hit as was comentated, it turned out bad due to the timing and the angles but comon, sorry for what happened but I think Shanahan called thuis one right!
    • jerryB  •  Wallingford, Connecticut  •  3 months ago
      Can you get of the Bouchard thing already. These two instances ARE NOT COMPARABLE in the slightest!

      If you cannot tell the difference between this, in play, interference and how his own stick came up and hit his face, and a guy who swings his stick high AT a player away from the play, you should reconsider even writing about Hockey IMO, because that is just ridiculous.
    • WishIUnderstood  •  Las Vegas, Nevada  •  3 months ago
      Apparently, Shanahan is no daVinci,,

      Leonardo daVinci: "He who does not punish evil commands it to be done."

      Fortunately, the game is hockey, where what goes around, comes around. Moore will pay, sooner or later.
    • Peter  •  3 months ago
      I disagree that Moore even should have got a fine. this is incidental contact. His back hit an opposing players stick which in turn hit the stick owner in the face. Its unfortunate that Tank was injured but they are playing hockey not figure skating.
    • MAWBSTA  •  Toronto, Canada  •  3 months ago
      what is lost in all of this is intent. Moore was not attempting to hit the stick or the hands... he was coming blind side and trying to knock the guy off his skates. Lets be thankful it wasn't a shoulder as it most certainly would have been good night irene. Instead it's a slash in the face that he can come back from. As for Moore, he got off lucky considering he was attempting to level the guy from behind... I guess the NHL is going to give this guy one more chance until he ends someone's career, and everyone asks "how was this goon allowed to do this to so many players..."

      Shame on Shanahan. Track record and intent should be enough to warrant a suspension.
    • Bruce Wayne  •  Chatham-Kent, Canada  •  3 months ago
      Wysh - I'm pretty sure the message for Bouchard (and everyone else) is that when you swing your stick at someone - no matter what your intent - you are responsible for any bad thing that happens as a result. I can see the argument for the same principle applying here, which is why they fined Moore for the interference - keeping in mind that in this case it was Fedotenko's stick that hit his face, and in Bouchards case it was Bouchards stick that hit Calvert.
    • Bugeye  •  Romeoville, Illinois  •  3 months ago
      So I'm curious... if you blindside hit a guy (without hitting his head) and his head hits, say the goalpost or the glass or whatever... it's non-suspendible and just a fine? At least Chara#$%$ on Pacioretti was not blindside - but people called the freaking police!!! Moore is a cheapshot artist and hopefully will be destroyed the next time he's in NY.
      • kamujin 3 months ago
        I'm a Rangers fan and have watched dominic moore play for years. He isn't even close to a cheapshot artist. It was a bad play, but not one that I'd call indicitive of Dominic's play.
      • radar 3 months ago
        Also bugeye Chara deliberately led Pacioretty's head into the stanchion, and held his body against the boards so he could not defend himself. That was definitely a cheap shot.
      • Awaken the Bear 3 months ago
        Radar u better go watch tghe Chara play over and over til u actually see what happened they were both going full speed and Chara hit him, it wasnt blind side it was shoulder to shoulder, also chara didnt hold Pac against the boards , Pac went againt the stantion after being hit
    • AlexandreL  •  Montreal, Canada  •  3 months ago
      Seriously. More of the same. Nothing settled. Same type of clowns on discipline committees.
    • Jezuz  •  Toronto, Canada  •  3 months ago
      This is a farce!! The intent was there as well, is it coincidence that 10 secs prior to the play Moore gets hit by Fedontenko?
      • Diya 3 months ago
        the history within the game never seems to be taken into account with Moore. During the preseason in the game against montreal he was head hunting and interfering with players the entire game, but the league ruled that a hit to the head of Campoli was Campoli's fault for putting his head in the way while attempting to play the puck. It was determined that Campoli put himself in a vulnerable position when he already had a man on him and wouldn't have been able to get out of Moore's way no matter what. Moore walked and Campoli was out with a concussion.
      • Phillip 3 months ago
        You mean when fedotenko border line runs him from behind?
      • Sman 3 months ago
        Open your eyes.
        Check @ 1:29, and tell me this is dirty in any way! Moore doesn't contact him ANYWHERE above the chest
    • Chach7171  •  West Warwick, Rhode Island  •  3 months ago
      It would've been fine had Moore not 'shrugged' his shoulder up knowing it would hit RF square in the chin. He did that knowingly and knew where he was going to hit him, sounds to me like Shanaban is hanging with Colin Campbell too much..
    • DJ  •  Buffalo, New York  •  3 months ago
      How did LUcic hit on Miller ever be claimed to not have intent to injure after crap like this. WOW
    • swatter  •  Saskatoon, Canada  •  3 months ago
      Shanahan blew another one.......shouder to jaw, don't give me #$%$ about the stick in between, Fedetenko's head snaps back when Moores shoulder hits his jaw...if that is not exactly what they are trying to get rid of...no puck, just bind side hit to head.....this actually could be used a prime example of the type of hit they are trying to get rid of...unbelievable
    • lmjiason  •  Toronto, Canada  •  3 months ago
      Dominic was pissed that Feds took him out along the boards and thats why he gave him a blind side, should have bee a suspension for sure, intent to injure was there you can see it in the body reaction, elbow up. PS RANGERS AND TB SUCK.
    • Chaas  •  3 months ago
      Greg, why are we even discussing the PM Bouchard swing? I mean Bouchard didn't try to McSorely Calvert, but the end result was just the same. Name that rule: A player must be in control of his stick at all times. Bouchard caught Calvert in the face because he wasn't in control of his stick; if he was he wouldn't have hit him in the face. It's not a popular decision because Bouchard is Bouchard, but it's the correct one. Ask yourself, had it been Matt Cooke would he have been suspended too? If it had been Crosby swinging, he'd deserve a suspension as well. We can't expect the Department of Player Safety to simply drop a case based on the player's name any more than we can expect them to suspend a player based on his name.

      Moore took a pretty deliberate step in front of Fedotenko, and made unnecessary contact which resulted in an interference minor. I hope we're not debating the validity of that call. As to why it went further, the TV angles appeared to show a head shot, so it had to be investigated. It's good to know that it wasn't one of those intentional face-breaking plays, and it's good to see that he only got fined for reckless contact. That's all it was, he had the ability to avoid contact with Fedotenko and he didn't, it resulted in an injury so the fine is well-deserved. At the beginning of the play, there's talk of a hit by Fedotenko on Moore. It was a pretty solid hit. One has to think that the decision-makers took that into account as well.

      I can see that you have a great conviction when it comes to the Bouchard suspension, but why do you keep bringing it up when there's no real link to the latest investigation?

      Looking forward to your response.
    • AlaskanKnight  •  Soldotna, Alaska  •  3 months ago
      Never mentioned......at the start of the clip....Fedetenko hits Moore along the boards........after which Moore circles and comes back into the play...and clips RF. It is clearly a little back...for the hit along the boards. This is how a lot of bad things happen....one guy takes a hit...and decides he did not appreciate it...and gives it back. As clearly stated in the clip....Moore had the choice to slide by and avoid contact...and didn't. Nuff said.
    • Dave H  •  3 months ago
      So if the hit is "borderline" as you say, why is the decision so puzzling?

    Yahoo! Sports Authors