YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Puck Daddy

    Should Dominic Moore be suspended for this hit on Rangers’ Fedotenko? (Video)

    In the third period of Thursday night's 4-3 New York Rangers OT win over the Tampa Bay Lightning, Ruslan Fedotenko was defending a pass when Tampa's Dominic Moore gave him a hard shoulder hit that appeared to connect with Fedotenko's jaw (s/t Kukla):

    Moore received two minutes for roughing. Fedotenko didn't return to the game. The Rangers, via Katie Strang of ESPN New York, were pissed:

    "We're still pretty angry about that," said center Brian Boyle, who tallied the game-tying goal in the third period. "That was a really, really dirty play."

    "It's us doing it to each other," [Brad] Richards said. "I'm pretty sure he knew what he was doing. If we want to keep doing it to each other, we're going to keep having problems. It's idiotic."

    Strong words by Brad Richards which will no doubt bite him on the ass the next time a Rangers player is suspended for a head-shot …

    From the Tampa Bay Times, Moore had his say as well:

    Moore said he was "competing for body position" while "trying to make myself available for a shot. I guess (Fedotenko) wasn't ready for that."

    Moore, called for roughing, said the hit was not in retaliation for Fedotenko running him into the boards earlier in the period: "I didn't know it was him until after." The league will look at Moore's hit for supplemental discipline.

    Whether or not you believe that last part with regard to intent, we do believe that first statement: He was trying to establish position for a scoring opportunity.

    Trouble is, his means to that end appeared to be a shoulder to The Tank's turret, which could give us our first Shanaban since that 3-game suspension that gave Alex Ovechkin an education: Hanging at Miami Beach is better then freezing in Ottawa for a weekend!

    More sports news from the Yahoo! Sports Minute:

     

    52 comments

    • Lime D. Zeze  •  Seattle, Washington  •  3 months ago
      I don't think Richard's words will "bite him on the #$%$ as you say. I think they are entirely accurate. He says "We" keep doing it to "each other" which I read as him saying it's a league-wide problem, not just specific teams or individuals.
    • Mr Shakey  •  3 months ago
      While I think it should be a suspension, Shanahan has set precedent this season by NOT suspending Neil for a similar hit on Grabovski and Wolski on Alfredson. So, I have no idea which way this one will swing.
      • JustinL 3 months ago
        The wolski hit was incidental contact, where this more or less shows Moore targeting Fedotenko's head as he skates by. There should be no contact with Fedotenko as the puck was nowhere in his vicinity. Moore made the decision and made the check, only to probably end up with a suspension for it.
    • Wit Dickman  •  3 months ago
      As a Rangers fan...yes.

      As a hockey fan...yes.
    • Mark  •  3 months ago
      Clear cut...Yes
    • Greg K  •  3 months ago
      If you watch the replay that starts at the 1:21 mark, it really looks like Moore hit him in the chest. Looked so dirty from every angle, but that one is weird.
    • Shawn  •  Richardson, Texas  •  3 months ago
      yup, not doubt. At full speed it almost looked like coincident contact. Second look the intent was certainly there 3rd slo-mo proves it.. 2-3 games should do the trick.
    • CoryM  •  Rochester, New York  •  3 months ago
      There's so many different things that you have to take into account before you can decide if this is suspension worthy or not. First off, I believe that this is definitely an interference penalty (though it was called roughing) and that Moore deserved the two minutes. However, while the point of contact looks like it's clear as day to the head from the broadcast angle and from the first few replays, you have to look very closely to notice that it is not. Some have already mentioned that it seems that Moore made contact with Fed's stick or even his arm which was then forced up under his chin, thus causing the injury. Technically, that is not a headshot, though I do still believe that it is a careless play that should never have happened. Give Moore two games to sort out how to cleanly establish body position in front of the net. You most definitely DO NOT do it by using that little "drive by" technique and going up high. Fedotenko probably won't miss any time, but if he was truly faking it, he would have returned to the game. I'm sure it knocked the wind out of him and maybe even knocked him loopy, but he's probably fine.
      • Katie 3 months ago
        at the 1:23 mark of the video it is clear he makes contact with the lower jaw. i've looked over and over and over at the video in slow motion...but it is very clear he does connect with the lower jaw. he is out for tomorrows game at philly...just letting you know
      • CoryM 3 months ago
        I'm sorry, but it is not clear in any way. In fact, that particular replay is what made me change my mind about it being a headshot. This is a weird play that combines elements of incidental contact, interference, rule 48, and a whole bunch of other factors. Shanahan is smart enough to break down the factors involved, and I'm confident that if this is a suspendable hit, his explanation will reflect the things I said above. It's not a headshot but it's a reckless play that resulted in an injury, plus Moore has faced supplementary discipline before, so I believe it will result in a short suspension and hopefully Moore will learn from it.
    • Mike L  •  3 months ago
      Head was the "principle point of contact" on that hit. Whether it's a shoulder or elbow, you still can't do it. 2 games for Moore. Put it in the rear-view.
    • doh  •  3 months ago
      all angles looked cheap except one that looked like the chest..... strange
    • sotsohockey  •  Minneapolis, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
      The view at :40 seconds looks like Moore is raising the elbow.

      The problem is it's hard to tell if the head is actually the point of impact. I'm trying to watch the view at :53 seconds to see if Fedotenko actually takes it on the chin, or if the chest is the point of impact.

      In a perfect world, the reckless elbow would be enough for a suspension. But in this regime, it must be head contact, and if the so-called department of player safety doesn't find it, Moore might skate off.

      But if it's up to me, a two-gamer is probably in order here.
    • RichardS  •  3 months ago
      4 games minimum. Although I can't recall any priors for Moore.
    • Ron  •  Providence, Rhode Island  •  3 months ago
      Having talked to Dominic many times when he played in Hartford in the AHL, he better than anyone should know better than to even come close to anyones head considering the mugging his bro got for Betruzzi.
    • Renniks  •  Hanover, New Hampshire  •  3 months ago
      I watched the Lightning stream last night and they never showed a good angle on the head shot. They were in fact complaining that there was even a penalty. I figured there was a better angle of it, but didn't get to see it until I check the tubes later. Pretty despicable form of homerism if you ask me.
      • Ari 3 months ago
        +1
    • Craig D  •  3 months ago
      As a Ranger fan, of course I immediately want to say yes, but upon looking at the play in slo mo, I don't think it is suspension worthy....fine yes..... It was a dtupid, careless play but I don't think Moore intended to head hunt on the play. The puck comes into view after the hit, I could argue that Fed's managed not to hit Moore in the face with his stick as it was swinging forward, he knew Moore was there......Moore should have held up but I don't see this as a deliberate attempt injure. A lot of these hits, are based on timing....one second earlier or later it might be a great shoulder check, but in the moment of impact, the guy getting hit drops down, its a hit to the head. I think it is timing more than anything else. I don't think too many guys go out there trying to hurt people.
    • wakeboarder  •  Orlando, Florida  •  3 months ago
      He never even hit him! Didn't touch his jaw at all! Ridiculous
    • The Party Guy  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
      If the question even needs to be asked, then the answer is "yes." The players and the league still don't get it.
      • sotsohockey 3 months ago
        Remind me to ask that question of every star player the Minnesota Wild faces for the rest of the season.
      • John 3 months ago
        "The Party Guy" has spoken.
    • MattD  •  3 months ago
      The path that Moore took to the net puts the onus on him to avoid contact with Fedotenko. He chooses instead to cut him off and elevates his shoulder into his head. I am alright with 3-25 games. Yes 25, if the league is serious about protecting against concussions they apparently need to raise the bar because the message hasn't gotten through to a fair number of players.
      • CoryM 3 months ago
        Hahahahahaha! 25 games? Get a clue, man. This isn't even a headshot!
      • MattD 3 months ago
        @Cory; it's a cheapshot resulting in concussion. Suspension likely. I'm just really sick of dirty hockey from 2-bit p.o.s. players like Moore. If he's gone 25 games is there any hockey fan that would g.a.s.?
    • Nosferatu  •  Austin, Texas  •  3 months ago
      That's the definition of a cheap shot. Interference. Suspension worthy.
    • Pellerin Productions  •  Washington, District of Columbia  •  3 months ago
      I'm a Rangers fan. It looked like interference live, meaning it was non-incidental contact, but a clean hit if Feds had the puck. I was surprised they even called a penalty. Watching the replay now, it still looks like a clean hit. 2 for interference and then be done with it. Dom Moore is not a dirty player, he lead with his shoulder and the principal point of contact was the stick.
    • Potvinsux  •  3 months ago
      Yes. He deserves a suspension. I was at the game and was sitting in the West Balcony where you actually get a great overhead view of the whole game. I saw the whole play develop and happen. I thought right away that Moore was going to get a 5 minute major and game misconduct for it. I was surprised with the 2 minute minor but then again the refs were horrible for both teams all game last night. You would think Moore would know better after what happened to his brother.....

    Yahoo! Sports Authors