Advertisement

Social media cries foul on Sheryl Swoopes’ misinformation campaign around Caitlin Clark

Jacob Keppen
·8 min read
448

One of the pitfalls of the massive surge in popularity of women’s basketball and the increased media attention is the increase in the number of people who have no idea what the heck they’re talking about.

Now, I thought this type of statement would be about one of the usual culprits: the Skip Baylesses, the Colin Cowherds or maybe Stephen A. Smiths of the world. The talking heads who are undoubtedly great at their jobs and at getting attention, but we know they can make some pretty outlandish, uninformed claims on television.

I didn’t think it would be coming from one of the greatest players in women’s basketball history.

So, Sheryl Swoopes — you know, former three-time WNBA MVP Sheryl Swoopes — recently went on former NBA All-Star Gilbert Arenas’ podcast and, naturally, the topic of women’s basketball came up.

Some of the comments Swoopes made about the stars of today’s game, LSU‘s Angel Reese and Iowa‘s Caitlin Clark, made headlines for how she thinks they will translate to the WNBA.

I actually agree with a number of points she’s making here. The WNBA is the best of the best in women’s basketball. The people that are still hating on it need to find jobs, because there are some elite ballers there. The jump from the (sort of) amateur levels to the pros is gigantic in any sport, because every player in the league belongs.

While we may not necessarily agree on that point by Swoopes about Clark, the overarching point about the WNBA being stiffer competition is absolutely valid. That statement by Swoopes is not the problem. The problem is the misinformation spread about Clark in the podcast episode to discredit the Iowa point guard.

In the podcast, Swoopes talks about Clark rapidly approaching Kelsey Plum’s all-time NCAA women’s basketball scoring record and gets a whole lot wrong.

“If you’re going to break a record, to me, if it’s legitimate, you have to break that record in the same amount of time that that player set it. Right. So, if Kelsey Plum set that record in four years, well, Caitlin should have broken that record in four years,” Swoope said. “But because there’s a COVID year, and then there’s another year, you know what I mean? She’s already had an extra year to break that record. So is it truly a broken record?”

Don’t worry Ms. Swoopes. Since you don’t know the answer, and didn’t bother doing a quick Google search before going off on your tangent, I’ll provide the answer. Caitlin Clark only just turned 22, and she’s only in her fourth year at Iowa. That’s the same four years that were afforded to Kelsey Plum when she set the record.

What’s frustrating is not that Caitlin Clark is getting hate. The great players get hate because people are jealous. People have hated on LeBron James since he was in high school and they still do.

No, the problem is that the hate is always unchecked. It is based on misinformation and lies. People have run out of criticisms, run out of ways to hate, so they’ve made new ones up.

I guess when you’re hating on a player as good as Caitlin Clark is, you have to create your own imaginary straws to grasp at.

Social media wasn’t having it, making sure Swoopes and others know that this narrative is just flat-out wrong.

And here's your numbers

The official account sounds off!

Just making things up

Can you imagine?

It's actually crazy

The misinformation is strong

Hilariously erroneous

Better be 100%

Hmm

Just embarrassing

OK, this might actually be a good thing on some level

It would solve all of this

Just don't understand it

It would help if she did know what she was talking about

In regards to all those shots

The Three Haters

Just ignore and move on?

I mean...

Oof

Phone a friend

Contact/Follow us @HawkeyesWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Iowa news, notes, and opinions.

Follow Jacob on X: @Jacobkeppen

Story originally appeared on Hawkeyes Wire