Tue May 12, 2009 1:10 pm EDT

Quite a few people remember Moses Malone's semi-guarantee of
"Fo', fo', fo';" given before the 1983 playoffs. What a lot of people don't
remember is that Moses' 76ers
team actually went "fo', fi', fo'" on its way to a ring, and that the first
two syllables of that quote came in what was a truncated (compared to the
modern NBA) run toward the Finals.
Back then, you had first-round byes, or best-of five series' should you miss out on the bye. By the next season, no pun intended, every team had to go through an opening-round best-of five.
So, while Cleveland's recent dash toward a 12-0 in-conference run to the Finals might eventually rank them amongst the all-time greats, it doesn't quite compare with what those Sixers had to deal with, and not in a bad way. Beyond that, we thought we'd look at the best conference play in the years since Moses' championship run.
1. 1985-86 Boston Celtics
(11-1 record; defeated Chicago Bulls 3-0, Atlanta Hawks 4-1, Milwaukee Bucks 4-0)
A small part of me wanted to put the third-place outfit ahead of these C's (and the second team on this list), based solely on the fact that Boston did drop a game, and could have dropped Game 2 of the opening round series against Chicago. But, come on. The sheer amount of talent this team had to dispatch on its way to the Finals? It's sickening. A proper ranking, for a proper, all-time, team. Bow down.
2. 1995-96 Chicago Bulls
(11-1; defeated Miami Heat 3-0, New York Knicks 4-1, Orlando Magic 4-0)
But they never had a center! They never had a center! Kareem, Parish, Shaq ... they would have destroyed Luc Longley!
Alonzo Mourning(notes), Patrick Ewing, Shaquille O'Neal(notes). 11-1. The only reason this team is ranked in second place is because, as a bit of an anorak when it comes to the 1995-96 Bulls, I can tell you that (due to nagging injuries to Scottie Pippen and Toni Kukoc), Chicago wasn't playing its best basketball during this time of year. Like it mattered.
3. 2000-01 Los Angeles Lakers
(11-0; defeated Portland Trail Blazers 3-0, Sacramento Kings 4-0, San Antonio Spurs 4-0)
History compels me to admit that the Lakers moped through a healthy chunk of the season. The team dealt with a little back-and-forth between Kobe Bryant(notes) and Phil Jackson after Phil passed along a few iffy rumors he'd heard about Kobe's martyr'ish run as a high school player, and the entire team passed on playing defense until Derek Fisher(notes) returned with a month to go in the regular season. They also employed Isaiah Rider.
Of course, after mid-March, they also looked as good as any basketball team I've ever seen. Ever, ever, ever.
4. 1986-87 Los Angeles Lakers
(11-1; defeated Denver Nuggets 3-0, Golden State Warriors 4-1, Seattle SuperSonics 4-0)
The talent, in this conference, that the Lakers had to run through? Only to meet the Celtics? This team was so, so good; and rarely recognized despite all the star power.
5. 1990-91 Chicago Bulls
(11-1; defeated New York Knicks 3-0, Philadelphia 76ers 4-1, Detroit Pistons 4-0)
This team came out hungry, it destroyed a Knicks team on the verge of becoming a championship contender, had no issues with a 76ers outfit led by Charles Barkley, and took the heart from what turned out to be a classless Detroit Pistons team in the Eastern finals.
Also considered: 1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers, 1984-85 Los Angeles Lakers, 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Ball Don't Lie is an NBA blog edited by J.E. Skeets. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Nov 25 2009
Posted Nov 25 2009
Posted Nov 25 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
55 Comments
1 - 22 of 55
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Jordan was the best and Un-stop-a-bull!!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
2000 Monte Carlo SS- $27,000
using the car's roof as dance floor- $250 (insurance deductable)
2000-01 Lakers Championship memories- Priceless
Report Abuse
3-1 vs. Minnesota
4-0 vs. Lakers
4-0 vs. Portland
Went on to win FINALS 4-1 vs. New York
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
-played a 30-52 Bulls team in round one.
-played a 50-32 Hawks team in round two.
-played a 57-25 Bucks team in round three.
-Those three teams combined for 137 regular season wins.
2001 Lakers:
-played a 50-32 Blazers team in round one.
-played a 55-27 Kings team in round two.
-played a 58-24 Spurs team in round three.
-Those three teams combined for 163 regular season wins.
How can you possibly rank the Celtics higher? The Lakers went 12-0 against much better teams. The Celtics did not go undefeated and played worse teams in each round. Do some research please, Mr. Dwyer.
Report Abuse
The anti-Laker in me likes that the 2000-2001 squad didn't win this contest, but it's hard to argue against them from an objective standpoint due to the fact that they still remain the only team to ever sweep through three straight rounds of Playoff basketball.
Report Abuse
The '89 team ... don't be fooled by the 11-0. The SuperSonics were about to be rebuilt, they weren't that great, and yet the Lakers could have lost both games 3 and 4 (especially) in the final 90 seconds. I remember those games. The Suns in the third round was like the Jazz meeting Utah in the third round back in 2007.
Report Abuse
1 - 22 of 55