Ball Don't Lie - NBA

Tue May 12, 2009 1:10 pm EDT

Top five NBA in-conference playoff runs


Quite a few people remember Moses Malone's semi-guarantee of "Fo', fo', fo';" given before the 1983 playoffs. What a lot of people don't remember is that Moses' 76ers team actually went "fo', fi', fo'" on its way to a ring, and that the first two syllables of that quote came in what was a truncated (compared to the modern NBA) run toward the Finals.

Back then, you had first-round byes, or best-of five series' should you miss out on the bye. By the next season, no pun intended, every team had to go through an opening-round best-of five.

So, while Cleveland's recent dash toward a 12-0 in-conference run to the Finals might eventually rank them amongst the all-time greats, it doesn't quite compare with what those Sixers had to deal with, and not in a bad way. Beyond that, we thought we'd look at the best conference play in the years since Moses' championship run.

1. 1985-86 Boston Celtics

(11-1 record; defeated Chicago Bulls 3-0, Atlanta Hawks 4-1, Milwaukee Bucks 4-0)

A small part of me wanted to put the third-place outfit ahead of these C's (and the second team on this list), based solely on the fact that Boston did drop a game, and could have dropped Game 2 of the opening round series against Chicago. But, come on. The sheer amount of talent this team had to dispatch on its way to the Finals? It's sickening. A proper ranking, for a proper, all-time, team. Bow down.

2. 1995-96 Chicago Bulls

(11-1; defeated Miami Heat 3-0, New York Knicks 4-1, Orlando Magic 4-0)

But they never had a center! They never had a center! Kareem, Parish, Shaq ... they would have destroyed Luc Longley!

Alonzo Mourning(notes), Patrick Ewing, Shaquille O'Neal(notes). 11-1. The only reason this team is ranked in second place is because, as a bit of an anorak when it comes to the 1995-96 Bulls, I can tell you that (due to nagging injuries to Scottie Pippen and Toni Kukoc), Chicago wasn't playing its best basketball during this time of year. Like it mattered. 

3. 2000-01 Los Angeles Lakers

(11-0; defeated Portland Trail Blazers 3-0, Sacramento Kings 4-0, San Antonio Spurs 4-0)

History compels me to admit that the Lakers moped through a healthy chunk of the season. The team dealt with a little back-and-forth between Kobe Bryant(notes) and Phil Jackson after Phil passed along a few iffy rumors he'd heard about Kobe's martyr'ish run as a high school player, and the entire team passed on playing defense until Derek Fisher(notes) returned with a month to go in the regular season. They also employed Isaiah Rider.

Of course, after mid-March, they also looked as good as any basketball team I've ever seen. Ever, ever, ever. 

4. 1986-87 Los Angeles Lakers

(11-1; defeated Denver Nuggets 3-0, Golden State Warriors 4-1, Seattle SuperSonics 4-0)

The talent, in this conference, that the Lakers had to run through? Only to meet the Celtics? This team was so, so good; and rarely recognized despite all the star power.

5. 1990-91 Chicago Bulls

(11-1; defeated New York Knicks 3-0, Philadelphia 76ers 4-1, Detroit Pistons 4-0)

This team came out hungry, it destroyed a Knicks team on the verge of becoming a championship contender, had no issues with a 76ers outfit led by Charles Barkley, and took the heart from what turned out to be a classless Detroit Pistons team in the Eastern finals.

Also considered: 1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers, 1984-85 Los Angeles Lakers, 1999 San Antonio Spurs

digg delicious
more

55 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Luis J
    1. Posted by Luis J Tue May 12, 2009 1:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Both Laker teams should be 1 and 2 on this list.
  2. Luis J
    2. Posted by Luis J Tue May 12, 2009 1:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    1986-87 Laker team number one and 2000-01 Laker team number two.
  3. Luis J
    3. Posted by Luis J Tue May 12, 2009 1:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The 1988-89 Laker swept through the conference playoffs (11-0) also but losing Magic Johson and Byron Scott for the Finals doomed them to being swept by the late Chuck Daly's Bad Boy Pistons.
  4. CB
    4. Posted by CB Tue May 12, 2009 1:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I wish they did games like they did on # 4. that is what you call true play by play..
  5. mcwelk
    5. Posted by mcwelk Tue May 12, 2009 1:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Coby Karl is adorable:).
  6. Rise With Us
    6. Posted by Rise With Us Tue May 12, 2009 1:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Bulls teams should be 1 & 2 on this list
  7. Rise With Us
    7. Posted by Rise With Us Tue May 12, 2009 1:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    1995-96 Bulls at #1 - 1990-91 #2
    Jordan was the best and Un-stop-a-bull!!!
  8. Redskins21
    8. Posted by Redskins21 Tue May 12, 2009 2:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    They all good teams. I guess it just depends on who ya like. all 5 of these can be in any order and there all GREAT teams..
  9. Benjamin V
    9. Posted by Benjamin V Tue May 12, 2009 2:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Nice list. how about in-conference playoff runs by non-champion teams?
  10. JONESONTHENBA
    10. Posted by JONESONTHENBA Tue May 12, 2009 2:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Was just about to write the same thing about the Lakers sweeping through the 89 playoffs before losing Magic and Byron in the finals.
  11. Mask Marval
    11. Posted by Mask Marval Tue May 12, 2009 3:08 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    2000-01 Lakers..... The city went crazy after winning the "C" nobody expected everybody to go nuts. the roof of my car got dented so bad looked like bowling balls fell from the sky on it...lol I had just got that car 3 months prior to that...
    2000 Monte Carlo SS- $27,000
    using the car's roof as dance floor- $250 (insurance deductable)
    2000-01 Lakers Championship memories- Priceless
  12. sour patch
    12. Posted by sour patch Tue May 12, 2009 3:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The 99 Spurs were 11 & 1... And won the FINALS!
    3-1 vs. Minnesota
    4-0 vs. Lakers
    4-0 vs. Portland
    Went on to win FINALS 4-1 vs. New York
  13. prince_m12
    13. Posted by prince_m12 Tue May 12, 2009 3:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What's messed up is that Shaq and Kobe had 70+ points combined and they still almost lost that game in that clip for the Lakers.
  14. bcatsfaninla
    14. Posted by bcatsfaninla Tue May 12, 2009 3:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #9 & #10 - The 2003 New Jersey Nets are definitely up there for best runs by a runner-up. Casual fans outside of New Jersey forget that they went 12-2 (the best to date in the new 7-7-7-7 format) and won 10 STRAIGHT GAMES before they eventually went down to the Spurs in 6.
  15. Raj A
    15. Posted by Raj A Tue May 12, 2009 4:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    1995 Rockets. They only went 11-7, but did it all ON THE ROAD against 60-22 Utah, 59-23 Phoenix and 62-20 San Antonio. None of these teams ranked here comes anywhere near that degree of difficulty.
  16. Jub Jub
    16. Posted by Jub Jub Tue May 12, 2009 4:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Houston Rockets 1994-1995. They didn't sweep anyone (until the NBA Finals), but look at the teams they had to go through as the 6th seed: Utah, Phoenix, San Antonio. What a wild ride that was!
  17. Doug D
    17. Posted by Doug D Tue May 12, 2009 4:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm by no means a Laker fan (I root for them to lose), but I'd give the nod in this list to the 2001 Lakers. Those Portland, Sacramento, and San Antonio teams they clobbered were all legitimate title contenders.
  18. xkal318
    18. Posted by xkal318 Tue May 12, 2009 5:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Cleveland should never be on this list because of the caliber of teams they're playing this year. Detroit was depleted. The era of the Pistons is over. The Hawks got past an inexperienced Heat team. Cleveland basically played teams that didn't belong.
  19. McHouse
    19. Posted by McHouse Tue May 12, 2009 5:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    1986 Celtics:
    -played a 30-52 Bulls team in round one.
    -played a 50-32 Hawks team in round two.
    -played a 57-25 Bucks team in round three.
    -Those three teams combined for 137 regular season wins.
    2001 Lakers:
    -played a 50-32 Blazers team in round one.
    -played a 55-27 Kings team in round two.
    -played a 58-24 Spurs team in round three.
    -Those three teams combined for 163 regular season wins.
    How can you possibly rank the Celtics higher? The Lakers went 12-0 against much better teams. The Celtics did not go undefeated and played worse teams in each round. Do some research please, Mr. Dwyer.
  20. bcatsfaninla
    20. Posted by bcatsfaninla Tue May 12, 2009 6:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #19 - McHouse, excellent stats, and while I agree with you that the teams the Lakers played in 2001 had better records, don't forget that the 30-52 Bulls were also without Michael Jordan for 64 games (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jordan#Early_career). The Bulls went on to win 40 and 50 the next two seasons, respectively, so they're what you could possibly call a number eight with an asterisk, only in the sense that they did so poorly because they were without Jordan for more than 75% of the regular season.
    The anti-Laker in me likes that the 2000-2001 squad didn't win this contest, but it's hard to argue against them from an objective standpoint due to the fact that they still remain the only team to ever sweep through three straight rounds of Playoff basketball.
  21. KD
    21. Posted by KD Tue May 12, 2009 6:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    That Blazer team was imploding, absolutely imploding. This was the series that saw Paul Allen add Rod Strickland at the last second, Rasheed throw a towel in Arvydas' face ... etc. Pitiful team. And the Kings were just useless as Williams 27-foot'ered his way out of Sacramento.
    The '89 team ... don't be fooled by the 11-0. The SuperSonics were about to be rebuilt, they weren't that great, and yet the Lakers could have lost both games 3 and 4 (especially) in the final 90 seconds. I remember those games. The Suns in the third round was like the Jazz meeting Utah in the third round back in 2007.
  22. curtis
    22. Posted by curtis Tue May 12, 2009 6:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The homer in me is compelled to argue for the 94-95 Rockets. That team defeated the top 3 seeds in the West all of which had 59+ wins. No other team can claim that on their resume.

Ball Don't Lie

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

J.E. Skeets

Ball Don't Lie is an NBA blog edited by J.E. Skeets. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Featured NBA Video

Y! Sports Blogs

Ball Don't Lie Recent Readers