Ball Don't Lie - NBA

Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:38 am EST

Save your Miles ire, please

The Darius Miles saga could be over soon, in a way. 

If the Grizzlies forward plays against the Jazz on Friday, we will see the NBA credit his former team's payroll with the agreed-upon contract terms that are now being shelled out to Darius by way of insurance checks.

His former team, the Portland Trail Blazers, will be on the hook for around $18 million for this season and next; and while the Paul Allen-led franchise doesn't mind adding to the bottom line if it brings in a winner, this does severely curtail the team's plans to have about $20 million in cap space this summer, and even more during the 2010 offseason.

So you can understand why the Trail Blazers, under GM Kevin Pritchard, having been trying dissuade teams from thinking that Miles could play NBA-level basketball after undergoing microfracture knee surgery in 2006. The Blazers declared him medically unfit to play a year ago, which meant that his salary (already covered by insurance) would come off the salary cap books if Miles couldn't play a certain number of games in the season directly following his release.

Miles was an underachieving talent who never appeared to really love the game, so it seemed like a match made in heaven when the divorce was finalized: Darius doesn't really have to rehab within an inch of his life, while still collecting checks, and the Blazers would be replete with cap space in order to add talent to its already-formidable roster.

But 2008 was an odd time for Miles to have the first attack of conscience in his career.

After barely being bothered to own up to his lackadaisical play and boorish locker room behavior in stops with the Clippers, Cavaliers, and Trail Blazers, Darius finally found basketball religion last year, and attempted a comeback with the Boston Celtics. The problem for Portland was and is that, should Darius play in 10 preseason or regular season games with an NBA team, the insurance claim is nullified in the NBA's eyes (if not the insurer's), and his contract counts against the salary cap.

Portland got to work, leaking word of a drug suspension that would co-incidentally cost him the first 10 games of his 2008-09 season, and though this probably wasn't the reason Boston released him after playing six preseason games, it didn't help. Memphis signed Darius to a non-guaranteed contract in December, just as Portland sent out word that it would attempt to take legal action if the team could prove another franchise was deliberately trying to mess with its salary cap structure. Of course, the Blazers couldn't ever prove this, but it was worth a shot.

In the meantime, Miles was released by the Grizzlies before his season-long contract became guaranteed, scooped up soon after on a 10-day deal, and now he's a game away from costing Portland a shot at reeling in a big fish this summer. This was after, Woj (who has been killing it; kindly bow down, people) reported, Portland tried to claim Miles on waivers in order to keep him off some other team's roster.

And, nearing the end, I'm having a hard time getting too upset over any of this.

If I'm honest, I don't like Portland losing all that cap space. I'm not a fan, but I do like seeing teams with flexibility, especially when it comes in the form of an expiring (in a way) deal belonging to a player who isn't with the team any more. An out of shape Miles has nothing to offer me as an NBA fan at this point, and there's nothing that can be gained by the average fan if Miles plays and every team racks up an extra $290k bonus this summer by way of Portland's luxury tax dole-out.

And, really, I'm hoping there's more to Memphis' machinations beyond just slightly making every other team happier, and grabbing a few hundred thousand of their own. They can't possibly want Miles, not with his current game, and certainly not with the absolute best of his skill set already prominently featured on the Grizzlies in the form of Rudy Gay and Hakim Warrick. You'd like to think that they could use Miles to do something to, you know, actually better their team.

There's the idea of the Grizzlies holding Miles' playing status over Portland's head as a sort of ransom, used to get some sort of compensation for the Trail Blazers, and nobody (not Trail Blazer fans, the team, the league, the Players Association) should have any issue with that in the slightest. It was brought up on Tuesday's Basketball Jones video podcast, it smacks of everyone getting what they want, and what's the problem with that?

Memphis is under the cap. Well under it. Portland could send, say, Travis Outlaw and Ike Diogu to the Grizzles for conditional second round draft picks, and it would be cap legal. And though Outlaw is a few days removed from dropping 33 points, and a fine player, wouldn't he be worth sacrificing in order to take on huge gobs of cap space? If I were Kevin Pritchard, and that was the price to pay, I wouldn't waste a second in making that happen.

The Players Association couldn't moan about it, because Miles would be getting paid (both in insurance money, and whatever minimum salary he would agree to over the rest of the year with Memphis), and if nothing is put in writing, nothing could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The Grizzlies would get a player or two that they could actually use (unlike Miles), and the Trail Blazers would get their cap space.

Still, this would mean everyone would be happy. So everyone's going to have a problem with that.

And adding free talent to his roster might not be Memphis owner Michael Heisley's top concern at this point. We've heard for years that every thousand bucks counts to this guy, even as he was doling out millions to Dick Versace and/or Chuck Daly. Perhaps, just as Portland is now paying the price for overpaying those who didn't deserve it with Miles, Heisley has to go through a little retroactive recouping of his own.

And we should come correct in talking about the Trail Blazers.

Should they have signed Miles in the first place? Were they pushing it by calling Darius unfit to play after he underwent a surgery that, while potentially devastating, has been successfully rehabilitated from time and time again? Were the drug leak and last week's emails pretty skeevy? Have they won many friends around the league with the way they've handled the Miles case?

No, yes, totally, teams hate them.

And their fans? This team's fans should love them.

The Trail Blazer brass is going way, way, way out of its way to better this team. They don't care how it looks, and they don't care how much money they have to spend, they want to develop a champion. And in a league full of cut corners and executives just looking to hang onto their jobs, this is refreshing, and (dare I say) admirable. This team wants to win.

And unless Memphis works this Miles situation to its advantage in basketball terms, you can't say that about the Grizzlies. They're the ones that will sell out for a few hundred thousand. They're the ones that are thinking about the bottom line 20 times before thinking about what happens on the court. And I don't want to hear any nonsense coming out of Tennessee about just how highly they regard Miles as a potential contributor, and how he's worth a look. Don't even start.

So hem and haw at the underhanded way Portland tried to work Darius' injury to their advantage. They saw an opportunity to make their team better, way better, and went for it. This is the sort of thing that Red Auerbach was all over for the first 30 years of this league, and people wrote books about him.

Could Pritchard have handled it better? Of course. But, for his team and the fan base that supports it, he took a chance. That's not something to get angry over.

digg delicious
more

166 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Envigado
    1. Posted by Envigado Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Sorry KD, there is no defending what Portland did. Most of us are aware that Miles isn't exactly a breath of fresh air in the locker room, but there is no excuse for Portland to mess with somebody's livelihood for the sake of the salary cap.
  2. the REAL Headless Chicken
    2. Posted by the REAL Headless Chicken Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Clap, clap, clapclapclap, clapclap! Though, in stark contrast to me, you seem to really dislike Miles. And I don't say I like how he acted as a person. Just as a "player prospect". (Oh hell yeah, I know there's nothing much about all those prospects. But he'll prove critics wrong. Except for those criticizing high-school players being drafted because they need to grow up. He definitely needed to.)
  3. indeedproceed
    3. Posted by indeedproceed Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What about Miles, KD? This is a guy who was jettisoned by his squad mid-rehab, and left out to die (in terms of his basketball career). He's pulled himself back into the shape that granted him a camp tryout from the League Champs, then he's signed on with a losing team to play freakin 3rd string SF! I mean this guy just wants to play basketball! Screw the email, that was just hot air, but trying to actually claim him off waivers, with the obvious intention of sitting his keester on the bench blatantly so he will NOT play in another NBA game this season. How are you not gonna even mention how evil that is?
  4. the REAL Headless Chicken
    4. Posted by the REAL Headless Chicken Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I wouldn't see this post as an excuse, just see:
    "Should they have signed Miles in the first place? Were they pushing it by calling Darius unfit to play after he underwent a surgery that, while potentially devastating, has been successfully rehabilitated from time and time again? Were the drug leak and last week's emails pretty skeevy? Have they won many friends around the league with the way they've handled the Miles case?
    No, yes, totally, teams hate them."
    It's just a bow to how they care about winning. And I think they have a right to do all they think is appropriate as long as they not infringe someone's rights. And Darius had his check paid. Still has. So him trying to come back was the same way messing with PDX' livelihood. And remember, I'm all for Miles to be successful with this.
  5. the REAL Headless Chicken
    5. Posted by the REAL Headless Chicken Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Btw: 14 minutes, 4/6 FG, 5/7 FT, 13 points and a lot of naughts. And the game before seven minutes and 2 blocks. Welcome back...
  6. KD
    6. Posted by KD Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Miles wouldn't even be making the few hundred thousand he'll make this year if Portland's cap situation wasn't what it is.
    If not for that $290k, the guy would not have a deal with Memphis, or anyone else. It's not as if this guy isn't getting paid nine million a year ... right now.
  7. the REAL Headless Chicken
    7. Posted by the REAL Headless Chicken Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    How about an excuse by Pritchard that he would indeed not have proceeded sitting his keester. Though by all means I would judge that PDX' and Memphis' behavior upon the last hire both indicate very strongly toward mala fides. What other use than sitting Miles by claiming him off waivers for PDX and what other for Memphis signing him than to finish off PDX' cap?! Considering all circumstances? None really.
  8. the REAL Headless Chicken
    8. Posted by the REAL Headless Chicken Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    So do you say he's getting his Portland money right now (from some insurer) or not? I somehow lost it in your first sentence K.D..
    (Anyone who wonders how I care so much about Miles: I even had a web page trying to follow him from the start. So glad nobody knows. Uhmmm ....)
  9. indeedproceed
    9. Posted by indeedproceed Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    See I guess I care less about Memphis's motives here. And I understand that Miles is getting paid more than I will ever make in my lifetime regardless of if he plays this season, but Portland released all claims to him. Its his choice whether or not to play, so what kind of right does Portland have to try and deny him that. If Memphis is just using him to affect the blazers bottom line (which is entirely possible, maybe even probable), then so be it. At least Miles is still allowed the right to try and earn his minutes. Portland would never have given him that chance.
  10. spencerO96
    10. Posted by spencerO96 Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "This was after, Woj (who has been killing it; kindly bow down, people) reported..."
    you mean the ONE time when he took a break from spending every waking minute trying to convince LBJ to leave the cavs? that's "killing it?"
    bow down to a media maggot who has nothing better to write about than self-serving tripe regarding the gutting of a small-market team? no thanks.
  11. LAKERS ALL THE WAY
    11. Posted by LAKERS ALL THE WAY Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:28 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Man I know this game is a business but DAMN PORTLAND, you are cold when it comes down to it. To sign this man and sit him just to advoid the hit is cold. You pretty much threw him under the bus already with the leaks now you want to claim him off of waivers... What is also funny is the email that you sent out to the other owners, Pritchard (Debo)(Suge Knight) are you serious.. You can't be making threats out there like that. I would have pick him up to just because..
  12. michael c
    12. Posted by michael c Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    KD how does Miles going back on Portland's books negatively impact their 2010 offseason? Doesn't he expire after the 09-10 season?
  13. Sunil A
    13. Posted by Sunil A Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why is Portland management applauded for being shrewd.
    And NBA players are denigrated.
    It's pretty un-american to deny someone the right to work in the occupation of their choosing.
    especially via slander
  14. DarkDestroyer
    14. Posted by DarkDestroyer Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i hate reading articles like this..your a joke...So do you really feel that darius Miles cannot help an NBA team.
    Boston thought he was good but just couldn't keep him. They are loaded with talent. Darius played last night for Memphis and scored 13 points in 13 minutes. Not bad for his time really being on the court!
    This kid is 27 yearts old and should be allowed to play. I understand why Portland does not want him to play and if I was them I wouldn't want him to play either but the fight is over. he was going to play for a team and to try and fight it and send emails around the league to discourage teams makes you look desperate and not credible. If I was a team owner and I recieved an e-mail from a team about not signing a player I would sign that player for the fact that there is no owner who is going to dictate to me how I run my team and what i can do with my roster. Portland this is your bad - you are building a great team - but you should have let this one go and draw ito the public eye.
  15. DarkDestroyer
    15. Posted by DarkDestroyer Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i hate reading articles like this..your a joke...So do you really feel that darius Miles cannot help an NBA team.
    Boston thought he was good but just couldn't keep him. They are loaded with talent. Darius played last night for Memphis and scored 13 points in 13 minutes. Not bad for his time really being on the court!
    This kid is 27 yearts old and should be allowed to play. I understand why Portland does not want him to play and if I was them I wouldn't want him to play either but the fight is over. he was going to play for a team and to try and fight it and send emails around the league to discourage teams makes you look desperate and not credible. If I was a team owner and I recieved an e-mail from a team about not signing a player I would sign that player for the fact that there is no owner who is going to dictate to me how I run my team and what i can do with my roster. Portland this is your bad - you are building a great team - but you should have let this one go and draw ito the public eye.
  16. JCM
    16. Posted by JCM Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    this post would have been a lot more convincing if you'd written it yesterday. i watched miles last night, and aside from the blown dunk he looked pretty good. good enough to be on a roster somewhere, anyway.
    as far as your plan that would make "everyone" happy, i think you're forgetting about miles himself. dude clearly wants to play. burying him on a bench to save cap room for portland isn't right.
  17. Matthew T
    17. Posted by Matthew T Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    what every reporter seems to be overlooking and trying to make the blazer ownership look more like the "bad guy" is that it was not the blazers or a team doctor that called darius unfit to play, it was an independent third party doctor. it's sad that something like this could happen to any team and to count exhibition games as part of this process is rediculous. here is a rare case of someone taking advantage of the system and i understand why the rules aren't better defined being how limited this happens but this is a perfect example of why this clause as it is set up by the nba does not work.
  18. gaborik10m
    18. Posted by gaborik10m Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    WHY WOULD PORTLAND ACTUALLY CHANCE LOSING ALL THIS MONEY UNLESS THEY REALLY BELIEVED THE DOCTOR'S OPINION MILES COULDN'T PLAY?!?!?!?!?!?!?
    It makes no sense, people. They find a doctor to lie about Miles not being able to play and he believes it? Right, Miles is going to feel his knee and say, "Hey, this knee feels like it can get some run...maybe I should talk to somebody else?" WHY, OH WHY? would the Blazers just assume he would lay down, obviously he wanted to play.
    This whole scenario makes no sense...
    http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2008/04/april_14_darius_miles_waived.html
    "The release of Miles comes after an independent doctor appointed by the NBA and the Players Association examined Miles and found his injuries to qualify as "career-ending." "
    Wow really, so according to this a doctor that the NBA and the Association representing Darius Miles' BEST INTERESTS declared Miles to have "careeer-ending" injuries? This prompts the Trailblazers, in their own best interests, to retire a player who CAN'T PLAY, and take their money back, so to speak.
    Why is this the Blazers' fault? If you ask me, this doctor that the NBA and NBAPA chose to represent Darius Miles' best interests WAS WRONG, the Blazers SHOULD NOT be punished (Lose salary cap considerations) for something they essentially set in motion.
    If this is true, somebody, ANYBODY sit here and tell me that they would not release Miles on the grounds that he was not able to play at a professional level and then scramble to try and keep that money when its found that he actually can?
    Nope, doesn't make sense, and anyone who thinks the Blazers are classless for trying to keep the money is wrong.
    First the Grizz front office screws the entire league by Gift-Wrapping Pau Gasol to the Lakers, remember when you all hated them 8 months ago?
    Well now they can give every team (less one) a $290k cash gift...
  19. C-Note
    19. Posted by C-Note Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    OK? But the bottom line is Portland deemed Miles medically unable to perform in the NBA and even took it a step further by saying he will NEVER play in the NBA again. By declaring him unable to perform they benefited from the situation by way of salary cap which helped make the blazers the team they are today. Let's face it, if Miles was never injured the Portland roster would look a whole lot different today.
    Now, its been proven Miles can in fact play, therefore Portland was wrong in their medical assessment and will pay the consequences attached to the benefit of cap flexibility they received the 2 prior seasons. Kind of makes you wonder if Portland even went the extra step in seeking outside medical opinions....my guess is no.…..KARMA GOT TO LOVE IT!!
  20. gaborik10m
    20. Posted by gaborik10m Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    KD, why would the league allow the Blazers to trade for Miles with one game left before he secured his 10 days (they obviously would not play him for the rest of the season, maybe they run him HARD in practice until his knee finally busts for good, which I bet is what will happen later on this season, assuming he actually continues to play beyond this second 10-day (yeah right!))...when they won't let them sign him up for the rest of the year off waivers? He'd get the same league minimum whether he was traded and signed, or signed off waivers.
  21. C-Note
    21. Posted by C-Note Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    My bad, Portland did see a third party doctor.......still it does not justify Portland's actions
  22. Norsktroll
    22. Posted by Norsktroll Thu Sep 03, 2009 11:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Portland didn't leak the suspension, or do you have sources for that? Miles suspension (for the use of weight loss drugs) was officially announced by the NBA on September 19, long before the pre-season even started. Boston and all other teams knew he would be out for ten games before they signed him (or passed, like most teams).
    http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
  23. T Darkstar
    23. Posted by T Darkstar Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Let me say right up front. I'm a Portland fan. I've seen the Darius Miles show for a long time now, and you're absolutely right when you say Miles never seemed to love the game. He was given plenty of time to rehab his knee while on the Portland roster, and never did. It finally got to the point where the team told him that he didn't really need to try anymore. Zack Randolph, when he was here tried. Greg Oden tried. Plenty of players in the NBA have gone through micro-fracture and returned because they tried. It was obvious that Miles didn't care enough to try. That is, until he was told that he couldn't by an independent doctor from the NBA, until he was released by Portland. Only when he thought he was being punked did he bother to try and prove everyone wrong. I wish he would have had this fire in him all along. Portland could use a SF like him on the roster. But it never happened.
    Could Portland have dealt with this situation in a way that would have been more pleasing to the public? Definitely. But this isn't a case of Portland trying to punk Miles. Miles gave up on us first, and long ago. This is about Summer 2009 salary-cap, which is a bigger fish than one Darius Miles.
    I'm curious to see who is using whom. If Miles' 10-day contract expires and no one resigns him, then we'll know what this was all about. If he hangs on with the Grizzlies, then good for Miles, he finally worked hard enough at something to succeed. Whichever way it goes, Portland will be fine going into the future. We've got an interesting, up-and-coming team, who in a few years look to be very, very good. 20 Million in cap space in 2009 would have just been icing on the cake.
  24. gaborik10m
    24. Posted by gaborik10m Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    C-Note, wrong, read post 18, the NBA and Players Association chose the doctor, who then announced he had "career-ending" injuries.
    http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=list&p_topdoc=21
    "Trail Blazers request waivers on F Darius Miles
    Date: April 15, 2008
    Publication: Associated Press Archive
    The Portland Trail Blazers have requested waivers on injured forward Darius Miles, a move to save money under the NBA salary cap.
    A medical examiner appointed by the league and the players association determined the damage to Miles' right knee is severe enough to qualify as a career-ending injury, general manager Kevin Pritchard said Monday. The 26-year-old Miles had microfracture surgery in 2006, and has not played for the Trail Blazers since. Tuesday marks the second..."
  25. the REAL Headless Chicken
    25. Posted by the REAL Headless Chicken Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Gaborik, I guess everybody who considers this all closely knows where we're running: The insurance company is going to check whether to sue that doctor over his faulty opinion. And no one is going to touch the Grizz.

Ball Don't Lie

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

J.E. Skeets

Ball Don't Lie is an NBA blog edited by J.E. Skeets. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Featured NBA Video

Y! Sports Blogs

Ball Don't Lie Recent Readers