Shutdown Corner - NFL

Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:47 pm EST

Peyton Manning is your uninspiring MVP selection

Consider the following about our newly-crowned NFL MVP:

• Four quarterbacks had a higher QB rating than he did
• Five quarterbacks threw for more yards than he did
• Four quarterbacks threw more touchdown passes than he did
• He spent the first 25% of the season doing a fine Dan Orlovsky impression

And he just won the Associated Press's MVP award in a landslide that Walter Mondale looked at and said, "Damn." Peyton got 32 votes. Closest to him were Chad Pennington and Michael Turner with four each. James Harrison and Adrian Peterson tied with three votes each.

I'm not necessarily complaining about it. I don't have any huge problem with Manning winning the hardware, and I can't name another player who I feel is clearly and definitively a better choice.

It's just that it feels like the most "blah" MVP selection of all time. Exactly how did Manning distinguish himself to the point where he won in such a convincing fashion? The biggest thing I see is that he presided over a nine-game winning streak to get his team into the playoffs.

And that's great ... I guess that's a reason to give a guy an MVP award. But wasn't that win streak necessary at least in part because Manning was so average early in the season? What's the big accomplishment? That he got his team into the playoffs? Congratulations, so did 11 other quarterbacks. And at least a handful of them did so with better numbers than Manning.

This is where the word "valuable" just gums up everything. If you want to tell me that Peyton Manning's been more valuable to the Colts than Chad Pennington was to the Dolphins, James Harrison was to the Steelers, Kurt Warner was to the Cardinals, or Michael Turner was to the Falcons, you can. And you might be right, but I don't know how you could prove it. It's a more subjective statement than "Asparagus is delicious."

Here's what I think happened. A lot of guys were fantastic this year. There were MVP-caliber performances all over the league. But there wasn't that one guy who stood out clearly above the rest. And it also happened to be that lot of the guys who did have MVP years don't necessarily fall in the "superstar" category. Chad Pennington, James Harrison, and Michael Turner aren't moving a lot of Fatheads, you know?

And since they don't have those big names, it might have taken a little bit of a pair to write their names down on an MVP ballot. Peyton Manning, meanwhile, because his name is Peyton Manning, is very easy to write down. Because not only is he a great player, and not only did he, like a lot of guys, have an MVP caliber year ... but he's Peyton Manning. Everyone knows how great he is. And the familiar name and his history with the award made writing his name on the ballot feel like snuggling up against a warm, comfortable, familiar blanket.

The snuggling blanky factor. That's what got Peyton his landslide.

digg delicious
more

177 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. UltraGal
    1. Posted by UltraGal Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    twat
  2. Trooper
    2. Posted by Trooper Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:17 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You want a little cheese with that whine?
  3. Dave N
    3. Posted by Dave N Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "it's a more subjective statement than 'asparagus is delicious.'"
    No, no, you used a bad example. asparagus is vile. objectively speaking.
  4. jeffutlaw
    4. Posted by jeffutlaw Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Terrible analysis, just terrible. The very things you point at why he SHOULDN'T be MVP (in a landslide) are why he SHOULD be.
    Sure, he had a bad start to the season, but he had two knee surgeries and no training camp. Once he got his legs beneath him, he showed how VALUABLE he was to the team. It certainly wasn't the 31st ranked rushing offense that carried that team.
    That's why he won with a landslide. Because he clearly deserved it. Not the snuggling blanky factor.
    So, the overall estimation is that he should have won, but not with so many votes? You take issue with so many sportswriters getting it right?
  5. BIGGER
    5. Posted by BIGGER Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:34 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    And I wasted time reading this article? If it were in print it would be in a bird cage.
  6. Blake
    6. Posted by Blake Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It seems the problem is with the award and the term "valuable"..don't diss on peyton because you have a problem with the award itself. He had a great year and he deserves the award, end of story.
  7. No Sympathy
    7. Posted by No Sympathy Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    MVP: Manning
    Coach: Mike Smith
    DPOY: Harrison/Ware
    OPOY: Brees
    All-pro: QB: Manning
    HB: Turner, Peterson
    FB: ?
    WR: Andre Johnson, Fitzgerald
    TE: Gonzalez
    OT: ?, ?
    C: ?
    OG: ?, ?
    DE: John Abraham, Jared Allen
    DT: Haynesworth, Kevin Williams
    OLB: Harrison, Ware
    ILB: Ray Lewis, Patrick Willis
    CB: Asomugha, Charles Woodson
    S: Ed Reed, Troy Polamalu
    K: Gostkowski
    P: Lechler
  8. jeffutlaw
    8. Posted by jeffutlaw Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    And Good Lord, MJD, if dedicated professionalism, playing through pain, never missing a snap, and outrightly obsessive preparation aren't inspiring to you, then I suppose there's no point in being contrary to you. You don't make sense.
  9. EXCITEMike
    9. Posted by EXCITEMike Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:19 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You sir, have no real knowledge of football, do you? He was the most valuable player because he was able to overcome that type of knee malady and spark this run to the postseason. This is his first major injury, and he STILL didn't miss a game. Name another QB that can do this under these circumstances? Its also not just that they won 9 in a row, but they beat New England and won AT San Diego and AT Pittsburgh and AT Jacksonville. Clutch games that they needed every one of as it turns out. That's why he won. No other candidate this season can produce a resume that even comes close to that one.
  10. Pickles
    10. Posted by Pickles Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    so is this writer upset because peyton won (and he can't even name someone more deserving) or because of the amount of votes he got? I guess he just likes to cry so he can get attention. his logic is kinda faulty because he thinks because peyton's season wasn't WAY above everyone else, it shouldn't have been a landslide, but if everyone else thinks that too- that peyton had a better year, not by much, but better nonetheless, why wouldnt it be a landslide?
  11. domenick2x
    11. Posted by domenick2x Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    EXCITEMike, I'd offer up Kurt Warner for MVP. Without him having the season he had, with no defense to help, no running game to speak of... HE GOT THE CARDINALS IN THE PLAYOFFS. It's a sign of the apocalypse...
  12. Craig
    12. Posted by Craig Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You never seem to amaze me with your stupid remarks...and opinions..how you got this job is a trip....the man deserves the award....he brought a team from no where back to win 9 in a row...and make the playoffs from dead....I could go on and on cause you always write crap no matter what anyone says to you....look at the comments...got back to school and learn to write with sense.
  13. Craig
    13. Posted by Craig Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You never seem to amaze me with your stupid remarks...and opinions..how you got this job is a trip....the man deserves the award....he brought a team from no where back to win 9 in a row...and make the playoffs from dead....I could go on and on cause you always write crap no matter what anyone says to you....look at the comments...got back to school and learn to write with sense.
  14. Colts fan
    14. Posted by Colts fan Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:28 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    SOOO happy to see Peyton get another MVP !!!! I hope the rest of you choke on it !!!
  15. Colts fan
    15. Posted by Colts fan Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:28 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Go colts !!!!!!!!!!!!!
  16. Carlos R
    16. Posted by Carlos R Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:31 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Seems like MJD ran out of ideas to write. You are a real dumbass. I guess you think Brees deserved the award despite an 8-8 record or something like that. I think this has been Peyton´s greatest year so far, and the statistics not always get you MVPS.
  17. karazekevin
    17. Posted by karazekevin Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Kurt Warner received zero votes for a reason. He didn't lead the Cardinals to the playoffs, the bad teams of the NFC West led the Cardinals to the playoffs.
  18. volwallace
    18. Posted by volwallace Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Uninspiring really? Consider the following three inspiring facts and then rewrite this dribble you call an article.
    1. 7 wins by 6 points or less!
    2. Come from behind wins against Minnesota (down 15 points in 3rd QTR), Houston (down 17 points half way through 4th QTR) , New England and Pittsburgh
    3. 9 Straight wins
  19. *M*
    19. Posted by *M* Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:31 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    manning is mvp u idiot
  20. Colts fan
    20. Posted by Colts fan Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:28 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    PEYTON is the MAN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  21. k9
    21. Posted by k9 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    If the criteria is value to a team, I would have to agree.The Colts would be a big fat zero without Payton .
  22. Colts13
    22. Posted by Colts13 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Really? You said "I'm not necessarily complaining about it. I don't have any huge problem with Manning winning the hardware, and I can't name another player who I feel is clearly and definitively a better choice"
    If that's not complaining, what then do you call it. What an insult to compare Manning to Dan Orlovsky. I don't think that there is another qb in this league that could do what Manning did with what he went through the 1st seven games this season!!! Do you even watch football???
    .
  23. Airon
    23. Posted by Airon Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Most valuable to his team? I can't argue with that. Maybe Petterson is AS valueable, but you could make that case for 3 or 4 guys. Not Harrison though. The Steelers are good with or without him, but certainly better with him. I don't think there is much to complain about with this pick.
  24. JstWndring
    24. Posted by JstWndring Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The only writer on this entire site who may be more clueless than MJD is the guy who writes Puck Daddy. Many of the previous comments re: Peyton Manning coming through despite injuries and missing training camp are right on. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Colts in the Super Bowl. Yes, MJD, Manning IS that valuable.
  25. Pickles
    25. Posted by Pickles Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    nice try putting that picture up there to try and convince us your article actually contains a rational argument. it's clear that it written by someone not completely ignorant of football. haha, no positive comments

Shutdown Corner

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

MJD

Shutdown Corner is an NFL blog edited by Matthew J. Darnell. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Shutdown Corner Recent Readers