Big League Stew - MLB

More than one sports news outlet noted that Friday is the fifth anniversary of Aaron Boone's ALCS-ending home run that sent the Yankees to the World Series in 2003.

If you've been watching ESPN's highlights of Thursday night's Game 5, you're being  reminded repeatedly that J.D. Drew's game-ending single to beat the Tampa Bay Rays came exactly five years to the minute — 12:16 a.m. Eastern — of Boone's homer against Tim Wakefield in '03.

And the significance of this is?

Combined, these two moments in baseball history barely meet the qualifications for coincidence, much less irony, as ESPN and others such as the New York Times baseball blog would have you believe. ESPN and the NYT again show their "if it involves the Red Sox or Yankees, even speciously, it must be reported — with extreme prejudice" mentality.

If someone wants to claim linkage, they need more than "12:16" or some sort of hex that was probably exorcised the next year when the Red Sox won the World Series. Like anyone should have been keeping track of the time when Boone won the game. Seriously, it's not even that late. Everyone wants to get all Vin Scully with the time stamp, but it usually has such little importance, it's just adding unnecessary adjectives.

There are other differences, possibly infinite ones, between Boone 12:16 and Drew 12:16.

Follow the jump for some of them:

Boone's moment came at Yankee Stadium, not Fenway Park

He hit a home run; Drew's hit left the yard only on a bounce.

Boone's came in a Game 7, not a Game 5

Boone played for the Yankees, who are not involved in this season's playoffs last time anyone checked

Tim Wakefield did not pitch in Thursday's game

Jason Varitek and David Ortiz are the only two other current Red Sox players on that '03 team.

Boone's homer beat the Red Sox, not the other way around; Boston's great comeback against the Yankees came in '04

Add another commonality, just one, and maybe we have the makings of a "You don't say!" But at the moment, all we got are two plays that have baseball, and someone's overactive Red Sox-Yankees brain, in common. Nothing more.
digg delicious
more

10 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. A Yahoo! User
    1. Posted by A Yahoo! User Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    12.16 baby .this time it was our turn.that;s all it means so far ,but if the ray;s choke then your talking a whole new ghost in town.GO SOX
  2. Brian
    2. Posted by Brian Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:57 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I haven't seen ESPN's coverage today so I don't know how bad it's been, but that NYT blog post wasn't that bad. It was an interesting coincidence (two game-winning hits involving the same team taking place at the exact same time five years apart qualifies as an interesting coincidence in my book) and they treated it as such.
  3. Rusty
    3. Posted by Rusty Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:22 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The significance of the coincidence is that the Boone homer and Drew’s hit both affected the Red Sox in an elimination game, in opposite ways, EXACTLY 5 years to the minute apart. That isn’t a coincidence, by definition a “chance happening”? We might assume that Mr. Brown is either one of that new breed of bitter Yankee homers, or perhaps a whiny midwesterner who makes his living crying about the significance of successful northeast sports franchises. The latter is particularly bad this year since the “favorite” Cubs got bounced early
  4. Larry
    4. Posted by Larry Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Well maybe not so direct, but if the game in 2003 doesn't get to 12:16 AM, maybe the Red Sox win the series then and Terry Francona doesn't come in and all the events that have happened to the Red Sox since then might not take place.
  5. Mike
    5. Posted by Mike Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:18 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    David Brown shouldn't be a sportswriter - this is just another example of his "lack of something useful to add" writing.
  6. L-Money
    6. Posted by L-Money Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This article was pretty accurate, however the fact that Yahoo! Sports and ESPN are direct competitors has to be taken into consideration here aswell.
  7. bigboo's bro
    7. Posted by bigboo's bro Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Having both of these games end after midnight EST shows that MLB and the networks are the same pigs they were five years ago. 4 hours and 8 minutes for a 9 inning game is just plain ridiculous.
  8. Kenny
    8. Posted by Kenny Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I agree with David Brown but I don't think anyone cares as much as he does about the topic, which makes it bad sportswriting.
  9. dookie
    9. Posted by dookie Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    ESPN bothers me, a lot, for things like this. But what bothers me even more is mlb.com's article at the beginning of the 2008 playoffs, something to the effect of "Yankees fans conflicted on which team to root for (Dodgers or Cubs)". Apparently those teams both have former Yankee managers, so its newsworthy to ask Yankee fans what they think about all this. I can't help but wonder if the Yankees were in the 2008 playoffs, would the writer have posed this question or even thought to write about it? Or if this was simply a way to push themselves into the playoff news due to an obviously pro-Yankee writer.
  10. Zortaf
    10. Posted by Zortaf Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    in response to Red Sox Rusty...
    We could also assume that David Brown is a realist and doesn't make assumptions based on the fact that Drew just happened to hit a SINGLE when Boone had hit a homerun 5 years earlier.

Big League Stew

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

'Duk

Big League Stew is an MLB blog edited by Kevin Kaduk. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Big League Stew Recent Readers