Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:32 am EST

Getty Images
New York Post columnist Peter Vecsey called the deal that sent Pau Gasol to the Los Angeles Lakers "the Memphis Grizzlies' tax-deductible donation to the Lakers.''
Vecsey reported that other than the Lakers not a single team was approached regarding Gasol's manifest availability. Had they been, there's every reason to believe the Grizzlies could've gleaned more. At the very least, there's no way Gasol should've been traded for next to nothing except promises of something to come unless Brian Cardinal's contract ($6.3M/$6.7M after this year) was part of the outgoing package.
Guaranteed, Pat Riley would've said "yes" to that in a heartbeat, as evidenced by the Shaq deal. Phoenix insisted Miami assume Marcus Banks' remaining three ($4.2M/$4.55M/$4.847M) years after this one. I assure you, that would've been a Steve Kerr stipulation no matter where Shawn Marion wound up.
Source: New York Post
NBA: Chat with Chris Webber and Kevin McHale
Posted Feb 9 2010
Posted Feb 9 2010
Posted Feb 10 2010
243 Comments
1 - 24 of 243
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Why because Mchale wanted his Celtics to have them. Why can't West let the Lakers have Gasol..
GO LAKERS!!!!
Report Abuse
Lakers defeat Celtics in the 2008 NBA Finals 4-2 and Jax passed Red with his 10th championship!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 24 of 243