December 20, 2011
Liverpool striker Luis Suarez has been banned for eight matches (one match longer than his ban for biting PSV's Otman Bakkal last year) and fined £40,000 for using racial insults against Manchester United's Patrice Evra. In response, Liverpool's official website published a lengthy defense of Suarez/attack on Evra that went beyond your usual club support for a punished player.
Here it is, in full:
Liverpool Football Club is very surprised and disappointed with the decision of the Football Association Commission to find Luis Suarez guilty of the charges against him.
We look forward to the publication of the Commission's Judgment. We will study the detailed reasons of the Commission once they become available, but reserve our right to appeal or take any other course of action we feel appropriate with regards to this situation.
That's certainly fair enough. I like to think Liverpool's actual press officer wrote this and intended it to be the club's full statement on the matter, but just before he could hit "publish," an escaped lunatic crashed through his office window, bludgeoned him with a rock and wrote what follows.
We find it extraordinary that Luis can be found guilty on the word of Patrice Evra alone when no-one else on the field of play - including Evra's own Manchester United teammates and all the match officials - heard the alleged conversation between the two players in a crowded Kop goalmouth while a corner kick was about to be taken.
How is Liverpool so sure that the committee doesn't have reason to believe otherwise when it hasn't studied "the detailed reasons of the commission" yet?
The Club takes extremely seriously the fight against all forms of discrimination and has a long and successful track record in work relating to anti-racist activity and social inclusion. We remain committed to this ideal and equality for all, irrespective of a person's background.
Unless, as you will soon find out, that background is Patrice Evra's.
LFC considers racism in any form to be unacceptable - without compromise. It is our strong held belief, having gone over the facts of the case, that Luis Suarez did not commit any racist act. It is also our opinion that the accusation by this particular player was not credible - certainly no more credible than his prior unfounded accusations.
So, Liverpool FC thinks the Liverpool player is innocent and the Manchester United player is a liar. Who needs independent commissions?
It is key to note that Patrice Evra himself in his written statement in this case said 'I don't think that Luis Suarez is racist'. The FA in their opening remarks accepted that Luis Suarez was not racist.
You don't have to be a member of the KKK to say something racist. Even smart people say stupid things sometimes.
Luis himself is of a mixed race family background as his grandfather was black.
Irrelevant. A homosexual person can have a relative that is homophobic or uses homosexual slurs.
He has been personally involved since the 2010 World Cup in a charitable project which uses sport to encourage solidarity amongst people of different backgrounds with the central theme that the colour of a person's skin does not matter; they can all play together as a team.
He has played with black players and mixed with their families whilst with the Uruguay national side and was Captain at Ajax Amsterdam of a team with a proud multi-cultural profile, many of whom became good friends.
See picture of Luis hugging Tokyo Sexwale above.
It seems incredible to us that a player of mixed heritage should be accused and found guilty in the way he has based on the evidence presented. We do not recognise the way in which Luis Suarez has been characterised.
It appears to us that the FA were determined to bring charges against Luis Suarez, even before interviewing him at the beginning of November.
When did Alex Ferguson start writing statements for Liverpool? That's an impressively paranoid accusation for an official club website.
Nothing we have heard in the course of the hearing has changed our view that Luis Suarez is innocent of the charges brought against him and we will provide Luis with whatever support he now needs to clear his name.
We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult.
Well, then maybe that's why they're not charging him? Someone really should tell Liverpool that while Suarez can't play a few football matches, John Terry is being investigated by the police for allegedly using a racial slur during a match (no one made a report to the FA on that matter, which is why they aren't investigating it).
The bottom line is that Liverpool is obviously welcome to appeal and defend its player, but maybe it should've counted to 10 before publishing this.
Previously in regrettable club statements: Chelsea sack Carlo Ancelotti, release farcical statement