Allen, who played and won championships with Pierce and Wade, found it difficult to compare the two due to the types of players they were, but didn't think Pierce should have sparked the debate in the first place.
Paul had a great career, but what he did was he entered the arena of allowing people to start judging him, and it took away from his greatness... What we have to get away from is trying to pit this player against that player and look at each player individually and marvel at their impact on the league and appreciate who they are.
Pierce has said the debate and his villain status doesn't bother him, but Allen seems to have a different perspective of how people should talk about player's legacies.
Still, more and more prominent NBA figures continue to weigh in. Danny Ainge has already backed Pierce with the use of analytics, so it's only a matter of time before Kevin Garnett and Rajon Rondo comment on the debate, right?