Government insists animals DO feel pain after social media backlash against 'sentient beings' vote

The Government has been forced to put out a statement that insists they do believe animals feel pain after a social media backlash.

Petitions have spread across Twitter and Facebook, while stories have also been shared claiming Tory MPs voted to not recognise animals as sentient beings.

Animal lovers were concerned that Brexit would weaken welfare rules but Environment Secretary Michael Gove has now sought to assuage those fears.

Responding to the recent parliamentary vote against transferring EU rules on animal welfare into British law, Mr Gove said it was “not a vote against the idea that animals are sentient and feel pain”.

The amendment to the European Union Withdrawal Bill, which would have transferred the EU protocol on animal sentience, so that animals are still recognised as sentient beings under domestic law, was voted down last week.

Green Party co-leader Caroline Lucas, who tabled the amendment, had raised concerns that the current regulations risked dropping out of UK law by accident once Britain leaves the European Union.

However, in a written ministerial statement, Mr Gove said the Withdrawal Bill was not the right place to address the issue and the vote was a “rejection of a faulty amendment” that would not have achieved its aim of providing appropriate protection.

He said: “This government will ensure that any necessary changes required to UK law are made in a rigorous and comprehensive way to ensure animal sentience is recognised after we leave the EU.”

The Government’s policies are driven by the recognition that animals are sentient beings and “we are acting energetically to reduce the risk of harm to animals, whether on farms or in the wild”, Mr Gove said.

Yahoo News UK

89-year-old retired policeman murdered wife because he couldn’t cope with her dementia
Catholic school covers up ‘suggestive’ statue of saint giving boy a loaf of bread
Ikea reissues recall of Malm drawers after eighth child dies – but they’re still on sale in the UK
Shadow education secretary Angela Rayner becomes a grandmother at 37
James Bulger killer Jon Venables ‘jailed for second time for possession of child sex abuse images’

He also said the EU laws on animal sentience were not delivering the wanted progress on welfare, and prevented action on issues such as cracking down on puppy smuggling and banning the import of young dogs, or restricting live export of animals for slaughter.

He added that ”leaving the EU gives us the chance to do much better” in these areas.

Humane Society International UK director Claire Bass welcomed the reassurance that the Government would formally recognise animal sentience in UK law post-Brexit and strengthen rules to protect animals in the UK.

She said: ”Acknowledging that animals have the capacity to suffer and feel pain is absolutely fundamental to protecting them from harm, and we need a binding imperative enshrined in UK law that will hold government to account, ensuring that animal welfare is fully taken into account in all UK law and policy-making.

“We can’t afford for this guiding principle to be thrown out with the Brussels bathwater and so look forward to hearing the Government’s legislative plans in the very near future.”

But Ms Lucas said the Government’s refusal to accept the amendment was “simply absurd” and said the continued insistence that sentience was covered in Animal Welfare legislation was wrong.

She said: ”Britain has been forward-thinking animal welfare over the years, which is why ditching this provision would be such a backwards step.

“The UK Government led on introducing this EU protocol in the first place, and it’s only an obsession with refusing changes to the EU Withdrawal Bill that’s stopping ministers adopting this amendment now.”