Fantasy Football Podcast: Valentine's Day matchmaker with Philip Rivers, Amari Cooper and the 2020 free agent class

Subscribe to The Yahoo Fantasy Football Podcast

Apple PodcastsStitcherGoogle PodcastsSpotify

It’s the second full week of February, and for many folks, that means love is in the air — yes, Valentine’s Day.

And in the spirit of happy couples, Liz Loza and Matt Harmon decided to play matchmaker in the latest fantasy football podcast.

But instead of bringing couples to the perfect V-Day restaurant or pairing a significant other with the perfect gift, they’re taking the top soon-to-be free agents and placing them in a new team.

[Yahoo Sportsbook powered by BetMGM: Deposit $10, Get $100 in Free Bets. NJ only. 21+. Terms apply]

The first candidate is Philip Rivers, newly “single” after the Chargers and QB said their goodbyes (4:45). There’s Amari Cooper, on the market after being the odd-person-out in a highly publicized sugar-daddy situation (10:25).

Should Melvin Gordon look for love outside of LA? (16:40)

Are Derrick Henry and Ryan Tannehill meant to be? (24:45)

Where will the second chapters of Jameis Winstonwho got LASIK surgery so now everyone will overdraft him in 2020 — and Marcus Mariota take them? (25:40)

Kenyan Drake was broken up with (freed?) by the Miami Dolphins and went on to produce successfully with the Cardinals — so is this pairing the real thing? (44:10)

These are just a few of the names Liz and Matt play cupid with — where do you wish your favorite free agents would land this offseason?

Liz Loza & Matt Harmon play Valentine's Day matchmaker with the 2020 NFL free-agent class-members Amari Cooper, Teddy Bridgewater & Melvin Gordon on the latest Yahoo Fantasy Football Podcast. (Getty Images/Yahoo Sports/Michael Wagstaffe)

Please remember to rate, review and subscribe on your podcast provider of choice and send us your questions for future episodes on Twitter @YahooFantasy.

Follow Liz @LizLoza_FF

Follow Matt @MattHarmon_BYB

Check out the rest of the Yahoo Sports Podcast family at or at