SEC files notice of appeal in Cuban trading case

  • Print

DALLAS (AP)—The Securities and Exchange Commission said Wednesday it plans to appeal a federal judge’s dismissal of the agency’s insider-trading lawsuit against Mark Cuban.

The SEC filed a notice in U.S. District Court in Dallas that it plans to take its case to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

The outspoken billionaire owner of the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks was accused in a civil lawsuit of selling his shares and avoiding a $750,000 loss after receiving confidential information about the Internet search engine company Mamma.com Inc. in 2004.

U.S. District Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater dismissed the case in July, ruling the agency didn’t allege that Cuban had agreed not to trade on confidential information.

Fitzwater gave the SEC 30 days to amend the complaint if the agency could allege that Cuban agreed not to sell stock when he told the company’s chief executive that he wouldn’t divulge secret information he was about to receive.

Rather than amend the lawsuit, the SEC chose to appeal.

“We believe the District Court erred in dismissing our complaint, and we look forward to presenting our position to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals,” SEC spokesman John Nester said in a statement.

According to the SEC, Cuban agreed not to share any information before Mamma.com Chief Executive Guy Faure told him in a phone call that the company planned to raise money through a private stock offering. The complaint says Cuban became angry because he said the plan would hurt his stock’s value and ended the call by saying, “Well now I’m screwed. I can’t sell.”

The SEC alleges that Cuban sold his 600,000 shares, or 6.3 percent stake in the company, before the announcement of the private offering.

Stephen Best, one of Cuban’s attorneys, said in a statement that Fitzwater dismissed the case “based on the SEC’s own version of the facts.”

Best also noted a recent court filing by Cuban that asked the SEC to pay his legal fees and accused the agency of misconduct.

“This appeal is nothing more than the SEC’s desperate attempt to shock a heartbeat into a case that was dead on arrival,” Best said. “It’s just one more example of wasting taxpayer money.”

The 51-year-old Cuban is a technology entrepreneur who sold his Broadcast.com to Yahoo Inc. in 1999 at the height of the dot-com boom. He bought the Mavericks in 2000.

Cuban runs a Web site called Sharesleuth.com, which bills itself as providing “independent Web-based reporting aimed at exposing securities fraud and corporate chicanery.” A companion site, BailoutSleuth.com, tracks the government’s $700 billion financial rescue plan.

Updated Oct 7, 3:34 pm EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

9 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Paul
    9. Posted by Paul Fri Jul 17 7:12pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    it pays to be an Obama supporter and yes a key donor as well. His campaign contribution was well spent.
  2. Max
    8. Posted by Max Fri Jul 17 1:55pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    innocent until proven guilty. some butt-wipe at the sec had it in for him on a personal vendetta and it didn't pass the muster. justice is served. mark, come home and buy the pirates, please.
  3. Shirley
    7. Posted by Shirley Fri Jul 17 1:30pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    hes guilty as all hell and everyone knows this. another case where if ur wealthy u can buy ur way out.
  4. rae m
    6. Posted by rae m Fri Jul 17 12:45pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The concept of "promising not to trade" is full of more holes than swiss cheese. Anyone can make a verbal statement and then claim it wasn't made just as there can be a claim that something was said when it wasn't. The law is written to avoid such situations. Cuban was privy to information that the "common man" was not and then he sold his shares and avoided a huge loss. The idea that the law can be circumvented because he promised is ridiculous. Your honor I promised I wouldn't sell the shares based on that information, I was planning to sell them anyway. RIGHT! The appearance of impropriety is enormous. This is an example of judges trying to interpret the law instead of enforcing it. The law is the law, he benfited from information that most people were not privy to.
  5. Larry R
    5. Posted by Larry R Fri Jul 17 12:26pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Juan S is obviously an educated man.
  6. Chris M (2009 NBA CHAMPION LAKERS!)
    4. Posted by Chris M (2009 NBA CHAMPION LAKERS!) Fri Jul 17 12:20pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    He wasn't guilty of insider trading.....no rich ass person is! Right? The fact of the matter is he really saved $750,000 by switching to Geico the night before! LOL! He's a genius! ROFL!
  7. Ralphredimix
    2. Posted by Ralphredimix Fri Jul 17 11:44am EDT

    Report Abuse

    His team is doing that already!
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Video Spotlight