Ricketts family to buy Cubs for $845 million

  • Print

CHICAGO (AP)—A billionaire brokerage family will attempt what a newspaper publisher and a chewing-gum dynasty failed to do: Break baseball’s longest World Series drought.

The Rickettses, longtime Cubs fans whose wealth comes from family-owned Ameritrade, signed an agreement Friday to buy a 95 percent stake of the team and its Wrigley Field home from Tribune Co. The $845 million deal also includes Tribune’s approximately 25 percent share of regional cable TV network Comcast SportsNet Chicago.

The deal, which requires approval by a bankruptcy court judge and Major League Baseball, may not help deliver a title to a profitable but hapless franchise that last won the big one in 1908. But the new owners can’t do any worse, championship-wise, than Tribune has during a 28-year stewardship or the Wrigley family during its 60 years at the helm.

Fans said they hope this will be the ownership that ends the century of failure.

“Hopefully the Rickettses will spend money on the team” for good players and rehabbing Wrigley Field, said Devon Vowman, 21, who works at a sports shop across from the ballpark.

“It’ll be nice for a family to own the Cubs that cares about more than the bottom line,” said his co-worker, Alex Sheehan, 20. “I think it definitely helps because if you look at the teams that win the World Series and the people that own them, it’s always a single guy who cares more about winning than anything else.”

Joe Ricketts, who founded Omaha, Neb.-based TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., issued a statement saying his family is “thrilled” to acquire a controlling interest in one of the most storied franchises in sports. “The Cubs have the greatest fans in the world, and we count our family among them,” he said.

But it is his son Tom Ricketts, 43, who led the purchase bid and is expected to assume the most active ownership role. The Chicago investment banker grew up watching the team, once lived across the street from Wrigley and first met his wife in the stands at a game there.

Ricketts likely needn’t worry about missing out on a chance to collect a World Series trophy as owner this fall. The Cubs, favored to win the National League Central division going into the season, are a distant second behind the St. Louis Cardinals and fifth in the wild-card chase.

Tribune had announced on Opening Day in 2007 that the marquee franchise and historic ballpark would be sold at the end of that season. But the process was slowed by CEO Sam Zell’s efforts to maximize sale profits, the collapse of the credit markets and Tribune’s 2008 bankruptcy filing.

The Ricketts family, tentatively selected as the winning bidder last January, had agreed to pay about $900 million for the package. But that total was renegotiated, with Tribune retaining a small stake for tax purposes.

The sale figure exceeds the record $660 million paid for the Boston Red Sox, its ballpark and its TV network in 2002.

Tribune said it will include the Cubs in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. The ballclub was left out of the initial filing last December while the sale negotiations proceeded. Taking it into bankruptcy court now is intended to expedite the sale.

After that, the ownership change needs to be approved by three-quarters of the league’s 30 team owners.

A Ricketts family spokesman, Dennis Culloton, said both sides hope the sale can close during the fourth quarter.

Chicago-based Tribune bought the Cubs in 1981 from candy maker Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co. for $20.5 million. Zell, a real estate mogul, engineered a takeover of Tribune in 2007—but may not remain for long as head of the company, which also owns the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, other major U.S. newspapers, two dozen TV stations and Chicago radio station WGN.

Randy Michaels, the company’s chief operating officer, said in a note Thursday to employees that “the ownership structure of the company is likely to change.”

Zell said in a statement that the Ricketts family “will be a great steward of the franchise.”

“This thing here has been in a bit of flux for the three years I’ve been here,” Cubs manager Lou Piniella said in Los Angeles, where his team was taking on the Dodgers. He called the sale “very positive and very encouraging for this organization.”

As the negotiations with the Rickettses dragged on earlier this year, Tribune had conducted separate sale talks with a group led by New York investor and former Chicagoan Marc Utay. He told The Associated Press on Friday that he was disappointed but had no hard feelings.

“The Ricketts seem like a very nice family,” he said. “We wish them the best of luck and hope they will bring a World Series title to Chicago.”

Tom Ricketts was a market maker at the Chicago Board Options Exchange and a finance executive before starting investment bank Incapital LLC in 1999.

The Ricketts family sold 34 million Ameritrade shares earlier this year to raise $403 million for the Cubs deal, but still controls about 16 percent of the company’s stock and two board seats. Toronto Dominion Bank became Ameritrade’s biggest shareholder with 45 percent of the stock after Ameritrade acquired TD Waterhouse’s U.S. retail securities business in 2006.

Associated Press writers Josh Funk in Omaha, Neb., and Christina M. Wright in Chicago and AP Sports Writer Beth Harris in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

Updated Aug 22, 11:12 am EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

58 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. AlS
    58. Posted by AlS Fri Oct 16 4:27pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Dear Loser Boy Ron. Why don't you go back to Boys Town(where the Dump is located) this weekend and drown your 101 years of ineptitude in a few beers. Keep wasting your money on overpriced tickets and the overrated SUBS. You would be better served trying to cut a deal on lifetime supply of antidepressants. Stick it Loser Boy.
  2. <i>omgitsatarban</i>
    57. Posted by omgitsatarban Sun Aug 23 12:21pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    and for all you people who say the cubs suck, who had 8 all stars in the '08 season? ...Yeah, thought so. The cubs. They're alot better team than most of your favorites, even if they haven't been so hot this year. It's not ALL ABOUT THE WORLD SERIES FOLKS, ITS ABOUT THE LOVE OF THE GAME.
  3. <i>omgitsatarban</i>
    56. Posted by omgitsatarban Sun Aug 23 12:18pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I don't care what any of you people say. I love the Cubs. I don't give a @#$% if they win or lose, they're an amazing team. If you dumbasses ever get the chance to go to wrigley field and watch one of the best teams in HISTORY play, I'm sure you'd enjoy it. They've got their irks.. But I've seen more cubs fan in san diego than san diego fans! Screw the red sox, all they do is fight, fight, fight.
  4. jerryt
    55. Posted by jerryt Sun Aug 23 11:38am EDT

    Report Abuse

    everyone acts like their team never underachieved, stfu, go cubbies!!!!
  5. <i>kevingmurray2002</i>
    54. Posted by kevingmurray2002 Sat Aug 22 9:00pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ummm the article says that the Cubs fans are the best in baseball...maybe the most patient..but certainly not the best...and not the worst either...come on down to st louis in october and catch a game since there will be no baseball to be had in chicago...unless maybe the white socks pull it out!!
  6. <i>million_dollar_sleeper</i>
    53. Posted by million_dollar_sleeper Sat Aug 22 6:25pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    ppl in chicago dont know how to drive
  7. James
    52. Posted by James Sat Aug 22 6:01pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You must not A: pay close attention to baseball... and B: Come from Chicago and have been to Wrigley at all.... and C: Haven't been to many other major league ball parks.

    I go to a lot of Cubs game every year and have never seen or had any debris fall on me or anyone. That happened over 5 years ago.... get a new story!!! And that did not only happen at Wrigley... similar problems happened at many of the older parks... Fenway, Tiger and Yankee stadium as well. That's why all three ball parks have gone under serious renovation or torn down. I will agree that Wrigley needs better up keeping!!!!

    Gone are the huge "cookie cutter" or "concrete donut" stadiums out in the middle of nowhere of the 60s and 70s. All the new stadiums that are being built all try to borrow the design and ambiance of the older ball parks... ie Wrigley, Fenway, Yankee, Ebbets, Tiger.

    I'm not going to waste my time and go into specifics... just look at pictures of the newer stadiums and see how they try to recreate the feel of the old parks.
  8. holeinone
    51. Posted by holeinone Sat Aug 22 3:30pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    James, please, are you serious? Please tell me which stadiums were built that "stole" Wrigleys design...and furthermore ambiance. Too funny. Did they steal the idea of the pee troughs for horses or maybe it was the concrete slabs that fall on a daily basis or maybe it's the Old Style beer that they sell? That's definately ambiance. Please James explain.
  9. James
    50. Posted by James Sat Aug 22 3:16pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    If Wrigley Field sucks so bad and is such a dump... then why is it that every time a new ball park is built... they steal some aspect of Wrigley's design and ambiance???
  10. Guy S
    49. Posted by Guy S Sat Aug 22 3:08pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    well does anyone really know what the cubs name stands for i'll tell you, Completely Useless By Septermber...lol,Go cubs Go and take the fans with ya...lol Cardinals all the way baby.
  11. Wayne S
    48. Posted by Wayne S Sat Aug 22 3:07pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    As a die hard red sox fan i am happy that the cubs has an ownership group that will care for the team like the red sox have maybe we will see the sox and cubbies in the world serious someday in the near future would be a dream come true and let the sox win it (sorry cubs fan still got to pull for my team) i just hope they keep the old ballpark and do what they are doing at fenway making improvments
  12. Tony T
    47. Posted by Tony T Sat Aug 22 1:55pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why didn't the Cubs sign Michael Vick...he could play with fellow thugs Zambrano and Bradley...they could also sign Patrick Kane and Derrick Rose....Ha Ha Ha
  13. who the hell?
    46. Posted by who the hell? Sat Aug 22 1:53pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The owners are business people, investors to be specific, do you really think they will run this team to satisfy the fans? I see another ownership group worried more about the bottom line than winning - they are not going to run this business for the pure enjoyment of it - because that is how these wealthy folks are wired. Besides, the Cubbies are cursed.
  14. Tony T
    45. Posted by Tony T Sat Aug 22 1:52pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    How come the Cubs didn't put Bradley, Zombrano, or Soriano on waivers anyway? Didn't they think anyone would want them?
  15. <i>stacivining</i>
    44. Posted by stacivining Sat Aug 22 1:48pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm a Cards fan from birth, so you probably won't care about what I have to say in Chicago. New stadiums aren't all that bad, but I don't want to see Wrigley go either. I got to go to a game at Wrigley in '96 and it was the best baseball experience of my life. Ryne Sandberg, Mark Grace, Shawn Dunston, Ozzie Smith (they played the Cards) Harry Carey singing. . .there's too much nostalgia amongst Cubs fans and rivals alike to get rid of the bricks and ivy.
  16. <i>budseligbehindbars</i>
    43. Posted by budseligbehindbars Sat Aug 22 12:49pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    ha ha Bill Murray no World Series for you EVER muhahahahahahahah !!!!!!!!
  17. <i>tazz43@...</i>
    42. Posted by tazz43@... Sat Aug 22 12:31pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    tazz43 I'm a die hard Cubs fan I don't care who owns them. Just buy some decent players & they will start to win. The Cubs are a legend in my mind.
  18. J
    41. Posted by J Sat Aug 22 12:28pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    a goat cursed the cubs? i think not. maybe though it is a wrigley field curse. too many hot days of baseball drains the players. maybe god didn't like it either as wrigley field was built on the location of a monestary. true! perhaps a new ballpark that can hold 60,000 fans should be built. yes you cub bashers, that park if built, would fill up for every home game. what's the average attendance for white sox home games? southside sucks.

    go cubbies
  19. ZACK R
    40. Posted by ZACK R Sat Aug 22 12:21pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What are the chances of the Rickett family cleaning house and putting people they want in all major slots?

    New President (don't think they have one since McDonough resigned), who will then probably want his own GM (bye Hendry), who then in turn will want his own manager (bye Lou).

    I can see Hendry and Lou getting one more year under the new ownership, but if they fail to make the playoffs (and possibly the WS): Bye, Bye to all - not just Lou. And make no mistake, this will be essentially the same team next year due to current contracts and team payroll.
  20. Harry Nuts
    39. Posted by Harry Nuts Sat Aug 22 10:58am EDT

    Report Abuse

    30. Posted by ron k Sat Aug 22 7:15am EDT your a idiot... the tax payers totally payed for wrigley field...

    wrigley gum is sold where??? not on a damn street corner like drugs!!!

    the news papers sold where??? ok so the street corner counts here.. BUT ITS STILL TAXED !!!!

    God I love when people post stupid comments without TRUE thought lol....
  21. da bulls
    38. Posted by da bulls Sat Aug 22 10:44am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yeah the Cubs were finally sold. The Ricketts are die hard cubs fan so this must be a dream come true to own the Cubs. I don't think they should move into a new ballpark. I love the old tradition. Fenway and Wrigley are the only 2 old parks left. I can't understand why the the Florida Marlins don't draw many fans. They have won 2 world series in a fairly short amount of time. I understand they are building a new ballpark. Why? They can't get many fans in their current park. Go Cubs!!!!!
  22. Artie Lang
    37. Posted by Artie Lang Sat Aug 22 9:45am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hey poster 34 Where do you live boy's town
  23. Jillybean
    36. Posted by Jillybean Sat Aug 22 9:37am EDT

    Report Abuse

    so the cubs got bought out? I wonder what their new name will be? Where will they play!? im confused

    age 11
  24. David
    35. Posted by David Sat Aug 22 9:03am EDT

    Report Abuse

    As a Red Sox fan, I am thrilled that new owners didn't blow up Fenway Park in its footprint and build a new cookie-cutter stadium and rename it for some corporate bozos.

    As a baseball fan, I hope to see Wrigley Field STAY Wrigley Field! Sure, it would be the same place, but it would lose a certain something if it was renamed TD Ameritrade Field.

    I grew up near Boston and I love Fenway Park; I live in Florida and have been to Tropicana Field (obviously named for the orange juice conglomerate), but Wrigley Field has always been a place I'd love to see in person (call it an item on my bucket list). If the stadium needs some minor fixes, that's fine, but please do not knock it down or re-design the whole place. When I finally get to see it, I still want to see the bricks and ivy. I've walked on the field at Fenway Park, but I've only seen Wrigley on TV. Unless it's structurally necessary, please don't change a thing.
  25. holeinone
    34. Posted by holeinone Sat Aug 22 8:55am EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Cubs and their fans are a bunch of loser. The only people that want to live in that dump of a city are the people that haven't lived any where else. Constant traffic, ignorant sports fans.......
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrobcJa_EV8&feature=related
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Video Spotlight