Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:58 pm EDT
Follow him. No, not him. Not Tiger. I'm not concerned with what Woods does at the Masters on Thursday and Friday. Just tell me whether he's in it or not. Woods does not produce highlights on Thursday and Friday. So I don't need a Tiger Cam for the first and second rounds at Augusta (unless he needs to make a putt on the 36th hole in order to make the cut...Ha!)
Instead, follow one of the game's greatest characters, and one of its greatest players.
Follow the guy who was Tiger - the top player in the world - for 331 weeks.
Follow the guy who's produced some of the Masters' most memorable moments.
Follow Greg Norman.
Follow the 54-year-old Aussie who very well may be playing his last Masters.
Follow the guy who deserves a green jacket more than Zach Johnson and a few others, honestly.
This will be Norman's 23rd Masters, a rightly-earned likely-swan turn. He'll be there based on his third-place finish at last year's British Open. It was a "comeback" that allowed us to remember just how much golf missed his presence, his class.
And he brought Chris Evert along. America's sweetheart is now Shark's sweetheart, and his return to Augusta is in part due to how she helped him overcome demons that we won't let him forget:
*The bogey on 18 on 1986 to miss a playoff.
*The playoff loss to Larry Mize in '87.
*And of course, '96, losing by five strokes after leading by six as the sun rose on Sunday.
Norman could have disappeared then. And he did, slowly. He finished third in he Masters two years later but missed the cut three of the five years after '96. Demons do that.
Demons also do divorce, but demons didn't count on Chrissie. She loved him and lifted him from the ashes of his professional and personal failures. She'd been there, too. On both fronts. The only difference was that she overcame her demons.
"She completely understands," he told the BBC earlier this year. And now, it seems, so does he.
So follow him. Follow him not because he may earn a green jacket. That's not likely. But no matter.
Follow him because he seems to be having fun. Because he deserves more than we recognize and remember him for.
Follow him because he understands, finally.


Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by MJD
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Andy Behrens
Posted Nov 27 2009
Posted Nov 27 2009
NFL: Our Locks to Win, Week 12
Posted Nov 25 2009
19 Comments
1 - 19 of 19
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Tear em up Greg!
PS the writer didnt say Johnson didn't deserve his green jacket, only that Norman deserved it more.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Norman is, arguable, the greatest individual choker in sports history, and the fact that he only has two British Open trophies in his drawer- despite somehow ranking #1 in the world for 331 weeks- bears this out..... Tiger has had better YEARS than Norman has had a CAREER.
Oh, and the Chrissie thing? Let's ask Andy Mills about that, shall we?
Report Abuse
p.s. thanks for the wonderful memories you gave me and still do when you are playing.
Report Abuse
Also, Zach Johnson deserved to win, because he won. It wasn't a tuck rule, or a bad officiating call, or "Whitey", trying to keep everyone else down. He played better than everyone else that day.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
This article is one of the fluffiest I've wasted my time reading in a while. Those short, choppy, sentences in an obvious effort to sound profound, just make you look like a "try hard." The point of a blog is to have a unregulated platform to write something interesting and unique. In a single google news search, I could find a dozen or more articles just like this one, only without all the fluff
Report Abuse
this article is one of the fluffiest i've wasted my time reading in a while. those short, choppy, sentences in an obvious effort to sound profound, just make you look like a "try hard." the point of a blog is to have a unregulated platform to write something interesting and unique. in a single google news search, i could find a dozen or more articles just like this one, only without all the fluff
Report Abuse
this article is one of the fluffiest i've wasted my time reading in a while. those short, choppy, sentences in an obvious effort to sound profound, just make you look like a "try hard." the point of a blog is to have a unregulated platform to write something interesting and unique. in a single google news search, i could find a dozen or more articles just like this one, only without all the fluff
Report Abuse
This article is one of the fluffiest i've wasted my time reading in a while. those short, choppy, sentences in an obvious effort to sound profound, just make you look like a "try hard." the point of a blog is to have a unregulated platform to write something interesting and unique. in a single google news search, i could find a dozen or more articles just like this one, only without all the fluff
Report Abuse
1 - 19 of 19