Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:10 am EDT

It's not about LeBron, really. Sure, it is for the Cavs, their fans and for those who believe the Little Franchise That Should put all its hopes for an NBA title in the LeBron Era (however short it may be) on the shoulders of 37-year-old Shaquille O'Neal.
In other words, it's next season or probably not.
But it's not about LeBron.
This trade, the biggest of a major trade season already, is at least as much about legacy. Shaquille O'Neal's legacy.
Should he lead LeBron to the jewelers, should he give Cleveland its first championship in any sport that matters, O'Neal will thrust his Shaqulicious self smack into the debate over the best player of the generation.
And he knows it.
He's been pretty quiet since Kobe won his first ring without him earlier this month. Uncharacteristically so. He was gracious and congratulatory in words, deeds and tweets, even as Kobe was elevated to "best ever" status by some and at least a solid No. 2 by most.
He was also patient, too, though I'm certain he was aware that something was brewing up north, that he was soon going to be paired with the Chosen One, where he'd have the chance to fit his third Young Thing with a ring.
Kobe was the first beneficiary, three times; then Dwyane Wade rode the Big One to the title in '06.
Now, it's LeBron's turn to saddle up.
Or maybe it's the other way around.
Winning rings with Kobe, D-Wade and LeBron would make O'Neal, at minimum, the league's MVT (Most Valued Teammate) of this era.
Certainly the most dominant.
Arguably the best.
That's what it's about. Really.
AP Photo
follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/roysj

Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by MJD
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Andy Behrens
Posted Nov 27 2009
Posted Nov 27 2009
NFL: Our Locks to Win, Week 12
Posted Nov 25 2009
126 Comments
1 - 25 of 126
Report Abuse
http://ryanshub.blogspot.com for more good reads.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I will mourn for the city of Cleveland, but I will rejoice in Shaq's humbling.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
As a lifetime Cleveland fan, there's really no downside. It is a 1year experiment with Shaq's salary coming off the books after the season.
Upside - Shaq puts up his 18/8 in 30min per game while Z puts in 12/6 in 18min per game, and gives the Cavs a body to put on Dwight in the playoffs. We double team him less, and get out to their shooters, and make it to see LA(who knows what happens there).
Downside - Shaq & Lebron don't mesh well w/ both needing touches and it doesn't work. Shaq's gone after one year.
No matter what happens either way, we still don't know if Lebron will re-sign, and we'll still have the money to re-sign Lebron & maybe a guy like Bosh too.
Report Abuse
sasha and big ben did nothing.
shaqs got a 20 mill expiring contract.
to me as a cavs fan im fine with this trade.
even if its rent a shaq its better then rent a ben.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 126