Roy S. Johnson Blog

Fri May 22, 2009 1:25 pm EDT

Expand the Rooney Rule all the way

The Rooney Rule could go down as the second-most influential move ever when it comes to impacting diversity in sports. Second to the Brooklyn Dodgers signing Jackie Robinson, of course.

The NFL mandate requiring GMs to interview at least one non-white candidate for head-coaching vacancies has been so effective that hiring a black head coach is no longer news. (At least not in the NFL; in college sports it still inspires cries of "Hallelujah.")

The league is considering expanding the rule to include GM vacancies. (Jerry Reese of the New York Giants, above, and the Detroit Lions' Martin Mayhew, below, are two of the NFL's three African-American GMs. Ozzie Newsome of the Baltimore Ravens is the other.) Essentially, owners will be holding themselves accountable.

As they should.

Why stop there? The rule should be expanded to all openings – from radio and television announcers to team doctors to marketing, sales and finance positions.

The disintegration of color barriers and misconceptions in sports rightfully began on and around the field. Players and coaches are the most visible participants, and most highly paid. Opening those positions to all was not only right but it was vital to the long-term viability and credibility of all sports.

But I've long been troubled by the reality that no matter how wide the net is cast for athletes and coaches, it still reaches only a very small, elite group of men. Yes, men. Every young man in America is told they stand a better chance of becoming a physicist than playing professional sports. Yet ask them what they want to be when they grow up and almost every one of them (including my own son) will say, "Play pro ball."

The better reality is that there are myriad jobs in pro sports, ones to which almost any kid (boy or girl) can aspire. Jobs in accounting, ticket sales, arena management, training, public relations and on and on.

The league is doing pretty well, actually, when it comes to race. Last summer, it received a B+ on racial hiring practices among top team management, administration, physicians, head trainers, and broadcasters on the annual Racial and Gender Report produced by Dr. Richard Lapchick at the University of Central Florida.

That was despite the fact that the NFL did not provide Lapchick with data for the survey – it was the only pro sports league not to do so – nor did it corroborate data gathered and submitted by UCF prior to publication. With insufficient data, the league was issued an I (Incomplete) in gender hiring. In 2004, the last time it received a grade on gender hiring, the league received a D+. "The record of NFL teams regarding the hiring of women remained poor," the report said, "especially compared to the significant progress on race."

Sticking its chest out about the Rooney Rule yet not participating in the most credible measurement of race and gender hiring in sports is, frankly, hypocritical. That must change.

Subsequently, expanding the Rooney Rule to include all positions would not only allow the NFL to add women to the interview process, it would also send a critical signal to young men and women nationwide who are aspiring to "play pro ball" that they can do so without having to be an elite athlete.

Photos by NY Daily News and AP


digg delicious
more

118 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Tut
    1. Posted by Tut Fri May 22, 2009 3:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ownership. Seriously, we can't do any worst than Detroit.
  2. Joey
    2. Posted by Joey Fri May 22, 2009 3:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Opening those positions to all was not only right but it was vital to the long-term viability and credibility of all sports." So you mean to tell me that before the rooney rule non-white people couldn't interview for head coaching or GM jobs...ignorance i tell ya...no owner of any business in america should be told who they can and can't interview and how many of this or that race they should...thats the definition of racial discrimination.
  3. Stephen M
    3. Posted by Stephen M Fri May 22, 2009 3:44 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This is one of the leagues most meaningless rules ever!! If the team hires on qualification (which most teams do) already then is doesn't matter what he/she is(race or sex) it just matters how good they are that gets them the job. If a team doesn't hire based on qualification then the franchise suffers and rightfully so with a losing season. If a team is that way and doesn't like someone based on sex or color then the person is destine to fall do to lack of cooperation and wont be welcome there. That's not fare to the franchise or the individual because they can make each other look even worst then they actually are. Which can leave a black eye on the franchise or the persons record. In the end neither one can say anything about the other with out making them self look bad.
    This real reason i don't like this rule it forces teams to make meaningless interviews with people they don't wont. It then makes it a waste of time and money for both parties just to fill a meaningless rule.
  4. Hunter
    4. Posted by Hunter Fri May 22, 2009 4:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "...it would also send a critical signal to young men and women nationwide who are aspiring to "play pro ball" that they can do so without having to be an elite athlete."
    Why is that a good thing? Is diversity so important as to ignore the quality of the game itself? If it is then why not just have them all sit in a circle and sing "Kumbaya" or something else stupid for their paychecks? Why not just make a hundred professional "ball" leagues and let everybody play? People go to games to see elite athletes; without them, nobody would go to games, the leagues would fail, and then none of the athletes, elite or not, will be "playing pro ball."
    As far as expanding the Rooney Rule to GMs, an owner could easily get around it by hiring a guy, giving him a title along the lines of "Director of Football Operations," and letting him make the football decisions. SImple as that.
  5. Andy T
    5. Posted by Andy T Fri May 22, 2009 5:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The only downside to the RR is that a team might already have a guy in mind, and bring in a minority candidate only as lip service ("because they have to") -- which isn't fair to that person.
    I don't want to say the rule isn't needed, but if an owner is not racist, they'd want to bring in whoever was best for the job -- so why would they prejudge a minority if he was a great candidate (granted, it may force them to explore an "unknown" guy who could turn out to be good)
    or if they were racist.....it's just lip service then because they won't hire the guy
  6. Andrew M
    6. Posted by Andrew M Fri May 22, 2009 5:34 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Whoever is the most qualified should get the job!!! End of story. It shouldnt matter about race. Im soo sick and tired of hearing about race in this country.
  7. Leff NutZ
    7. Posted by Leff NutZ Fri May 22, 2009 6:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    YOu guys who have posted on are seem to be missing the point. Racism has yet to be vanquished (sp) from our country. The "Rooney Rule" is just an asset to help remove more of it from the game. Owners often are very rich white males, who would not like to be around anyone besides their "good ol boys". The function of the rule helps gets the personal department meet these other persons & at least give them a chance they might not have recieved without this chance.
    The "R.R." does have its falls, as were posted. Now guys, who likely have no shot at a job are getting interviews as PR. But you know what? It's at least very well qualified guys, who if not for their race, might have already been in these higher positions.
    So in my opinion, the rule has helped the league.
    And what Roy is saying makes sense. Why not make the rule "global" through out the business? Why not include women?
    It does suck to MAKE these huge organizations change their policies. But on the otherhand, why have they not done it on their own??
  8. Chris
    8. Posted by Chris Fri May 22, 2009 7:17 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The last figure that I have seen is that there are 10 black head coaches, which means over 30% of the coaches in the NFL are black. Yet only 12% of the US population is black. It seems that the Rooney Rule is outdated and may be causing reverse discrimination.
  9. L
    9. Posted by L Fri May 22, 2009 7:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Roy, I believe you've forgotten Texans GM Rick Smith as an African American GM
  10. Adam
    10. Posted by Adam Fri May 22, 2009 7:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #8 you couldn't have said it any better
  11. BroncoJimmy
    11. Posted by BroncoJimmy Fri May 22, 2009 7:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think this rule should also extend to players. Where are the Indians? I don't see any indians playing football? How about orientals? Why is always just the blacks?
  12. BroncoJimmy
    12. Posted by BroncoJimmy Fri May 22, 2009 7:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think this rule should also extend to players. Where are the Indians? I don't see any indians playing football? How about orientals? Why is always just the blacks?
  13. T
    13. Posted by T Fri May 22, 2009 8:22 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Rooney Rule should be extended to all positions in the NFL game including running back. As it says in the artical, we need to increase diversity in the hiring process. Right now every team has an Africanamerican running back. The rule should force each team to try out at least two white candidates for each available running back postition before signing anyone.
  14. Wickster
    14. Posted by Wickster Fri May 22, 2009 8:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ok, I know this will be unfavorable comment, but it is just mu thoughts only. In it's day the Rooney rules was great and I think it still has it's place to a degree. However, in todays day in age, I don't think thye Rooney rule is neccasry anymore. If someone can do the job they can do the job. I have talked with friends and I know people think we still need it, but that is the past. I am just being honest, but I think owners need to man up and start hiring for the right reason and not because of skin color. The Rooney rule was good for its time in the 80's and 90's, but I think we have moved on. Bottomline, can you do the job, and before anyone says it, I am not racist, my wife is Puerto Rican. Personnelly I am tired of watching the NFL network and hearing about these rules and the status of how many mintory coaches there are. If anything where are the Mexican coaches?
  15. NOTORIOUS B O B
    15. Posted by NOTORIOUS B O B Fri May 22, 2009 9:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yeah....each team should be required to have at least one white guy at running back, receiver, and defensive back. I agree ...if they are going to try to make it a more racially diverse sport...you're right....why stop at coach & GM. They should try to eliminate all potions that are dominated by one race.
  16. Jason S
    16. Posted by Jason S Fri May 22, 2009 9:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This rule is the very definition of ignorance. "We can stop racism, by reversing it." How stupid do you need to be to see that giving favoritism to any race/gender/etc (including white males through blue transsexuals) is wrong?
  17. NOTORIOUS B O B
    17. Posted by NOTORIOUS B O B Fri May 22, 2009 9:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You lost me a "blue transsexuals"
  18. Barry B
    18. Posted by Barry B Fri May 22, 2009 9:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It's not reverse discrimination, the Rooney Rule is about equal opportunity.
    So what, if African-Americans are 12% of the population and 30% of the NFL head coaches? What percentage of the NFL *players* are African-American? I can guarantee you that it's a lot higher than 30%, although I don't know exactly.
    It may be, though, that the RR has served its purpose, and can be dropped. Ozzie Newsome and Jerry Reese have proved themselves to be elite GM's (and I'm a Giants fan, I'll admit to a little bias here, but his drafts have been awesome so far). Any team that wants to win has to see that, has to know that they can't afford to overlook qualified non-white candidates. And any team that does discriminate is more likely to lose, and it serves them right.
    Women in NFL front offices? The problem with the argument is that the NFL fan base is predominantly male, and women who understand the NFL, and its fans, well enough to get the kind of jobs the OP is talking about are probably few and far between. If there's a woman out there who's qualified and wants it badly enough, though, I'd bet on her making it.
  19. alex
    19. Posted by alex Fri May 22, 2009 9:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What ever happened to the best man gets the job?
    Here's a stat for you written by a black sports reporter from KC ... in the NFL ... the teams with the most whites on the rooster are the winning teams. Hmmmmmmmmm ... it makes you wonder doesn't it but then again if you watch the news/sports reports and hear about a player breaking the law and in trouble .... 9 of 10 times that player is black.
  20. Kyle
    20. Posted by Kyle Fri May 22, 2009 10:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This is reverse racism, plain and simple.
  21. Tony Mack
    21. Posted by Tony Mack Fri May 22, 2009 10:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Whenever I hear someone use the phrase "reverse discrimination", isn't that just another way of dismissing and the original discrimination which led to the Rooney Rule in the first place???
  22. Chesapeake Ron
    22. Posted by Chesapeake Ron Fri May 22, 2009 10:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This is not reverse racism. It is racism, plain and simple.
    If you want to go all the way with this rule, then each team should also be required to have on their rosters players in the correct percentage of races in the population. Then I would support hiring people of all colors in the other jobs.
    We have now had a person of color as president of the US, Supreme Court Justice, Sec. of State, various Generals, CEO's, etc. This nonsense needs to end. Scrap the Racist Rooney Rule!
  23. KING
    23. Posted by KING Fri May 22, 2009 11:08 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I dont have a problem with Extending the Rooney rule but let's be serious for a second. It is reserve racism. Second when Tony Dungy was hired by the Colts way back when a white candidate was not interviewed. That is wrong. If you have to interview a minority you also have to interview a majority (if that is even what Caucasian are called I dont know?)
    Also at this point if we like is said in the article take it to all jobs then again whites and all minorities need to be interviewer for all positions. Also I hate to say this but the Rooney Rule is an African America Rule. NOT a Minority rules. Please anyone tell me how many people of Oriental decent or Spanish decent have been interviewed for these head coaching jobs.
    I am all for equality but make sure when Morris was hired as the new coach in Tampa Bay was a white candidate interview? Maybe I dont know I am just saying you need it all ways. Also was a person of other decent rather than just African America interviewed?
    Bottom line is we have Obama in the White House! THE WHITE HOUSE PEOPLE! If he can make it to the highest profile job in this country do we really need a Rooney rule anymore. Or Affirmative Action at all?
  24. sixteen_blackbirds
    24. Posted by sixteen_blackbirds Fri May 22, 2009 11:57 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Rooney Rule is a racist rule, but it's also something I'm not going to gripe about. If that's what the league wants and everyone in the league is fine with it, then it's not worth my time to argue. The owners are the ones who have to deal with it, I just watch the product.
  25. Errol
    25. Posted by Errol Sat May 23, 2009 12:29 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    the main oversight in judging the Rooney Rule is that owners have to interview - not hire - at least one non-white individual. if in doing this, owners are convinced that (one of) the non-white individual(s) is the best candidate, hey! the problem was that non-whites couldn't even get an interview even though they had the same qualifications **to be interviewed** as the white applicants. saying the Rooney Rule is racial discrimination is as incorrect as saying regardless of Wal-Mart's lower prices for the same products, your committed to never (ever) shopping there. all it says is open the interview process then decide from a more diverse pool of candidates. stay blessed.

Roy S. Johnson Blog

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Contributors

Related Photo Gallery

Yahoo! Sports Blog Recent Readers