Wickmayer says drug-test rules weren’t explained
BRUSSELS (AP)—Belgian tennis player Yanina Wickmayer says she was never properly informed of the online reporting requirements for drug-testing that led to her one-year ban from the sport.
At a tearful news conference Thursday, the 20-year-old U.S. Open semifinalist accused the World Anti-Doping Agency and Belgian sports authorities of treating her unfairly and ruining her career.
“The people who made the rules are not really conscious of what this means for my future,” Wickmayer said. “I am No. 16 in the world. They are taking my work of 10 years away. Just like that! Just because I didn’t fill in (my whereabouts).”
Wickmayer was suspended by a Belgian anti-doping tribunal last week for failing three times to report her whereabouts for drug testing. The ban was confirmed by the International Tennis Federation last Saturday.
“They should inform us better on how this system works,” she said. “I am being punished for something that was not in my hands, that I had no control over.”
Another Belgian player, 2002 Wimbledon semifinalist Xavier Malisse, was also banned for a year for the same offense.
Wickmayer said she has been regularly tested for drugs, and never tested positive.
Although Wickmayer had indicated she would appeal the suspension, she refused Thursday to say if and when she will appeal.
“I don’t know what the future is going to bring,” she said.
Wickmayer said a year away from the tour will break her career.
“It means that my ranking is going to drop completely,” she said. “It means I have to start all over again. The next year will not be a challenge for me because all can do is practice. I am just a girl of 20 trying to reach my goals. I am working hard every single day. I am really sad about the decision they made.”
Wickmayer said anti-doping officials corresponded with registered mail to her home in Belgium where she lives with her father, who is also her coach.
The two travel together several months of the year, meaning registered mail remains unopened. Wickmayer expressed surprise that no one phoned or e-mailed her when the mail went unanswered.
Under WADA’s “whereabouts” rule, elite athletes must make themselves available for out-of-competition testing for one hour a day, 365 days a year. They must give three months’ notice of where and when they will be available so they can be tested.
The data is kept on a Web site where it can be changed. If athletes miss three out-of-competition tests or fail three times to register where they will be for anti-doping tests, they risk sanctions.
As she circled the globe, Wickmayer—whose career earnings to date total less than $1 million—said she received no guidance from tennis or anti-doping authorities on how to file her whereabouts data.
“They should inform us better on how this system works,” she said.

116 Comments
1 - 25 of 116
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Let's use some common sense for a moment. NOBODY wants their own life to become a disaster. It has become abundantly clear to athletes and other celebrities around the world that they are now being held responsible for their actions and inactions. Ignorance is no longer being accepted as a mitigating circumstance because, all too often, the ignorance is a pretence to avoid the responsibility.
But I believe Yanina. I believe Richard Gasquet. And Nickolas Cage too, for that matter. I accept her explanation and believe that she - and possibly Xavier Malisse also - is a victim of over-zealous policing by the WADA, whose recent decisions have indicated a callous will to destroy rather than to educate or to nurture.
I compare now what may seem to be "apples & oranges", but it's really not . . . Yanina's very-believable innocence and Serena's shameful outburst . . . and I wonder how the WADA can justify a YEAR of suspension for Yanina unless the WTA renders equal punishment in Serena's case, which has done greater harm to the sport and the athlete in question in both the short and long run.
I'll say it again, the WADA reminds me of gestapo tactics. It is NOT acceptable to destroy a career over SUSPECTED illegal activity, particularly when the athlete has NEVER TESTED POSITIVE for drugs. If I was Yanina, I'd be FURIOUS.
Drugs, gambling, prostitution . . . they are among the most grotesque facts of life. Individuals either choose not to be associated with them, or they are protected from them, or they are unaware of their existence. If not, they indulge and are inevitably - INEVITABLY - exposed for doing so. Those who indulge risk their careers or reputations or both.
Kolya Davydenko was cleared of wrongdoing in a gambling scandal, and thank goodness. Today he continues to achieve greatness and entertain a legion of fans around the world. I hope for the same outcome with Yanina.
I live in Arizona. My favorite tennis players are NOT Americans. I root for the Celtics when they come to Phoenix to play the Suns! Simply put, I like who I like, whether it's the Olympics or any sport, and I like Yanina Wickmayer a lot, and I wish her the very best.
Report Abuse
I guess WADA doesn't use email, as it is not yet as legally binding as certified mail. Email, could have someone else log on and delete you inbox material. Signing for a certifed letter makes someone responsible.
The rules may be dopey, but most players follow them. That implies that most players accept them. They follow them because it is their business and livelihood. Excuses are cheap, admitting wrong takes character. Yanina lashes out at the program rather than getting with it! Even those divas of the game follow these rules! So it is the programs fault that Yanina messed up?
Report Abuse
This is one of the best assessments I have ever read here!!
You are correct across the board and have brought to light many things some (even most) may not understand about the "system".
Tennis IS a harsh business. Someone compared what she allegedly did to Andre's predicament.
Apples and oranges!!!!
Thank you for your extremely intelligent, insightful, articulate & compassionate post which has enlightened and done so with dignity and civility~
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
and i don't agree with that idea that because she was on the ITF for so long that she should. to reiterate what bitter queen was saying there are different rules for players higher ranked.....this whereabouts rule is only set in place for the top 50. and how long has she been in the top 50...only this season.
and to back up that fact,this is from the wada web site
Are all athletes subject to these whereabouts requirements?
No.
Whereabouts requirements are for the limited number of top-level athletes who are in the registered testing pool of either their IF or NADO. They were designed to give those top-level athletes a flexible tool to show their commitment to doping-free sport, as well as appropriate, sufficient and effective privacy protection.
WADA is not responsible for deciding who should be part of these registered testing pools. IFs are afforded discretion as to who should be subject to these provisions internationally, and NADOs are afforded discretion to create a registered testing pool at the national level. It is WADA’s recommendation that registered testing pools be of proportionate and manageable size and focus on top international and national elite athletes.
Report Abuse
Maybe it better to give one or two month ban if a player failed to inform their location. Then 6 month ban for the scond time and one year ban for the third time.
A one year ban meaning a player will had zero point at all when he/she start fresh again. Just because she/he failed to inform.
I believe wholeheartly Wickmayer got one year ban cause Agassi confession of taking meth in his auto biography.
The comission who face got slap by Agassi confession make Wickwayer as ultimate example. Next Richard Gasquet will also probably got a very hard punsihment next month.
This like when they punish the players who bet around 5 to 10 Euros a few years back with a heavy ban too.
This become more and more hilarious. The player did not had any privacy. If suddenly they lost or retire, they will subject to suspicion if they throw the match for betting purpose. And then WTA and ATP keep making crazy schedules that the top players had to withdraw of injuries.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Wickmayer won 5 ITF titles in 2006 so while she may just have burst on to the relevant-tv-tennis scene shes been playing under these governing bodies for some time now
in today's day & internet age where regular mail is suddenly unacceptable Wickmayer defends accusations of failing to reply to "whereabouts" b/c she could not log on to a relevant website OR contact the right ppl & wasnt at home...so she had internet/computer/phone & mail problems...give me a break...sounds like nothing more than crap excuses
You may not know exactly where you will be 3 months from...but in todays internet age its relatively easy to update ur status in case that random trip pops up...and this is why she had 3 notifications just in case she missed the first 2 b/c u know she was "out"..sadly she didnt even bother to update her status and the mail was being sent to her last known residence
until these rules DO change ppl need to stop defending her by simply criticizing the rules every tennis player plays under & most comply to
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I would think that a person that is clean would -
1) constantly talk about appealing
2) appeal the ruling right away so that they could play in the warmup to AO and the AO itself
3) after the 2nd missed reporting, make sure that someone in their entourage always report their whereabouts
4) go/call the agency and understand how to use the system
5) talk to other players to find out how they are all able to keep up with the system.
These are some things that Yanina could do or could have done to convince everyone out there that she is clean. At the same time if she does accept the ban, maybe WADA did their job and caught someone cheating. They did find Sesil Karanchetseva (sp?) cheating when she was 16. She sat out a year and now is back on the tour.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 116