Wickmayer says drug-test rules weren’t explained

  • Print

BRUSSELS (AP)—Belgian tennis player Yanina Wickmayer says she was never properly informed of the online reporting requirements for drug-testing that led to her one-year ban from the sport.

At a tearful news conference Thursday, the 20-year-old U.S. Open semifinalist accused the World Anti-Doping Agency and Belgian sports authorities of treating her unfairly and ruining her career.

“The people who made the rules are not really conscious of what this means for my future,” Wickmayer said. “I am No. 16 in the world. They are taking my work of 10 years away. Just like that! Just because I didn’t fill in (my whereabouts).”

Wickmayer was suspended by a Belgian anti-doping tribunal last week for failing three times to report her whereabouts for drug testing. The ban was confirmed by the International Tennis Federation last Saturday.

“They should inform us better on how this system works,” she said. “I am being punished for something that was not in my hands, that I had no control over.”

Another Belgian player, 2002 Wimbledon semifinalist Xavier Malisse, was also banned for a year for the same offense.

Wickmayer said she has been regularly tested for drugs, and never tested positive.

Although Wickmayer had indicated she would appeal the suspension, she refused Thursday to say if and when she will appeal.

“I don’t know what the future is going to bring,” she said.

Wickmayer said a year away from the tour will break her career.

“It means that my ranking is going to drop completely,” she said. “It means I have to start all over again. The next year will not be a challenge for me because all can do is practice. I am just a girl of 20 trying to reach my goals. I am working hard every single day. I am really sad about the decision they made.”

Wickmayer said anti-doping officials corresponded with registered mail to her home in Belgium where she lives with her father, who is also her coach.

The two travel together several months of the year, meaning registered mail remains unopened. Wickmayer expressed surprise that no one phoned or e-mailed her when the mail went unanswered.

Under WADA’s “whereabouts” rule, elite athletes must make themselves available for out-of-competition testing for one hour a day, 365 days a year. They must give three months’ notice of where and when they will be available so they can be tested.

The data is kept on a Web site where it can be changed. If athletes miss three out-of-competition tests or fail three times to register where they will be for anti-doping tests, they risk sanctions.

As she circled the globe, Wickmayer—whose career earnings to date total less than $1 million—said she received no guidance from tennis or anti-doping authorities on how to file her whereabouts data.

“They should inform us better on how this system works,” she said.

Updated Nov 12, 12:01 pm EST
digg del.icio.us
more

116 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. jane f
    116. Posted by jane f Sun Nov 15 10:01am EST

    Report Abuse

    tinkerbell, i would love to be living in your fantasy world. but in the real world people cheat, lie and steal. they make mistakes and have to own up to them. rules are to be followed or they have to be changed if they are wrong. feeling sorry for privileged people is OK for some. but the regular people who have to suck it up and follow the rules are the real people. traffic laws, tax laws are some of the things we here in the real world deal with. Yanina may not have tested positive, but she didn't follow the rules! breaking rules does have consequences. Harsh consequences are given to make the others think twice about breaking the rules. Gestapo tactics? I think not. Tink, I believe your post was well thought out, well written and truly what you believe. That is your thoughts and feelings. I will not stoop to the level some other posters do. They name call and so on. I try to respect the writers and readers of posts. The players are people too and its too bad they are expected to be more than that at times. To those which much is given, much is expected!
  2. Tinkerbell
    115. Posted by Tinkerbell Sun Nov 15 9:35am EST

    Report Abuse

    I love tennis. I've been watching it for decades. Recently it's been giving itself a black eye, and that makes me sad. I deplore a lot of the peripheral distractions that have ensued, and apparently many of you do as well. I've read some insightful and inspired analyses here, and unfortunately some that range from mindless to vulgar to cruel.
    Let's use some common sense for a moment. NOBODY wants their own life to become a disaster. It has become abundantly clear to athletes and other celebrities around the world that they are now being held responsible for their actions and inactions. Ignorance is no longer being accepted as a mitigating circumstance because, all too often, the ignorance is a pretence to avoid the responsibility.
    But I believe Yanina. I believe Richard Gasquet. And Nickolas Cage too, for that matter. I accept her explanation and believe that she - and possibly Xavier Malisse also - is a victim of over-zealous policing by the WADA, whose recent decisions have indicated a callous will to destroy rather than to educate or to nurture.
    I compare now what may seem to be "apples & oranges", but it's really not . . . Yanina's very-believable innocence and Serena's shameful outburst . . . and I wonder how the WADA can justify a YEAR of suspension for Yanina unless the WTA renders equal punishment in Serena's case, which has done greater harm to the sport and the athlete in question in both the short and long run.
    I'll say it again, the WADA reminds me of gestapo tactics. It is NOT acceptable to destroy a career over SUSPECTED illegal activity, particularly when the athlete has NEVER TESTED POSITIVE for drugs. If I was Yanina, I'd be FURIOUS.
    Drugs, gambling, prostitution . . . they are among the most grotesque facts of life. Individuals either choose not to be associated with them, or they are protected from them, or they are unaware of their existence. If not, they indulge and are inevitably - INEVITABLY - exposed for doing so. Those who indulge risk their careers or reputations or both.
    Kolya Davydenko was cleared of wrongdoing in a gambling scandal, and thank goodness. Today he continues to achieve greatness and entertain a legion of fans around the world. I hope for the same outcome with Yanina.
    I live in Arizona. My favorite tennis players are NOT Americans. I root for the Celtics when they come to Phoenix to play the Suns! Simply put, I like who I like, whether it's the Olympics or any sport, and I like Yanina Wickmayer a lot, and I wish her the very best.
  3. jane f
    114. Posted by jane f Sun Nov 15 9:05am EST

    Report Abuse

    It seems as though some poeple think that these emerging stars do not have to know the business they are getting in to. With regard to support team, a coach of some sort, some access to legal assistance, training partner et als. New players do not have the funds to hire lots of people. Some players have people who wear many hats and have multi-functional jobs. They have family members do these things. A players job is to play. A coach to coach and so on. Tennis is a business and if you have no business acument, you will wither and die. Steffi had Peter for a while. Andre had his brother, Michael Chang had family to help also. Poor Yanina, all she wanted to do was play and win. Why is she one of the only two players ever suspended for this? Of all the players, why only two who don't know where they will be in three months.
    I guess WADA doesn't use email, as it is not yet as legally binding as certified mail. Email, could have someone else log on and delete you inbox material. Signing for a certifed letter makes someone responsible.
    The rules may be dopey, but most players follow them. That implies that most players accept them. They follow them because it is their business and livelihood. Excuses are cheap, admitting wrong takes character. Yanina lashes out at the program rather than getting with it! Even those divas of the game follow these rules! So it is the programs fault that Yanina messed up?
  4. pete'sbest14
    113. Posted by pete'sbest14 Sun Nov 15 1:43am EST

    Report Abuse

    #91 *`*Kennedy*~*

    This is one of the best assessments I have ever read here!!
    You are correct across the board and have brought to light many things some (even most) may not understand about the "system".
    Tennis IS a harsh business. Someone compared what she allegedly did to Andre's predicament.
    Apples and oranges!!!!
    Thank you for your extremely intelligent, insightful, articulate & compassionate post which has enlightened and done so with dignity and civility~
  5. Truthsayer
    112. Posted by Truthsayer Sat Nov 14 11:25pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Dementieva fans:TTC will show Elena D train with her coach at 6:30 pm on Sunday.
  6. nrgnorm
    111. Posted by nrgnorm Sat Nov 14 10:42pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I feel so sorry for Yanina a great girl who worked so hard to get where she is at and can go much further. The present system at WADA and ITF is antiquated and not at all accurate, many players, depending upon rankings and representation, get out of the tests. Telling someone where you are 3 months in advance, each and every day, is preposterous. All about selling tickets and filling sponsors coffers.
  7. Truthsayer
    110. Posted by Truthsayer Sat Nov 14 10:25pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I agree, in part, with Wickmayer...........she should have been stopped the first time she missed and given a heavy duty scolding..............THEN pump up the volume on punishment...........what a mess for her, the WTA, WADA, and belgium!
  8. Bazmeister
    109. Posted by Bazmeister Sat Nov 14 7:06pm EST

    Report Abuse

    What a crack up! The ITF have a calendar of events, so they know where she is going to be and when. Then they send registered mail to her home! Why not just have one of their reps hand it to her at the event they know she's going to be at? If you want a job done properly, do it yourself!
  9. Scott J
    108. Posted by Scott J Sat Nov 14 1:14pm EST

    Report Abuse

    or a warning considering that she's never been in trouble with dope tests before.

    and i don't agree with that idea that because she was on the ITF for so long that she should. to reiterate what bitter queen was saying there are different rules for players higher ranked.....this whereabouts rule is only set in place for the top 50. and how long has she been in the top 50...only this season.

    and to back up that fact,this is from the wada web site

    Are all athletes subject to these whereabouts requirements?
    No.
    Whereabouts requirements are for the limited number of top-level athletes who are in the registered testing pool of either their IF or NADO. They were designed to give those top-level athletes a flexible tool to show their commitment to doping-free sport, as well as appropriate, sufficient and effective privacy protection.
    WADA is not responsible for deciding who should be part of these registered testing pools. IFs are afforded discretion as to who should be subject to these provisions internationally, and NADOs are afforded discretion to create a registered testing pool at the national level. It is WADA’s recommendation that registered testing pools be of proportionate and manageable size and focus on top international and national elite athletes.
  10. John
    107. Posted by John Sat Nov 14 6:14am EST

    Report Abuse

    I agree with the opinion that one year ban just too hard on player who forgot to update his/her where about. Its not like Wickmayer done the doping. Please. Even in court of law, you had to be charge of guilty of something before you got punished.

    Maybe it better to give one or two month ban if a player failed to inform their location. Then 6 month ban for the scond time and one year ban for the third time.

    A one year ban meaning a player will had zero point at all when he/she start fresh again. Just because she/he failed to inform.

    I believe wholeheartly Wickmayer got one year ban cause Agassi confession of taking meth in his auto biography.

    The comission who face got slap by Agassi confession make Wickwayer as ultimate example. Next Richard Gasquet will also probably got a very hard punsihment next month.

    This like when they punish the players who bet around 5 to 10 Euros a few years back with a heavy ban too.

    This become more and more hilarious. The player did not had any privacy. If suddenly they lost or retire, they will subject to suspicion if they throw the match for betting purpose. And then WTA and ATP keep making crazy schedules that the top players had to withdraw of injuries.
  11. NightWing
    106. Posted by NightWing Sat Nov 14 2:47am EST

    Report Abuse

    TOMMY Y WL/Post #103: BRILLIANT analysis!
  12. NightWing
    105. Posted by NightWing Sat Nov 14 2:46am EST

    Report Abuse

    This entire affair seems so surreal...why doesn't Wickmayer just verify her whereabouts so that EVERYONE can move past this?
  13. Robbie
    104. Posted by Robbie Sat Nov 14 1:40am EST

    Report Abuse

    I agree with keeping drugs out of the sport and doing drug testing but I feel the best thing to do is test them 1 or 2 hours before playing or right afterwards. They are grown adults and should not have to report to someone everyweek, I would not want someone calling me in on my day off. Now I realize that the players signed the rule, but this rule needs to be changed, just as some of the schedules need to be changed so we can see the better players able to play better.
  14. Jess
    103. Posted by Jess Fri Nov 13 11:23pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I don't want to take sides here, but the problem is about information. Tests are necessary but, in fairness to everybody including us the viewing public, the concerned doping agencies should send a copy of their registered letter on whereabouts of the athlete in question to the Director of Tournaments she is participating (The athlete in question should, of course, inform the said agencies of these tounaments).
  15. TOMMY Y WL
    102. Posted by TOMMY Y WL Fri Nov 13 8:11pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I don't like this rule. It puts the players as "suspects" throughout their career. This is really intrusive and violates a player's piracy. I also wonder why there was no penalty when Wickmayer failed to reply her whereabouts the first time. The system should give a suspension for a short period of time, say 2 months or so, if a player violates the rule the first time. Then, if the player fail to comply this rule again, a longer suspension will be applied and so on.
  16. Tri N
    101. Posted by Tri N Fri Nov 13 7:56pm EST

    Report Abuse

    The ITF sponsor some Future tour and the total purse very small like 10,25,50,or 75 K . The winner can get a check from $2000 to $10,000 . Just enough to pay for lodging , food , ect . Until you have some points then get qualify to compete in Tier 1 or 2 . It is not easy life .
  17. Sampras
    100. Posted by Sampras Fri Nov 13 7:48pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Ignorance of the law excuses no one!
  18. Polo
    99. Posted by Polo Fri Nov 13 7:40pm EST

    Report Abuse

    She should consult on Agassi on what to tell the doping agency. Agassi just lied and they let him off the hook. Why couldn't she or any other tennis player?
  19. SherrickW
    98. Posted by SherrickW Fri Nov 13 5:04pm EST

    Report Abuse

    While I think a year is too long; something seems off. Her first story was that she couldn't log into the database because she didn't know her password but now she doesn't know the rules at all? They don't just throw a website to you and tell you to create a username and password and you are on your own. She KNEW she had to log into the database but now she doesn't know the rules; which includes logging into the database to report your whereabouts. While I think a year is completely unfair, I just don't buy that she doesn't know the rules.
  20. Nightman Cometh
    97. Posted by Nightman Cometh Fri Nov 13 3:58pm EST

    Report Abuse

    to #91-
    Wickmayer won 5 ITF titles in 2006 so while she may just have burst on to the relevant-tv-tennis scene shes been playing under these governing bodies for some time now



    in today's day & internet age where regular mail is suddenly unacceptable Wickmayer defends accusations of failing to reply to "whereabouts" b/c she could not log on to a relevant website OR contact the right ppl & wasnt at home...so she had internet/computer/phone & mail problems...give me a break...sounds like nothing more than crap excuses

    You may not know exactly where you will be 3 months from...but in todays internet age its relatively easy to update ur status in case that random trip pops up...and this is why she had 3 notifications just in case she missed the first 2 b/c u know she was "out"..sadly she didnt even bother to update her status and the mail was being sent to her last known residence

    until these rules DO change ppl need to stop defending her by simply criticizing the rules every tennis player plays under & most comply to
  21. Mopbrothers
    96. Posted by Mopbrothers Fri Nov 13 3:11pm EST

    Report Abuse

    The WDAA needs investigating. I hope she appeals. The punishment is DRACONIAN. Also, there is a bit of bias against her by Yahoo, writing "Wickmayer Blames".
  22. noxishigh
    95. Posted by noxishigh Fri Nov 13 2:23pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Post #71 knucklehead, you apparently did not understand the post, but anyway, you probably don't understand any of them.
  23. goFed
    94. Posted by goFed Fri Nov 13 2:21pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Why is she not adamant about appealing? Is she guilty of doping and trying to figure out her options? Did she think she was bigger than the sport and can get away with anything?

    I would think that a person that is clean would -
    1) constantly talk about appealing
    2) appeal the ruling right away so that they could play in the warmup to AO and the AO itself
    3) after the 2nd missed reporting, make sure that someone in their entourage always report their whereabouts
    4) go/call the agency and understand how to use the system
    5) talk to other players to find out how they are all able to keep up with the system.

    These are some things that Yanina could do or could have done to convince everyone out there that she is clean. At the same time if she does accept the ban, maybe WADA did their job and caught someone cheating. They did find Sesil Karanchetseva (sp?) cheating when she was 16. She sat out a year and now is back on the tour.
  24. Bitter queen
    93. Posted by Bitter queen Fri Nov 13 12:35pm EST

    Report Abuse

    It's stupid because the "reporting whereabouts" rule only applies to the top 50 players? I think Wickmayer only broke into top 50 this year. Naturally she won't fully understand how the system works. It almost feel like its unfair against the top players. You're sort of being penalised for being the top 50 in the world.
  25. Tri N
    92. Posted by Tri N Fri Nov 13 12:08pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Post #91 "-- Kennedy -- " . Thank you very much for your post , that 's exactly what I want to say . You are perfectly correct . Thanks again , Good day .
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account