Federer in form, wins Cincy Masters title

  • Print

MASON, Ohio (AP)—Changing diapers doesn’t seem to bother Papa Federer’s game.

With a dominant first set on Sunday, Roger Federer showed that he’s in top-of-the-world form after his time off to become a father. A 6-1, 7-5 victory over Novak Djokovic brought him the Cincinnati Masters title, his first championship since his twin girls were born last month.

“That’s the special part, especially winning for the first time as a dad,” Federer said. “It gets me going emotionally a little bit, because I know it’s been a wonderful summer.”

His stellar season can get even better beginning next week at the U.S. Open. The Swiss star has won the last five titles there, and his performance on Sunday suggested he’s fully capable of another. Djokovic hadn’t lost a set all week, but was never in the title match.

“The closest I was going to get to the first-place trophy is now,” the world’s fourth-ranked player said, standing 5 feet away from the crystal bowl that goes to the winner of the $3 million Western & Southern Financial Group Masters.

Federer’s glass-enclosed trophy case in Switzerland has gotten a lot of precious additions lately. The 28-year-old star won his first French Open championship, then outlasted Andy Roddick in an epic five-set Wimbledon match that brought him a record 15th Grand Slam title.

He shuttled between hospital and practice court for three weeks after his wife, Mirka, gave birth to twins in July. His goal in Cincinnati was to work off the rust and get ready for the Open.

What rust?

“I felt like my game was already pretty well in place in practice, so knew coming over here it was not just to show up,” he said. “That it paid off so quickly, I’m a little bit surprised, you know?”

He took control right away, breaking Djokovic’s serve in a second game that lasted 13 minutes and 22 points overall. The 22-year-old Serb kept up better in the second set, but knew he was headed for his fourth runner-up finish in a Masters tournament this year.

Djokovic is looking forward to the U.S. Open, where he had one of his worst moments last year. He got into a verbal squabble with crowd-favorite Andy Roddick, who made a flippant remark about the Serb’s numerous injuries during the tournament.

When Djokovic took exception to the remarks after a match at Arthur Ashe Stadium, the crowd booed. Djokovic later apologized.

“It was unfortunate for me that it happened in one of the four biggest events in the world, and it happened in the city and tournament where I’ve always felt great, felt at home,” he said Sunday. “But, you know, it’s the past. I forgot about it. I really look forward to playing there, and hopefully the fans will accept me in a good way.”

Federer knows what kind of reception he’ll get, from street corners to center court. They love him in NY.

Last year, he was struggling when he showed up in Cincinnati and took an early loss, which opened the way for Rafael Nadal to end his four-year run as the world’s No. 1-ranked player. A disappointing showing at the Olympics in China made Federer feel worse. Some commentators suggested he’d lost his ability to dominate the big moments.

He landed in New York and everything changed.

“I was lucky enough that when I got to New York, the fans were really there trying to push me back to No. 1 right away,” he said. “They were great, you know. All the cab drivers and everybody was stopping to wish me luck. It was something that I’ve never really experienced before in New York. I think that really helped turn it around for me.”

Feeding off the energy, he beat Djokovic in the semifinals and Andy Murray for the title. When Nadal had to take two months off after the French Open to let his sore knees heal, Federer took advantage of the opening and moved back to No. 1.

Federer will be trying to win a sixth straight U.S. Open title, something no one has accomplished since Bill Tilden did it from 1920-25.

“The fans for me really turned it around, and that’s why this year I’m so excited going back there,” Federer said. “I’ve had even better results, so I hope I can again show them what I can do on a tennis court.”

Updated Aug 23, 5:09 pm EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

427 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Tri N
    427. Posted by Tri N Sat Aug 29 9:06am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Every body can see that Nadal gave a lot of trouble to Federer on slower surface , but on FAST hard court like USO there is difference . Federer like the pace so he can use his one handle back hand slide deep and low . On slower surface like clay , he have to created his own pace so his shot often hit the net or short then he will be in trouble . You can not pick the absolute winner , just pick the one have a greater or greatest chance . Hope everyone will be at their best so we'll have the great USO to watch .
  2. Vijay
    426. Posted by Vijay Tue Aug 25 10:25pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #424: Great post! Loved your comment about Fed kicking Nadal's most preferred part of his anatomy!!! Would be great if they are drawn in the same half. Federer, in the form he is in, would just thrash Nadal if they are to meet in the semis. But that is if Nadal even reaches there. He'd be dreading running into 'his big daddy' Soderling who gave him a hiding in Paris!! Would be nice to see a Federer / Roddick or a Federer / Murray final. Either way ... I can't see anyone stopping the 'Fedster' from his 16th major!!!
  3. proudyankee
    425. Posted by proudyankee Tue Aug 25 9:21pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #399 Michael C ------ Seek professional help !!!! Crack is killing you......Stop smoking that @#$% !!!!

    Nadal gives Federer trouble????? Didn't see that over the 15 GS, 16 Masters Series and countless other tournament wins !!!!!!
  4. Seashore girl
    424. Posted by Seashore girl Tue Aug 25 9:21pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    My heart once belonged to Andre Agassi, who with style and class was a sheer joy to watch. Since his stepping down, my heart has flown over to the Fedster. And I CAN'T WAIT to see him kick Nadal's ass.
    (so maybe Nadal can finally stop picking his ass - disgusting) , Love Andy Roddick and was a sad, heart-wrenching thing for him to lose to Federer the way he did, but it's GO TIME for Roger in the Open.
    GO ROGER GO....................................................................................................................................................................
  5. Lind
    423. Posted by Lind Tue Aug 25 9:01pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What up ladies and gents????, is everyone ready for Fed to take the US Open title again. Queens in the hizzeeeee. Roger is the best ever. Go fed. Rock the swiss flags in NYC. Dont worry Nadal will play well but he wont win. I like Nadal but Roger Federer is the best ever!!!!
  6. <i>mrmatte</i>
    422. Posted by mrmatte Tue Aug 25 7:57pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Thanks Vijay for the input on that Madrid Masters match where Fed beat Nadal in straight sets on clay in Spain. I think you are completely correct regarding Nadal's situation. I've been thinking the same thing, mainly that Nadal's ego was bruised. I mean if it wasn't deeply bruised by Fed there and then in front of those 12.500 spanish fans cheering wildly for Rafa, it definitely was shattered by Soderling in Paris. The weird thing to me, was that Nadal never played as though he was injured - not against Soderling, nor against any other. In fact, when asked immediately after his loss to Soderling, Nadal INSISTED that he felt fine, was NOT injured, was NOT sick, was NOT tired. And remember how fast he left the courts and how he snapped at the on court interviewer when he walked off center court? He insisted that the ONLY reason that he lost to Soderling was because he himself played so poorly, but in fact, Rafa could not have played any better; Soderling was too good (indeed, no one could have beaten Soderling that day IMO). Then a few days after that, they start spreading the news that he has an injury after all. This was even after his Uncle complained and stated that the reason he lost to Soderling was because of the FO fans not rooting for Rafa enough! Completely silly BS, i think, especially in light of him getting beat by Fed in front of 12,500 spanish fans in Madrid who did nothing but root for him. Doesn't that seem strange? Tell me there's nothing strange about all that, please. I will listen.
  7. Vijay
    421. Posted by Vijay Tue Aug 25 4:10pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    419 & 420: Valid observations indeed! I did watch that Madrid Masters final you are talking about. Roger beat Del Potro in straight sets in the semis and took out Rafa 6-4; 6-4 in the final snapping Nadal's 33 match winning streak on clay! That was an awesome to beat Rafa in straight sets, on clay, and in front of 12500 screaming Spaniards rooting for Nadal!! Fed played a tactical game, used a lot of drop shots - couple of which bounced twice before Nadal even got there. Federer served well too and didn't give Nadal much of a look to try to break him. Roger seemed more relaxed than when he normally plays Rafa and that helped because he calmly converted the break point in each set to win comfortably. That was a huge win in many ways. For Roger it was a big confidence boost ahead of the French to win his first Masters title of the year beating Rafa at home on clay. And conversely for Nadal too as he took some serious damage from that defeat. His fans will not admit it, but Nadal is not the same player since losing to Federer in Madrid! I don't think he has strung together 4 matches in a row since then. He can cite injury and other reasons, but the fact remains that his confidence has been seriously dented by that loss to Roger Federer who has now won his last meetings against Nadal, Murray, Djokovic, Del Potro & Roddick. Fed is the best ever!!!
  8. <i>mrmatte</i>
    420. Posted by mrmatte Tue Aug 25 3:35pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i mean, k tennis, not jeezee. sorry
  9. <i>mrmatte</i>
    419. Posted by mrmatte Tue Aug 25 3:33pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i agree that last year and at this years AO, Fed's topspin backhand was useless against Nadal. And primarily because it bounced way to shallow in Nadal's court, and just sat up there way inside the baseline which allowed Nadal to just totally tee off on them. I, and others (JMac, from his comments), never understood why Fed always insisted on playing Nadal that way...it was as if Fed wanted to try and beat Nadal in a topspin contest, or that he wanted to somehow "out" or "over" power nadal with topspin, like nadal does to his opponents. didn't make sense. I wish i could have see the Madrid Masters final, a week prior to FO 09, where Fed defeated Nadal in straight sets. Did anyone watch that? What was Fed's game plan like...was he continuing the same thing in this regard, or did he switch to hitting much more backhand slices? I agree w/ jeezee in that Fed's bh slice would be a better choice... kind of interesting, though, huh?
  10. <i>mrmatte</i>
    418. Posted by mrmatte Tue Aug 25 3:22pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    the problem that Fed and all others who have lost to Nadal on a reg basis, is that they don't keep their balls, or shots, deep enough (close enough to the baseline). When they do hit the balls deep enough, then Nadal has problems...look at what Soderling did to him by doing this...and nadal could not have played any better than he did against Soderling @FO. Nadal needs the incoming shots to be a couple of feet inside his baseline to torque them the way he does and make them be effective on his opponents by landing deep in their courts. The way that Soderling played him, Nadal, when he was able to gets his shots back, was not able to place them as deeply as he would have had his opponent not placed their shots so deep to nadal...basically, when they allow nadal to stand on or slightly inside his own court's baseline, Ndal will win the points. If they force nadal to stand at least a few feet behind his own baseline, then it's much easier for the opponent to win. it's funny, because Drysdale, during the entire FO, kept mentioning this fact; and then low and behold, Soderling did it perfectly.
  11. K..... Tennis
    417. Posted by K..... Tennis Tue Aug 25 1:16pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #399 You said Federer can't beat Nadal based on a victory over Federer from Nadal.... Wow. Than you probably mean that a if someone beat Nadal once, than he's the greatest ever, huh? You must be joking that Nadal can own Federer, Nadal only uses power, that's why he has so many injuries, whereas Fed uses varieties of shots. But, I agree with you that Federer 's backhand slice is the only way to play against Nadal's high-top spin unless he knows how to hit a powerful backhand against Nadal's forehand.
  12. <i>jeezee10</i>
    416. Posted by jeezee10 Tue Aug 25 1:02pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I would like Andy Roddick to win the US Open. But the way Federer The Great dismantled the game of Andy Murray and Djokovic, I'll bet my money on him winning again. He beat Murray who has a better win-loss score in their matches. It tells a lot of what kind of player Fed is. He studies his opponents' games and look for their weaknesses and exploit those.
    It's sad to say he knows Andy Roddick's game; he reads his serves. I hope to see Roddick and Fed play a game again like the memorable Wimbledon Finals. But knowing Fed, it's just a hope.
    And I don't like the current infatuation of Roddick in slices in his current games. In the fast and hard surface like that of the US Open, he should go Boom, Boom, Booommm! A slow return invites disaster!
  13. <i>jeezee10</i>
    415. Posted by jeezee10 Tue Aug 25 12:58pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I would like Andy Roddick to win the US Open. But the way Federer The Great dismantled the game of Andy Murray and Djokovic, I'll bet my money on him winning again. He beat Murray who has a better win-loss score in their matches. It tells a lot of what kind of player Fed is. He studies his opponents' games and look for their weaknesses and exploit those.
    It's sad to say he knows Andy Roddick's game; he reads his serves. I hope to see Roddick and Fed play a game again like the memorable Wimbledon Finals. But knowing Fed, it's just a hope.
    And I don't like the current infatuation of Roddick in slices in his current games. In the fast and hard surface like that of the US Open, he should go Boom, Boom, Booommm!
  14. <i>mrmatte</i>
    414. Posted by mrmatte Tue Aug 25 12:57pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i guess you are a lot different than me, George Z...cuz I can't predict Roddick to win anything anymore with any accuracy. I'd like to see him win another slam...it's been since 2003? Six years? He's definitely capable, but....man, so are so many others. He should definitely have the crowd's support, as usual, though. Power to him
  15. George Z
    413. Posted by George Z Tue Aug 25 10:22am EDT

    Report Abuse

    nice federer, but roddick gonna win the us open
  16. Cristi
    412. Posted by Cristi Tue Aug 25 7:11am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Fèdărăr in form, uinz Sinsi Mèstărz taitâl
  17. tony w
    411. Posted by tony w Tue Aug 25 3:10am EDT

    Report Abuse

    gj Fed yet another win lol, the best player ever strikes again
  18. <i>eryk83</i>
    410. Posted by eryk83 Tue Aug 25 1:49am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I get so tired of the Nadal/Federer thing. Let their records speak for themselves and do the frickin math.
  19. Julloo B
    409. Posted by Julloo B Tue Aug 25 12:49am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Fed maynot be able to learn the counter strategy for the top spin kicking high on his backhand by USO SF time (if John Mac got it right)... The best option for him in that case would be to retire from the match citing mono.

    Come on, Fed is winning his 6th consecutive USO this year 2009 (only one other guy by name Bill Tilden has done it before). Let's see who can stop Fed, the best or the greatest among the GOATs of all time.
  20. frank
    408. Posted by frank Tue Aug 25 12:41am EDT

    Report Abuse

    To Michael, #399. You may be right about Rafa's heavy topspin and Roger's one-handed backhand but Roger has a lot more repertoire in his arsenal than Rafa. Rafa is pure brute force and his physcical ability is really exceptional which explains his winning record against Roger. The last time they played it was Roger coming up with the win played in Rafa's favorite surface, via straight sets. Come on! Rafa has to do his part by reaching the semis or finals and we will see it from there.
  21. Julloo B
    407. Posted by Julloo B Tue Aug 25 12:19am EDT

    Report Abuse

    #399, MichaelC, Federer has been looking for a coach on how to play the vicious top spin from Nadal and he truely cried thinking about that in the AO finals 2009.

    Tony Roche was not good enough. You go Michael, teach poor Fed how to play some lefty top spin on the backhand...Guy can only slice with some accuracy. Not good:-( He could win only 15 GS with the current technique and with that limited ability and very few (I think somewhere around 16) ATP singles titles which is far less than Agassi could win in his career (17, see 16
  22. topseedno1
    406. Posted by topseedno1 Mon Aug 24 11:11pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    To petebest14: Hello and how are you? Have you been reading my posts ? I am enjoying very much responding to the many who are still talking about Roger's crying at the AO 2009. Some of them have selective memory- only talking about his crying, when he lost- and never mention that he cries too -when he won his first Championship matches- Or maybe they did not see those matches?Agassi cried too, at his last match at the US Open when he lost to Benjamin Becker.... did you remember that? And to me Agassi showed he too is a human being. Looking forward to watching the tennis matches at the US Open 2009. My nephew's family from North Carolina are driving to New York to see some tennis matches. Ho I wished I could meet them there- but I can't because of my job. Can't get away. On the days that I'll be working, probably I'll watch the games on replay- but that's o.k. Take care and have a good night!
  23. First NamePester
    405. Posted by First NamePester Mon Aug 24 10:36pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I agree with you Joed7 number 402. I absolutely agree with you that Noone beats the Fed when he is in form. Obviously Nadal can play too but he is not going as far as the Fed has gone because of the way or his pattern of playing tennis. Most of the players on tour who copied the way Nadal plays, sometimes they do well and sometimes they are beaten as early in the tournament but those who copied the Federer's way of play, they are still around and a threat to so many including Federer sometimes. So there you are. You know Federer knows when to change gear if the opponent is playing the same as him but Nadal does not know when to change his tactics when the opponent is playing his tactics that is why he is being beaten with players like Verdasco, Soderling, Djockovic, Murray Del Patro and others. Dont get me wrong I know Nadal plays very good Tennis but it is the way he plays that gets him into trouble sometimes and it makes him more tired and maybe does not get any further. Look how the Feds plays very smart and steady, he can go to 20 or more Grand Slams and I am loving it when the Fed is winning. You know Last year in 2008 here in Australia I cried with him when he cried after losing to Nadal when he alsmost had a chance to win and lost it after a very long game. I felt for him and that year I was not interested in Tennis because Federer was not winning. I can tell you Roger is my favourite player on the tour and good luck with the twins. wish you can win more more grandslams..............................
  24. topseedno1
    404. Posted by topseedno1 Mon Aug 24 10:11pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Post 398 Posted by Jim: Yes, Roger cried at the AO after he lost to Rafa; but may I remind you, he cried, when he won his first Wimbledon Championship; he cried when he won his first USO championship; so he cries when he lost a match and cries when he wins a match--- you call that emotions and also he is just proving that he is human being and appreciates his winnings as well as when he is loosing. He cried when he beat Pete Sampras in Wimbledon . So Roger is proving to everybody that he is human being who cries when he is happy and cries when he is frustrated- very healthy process!!! " Roger chokes when he steps at the same court with Rafa"? Wow..... he did not choke at the 2008 Wimbledon Champioship- he fought well and good that's why it is a very classic game- because either could have won and lucky Nadal he did. So please, get your facts straight before posting comments . Have a good night!
  25. Vijay
    403. Posted by Vijay Mon Aug 24 7:01pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    # 402 - joed7: Good response! Rafa took full advantage of a dip in Federer's health (mono) in 2008 and also the fact that Fed was chasing all those records amid all the pressure that comes with being #1 for
    4 1/2 years. Credit to him for that! Agreed his game exploits Roger's (absolutely elegant) single handed backhand, but that alone is not going to be enough. Roger has the superior all court game and when on song he can run around that backhand and pummel winners like he did in the semis & finals at Cincy last weekend! The fact is: Rafa can take down an unfit or 'under pressure' Federer. Federer in full form, as he is now, will shred Nadal to bits. I like Jim's (#398) style of setting the bar so low for his 'great hero Nadal'!!! Wonder what's left after the last grand slam of the year unless you are talking about some inconsequential tournament somewhere where Nadal 'will kick some serious butt for the rest of the year'. We first hope he stops picking his butt - absolutely disgusting!!
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account