Andre Agassi says Federer-Nadal era is ending
HONG KONG (AP)—Andre Agassi says Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal’s domination of the men’s game is coming to an end, tipping Scotsman Andy Murray as the most likely successor.
“Now we have possibly the changing of the guard. You have those top two who are now losing ground to the likes of (Novak) Djokovic and Murray and (Juan Martin) del Potro,” Agassi told reporters in Hong Kong by phone from Las Vegas.
Nadal has struggled with injuries since his stunning exit in the fourth round of the French Open. Federer won the French and Wimbledon, breaking Pete Sampras’ record of 14 Grand Slams, but was beaten in the U.S. Open final by 21-year-old Argentine del Potro. It was the first Grand Slam won by a player other than Federer or Nadal since Djokovic won the 2008 Australian Open.
Agassi, who preceded Federer in winning all four grand slam tournaments over his career, believes the Swiss “still has the chance to do some more special things,” but the 28-year-old’s chances are diminishing with age.
Agassi, who was promoting his upcoming exhibition match against Sampras in the Chinese gambling enclave Macau on Oct. 25, worried that Nadal’s injuries may be chronic.
“If you’re struggling with your knee, it tends to be recurring and not to be easy to do, so I got to believe he’ll struggle with it probably for his career,” Agassi said.
Agassi said the 22-year-old Murray is the man most likely to be the dominant figure over the next few years. The world No. 3 is still seeking his first Grand Slam title.
“From a talent standpoint, Murray is a person who should win multiple Slams,” Agassi said.
“When I look at his game compared to the other players, he has what it takes to win and to win against anybody on any surface.”

269 Comments
1 - 25 of 269
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
What a wonderful post!!!! Thank you for such beautifully written assessment with yet another point of view about this "era" decline issue. And I agree with you, no one knows, nor has that crystal ball Tinkerbell had in the "shop" for repairs..and we'd certainly not have nearly as much fun anymore~ without all the suspense! Anticipation is half of the fun :-) You are right whenever it "does" happen it will have been something special we all were privy to and I, for one, hope it isn't over~yet!
I do hope you are right about some "surprises" along the way, new names and faces carving out their "own" piece of history in this sport we love so very much~
Please continue posting as I'm sure there are many of us who will enjoy your comments as they were intelligent, insightful and refreshing~spot on :-)
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Again, thank you to both of you, my computer buddies!!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Federer is a different story. His game and style is such that I think he EASILY has 3-4 good more years in him where he will clearly dominate. Murray is the next up and comer as #2, but people really need to recognize his style is very similar to Nadal's and it's been obvious in matches that when Murray overextends, he's pretty much useless. His reserves are...zero.
Report Abuse
Your "creative" assessment of Andre's opinion was just the funniest I've ever seen and spot on to be sure :-)
Thank you for your gift of wit! Please continue to enlighten and enrich us with your charm and very obvious love of the sport~
Report Abuse
topseed, this is the absolute BEST assessment I've read about this issue~and absolutely I totally agree with johnp!!!
Your clarity, intelligence, insight and gentility in approach to a "delicate" issue was perfect and well balanced~
Thank you so much for sharing your views which are mine as well.
And yes, if the fans of tennis are blessed to have several more years, or simply a few more matches with these true Titans of the sport, we will have witnessed something few of any era have seen~something indeed special!!
I feel fortunate I was a part of this spectacular "part" of tennis history, whether that is written tomorrow, or hopefully, many years from now~Sterling post topseed :-)
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
In addition, I agree with you to some extent that A.A.'s opinions are way premature and obvious, but do think that Nadal's particular injury is the worst he could have [and it's chronic!] considering his style of play. It's really a loss for tennis because whenever he lost- it was an event! When he was playing well [which seemed like all the time] he seemed utterly unstoppable. Now when he loses the knee will be blamed. And if my fave Federer ever beats him a couple of times to balance out their head to head, it'll be the knee that failed.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
The other day, as I was stirring entrails in the dust, and my crystal ball was in the shop being polished, the Egyptian god Osiris appeared to me in the wrinkles of an old nectarine I was about to throw away. Osiris claimed to know that Andre Agassi was unable to predict (with any degree of certainty) whether the Sun would rise in the East the following morning, much less if Roger and Raphael were in their professional decline.
Since Rafa is only 23, and Roger appeared in . . . was it all 4 major Finals?!?! . . . it certainly does sound to ME like A.A. is regurgitating opinions unworthy of merit.
Why don't we all just wait and see, enjoy the oppportunities we receive, and stop lending credence to
anyone with an opinion?
I'd offer more, but I need to go outside and pick four-leaf clovers.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I love tennis because "on any given day anything can happen!"..and now more than ever I think this is true. I think 2010 may be shaping up to be a fantastic year for tennis lovers..perhaps seeing some break-through stars emerge, also some who have retired making a HUGE impact and shaking up the status quo!! Wouldn't that be FUN? Fun is why I love and watch this sport, pure unadulterated fun :-)
As much as I love Roger and Rafa's rivalry, and I DO, the fact is each will leave the profession leaving his footprint and others will come in and we'll love them too. We'll always have our favorites..those whom inspired and thrilled us and made us keep coming back for more~year after glorious year~
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
not buying this opinion at all.
Nadal is too hard on the body when he plays and I believe he will continue to suffer set backs until his health is back at 100%. I think he came back to soon and did not take enough time off to heal from the last injury
As far as Murray, well I do not agree with Agassi at all. I think he is a good player but I don't think he
will ever have Federer's talent
When the era does end I think it will be virtually an unknown who will take their place
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 269