Busted Racquet - Tennis

The Japanese lineswoman who earned the wrath of Serena Williams at the U.S. Open semifinals will not be part of the officiating team for the Sony Ericsson WTA Tour Championship in Doha later this month. This spares a possible reunion with Williams, who will be playing in the tournament.

A British newspaper reports that the woman, whose name still hasn't been publicly revealed, would have been considered for the prestigious assignment but declined for an unknown reason.

The amateur official became a worldwide figure last month after calling a foot fault that eventually led to Williams' infamous breakdown. But the high marks she earned earlier in the summer would have qualified her to work at the prestigious tour championships, which reward officials based on merit. Some speculate that she declined the invite because she was instructed not to travel to Qatar (by whom, the rumors don't say). The WTA has said the woman declined for family reasons.

Clearly the lineswoman is held in great esteem by colleagues if she was assigned a semifinal match at the U.S. Open and earned an invite to officiate at the eight-play season finale. But let's not forget her terrible decision to call a foot fault violation on Serena in her semifinal match against Kim Clijsters is what started this whole thing. Yes, she didn't deserve to be humiliated and we feel bad for her and family because of this, but she did deserve infamy for making such a match-changing call. (Look at the reaction to similar blown calls made in baseball last week.)

Serena's outburst was so bad that it overshadowed the awfulness of the call that caused it. If Serena had briefly argued before resuming play, the story would have been about the horrible foot fault called by the lineswoman, not the resulting tirade. Serena was set to be the sympathetic figure cast against the villainous lineswoman, but the roles were reversed the instant she dropped that first f-bomb.

digg delicious
more

135 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Hitman
    1. Posted by Hitman Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:13 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Chris Chase- you are such a worm. An official who makes the correct call at a crucial point of a tennis match is not the one at fault here. The real fault is the fact that there was any need for the call at all. No one has stated the underlying cause, which is, the player serving having their foot too close to the line prior to the serve. Standing two or three inches further behind the line prior to the serve is not going to affect the actual serve. Also, I applaude this official for having the guts to make the call- no matter what the timing of the match. A real champion would have had no problem with accepting the foul- rules are not made to be broken. And you, Chris Chase, apparently "think?" that stirring the pot with your twisted version is good journalism. You,sir, are just a hack.
  2. Will
    2. Posted by Will Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:53 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Not a bad call Chris -- sorry.
    Hitman is spot on with his comments.
    Do you play tennis ? ...ever have ? ...know the rules ?????
  3. Charles
    3. Posted by Charles Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:19 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The real question is why Serena Williams is still allowed to play? Why wasn't she banned for the rest of the season and perhaps next one? What about the threats? Why are these not being investigated? Earlier Serena and her sister lied under oath in a court of law that their father is not their coach; IRS records showed otherwise. Once again, no investigation. Time to start trteating the Williams sisters for grown ups who are not above the law and/or rules and not be so afraid to apply them because God forbid the trigger words will come out: We are racists! Weare not Pavlov dogs, so lets act like it.
  4. adolph12
    4. Posted by adolph12 Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why hasn't Serena been suspended. The WTA is gutless.
  5. Ashok
    5. Posted by Ashok Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:28 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    chris, you are an absolute moron.....it was the CORRECT call.....it DOES NOT MATTER at what point in the match it was made.........go get a real job....
  6. Chris C
    6. Posted by Chris C Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Note to self: So you're saying we should respect the opinions of a guy with the handle "Hitman" rather than John McEnroe, Bud Collins and Mary Carillo, all of whom said the call should never have been made? Will do.
    Whether it was a foot fault is irrelevant. Such a call has no business being made at 15-30 before a possible match point. That's what it was an abysmal call.
  7. OneWiseWoman
    7. Posted by OneWiseWoman Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:52 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I too think Serena ought to have been more severely punished for her obnoxious behaviour. Of course, her penalty should've been determined after reviewing prior outbursts of "legends" such as McEnroe, Connors etc. However, I do have a question for dr_edberg, though: If you are such a proud racist, why are you worrying your already overburdened head with this particular case? After all, the victim of Serena's wrath was a Japanese (I don't know your "trigger word" for this particular race!) woman. You should reserve your venom for the day Serena lashes out at a white person!
  8. Gail
    8. Posted by Gail Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why should Serena be suspended? While I agree Serena's reaction to the call was inappropriate and deserved the fine why suspend her when the WTA has never suspended anyone for behavior before. I believe the WTA rules are guidelines and list the options up to and including suspension but they have yet to enforce. The same goes for the ATP and the tournament organizers. Isn't this a case of the well-known athlete being treated differently than their lesser-known fellow athletes? The tournaments seem to be very loose in rule enforcement - some players are fined while others are not. I would hope Serena's reaction as well as all the press surrounding it would look to have rules enforced equally by all umpires vs. the willy-nilly method they use today. Either follow the rules and enforce across the board or throw them out but stop the piece meal process.
  9. Good A
    9. Posted by Good A Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What idiotic logic to say that the call shouldn't have been made at that particular time. If it was a foot fault, it should be called no matter what the score is. So I guess if it's match point we shouldn't count "let" serves either? Get real....Hey, here's a good idea. Let's just re-write the rule book to say: "If it's a tight match with high profile players at a big tournament, none of the rules apply." That should solve everything.
  10. danherb309
    10. Posted by danherb309 Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Chris: Sorry, but you are clearly wrong here. One, a rule is a rule. You know this. It truly doesn't matter when it happens as long as it happens. First point of the match or last--doesn't matter.
    Second, you are wrong about the feelngs of Carillo, McEnroe, Collins, etc. They all three, especially Carillo, were so obviously disturbed by Serena's actions that they could barely look in the camera and speak about it in the following days.
    It was an unfortunate call at an unfortunate time, but it was correct.
    To top off the ugly situation, Serena--on her own--was smug and unwavering until either her Mother or a top tennis official figuratively smacked her back into reality. Two days later, she was apologizing and saying the situation was 'behind her'. Well, how convenient.
    But seriously, to suggest that a rule is ok at one point of a match and not another is absurd.
  11. pepz
    11. Posted by pepz Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    For post #6 by the author.
    This is not about who to believe but about the rules. a foot-fault is a foot fault whether at the start of the game of at 0-40 at match point.
    You are making me think that before you decide, you have to check what others have to say?
    I have higher respect for the lineswoman.
  12. BrianN
    12. Posted by BrianN Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm just saying that I'd be pretty mad if I were in her situation and I was to be called out at that point of the match.
  13. Good A
    13. Posted by Good A Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #12, there's one cure for that. Don't foot fault.
  14. jackaroo
    14. Posted by jackaroo Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:34 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Bravo!
    This is tennis and the reason there is a rule book is to let the players know what can and cannot be done on the court.
    A foot fault is always a foot fault. Failing to call a foot fault would be dereliction of duty on the part of the lineswoman. If Serena had double faulted, would it be OK at this critical time in the match to have another serve.
    No rules are meant to be enforced.
    Chris Chase, this isn't football or basketball. The mindset in those two sports is to let them play at the end of the game and don't let the officials decide the outcome of the game. Chris, get your mindset on tennis.
  15. alice e
    15. Posted by alice e Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    why would the poor woman be a VICTIM of Serena's rage?
    she is being punished with possible loss of income while that arrogant;rude bytch is getting away with her usual BULLY self!
  16. Richard M
    16. Posted by Richard M Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    serena treated the Chinese woman so well, thinking that if i was in her place it will be a total new story. the chinese
    are very resist and when in america the feel still superior to a black person, lets put things right this chinese woman was just resist and not any foot fault in a grand slam. i admire serena and if the WTA should go ahead to suspen her, i will advise her to resign from the Hitla wta.
  17. Fred
    17. Posted by Fred Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What do you mean the official's "terrible decision" with such "match-changing" call? You mean we should throw the rules out the window every time a 'match changing' situation is reached? You're not making any sense at all! Might as well change the rules: foot faults should only be called during un-critical points of a match but when it's a point of two between winning or losing, foot faults should not apply! How's that? This is why nasty players like Williams who think rules apply to everybody except herself could never be made to follow the rules...because of apologists like you who can't call a spade a spade! What a shame.
  18. Rob
    18. Posted by Rob Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    OK, Chris so we're only going to enforce the rules for those players who are not superstars. Yeah, that makes sense. Just because McEnroe, Collins and Carillo disagree doesn't make it right, and from McEnroe such a statement is to be expected. A foot fault is a foot fault whether it's made at match point in a Wimbledon final or by Joe Schmo playing his buddy in the local park. ITF "Rules of Tennis" page 13: "The Server shall throughout the delivery of the Service ... not touch with either foot any area other than that behind the base-line within the imaginary extensions of the centre-mark and side-lines." I mean that's pretty clear. Sorry pal, you got it wrong on this one.
  19. Tracye H
    19. Posted by Tracye H Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    alice e- there was no point in using that type of language. my little brother and sister both read these headlines and i'd appreciate it if there was no crude language for them to pick up on.
    back to the subject at hand, i dont think that they should ban serena due to the fact that if a male player, say roger federer or any male at that, had done the same thing, then there wouldnt have even been an idea to ban them at all
  20. artea4sports
    20. Posted by artea4sports Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    So, Mr. Chase - let's clarify: with your (and McEnroe, Carillo, Colins, etc.) logic, at crucial point of the match so called "controversial" calls should NEVER be made. This means - "strike3 looking" at baseball game with 2 outs in 9th inning should never be called, penalty kick at the end of close soccer game should never been called; defensive pass interference at the end of close football game should never be called; foul shots with no time left in close basketball game should never be called, etc...? Is this is the logic behind your article, then you are in wrong business, and Yahoo really need to take close r look who is writing such unprofessional articles...
  21. Maria W
    21. Posted by Maria W Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You all need to just get over it (both pro and anti Serena). The fact is that she was not suspended whether or not she deserved to be. But then again, what you all have to blog over. You all appear to be enjoying this sorry story and really do need to move on.
    How about some positive discussion!
  22. Tinkerbell
    22. Posted by Tinkerbell Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    NOTE TO SELF: Remind ChrisC that a fault is a fault, a double-fault is a fault, and a foot fault is a FAULT. Remind ChrisC that, regardless WHEN any fault occurs, an HONEST linejudge will CALL it, on ANYONE. Remind ChrisC that, by his bizarre logic, a called strike three has no place in the bottom of the 9th inning with the potential outcome standing at the plate. Remind ChrisC that his bias for Her Lowness has no place in (and I use the following term loosely) journalism. Remind ChrisC that just about EVERYONE who has read this . . . DRIVEL!! . . . will start to wonder if he's actually a long-squatting pseudonym for that reknown hack Martin Rogers.
    On a more positive note, the day is swiftly approaching when the W sisters will retire!
  23. j r
    23. Posted by j r Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It wasn't even a foot fault... she hit the ball while her feet was in the air before landing on the court... and the line judge was behind her... even tv replay couldn't confirm a foot fault... I believe, even at a crucial point, rules are still rules... however calling a foot fault when its not during a crucial time... you deserve to get slapped! And I dont even like Serena and Im asian.
  24. JOHN P
    24. Posted by JOHN P Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Jimmy Connors, John McEnroe, just to name those two should have never been allowed on a tennis court, right? Matts Vilander, Ivan Lendl and other former players also would have to banished if they were judged the same way some of the comments suggest. It's clear that two wonderful and dedicated young American women 1 & 3 in world rankings, and 2 in double rankings must be punished for doing what all the others have done and gotten away with. My question is: WHY NOW ?
  25. brettdep
    25. Posted by brettdep Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The author states that making a valid call at certain points in a match is just 'wrong' then insults one of his readers and shields himself behind three famous yet equally wrong opinions (John McEnroe, Bud Collins and Mary Carillo) to attempt proving his illogical point. Yes, this is an opinion article, but, if there is a rule, and the rule is broken the call is made. The point in the match at which a foot fault is called is no different than that of a ball being called out. If the logic of Mr. Chase and his cronies is followed to its illogical end, then late in a match judges would just stop making ANY close calls and the game would lose credibility. Furthermore, comparing this lineswoman’s call to a demonstrably bad call in baseball does NOT make a good call on the part of the lines judge a bad call through comparison. You are employing false logic to get a reader to take for granted that this lineswoman’s call was bad. It wasn’t. The call was just and appropriate. Either follow the rule and apply it throughout or work to have it changed. Whining while employing manipulative tactics merely makes the author look small and petty to rational readers.

Busted Racquet

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Chris Chase

Busted Racquet is a tennis blog edited by Chris Chase. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Yahoo! Sports Blog Recent Readers