Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:32 am EDT

The Japanese lineswoman who earned the wrath of Serena Williams at the U.S. Open semifinals will not be part of the officiating team for the Sony Ericsson WTA Tour Championship in Doha later this month. This spares a possible reunion with Williams, who will be playing in the tournament.
A British newspaper reports that the woman, whose name still hasn't been publicly revealed, would have been considered for the prestigious assignment but declined for an unknown reason.
The amateur official became a worldwide figure last month after calling a foot fault that eventually led to Williams' infamous breakdown. But the high marks she earned earlier in the summer would have qualified her to work at the prestigious tour championships, which reward officials based on merit. Some speculate that she declined the invite because she was instructed not to travel to Qatar (by whom, the rumors don't say). The WTA has said the woman declined for family reasons.
Clearly the lineswoman is held in great esteem by colleagues if she was assigned a semifinal match at the U.S. Open and earned an invite to officiate at the eight-play season finale. But let's not forget her terrible decision to call a foot fault violation on Serena in her semifinal match against Kim Clijsters is what started this whole thing. Yes, she didn't deserve to be humiliated and we feel bad for her and family because of this, but she did deserve infamy for making such a match-changing call. (Look at the reaction to similar blown calls made in baseball last week.)
Serena's outburst was so bad that it overshadowed the awfulness of the call that caused it. If Serena had briefly argued before resuming play, the story would have been about the horrible foot fault called by the lineswoman, not the resulting tirade. Serena was set to be the sympathetic figure cast against the villainous lineswoman, but the roles were reversed the instant she dropped that first f-bomb.
Busted Racquet is a tennis blog edited by Chris Chase. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.
Troopers fail to talk with Tiger.
Posted Nov 28 2009
Source: Iverson May End Retirement For Sixers
Posted Nov 28 2009
Fantasy Football: Pickups for playoffs
Posted Nov 27 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
135 Comments
1 - 25 of 135
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Hitman is spot on with his comments.
Do you play tennis ? ...ever have ? ...know the rules ?????
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Whether it was a foot fault is irrelevant. Such a call has no business being made at 15-30 before a possible match point. That's what it was an abysmal call.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Second, you are wrong about the feelngs of Carillo, McEnroe, Collins, etc. They all three, especially Carillo, were so obviously disturbed by Serena's actions that they could barely look in the camera and speak about it in the following days.
It was an unfortunate call at an unfortunate time, but it was correct.
To top off the ugly situation, Serena--on her own--was smug and unwavering until either her Mother or a top tennis official figuratively smacked her back into reality. Two days later, she was apologizing and saying the situation was 'behind her'. Well, how convenient.
But seriously, to suggest that a rule is ok at one point of a match and not another is absurd.
Report Abuse
This is not about who to believe but about the rules. a foot-fault is a foot fault whether at the start of the game of at 0-40 at match point.
You are making me think that before you decide, you have to check what others have to say?
I have higher respect for the lineswoman.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
This is tennis and the reason there is a rule book is to let the players know what can and cannot be done on the court.
A foot fault is always a foot fault. Failing to call a foot fault would be dereliction of duty on the part of the lineswoman. If Serena had double faulted, would it be OK at this critical time in the match to have another serve.
No rules are meant to be enforced.
Chris Chase, this isn't football or basketball. The mindset in those two sports is to let them play at the end of the game and don't let the officials decide the outcome of the game. Chris, get your mindset on tennis.
Report Abuse
she is being punished with possible loss of income while that arrogant;rude bytch is getting away with her usual BULLY self!
Report Abuse
are very resist and when in america the feel still superior to a black person, lets put things right this chinese woman was just resist and not any foot fault in a grand slam. i admire serena and if the WTA should go ahead to suspen her, i will advise her to resign from the Hitla wta.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
back to the subject at hand, i dont think that they should ban serena due to the fact that if a male player, say roger federer or any male at that, had done the same thing, then there wouldnt have even been an idea to ban them at all
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
How about some positive discussion!
Report Abuse
On a more positive note, the day is swiftly approaching when the W sisters will retire!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 135