Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:04 pm EDT
Before Andy Murray ascended to the No. 3 spot in the world rankings this week, it was reasonable to suggest that the top two players in the world (Roger Federer and Rafa Nadal) made up the best top two of all-time. It's a debatable point but not an absurd one. What would be absurd is to contend that the current top 10 is the greatest ever, but that didn't stop a British writer from doing so.
In an article posted on the gambling site Betfair, Simon Mundie raises the possibility that the current ATP Tour top ten is the strongest ever. This claim was triggered by the impressive fact that the top eight players in the rankings all advanced to the semifinals of the Rogers Cup in Montreal, the first time that has happened in the 36-year history of the rankings.
Mundie suggests that the greatness of Federer and Nadal balances nicely with the consistency of the other eight players -- Andy Murray, Novak Djokovic, Andy Roddick, Juan Martin Del Potro, Jo-Wilifried Tsonga, Nikolay Davydenko, Gilles Simon and Fernando Verdasco -- to make for impressive "strength of depth".
I'm not so sure. It's a fine top 10, but one that only boasts four Grand Slam winners (Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Roddick). That is largely due to the fact that Federer and Nadal have been so dominant, but their dominance has little bearing on the fact that Tsonga, Verdasco and Simon have only made one Grand Slam quarterfinal. Calling a tennis player "consistent" is sort of like saying a girl has a "great personality". It's a backhanded compliment in most cases. The only thing consistent about Tsonga is his fourth-round losses. (Too harsh?)
So if this isn't the best top 10 ever, which is?
Throw a dart at the weekly rankings from 1992 through 1995 and you'll likely come up with a better one. After sifting through the lists, here's the best I could find:
1) Pete Sampras
2) Jim Courier
3) Stefan Edberg
4) Boris Becker
6) Petr Korda
7) Ivan Lendl
8) Andre Agassi
10) Michael Stich
Every player in that top ten won a Grand Slam event and nine of them (Stich being the exception) ascended to either No. 1 or No. 2 in the rankings at one point in their career. There may be a better top 10 out there from this time period as the top five stayed pretty steady for a few years and other Grand Slam winners/future No. 1s like Richard Krajicek, Sergi Bruguera and Thomas Muster danced in and out of the bottom part. But it's pretty safe to say that the '93 lineup would win in a walkover against its '09 counterpart.
And what about the top ten from November 16, 1987:
1) Ivan Lendl
2) Stefan Edberg
3) Mats Wilander
4) Boris Becker
5) Miloslav Mecir
6) Jimmy Connors
7) Pat Cash
8) Yannick Noah
9) John McEnroe
10) Andres Gomez
The only man not to win a Slam on that list (Mecir) has an Olympic gold medal. The current top 10 has a long way to go before they can match a resume like that.
Busted Racquet is a tennis blog edited by Chris Chase. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.
Patriots CB Hands Out Turkeys In South Fla.
Posted Nov 24 2009
Meyer: Notre Dame not a coaching option
Posted Nov 24 2009
NASCAR: 2009 Biggest Surprises and Disappointments
Posted Nov 23 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
85 Comments
1 - 25 of 85
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I'm pretty sure I watched a hell of a Semifinal Match with Nadal and Verdasco at the Aussie. That still doesn't put them in the same league as the other top tens but just giving Fernando a little credit for his showing early this year.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
btw, murray ascended 'from' the 3 spot to #2. for a so-called "expert", you make numerous mistakes.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
these guys have more power on the serve
return better
are faster and are stronger but 99% of the tour are basliners.No more s/v players like Edberd,McEnroe.Not many players with natural variety like Federer;Murray and Gasquet;Kohslchreiber.Most like Roddick buy his "variety"
Sampras was NEVER a factor on clay.1 semis in the French capital as his best result.Edberg
Courier made it to only 1 finals at Wimbledon and the USO
Edberg never won the FO and made it to just 1 finals
Becker never won the FO;not even a final there
Noah couldn't win chit outside of Paris
Murray has won a few MS but has he won slams?
Del Potro's best results in a major was this year in Paris when he pushed the GOAT to a 5 set match
Gilles Simon?HORRIBLE slam record;HORRIBLE.A 3th round best finish is his best result!
Nadal made just 1 semis in NY as best result and made it 1 semis in Australia last year before winning it this year.He doesn't own Australia at all nor the USO;nor does he own Wimbledon despite winning it last year.
Verdasco? a slam semis in Australia is his best result in a major to date
Blake?Give me a break!NO Masters for Blake;hell he hasn't even made it to a slam SEMIS!
3 Quarterfinals is Blake's best finish in majors.2 in NY and 1 in Australia
Davydenko has made the semis in 2 out of 4 majors.the USO and the FO.Best results in Australia is the quarters.No 2nd week for him at Wimbledon
Djokovic won in Australia and got to the finals in NY.Semis in Paris and Wimbledon;no finals there!
Tsonga made the FINALS in Australia last year losing to Djokovic.Missed 2 slams due to knee surgery but has won a MS.Made his First week in Paris.
Not even a quarterfinal in Paris for RoddIck!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1. "This claim was triggered by the impressive fact that the top eight players in the rankings all advanced to the semifinals of the Rogers Cup in Montreal, the first time that has happened in the 36-year history of the rankings." - The semifinals consists of only FOUR PLAYERS. The top eight made the QUARTERFINALS for the first time. And this is the second time you guys have made that mistake.
2. "... but their dominance has little bearing on the fact that Tsonga and Simon have only made one Grand Slam quarterfinal (which is one more than Verdasco can boast)." - Um, Tsonga reached the FINAL of the Australian Open in 2008, losing to Djokovic. Verdasco made the semifinals of this years Aussie Open.
Come on, clean up your errors, it's embarrassing for tennis fans.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1. "This claim was triggered by the impressive fact that the top eight players in the rankings all advanced to the semifinals of the Rogers Cup in Montreal, the first time that has happened in the 36-year history of the rankings." - The semifinals consists of only FOUR PLAYERS. The top eight made the QUARTERFINALS for the first time. And this is the second time you guys have made that mistake.
2. "... but their dominance has little bearing on the fact that Tsonga and Simon have only made one Grand Slam quarterfinal (which is one more than Verdasco can boast)." - Um, Tsonga reached the FINAL of the Australian Open in 2008, losing to Djokovic. Verdasco made the semifinals of this years Aussie Open.
Come on, clean up your errors, it's embarrassing for tennis fans.
Report Abuse
http://cdbaby.com/cd/CyrilDeaconoff
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I thought is was #2. Doesnt anyone check their facts?
Report Abuse
I thought it was #2. Doesnt anyone check their facts?
Report Abuse
The interesting thing with nowadays guys, is that they are very young...
If they keep playing like they do right now, in ten years you'll probably change your mind....
But for sure right now they cannot constitute a great top ten because Roger and Rafa have won most of the grand slam...
They are just "good" players, with great potential for the futur....
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 85