Busted Racquet - Tennis

Before Andy Murray ascended to the No. 3 spot in the world rankings this week, it was reasonable to suggest that the top two players in the world (Roger Federer and Rafa Nadal) made up the best top two of all-time. It's a debatable point but not an absurd one. What would be absurd is to contend that the current top 10 is the greatest ever, but that didn't stop a British writer from doing so.

In an article posted on the gambling site Betfair, Simon Mundie raises the possibility that the current ATP Tour top ten is the strongest ever. This claim was triggered by the impressive fact that the top eight players in the rankings all advanced to the semifinals of the Rogers Cup in Montreal, the first time that has happened in the 36-year history of the rankings.

Mundie suggests that the greatness of Federer and Nadal balances nicely with the consistency of the other eight players -- Andy Murray, Novak Djokovic, Andy Roddick, Juan Martin Del Potro, Jo-Wilifried Tsonga, Nikolay Davydenko, Gilles Simon and Fernando Verdasco -- to make for impressive "strength of depth".

I'm not so sure. It's a fine top 10, but one that only boasts four Grand Slam winners (Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Roddick). That is largely due to the fact that Federer and Nadal have been so dominant, but their dominance has little bearing on the fact that Tsonga, Verdasco and Simon have only made one Grand Slam quarterfinal. Calling a tennis player "consistent" is sort of like saying a girl has a "great personality". It's a backhanded compliment in most cases. The only thing consistent about Tsonga is his fourth-round losses. (Too harsh?)

So if this isn't the best top 10 ever, which is?

Throw a dart at the weekly rankings from 1992 through 1995 and you'll likely come up with a better one. After sifting through the lists, here's the best I could find:

July 26, 1993:

1) Pete Sampras

2) Jim Courier

3) Stefan Edberg

4) Boris Becker

5) Goran Ivanisevic

6) Petr Korda

7) Ivan Lendl

8) Andre Agassi

9) Michael Chang

10) Michael Stich

Every player in that top ten won a Grand Slam event and nine of them (Stich being the exception) ascended to either No. 1 or No. 2 in the rankings at one point in their career. There may be a better top 10 out there from this time period as the top five stayed pretty steady for a few years and other Grand Slam winners/future No. 1s like Richard Krajicek, Sergi Bruguera and Thomas Muster danced in and out of the bottom part. But it's pretty safe to say that the '93 lineup would win in a walkover against its '09 counterpart.

And what about the top ten from November 16, 1987:

1) Ivan Lendl

2) Stefan Edberg

3) Mats Wilander

4) Boris Becker

5) Miloslav Mecir

6) Jimmy Connors

7) Pat Cash

8) Yannick Noah

9) John McEnroe

10) Andres Gomez

The only man not to win a Slam on that list (Mecir) has an Olympic gold medal. The current top 10 has a long way to go before they can match a resume like that.  

digg delicious
more

85 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Alex J
    1. Posted by Alex J Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    those are probably the best list of top 10 of all time but this years top ten is also very good. as we saw last week in montreal. the top 8 players made up the quarterfinals. nadal and federer were both knocked off in the quarters by tsonga and del potro. any of these players are capable of beating each other and any point. a very deep top 10 right now.
  2. Alex J
    2. Posted by Alex J Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    those are probably the best list of top 10 of all time but this years top ten is also very good. as we saw last week in montreal. the top 8 players made up the quarterfinals. nadal and federer were both knocked off in the quarters by tsonga and del potro. any of these players are capable of beating each other and any point. a very deep top 10 right now.
  3. benjamin63_99
    3. Posted by benjamin63_99 Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    James Blake is one of the top 10 chockers of all time, but part of the top 10 ever? Uh, no.
  4. B.S.
    4. Posted by B.S. Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Didn´t verdasco lose in the semis of the australian open ????????????????
  5. Doyle M
    5. Posted by Doyle M Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It would appear that the dominance of Federer who has, now, been beaten by Nadal "shades" the assertion that this group is the best. We will never know how some of these "power hitters" would have done with wooden racquests against the Lavers and that Australian group. I recall McEnroe telling how Laver took a set from him when Laver was well past his prome. Historians will tell you that the game used to employ strategy. Now, it is who can outhit the opponent. I had an uncle who was a tennis star at Michigan State (used to be a big time program) in the early '30s. He told me that big Bill Tilden had the fastest serve that he had ever seen. That was with long pants and wooden racquets. This discussion is similar to the NFL asking which team was "the best".
  6. Tony S
    6. Posted by Tony S Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Chris said: "but their dominance has little bearing on the fact that Tsonga and Simon have only made one Grand Slam quarterfinal (which is one more than Verdasco can boast)."
    I'm pretty sure I watched a hell of a Semifinal Match with Nadal and Verdasco at the Aussie. That still doesn't put them in the same league as the other top tens but just giving Fernando a little credit for his showing early this year.
  7. demo30atl
    7. Posted by demo30atl Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yeah, Verdasco made the semis of Australian so that little comment about him is incorrect.
  8. EROGENOS.COM
    8. Posted by EROGENOS.COM Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Stich made it to #2 I think as well.
  9. fff
    9. Posted by fff Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:15 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @4 yeah, and he lost a tough match to nadal. and tsonga made aussie finals last year and aussie quarters this year. this guy must be living in 2008.
    btw, murray ascended 'from' the 3 spot to #2. for a so-called "expert", you make numerous mistakes.
  10. spartannewt17 c
    10. Posted by spartannewt17 c Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:16 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Argument for Best Top 2 is justified. But for 10 Top? Both the lists you suggest are far superior. Who is Simon, anyway?
  11. BMT
    11. Posted by BMT Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Every season has its heroes and it is difficult to compare different time periods since there have been changes in racket technology and in surfaces and balls. So the fair comparison is among current players and only use past players and results as a guide to where they rank as opposed to trying to nail down a definite rank. Right now just enjoy the quality of shot making and you can appreciate the difference when you watch the old "classic" matches that are shown on Tennis channel or sometimes on ESPN.
  12. alice e
    12. Posted by alice e Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:28 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    no HELL NO
    these guys have more power on the serve
    return better
    are faster and are stronger but 99% of the tour are basliners.No more s/v players like Edberd,McEnroe.Not many players with natural variety like Federer;Murray and Gasquet;Kohslchreiber.Most like Roddick buy his "variety"
    Sampras was NEVER a factor on clay.1 semis in the French capital as his best result.Edberg
    Courier made it to only 1 finals at Wimbledon and the USO
    Edberg never won the FO and made it to just 1 finals
    Becker never won the FO;not even a final there
    Noah couldn't win chit outside of Paris
    Murray has won a few MS but has he won slams?
    Del Potro's best results in a major was this year in Paris when he pushed the GOAT to a 5 set match
    Gilles Simon?HORRIBLE slam record;HORRIBLE.A 3th round best finish is his best result!
    Nadal made just 1 semis in NY as best result and made it 1 semis in Australia last year before winning it this year.He doesn't own Australia at all nor the USO;nor does he own Wimbledon despite winning it last year.
    Verdasco? a slam semis in Australia is his best result in a major to date
    Blake?Give me a break!NO Masters for Blake;hell he hasn't even made it to a slam SEMIS!
    3 Quarterfinals is Blake's best finish in majors.2 in NY and 1 in Australia
    Davydenko has made the semis in 2 out of 4 majors.the USO and the FO.Best results in Australia is the quarters.No 2nd week for him at Wimbledon
    Djokovic won in Australia and got to the finals in NY.Semis in Paris and Wimbledon;no finals there!
    Tsonga made the FINALS in Australia last year losing to Djokovic.Missed 2 slams due to knee surgery but has won a MS.Made his First week in Paris.
    Not even a quarterfinal in Paris for RoddIck!
  13. Chris C
    13. Posted by Chris C Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Thanks for the catch on Verdasco. An oversight on my part. It has been fixed.
  14. tennisfan6475
    14. Posted by tennisfan6475 Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:31 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Is it a requirement for the writers of this blog to make mistakes consistently?
    1. "This claim was triggered by the impressive fact that the top eight players in the rankings all advanced to the semifinals of the Rogers Cup in Montreal, the first time that has happened in the 36-year history of the rankings." - The semifinals consists of only FOUR PLAYERS. The top eight made the QUARTERFINALS for the first time. And this is the second time you guys have made that mistake.
    2. "... but their dominance has little bearing on the fact that Tsonga and Simon have only made one Grand Slam quarterfinal (which is one more than Verdasco can boast)." - Um, Tsonga reached the FINAL of the Australian Open in 2008, losing to Djokovic. Verdasco made the semifinals of this years Aussie Open.
    Come on, clean up your errors, it's embarrassing for tennis fans.
  15. Nurrr!
    15. Posted by Nurrr! Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hey Tsonga made it to the 2008 Australian Open finals. Huge error there. Verdasco also made it to the semis of the 2009 Australian Open.
  16. tennisfan6475
    16. Posted by tennisfan6475 Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:34 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Is it a requirement for the writers of this blog to make mistakes consistently?
    1. "This claim was triggered by the impressive fact that the top eight players in the rankings all advanced to the semifinals of the Rogers Cup in Montreal, the first time that has happened in the 36-year history of the rankings." - The semifinals consists of only FOUR PLAYERS. The top eight made the QUARTERFINALS for the first time. And this is the second time you guys have made that mistake.
    2. "... but their dominance has little bearing on the fact that Tsonga and Simon have only made one Grand Slam quarterfinal (which is one more than Verdasco can boast)." - Um, Tsonga reached the FINAL of the Australian Open in 2008, losing to Djokovic. Verdasco made the semifinals of this years Aussie Open.
    Come on, clean up your errors, it's embarrassing for tennis fans.
  17. kdyachkov
    17. Posted by kdyachkov Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Don't know where to start... Check your facts man. First of all, Murry became No.2 this week, not No.3. The top 8 players can't all be in semifinals, its was quaterfinals. Finally, Verdasco made it to the Aussi open semifinals so that's better than Simon and Tsonga. Too many wrong statements.
    http://cdbaby.com/cd/CyrilDeaconoff
  18. adrianskibum
    18. Posted by adrianskibum Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:44 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This guy, Chris Chase, needs to verify his facts before he publishes something like this. At least, let a real tennis expert read it to let you know how far off his facts are. The discussion is interesting, but come on already, get it right!
  19. Bill M
    19. Posted by Bill M Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Chris Chase, you've hit the nail on the head, well done! '09 against the others, no way:)!
  20. Linda
    20. Posted by Linda Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I just wish that the present top tens will continue to play well and wise because once you: become older no more will of power to win matches.
  21. John
    21. Posted by John Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Before Andy Murray ascended to the No. 3 spot in the world rankings this week"
    I thought is was #2. Doesnt anyone check their facts?
  22. John
    22. Posted by John Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Before Andy Murray ascended to the No. 3 spot in the world rankings this week"
    I thought it was #2. Doesnt anyone check their facts?
  23. con_nichon_hah
    23. Posted by con_nichon_hah Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think you should put the ages of the players base on the year of the releasing ranking....
    The interesting thing with nowadays guys, is that they are very young...
    If they keep playing like they do right now, in ten years you'll probably change your mind....
    But for sure right now they cannot constitute a great top ten because Roger and Rafa have won most of the grand slam...
    They are just "good" players, with great potential for the futur....
  24. Ed
    24. Posted by Ed Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:57 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The group from 1987 were by far the best ever! You have to include Connors, McEnroe, and Borg in any group of the greatest ever. Also, you have to make sure they are playing with the same type of rackets. Also, they have to be viewed from their prime.
  25. Ja
    25. Posted by Ja Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    yep, Stich made it to #2 in 1993. This blog is good but there are too many mistakes. I mean, come on, Verdasco played an amazing semi against Nadal in the Aussie Open and how could you screw up Tsonga making it to the Aussie Final. I think the 1993 top 10 is the best. We have a good top 10 now but compared to the others, it makes it look very weak.

Busted Racquet

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Chris Chase

Busted Racquet is a tennis blog edited by Chris Chase. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Yahoo! Sports Blog Recent Readers