UCI weighs appeal after Valjavec doping decision

AIGLE, Switzerland (AP)—The International Cycling Union is studying a Slovenian ruling which rejected biological passport evidence that rider Tadej Valjavec was doping before deciding whether to appeal to sport’s highest court.

The UCI said Friday it must translate the detailed judgment by Slovenia’s anti-doping organization which declined to sanction the 33-year-old Valjavec.

Cycling’s governing body can challenge the Slovenian decision at the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

The UCI asked Slovenian authorities in May to investigate Valjavec based on suspicious blood profile results in samples provided for his biological passport.

Valjavec was named in a second round of cases brought under the UCI’s pioneering anti-doping program.


It's game time! Sign up for Fantasy Football '10 today!
Updated Jul 30, 7:50 am EDT
digg del.icio.us

1 Comment

  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    John T Fri Jul 30, 2010 08:02 am PDT Report Abuse
    I think it is good to challenge WADA and the UCI on possible suspensions based on blood profiles.
    The blood profile is a good tool to suggest that something may be wrong and a reason to watch a rider more closely and test more often and more unexpectedly.
    However, ruining a person's life and livelihood should be based on more substantial forms of evidence.

Post Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.

Video Spotlight

Yahoo! News Network