Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:41 pm EDT
Today in Beijing, IOC spokeswoman Giselle Davies said of the inquiry into the ages of the Chinese gymnasts:
"We believe the matter will be put to rest and there's no question ... on the eligibility. The information we have received seems satisfactory in terms of the correct documentation-including birth certificates."
Translation: The IOC has absolutely zero intention of pressing this issue and discovering the truth about the ages of He Kexin, Yang Yilan, Jiang YuYuan, Deng Linlin and Li Shanshan. The investigation is, and always was, a sham.
The IOC announced the inquiry today in response to criticism that they weren't doing anything about the overwhelming evidence that suggests a Chinese conspiracy. But the IOC's mission with this faux-investigation -- which they passed on to the International Gymnastics Federation - was never to discover the truth, it was merely to create an illusion that they cared about it. Davies' quote indicates the IOC is content with the passports China produced before the Games. She deemed them "satisfactory". If that's the case, then why bother investigating at all? If the IOC thinks they already know the answer to the question, what's the use in asking it?
While spineless IOC President Jacques Rogge is busy criticizing a three-time gold medal winning athlete, his organization is content to look the other way while getting snookered by the Chinese government once again. (Remember, the Chinese also told the IOC that they wouldn't place restrictions on the Internet during the Games.) The IOC's party line seems to be that Usain Bolt showboating is not OK, but cheating in major competitions is fine as long as the paperwork is in order.
In reality, it's unlikely much would have come from a legitimate investigation anyway. It's one of those "He said/she said" cases (quite literally, in regards to He Kexin) that are impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. That doesn't mean the IOC shouldn't have tried though. By ignoring the mounting evidence and deeming passports "satisfactory" without addressing all the new information that has come to light, Jacques Rogge's organization becomes just as complicit in this mess as the Chinese Olympic officials who started it.
Photo via Getty Images
Fourth-Place Medal is edited by the contributors linked below. Please send them tips and such.
Posted Nov 20 2009
The Gentlemen's League: Episode 2, Ben vs. Charlie
Posted Nov 19 2009
Championship contender: Jimmie Johnson
Posted Nov 19 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
955 Comments
1 - 24 of 955
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
The IOC can only take this so far-- the only way I can see the results being changed is if China itself admits falsifying ages, which isn't going to happen. I have 2 questions for Chris: 1) are you worried about injuries to young Chinese gymnasts or do you just want Nastia to get another gold? 2) why do you even care if this doesn't enter into the "real" medal count?
M
Report Abuse
"We will show the world the true face of Britain. We could have a parade of people dressed up as rubbish. Hordes of drunken Brits fighting each other with displays of synchronized vomiting. Then we could show the world the true British work ethic by having a cavalcade of the unemployed and the unemployable. Perhaps our university students could show their dedication to learning by not turning up (just as they fail to attend lectures so frequently). "
So far
So far 34% Britons support the idea
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
If IOC is really serious, hire a doctor, if they can not afford, let's start to donate money to get it done!!!!
what a shame.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
This is a trick used in Chinese factory audits to find underage employees
Report Abuse
Here is a quote from an article on NBC:
To be clear:
The IOC has not ordered a formal "investigation" or even launched a formal "inquiry." The Friday report from London completely mischaracterizes such a process as well as the IOC's role in the course of such an action.
If the IOC had launched an "investigation," it would likely have named the members of such a commission as well as the persons of interest in such an inquiry. It did no such thing.
Nor could it have done such a thing. The way any such process plays out is that questions of age eligibility would be first directed to FIG.
If the IOC were dissatisfied with whatever findings FIG made, then the IOC could take the next step of perhaps launching its own follow-up inquiry.
Again, the IOC has done no such thing.
"You shouldn't regard this as some sort of formal investigation," Davies said, instead saying the IOC had informally gone to FIG about "apparent discrepancies."
Intriguingly, the matter appears to be of interest primarily to media from English-speaking media outlets, in particular American outlets. This shows no signs of becoming a consuming whirlpool like the figure-skating judging scandal at the 2002 Salt Lake City Winter Games.
For more than 20 years now, since the 1980s, every dodge, every ruse, every trick imaginable has been tried to show that this gymnast or that meets the age rule -- first 14, then 15 and, since 1997, 16.
In gymnastics circles, they still talk about Kim Gwang Suk of North Korea, the gold medalist on uneven bars in 1991. She was listed as 15 for three years in a row -- and North Korea barred from the 1993 world championships.
Moving past the outrage for a moment, consider this. The Chinese would run the risk of a major embarrassement at their Games by making the elemental mistake of posting the purportedly "real" ages of underage gymnasts on an online registration list that's accessible publicly?
And leave it there to be discovered by an American running, as the Times of London account relates, a Chinese search engine?
Does that make sense?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Too Bad....
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I don't think you are really care about young girls getting hurt in China, since Liukin & Shawn both started training at 3 yr old, which is treated as "cute" here in media.
The thing you really care about is China cheated and how many gold medals US can get back. BTW, the divers from China seem young to me too but no one is doubting their age. I guess it's because Americans cannot get any medals from diving.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 24 of 955