Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:58 am EDT
Quebec City is apparently planning on building a brand new arena and it has got NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman and deputy commissioner Bill Daly all excited. The rumor is that Quebec has moved itself up to the top of the list for cities that could take on an NHL club, according to the Toronto Sun.
Las Vegas and Kansas City are also apparently on the list but the Sun reports that Daly told competitor the Toronto Star on Oct. 11 that "the league favors Canadian cities that have supported NHL franchises in the past."
Quebec, of course, had the Nordiques, which became the Colorado Avalanche. So perhaps the league can put another team there and then eventually move them to Las Vegas or Kansas City.
Source: Toronto Sun
NY Islanders 3, Pittsburgh 2 (Nov. 27)
Posted Nov 26 2009
New Jersey 2, Boston 1 (Nov. 27)
Posted Nov 26 2009
Anaheim 3, Chicago 0 (Nov. 27)
Posted Nov 26 2009
47 Comments
1 - 24 of 47
Report Abuse
and bring back joe sakic
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1. Quebec
2. Winnipeg
3. Hamilton
4. Seattle
5. Las Vegas
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Move the Predators to Winnipeg. No one in Nashville will care, either.
Move the Coyotes to Hartford. Do they even have ice in Arizona?
Move the Islanders to Seattle. We already know Wang wants to move them to Kansas City, but the NHL in KC sucked before, and it will suck again. Seattle is a great market looking for something to take their mind off the Sonics leaving. Hockey could do that.
DO NOT put a team in Las Vegas. It will create no revenue, the team will suck and it will be folded.
DO NOT move the Florida teams. Both have had success very recently. If you have to move one, make it the Lightning, and move it to a hockey rich market, where St. Louis and Lecalvier can thrive in the public eye.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Here is the question of the day... What was the point of moving teams to the desert?
Phoenix and Dallas have both gone bankrupt... Hicks was close to losing the team, Florida has like no fans, the teams in Cali atleast have a decent fan base.
Go Canada!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
i think quebec is a good choice. i think the obvious ones are all in canada. and maybe one or two in america----seattle or las vegas. but i surprised that quebec wasn't in discussion before.
1. Quebec
2. Winnipeg
3. Hamilton
4. Seattle
5. Las Vegas"
I agree with this , except for Vegas. Vegas can't support a hockey team. They couldn't even support a minor league team.
THERE NEEDS TO BE MORE CANADIAN TEAMS!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
What the NHL really needs to do is CONTRACT. I'm sorry, but there is no need for 30 NHL teams. I know you have Canada that's bigger into hockey than any of the other 4 major sports....but even still, you only need about 24 teams max. Get rid of 1 team in each division (or something close to it).
Nashville, Atlanta, Phoenix, the Kings (sorry LA, you don't need 2 hockey teams...you don't have a football team for crying out loud), one of the Florida teams, and the Islanders (sorry, but they just need to go at this point, not move).
6 division of 4. No moving teams to more places where they'll fail or putting franchises where there is no ice or hockey fans.
1 - 24 of 47