Blackhawks eliminate Flames 4-1

  • Print

CALGARY, Alberta (AP)—Whooping, hollering and maybe a water fight in the locker room are what you might expect from a young Blackhawks team that won a playoff series for the first time in 13 years.

Not these Blackhawks. They didn’t act like a team of twenty-somethings on or off the ice in their conference quarterfinals win over the Calgary Flames.

Chicago downed injury-riddled Calgary 4-1 in Monday’s Game 6 to take the series 4-2. The Blackhawks’ previous playoff series win was a four-game sweep of Calgary back in 1996.

The Blackhawks were simply relieved after Monday’s game to have earned their first road win in the series and get a breather before facing the well-rested Vancouver Canucks in the next round.

“We’re excited about the win, but you pay the price,” captain Jonathan Toews said “You take a lot of pressure and abuse.”

Patrick Kane had a goal and an assist for Chicago, with Adam Burish and Brian Campbell also scoring. Dustin Byfuglien added an empty-net goal and had two assists. Rookie Kris Versteeg, a Calder Trophy nominee, also contributed two assists.

Todd Bertuzzi scored the lone goal for the Flames, who managed just two goals in the final two games of the series. They were ousted in the first round for a fourth straight season.

The Flames spent up to the salary cap to build a team for a long postseason run. Injuries hampered them in this series, but the depth wasn’t there in the playoffs, either.

“The organization gave us the opportunity to go deep and to win and we didn’t get it done,” Flames captain Jarome Iginla said. “Injuries are part of it. Even with those, we were still capable for winning this series and it’s hard to take.”

But to dwell on the Flames’ injuries would take away from the Blackhawks’ poise, tenacity and speed in this series.

The Blackhawks had 10 players with a combined 309 playoff games compared to Calgary’s 19 players with 764 postseason games. With 14 players under the age of 25, the Blackhawks are the youngest team in the NHL.

Nikolai Khabibulin made 43 saves for the win. He’s 8-3 in the playoffs against the Flames, including beating them in the 2004 Stanley Cup final when he played for Tampa Bay. His regular-season record vs. the Flames is 22-5-2.

“People started saying in Game 3 and Game 4 he wasn’t playing his best hockey,” Toews said. “He’s our best player and he proved that again tonight.”

Chicago was quicker out of its zone, faster on the forecheck and unafraid to engage Calgary physically.

“All season, I think teams thought they could challenge us physically and we’ve done a good job of answering that bell,” Burish said. “I think a lot of our guys enjoy that. I know I enjoy those confrontations.”

Calgary’s Miikka Kiprusoff stopped 12 shots in the loss. The Flames pressed for goals in the third period and pulled Kiprusoff with more than 2 minutes remaining to no avail.

With Bertuzzi in the penalty box, Kane made it 1-0 just 2:20 in. From the bottom of the circle, Versteeg tried to connect with Byfuglien in front of the net for a tip-in, but the puck deflected out front for Kane.

Byfuglien lugged the puck and circled behind the net to the half-boards before passing to Burish, who beat Kiprusoff midway in the opening period.

Defenseman Campbell’s slap shot from the point through traffic was deflected and beat Kiprusoff to the glove side for a 3-0 edge in the second period.

Bertuzzi skated deep down the wing and beat Khabibulin with a sharp-angled shot over the Russian’s shoulder 54 seconds into the third session.

Notes: With the exception of their run to the Stanley Cup final in 2004, the Flames haven’t made it out of the first round of playoffs since winning the Cup in 1989 … Flames defenseman Dion Phaneuf was a scratch for Game 6 because of broken ribs he suffered getting checked by Chicago’s Troy Brouwer in Game 5. Defenseman Cory Sarich played on a broken foot and both of Daymond Langkow’s hands were not fully functional … The Flames ended the regular season scoreless on their last 45 power-play chances. They were only marginally better during the postseason with two goals on 18 opportunities while a man up.

Updated Apr 28, 2:20 am EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

68 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. nadietienesto
    68. Posted by nadietienesto Tue Apr 28 11:55pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    where have all these Chicago fans come from anyways? Were they not giving away tickets for the last 10 years there with the purchase of a hotdog? Man! I read a Hawk fan's comment about the Northwest Division being weak, well gawd didn't weak @ss Chicago, St. Louis, and Columbus over the last 8 years make the Red Wings president trophy winners like 5 times. So shut it! You have a good team now. Finally! But yer not going anywhere so just calm down. Enjoy the moment.
  2. Tia K
    67. Posted by Tia K Tue Apr 28 8:42pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    im a huge flames fan so i was dissapointed that calgary lost because i live in calgary currently but i hope vancouver kicks chicago,detroits and bostons ass


    GO VANCOUVER
  3. gumby..
    66. Posted by gumby.. Tue Apr 28 7:00pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think Mats and the twins are going to have their hands full with the young guns from the Windy City.
    When it comes to goaltending...I have to give Vancouver the nod,although if the Bulin wall stands firm,this could be a long and enjoyable series.Never a big fan of the western Conferance,I'm the first to admit that picking a winner from this series is a challenge. I'm looking forward to an entertaining series..
  4. Icedragon
    65. Posted by Icedragon Tue Apr 28 6:09pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I have to go with the Canucks for the series if only because of Luongo. Hawks have more young talent offensively (though there's no denying what the Sedin twins can do), but lets face it. Luongo has proven time and again that he's simply one of the best damn goalies around. He got the Canucks into first spot by absolutely stealing the last game against my Flames, so he's fully capable of doing the same thing to the Hawks. Of course, this is definitely going to be a hard fought series, but I think its going to be the Canucks in 6.
  5. Sam S
    64. Posted by Sam S Tue Apr 28 5:45pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Here's to the heart sweat and soul of all involved. It was a tough series, and good luck Blackhawks, as soon you'll face the Vancouver Canucks.
    Go Canucks Go!
  6. billy s
    63. Posted by billy s Tue Apr 28 5:39pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Damn, I'm so sick of immature sports fans. Tell me, what EXACTLY did the hawks do this series to wow so many of you? For a team to have played so poorly the past several seasons, I'm rather happy for Chicago to see them finally getting their act together with a young core, and I think they will be a contender in following years. But some of the posts I'm reading about Calgary is just stepping over the line. Last time Chicago even made the playoffs? Anyone? But Calgary has been there consistently and even reached the finals in 04. "Oh, but Billy, they can't make it past the first round" CHICAGO COULDN'T MAKE IT IN THE FIRST ROUND! I am not taking a thing away from the Hawks, they have a good young core and played the better hockey overall in this series. But Calgary is a talented, hard nosed, physical team with a ton of heart, an amazing goalie, a true and talented captain, and a defense that never quits. So I'm sick of the @#$% people keep saying about how they were rolled over and they're so weak and what not. IT WAS A TERRIFIC SERIES DAMN IT, and both teams will be back. Grow up already, your making the city of Chicago look like a bunch of spoiled brats
  7. billy s
    62. Posted by billy s Tue Apr 28 5:38pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Damn, I'm so sick of immature sports fans. Tell me, what EXACTLY did the hawks do this series to wow so many of you? For a team to have played so poorly the past several seasons, I'm rather happy for Chicago to see them finally getting their act together with a young core, and I think they will be a contender in following years. But some of the posts I'm reading about Calgary is just stepping over the line. Last time Chicago even made the playoffs? Anyone? But Calgary has been there consistently and even reached the finals in 04. "Oh, but Billy, they can't make it past the first round" CHICAGO COULDN'T MAKE IT IN THE FIRST ROUND! I am not taking a thing away from the Hawks, they have a good young core and played the better hockey overall in this series. But Calgary is a talented, hard nosed, physical team with a ton of heart, an amazing goalie, a true and talented captain, and a defense that never quits. So I'm sick of the @#$% people keep saying about how they were rolled over and they're so weak and what not. IT WAS A TERRIFIC SERIES DAMN IT, and both teams will be back. Grow up already, your making the city of Chicago look like a bunch of spoiled brats
  8. Hawks Fan
    61. Posted by Hawks Fan Tue Apr 28 2:21pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    lol nucks are so over rated. Hawks finished with more points, had more goals had less goal against and played in a tougher division then the nucks. I can't see vancouver win, its impossible. Vancouver only has one good line and no depth.
  9. Icedragon
    60. Posted by Icedragon Tue Apr 28 2:17pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I suppose you could argue that the Hawks were the better team based solely on the fact that they DID capitalize on their chances, whereas the Flames did not. If you want to look at it that way I can certainly agree.
  10. Icedragon
    59. Posted by Icedragon Tue Apr 28 2:09pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Pass, you make no sense at all. Are you seriously saying that a 16 shot performance was truly dominant? There has to be something said for being outshot 44-16, despite what you say about 'playoff hockey'. That said, scores and shots should both be taken in stride. Neither one can truly indicate how a team really performed. A 4-1 hawks score doesn't indicate whatsoever that the hawks dominated, just as you say a 44-16 shot advantage shouldn't be used as an indication either. It only shows that the hawks took advantage of the chances they had. The only point of the hockey game where the Hawks actually performed well offensively was in the 1st period when they scored 2 of their goals and had some other chances. Just because their shots happened to go in doesn't mean they were superior. It all has to do with making the most of the chances you're given. As I've already stated, I am well aware that many of the Flames shots were perimeter shots that were not very good. Obviously the Hawks were doing something right to keep it that way. But as I also said with my previous post, its easy enough to say your team was great when they win. You would be trying to make a bunch of piss-poor excuses if the Hawks had lost too. Period.
  11. OilPatch
    58. Posted by OilPatch Tue Apr 28 2:09pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    .....boys, boys, the train wreck is gonna start the minute your Hawks meet Vancouver.

    This isn't an injury depleted team were talking about here (having said that, that is the only reason the Hawks rolled over the Flames) this is a well rested, focused club with one of the best keepers in the league, if not world.

    Luongo will stone your @sses.......... Canucks in 6.
  12. alwoychuk
    57. Posted by alwoychuk Tue Apr 28 1:47pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Flames are overpriced losers, no Phanooofs and Igggginle awill be on the Olympic Team, Hah, and Hah
  13. alwoychuk
    56. Posted by alwoychuk Tue Apr 28 1:41pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Canucks take out Hawks in 5 games,m blank them twice
  14. Pass
    55. Posted by Pass Tue Apr 28 1:39pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'll agree on one thing, we probably should have swept this weak, pathetic Calgary team. The only reason we didn't is this was the young Hawks' FIRST PLAYOFF EXPERIENCE. They learned what it takes, what playoff intensity means and how to rally from 2+ goals down. Overall, they come out even stronger than a team which simply swept through (nucks). Not making any predix...but I think the Hawks-nucks will go at least 6.
  15. Q-Stache Power
    54. Posted by Q-Stache Power Tue Apr 28 1:33pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It's gonna be a great series against Vancouver. Luongo vs. Khabibulin. It's gonna be all-around a fun matchup. I'm taking Hawks in 7, but I can easily see Vancouver winning as well.
  16. Adam
    53. Posted by Adam Tue Apr 28 1:24pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Does not matter how many times you shoot if you aren't placing your shots well. The Flames put up a lot of shots. However, they failed to center the puck multiple times (thorwing it in front of the net with no flames players there), threw errant passes away in their own zone, and were too closely covered by Blackhawk defenders to try for the one-timers. Yes, they had alot of shots on goal, but shooting it at a goalie (rather than drawing the goalie away from one side of the net and shooting there) is not going to have a lot of success against an NHL high caliber goalie such as Habby.
  17. Pass
    52. Posted by Pass Tue Apr 28 1:23pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    IceD, your the one ranting here that Calgary was the "better" team last night. Not only did the score indicate otherwise, as I posted earlier, anyone familiar with PLAYOFF HOCKEY knows who was truly superior last night. The shot total meant nothing. DEFENSE wins games in the playoffs and once the Hawks got the lead, we shut the flamers down preventing them from getting many scoring chances. Calgary's weak shots from 35 ft out just proves the fact the Hawks played good team defense and Khabby handled the few close in chances. You'd think after being booted out of the playoffs in the first rnd for 4 years in a row, the flames and their fans would know better. Maybe ignorance is bliss.
  18. Hawks Fan
    51. Posted by Hawks Fan Tue Apr 28 1:20pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I agreed they should of swept such a weak Calgary team.
  19. Hawks Fan
    50. Posted by Hawks Fan Tue Apr 28 1:18pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hawks won't have any problems against they girly Nucks, Northwest is such a weak division. Hawks in 4 at most 5.
  20. OilPatch
    49. Posted by OilPatch Tue Apr 28 1:13pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    ....... to all you Hawk bright lights that are saying that their team 'rolled' over the Flames, they skated circles around them, and yap, yap, yap......

    I'll I can say is this:

    why did it take your 'glorious' Hawks 6 games to beat an injury riddled, power play deficient, overmatched hockey team?

    Pretty P1ss Poor performance by the Hawks..... they should have swept the series but they didn't.
  21. Icedragon
    48. Posted by Icedragon Tue Apr 28 1:03pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What are you ranting about Pass? Who is arguing that Chicago handed Calgary's asses to them in game 5? I agree, Keenan sucks and Iggy didn't step up. Also, you're clearly making assumptions. I've accepted the defeat, if you bothered to read my first post you'd have seen that. There could easily be an arguement for how 'close' the series really was too. Game 1 the flames outplayed the Hawks the whole game, it was only the last 10 minutes that they started to get sloppy and Havlat made them pay. Congrats to him, nobody is taking that away. But of course, the fact that the Hawks won the game blinds you to the fact and its easy enough for you to say Chicago was the 'better team'. Its funny how easily people say 'oh our team was totally the better one' when their team is the one to win. Now, hypothetically speaking of course, if the Hawks had lost, you would be the one @#$%ing and trying to make excuses. I wonder if the score would have been 4-1 for the flames last night, you would have been the ones complaining 'oh the Hawks sucked tonight, look at the shots, 44-16, they didn't show up, they got their asses handed to them!' Obviously in the end it doesn't matter because whats done is done, I'm not going to argue that. But some people really need to take the time to pull their heads out of their asses and look at things from both angles.
  22. Oli
    47. Posted by Oli Tue Apr 28 12:44pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wow! Matt you need to stay awake for west coast games and make informed predictions. Nucks in 5 not sure about the other but it will go to 7. Chi fans kudos to a much improved team....gald to see an original 6 back on track....but this aint your year. Sure gonna be nice to see the ducks biatch slap those wings for 7 games....hope the wings win...they'll be like jello afterwards. :)
  23. Pass
    46. Posted by Pass Tue Apr 28 12:42pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Icedragon, your team was thoroughly beaten down game 5 and the Hawks just did what they had to win last night- no more, no less. If you want to talk about weak goals , I think half of Calgary's total fits into that category. The fact is this series was not even that close. Calgary never rallied from behind (2 goals or more) to win, they failed to hold a 3 goal lead in gm4. They were physically beaten down during game 5, and anyone who's familiar with playoff hockey knows the Flames shot total last night didn't mean jack $*&†. Those were weak shots and Khabby shut them down. Keenan was outcoached and your team was outplayed, even your vaunted captain Iginla admitted that. The sooner you accept defeat the easier it'll be for yourself. Have a nice summe...er wait, you had snow last week. Have fun trying to golf in the slush!! HAHAHA
  24. Matt N
    45. Posted by Matt N Tue Apr 28 12:16pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wings in 5. Hawks in 6.
  25. Icedragon
    44. Posted by Icedragon Tue Apr 28 12:11pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Dick F, you are correct of course. I got ahead of myself. My point is simply to not say that Hawks are going to roll over the Canucks as Peter Q is jumping the gun by implying.
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Three Stars

  Three Stars
N. Khabibulin
Nikolai Khabibulin
Blackhawks - G
Saves: 43
Save Pct.: .977
C. Sarich
Cory Sarich
Flames - D
Goals: 0
Assists: 0
D. Byfuglien
Dustin Byfuglien
Blackhawks - RW
Goals: 1
Assists: 2

Goaltending

Goalie Team Shot Save
Miikka Kiprusoff Cgy 15 12

Scoreboard

Monday, Apr 27
Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™