Report: Columbus Blue Jackets need financial fix

  • Print

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP)—Columbus may have trouble holding on to the NHL’s Blue Jackets because the club has been losing $12 million a year in central Ohio, according to a report released Thursday by a business group.

The report commissioned by the Columbus Chamber offers a variety of options for strengthening the hockey team’s financial position, such as new taxes or fees or selling shares to other investors or the general public.

Other suggestions include allowing the team to renegotiate its lease for Nationwide Arena or trying to attract a second major tenant, such as a basketball team.

“It is important that our community retain this team,” said Dave Blom, chairman of the Columbus Chamber board. “The Columbus Blue Jackets impact our regional economy, support thousands of jobs and bring millions of dollars in tax revenue that contribute to our quality of life.”

In the decade following 1998, the year after investors began the move to bring the team to Columbus, the city’s downtown Arena District has attracted various retail, restaurants and other businesses, increasing property values by 267 percent and employing thousands, the report says.

Columbus Blue Jackets President Mike Priest said that the team’s current economic model has “significant disadvantages” and that it plans to work with public and private groups to find a solution.

Priest said the Blue Jackets, now in their ninth season, have built and maintained fan and corporate participation that has supported the team.

“Public partnership in arenas and stadiums has been a critical element to ensuring healthy, competitive sports franchises in markets across the country, including Cleveland and Cincinnati in Ohio, and our priority continues to be to secure long-term financial viability in this great city,” he said.

Options in the report, produced by Stephen Buser, a finance professor from the business college at Ohio State University, include plans to continue the current private ownership, opt for alternate private ownership or public-private partnerships.

He says in the report the Blue Jackets are at a disadvantage to other NHL teams for reasons including that the team must pay $5 million a year to use the arena, incur costs of managing the arena year round and have no access to parking revenue or payments for arena naming rights.

The $150 million arena was financed by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. It is one of the few NHL facilities in the country that is privately owned—largely because county voters wanted it that way. They have rejected arena tax issues three times between 1986 and 1997.

The team’s owners unsuccessfully asked that the current state budget include a tax increase on beer, wine, liquor and cigarettes in Franklin County to raise $65 million to underwrite a county takeover of the arena.

The state Department of Development has been involved in discussions with Nationwide, the Blue Jackets, and city and county officials, department spokesman Bob Grevey said Thursday. While nothing specific is on the table, the state recognizes the importance of keeping the team in Columbus, he said.

Local voters have repeatedly rejected public financing of the center, and the tax increase was opposed by members of the beer and wine industry, including brewing giant Anheuser-Busch, which operates one of its 12 U.S. breweries in the city.

The Blue Jackets qualified for the first time last year for the NHL Western Conference playoffs, losing in the first round to the Detroit Red Wings.

The team came to town nine years ago through significant private funding— much of it from the late John H. McConnell of steel finishing company Worthington Industries. McConnell died last year, leaving his son John P. McConnell at the helm of the business.

Updated Nov 5, 5:16 pm EST
digg del.icio.us
more

129 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Michael
    129. Posted by Michael Fri Nov 6 8:40pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Cleveland doesn't want that stupid team, Brandon.
  2. overtaxed
    128. Posted by overtaxed Fri Nov 6 4:39pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Simple solution. Fire Gary Bettman.
  3. Art Vandelay
    127. Posted by Art Vandelay Fri Nov 6 3:18pm EST

    Report Abuse

    uh....Katie, under your proposal, 24 teams would be disbanded. Again...it has NOTHING to do with fan support. You could argue that Atlanta, Miami, an possibly Raleigh have fan base concerns. Even that is somewhat unfair, because when teams win, fans show up -- in any sport. Raleigh sold out games when they were winning, and Detroit, Chicago, and Boston had plenty of empty seats when they were losing. Why were the Blackhawks constantly "blacked out"? Does anybody remember the last time the Red Wings sucked for consecutive years? I do...it was the 1980's and they averaged 5-6000 people per game.

    TV revenue drives the machine for franchises to make money, because player salaries are high...factor in cost of maintaining a building, etc...and these teams are simply looking for the best deal out there. You tell me how many NHL teams are not cash strapped. Even teams who go deep into the playoffs don't hardly bring in any money.

    Again, the reality is the reality. If the Jackets leave, I will understand because their current business model sucks. But don't tell me the fans are doing their part or that , Winnipeg, or Quebec is a better option. At the end of the day, TV revenue drives the engine. I would be concerned as a fan in every NHL market out there, minus the original 6. If the Minnesota Northstars, the Quebec Nordiques, the Winnipeg Jets, the Cleveland Browns, the Baltimore Colts, the Houston Oilers... can ditch their fans...anything is possible.
  4. <i>youngjet</i>
    126. Posted by youngjet Fri Nov 6 2:17pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Columbus should play games in Cincinnati, Cleveland and Akron and rename themselves Ohio Bluejackets or Buckeye Bluejackets.. How about the Ohio Players??
  5. Turkpbr
    125. Posted by Turkpbr Fri Nov 6 1:14pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I heard Jim Balsillie is on the crackberry right now trying to put a deal together.
  6. Katie
    124. Posted by Katie Fri Nov 6 11:50am EST

    Report Abuse

    now columbus, last month phoenix, who is next tampa bay. the nhl has got to get rid of these teams. get the league down to a point where your not going to worry who is next in line to cry broke. a couple of years ago chicago was drawing about 9000 a game for 3 or 4 years i did not hear them crying about moving or getting a new lease. stop holding these cities for ramson if they cant afford the team and the city and fan wont support it well its just like losing your home your out of there! at the end of this year they should disband those team and have a draft of the players to other teams to make the league stronger. support the team or lose it!
  7. Katie
    123. Posted by Katie Fri Nov 6 11:47am EST

    Report Abuse

    now columbus, last month phoenix, who is next tampa bay. the nhl has got to get rid of these teams. get the league down to a point where your not going to worry who is next in line to cry broke. a couple of years ago chicago was drawing about 9000 a game for 3 or 4 years i did not hear them crying about moving or getting a new lease. stop holding these cities for ramson if they cant afford the team and the city and fan wont support it well its just like losing your home your out of there! at the end of this year they should disband those team and have a draft of the players to other teams to make the league stronger. support the team or lose it!
  8. Brandon
    122. Posted by Brandon Fri Nov 6 11:36am EST

    Report Abuse

    I'm really ashamed to be reading this. I love the Blue Jackets ever since they entered the league. And as everyone said, that area in Columbus is very nice and lit up.

    STOP TALKING ABOUT CANADA. Do you guys realize how dumb and greedy you guys look but viciouslly wanting a team to relocate? It's not happening, so stop your endless dreaming.

    AND WE'RE NOT MOVING TO CLEVELAND. Cleveland is Ohio's biggest @#$%hole. Crime, no education, just a big black hole for Ohio. Indians? They suck, always choke. Browns? Need more information? And Cavs? They choke. No hockey team would survive there. Keep them in Columbus where they can actually play and do something for us!
  9. <i>blulinr</i>
    121. Posted by blulinr Fri Nov 6 11:33am EST

    Report Abuse

    Why is it the NHL seems to desperately want to save teams like Phoenix, Nashville and Columbus? They haven't been able to make it on their own for whatever reason (in Nashville, they refuse to spend money), so why is it so important the NHL have struggling teams in markets that won't support them? Try somewhere else!
  10. Kevin D
    120. Posted by Kevin D Fri Nov 6 11:29am EST

    Report Abuse

    j namath,

    I don't know how you can say that considering CBJ was a playoff team last year. It would not make the league better.

    How about two hours north up 71, play at The Q??

    Having said that, I really hope they stay in Columbus, the arena district is very nice and it would be a shame to lose it.
  11. MUNCHIES MAN.. WHO'S GOT DA MUNCHIES???
    119. Posted by MUNCHIES MAN.. WHO'S GOT DA MUNCHIES??? Fri Nov 6 11:20am EST

    Report Abuse

    CAN THEY HOLD ON?/
    On Tuesday the voters in Ohio approved casino style gambling in four cities in Ohio and Columbus is one of them.

    I agree that they need to share the arena with an NBA team , but that won't happen ( Somebody tought that Oklahoma city was OK and Seattle is waiting).

    Well just wait and see if the team is moved to Hamilton or Toronto. This should be a sign to all hockey clubs. IT'S TIME TO DO SOME NEW MARKET DEVELOPEMENT.... Attrack non-traditional fans to the games.
  12. DON_DOC_IN
    118. Posted by DON_DOC_IN Fri Nov 6 11:01am EST

    Report Abuse

    Only Nash Jerseys? What no Boll jerseys? Now I'd get one of those! He still looks weird in #40. I still see him as the Whalers #7
  13. j namath
    117. Posted by j namath Fri Nov 6 10:58am EST

    Report Abuse

    It's about time. There's about 8 other teams and cities on life support. Contraction is the way to go. It would make the league so much better and stronger.
  14. Art Vandelay
    116. Posted by Art Vandelay Fri Nov 6 10:22am EST

    Report Abuse

    Thanks coldshot,

    As a former Whalers fan, I understand the what the Devils fans go through,tucked in between the big boy markets.

    Adam,

    Before Buttman goofed everything up in the NHL, teams were moving left and right as well. Colorado to NJ, Atlanta to Calgary, Minnesota to Dallas...I mean, it is not like the NHL has been stable trying to grow its product over the years.

    Did the Northstars deserve to leave Minnesota? It is not as simple as saying if a team does well, then the fans will throw down money to support the team and everything will be honky dory. You can't tell me that Phoenix doesn't support hockey, simply because the team plays in the desert. That is pure ignorance. Just because a team doesn't have the legacy of the Detroit Red Wings, the city and fan base should be cast aside????

    Average attendance for the Red Wings during the 80's was about 5-6 thousand per game. Some hockeytown! The team sucked, and nobody showed up. Any team in any sport (including the mighty Boston Red Sox or Dallas Cowboys, or LA Lakers...etc) will lose fan support if the team throws crap on the field/ice for a few straight seasons.

    Hockey is different than the other sports though because TV revenue doesn't generate squat. If an NHL team cannot survive in Columbus, it sure as hell won't survive in Winnipeg or Quebec or Portland, or Las Vegas, or Kansas City!!!

    So for people out there complaining that the fans are weak and that by moving to Canada will solve the NHL's problems...I say cut the league down to 5 or 6 markets like the 1920's...because ultimately the league will collapse if a franchise that fills over 90 % of it building for 9 (losing) seasons cannot make money. The problem is bigger than fan support!
  15. <i>coldshot89</i>
    115. Posted by coldshot89 Fri Nov 6 9:13am EST

    Report Abuse

    @ #110 Art: You're right on. I'm a Devils fan where we are in the last third of attendence in the NHL drawing an avg. of around $15,00/game. Tough market to break into wedged between original 6 Rangers, early 80s dynasty Islanders, and the Flyers. The Devils are the 4th team in a crowded hockey market in a hurting economy where the sport of hockey is fourth amongst popularity. However, The Devils organization has maintained its position in the top 5 of the teams with the healthiest profit margin. They are and have been a very financially successful franchise and it is because of the 'brain trust" that Art is talking about. It begins and ends there.
  16. da fat man
    114. Posted by da fat man Fri Nov 6 9:03am EST

    Report Abuse

    Somebody help me do the math on some of this. First, the owners claim a $12 mil/year loss, right? They then claim it's because of their lease agreement. How can a $5mil/year lease agreement cause you to lose $12 mil/year? CBJ is continually under the cap and the owners claim they have "great fan support
    "? Somebody please shed some light on this because it does not add up. I think a small part of the problem is merchandising. I never see a CBJ jersey in any of the sports shops in Ohio. My son wanted a Nash jersey and you have to order one from the team website to get it. Not real conducive to marketing, in my opinion. Last year the ONLY CBJ jersey available was a Nash jersey; no Mason, Voracek, Brassard etc...Whomever markets this team sucks.
  17. Adam P
    113. Posted by Adam P Fri Nov 6 9:02am EST

    Report Abuse

    What's interesting is that all the teams in trouble are eiter a) southern market teams, or b) Bettman-era expansion teams, or both (Nashville and Atlanta). The only financially stable team out of the southern and recent expansion teams is Minnesota, and that was going to be obviously successful before they joined the league. Columbus was a calculated risk, but eight straight years of missing the playoffs doesn't help a team's bottom line.

    The first question becomes: after a team has had a little success (and that is bound to happen for every team at some point), and fan support goes up as a result, will fan's financial support STAY when the team inevitably doesn't do as well? The answer in a good market is "yes" (Minnesota, Toronto), and the answer in a bad market is "no" (Tampa, Atlanta).

    Secondly, while no one loves spending money on a bad team, is the team capable of drawing enough fans to give the franchise enough money to make a legitimate attempt at competing well, whether the team is good or bad? In other words, if your team can only turn a minimal profit during a deep playoff run, and without that will severely hemorrhage money every year, then the odds are your team will eventually slip to mediocrity or worse. This is why Carolina, one of the strongest southern franchises, is, in reality, not in a long-term tenable situation- three luckily deep playoff runs, including an incredibly lucky Stanley Cup run, have kept them afloat. Luck, however, will lose out in favor of cold hard facts. If the Hurricanes face five or six straight years where they don't escape the 1st round, or worse, you'll start to see their franchise mentioned in articles like this.
  18. Adam P
    112. Posted by Adam P Fri Nov 6 9:02am EST

    Report Abuse

    What's interesting is that all the teams in trouble are eiter a) southern market teams, or b) Bettman-era expansion teams, or both (Nashville and Atlanta). The only financially stable team out of the southern and recent expansion teams is Minnesota, and that was going to be obviously successful before they joined the league. Columbus was a calculated risk, but eight straight years of missing the playoffs doesn't help a team's bottom line.

    The first question becomes: after a team has had a little success (and that is bound to happen for every team at some point), and fan support goes up as a result, will fan's financial support STAY when the team inevitably doesn't do as well? The answer in a good market is "yes" (Minnesota, Toronto), and the answer in a bad market is "no" (Tampa, Atlanta).

    Secondly, while no one loves spending money on a bad team, is the team capable of drawing enough fans to give the franchise enough money to make a legitimate attempt at competing well, whether the team is good or bad? In other words, if your team can only turn a minimal profit during a deep playoff run, and without that will severely hemorrhage money every year, then the odds are your team will eventually slip to mediocrity or worse. This is why Carolina, one of the strongest southern franchises, is, in reality, not in a long-term tenable situation- three luckily deep playoff runs, including an incredibly lucky Stanley Cup run, have kept them afloat. Luck, however, will lose out in favor of cold hard facts. If the Hurricanes face five or six straight years where they don't escape the 1st round, or worse, you'll start to see their franchise mentioned in articles like this.
  19. Adam P
    111. Posted by Adam P Fri Nov 6 9:02am EST

    Report Abuse

    What's interesting is that all the teams in trouble are eiter a) southern market teams, or b) Bettman-era expansion teams, or both (Nashville and Atlanta). The only financially stable team out of the southern and recent expansion teams is Minnesota, and that was going to be obviously successful before they joined the league. Columbus was a calculated risk, but eight straight years of missing the playoffs doesn't help a team's bottom line.

    The first question becomes: after a team has had a little success (and that is bound to happen for every team at some point), and fan support goes up as a result, will fan's financial support STAY when the team inevitably doesn't do as well? The answer in a good market is "yes" (Minnesota, Toronto), and the answer in a bad market is "no" (Tampa, Atlanta).

    Secondly, while no one loves spending money on a bad team, is the team capable of drawing enough fans to give the franchise enough money to make a legitimate attempt at competing well, whether the team is good or bad? In other words, if your team can only turn a minimal profit during a deep playoff run, and without that will severely hemorrhage money every year, then the odds are your team will eventually slip to mediocrity or worse. This is why Carolina, one of the strongest southern franchises, is, in reality, not in a long-term tenable situation- three luckily deep playoff runs, including an incredibly lucky Stanley Cup run, have kept them afloat. Luck, however, will lose out in favor of cold hard facts. If the Hurricanes face five or six straight years where they don't escape the 1st round, or worse, you'll start to see their franchise mentioned in articles like this.
  20. Art Vandelay
    110. Posted by Art Vandelay Fri Nov 6 8:34am EST

    Report Abuse

    wow...the ignorance on here astounds me. Again, all of you who blindly assert that Ohio and other "expansion" franchises can't support hockey...blah blah blah...you have NO CLUE about geography or economics. I am so sorry that you never left the confines of Toronto, NYC, or Boston....or you just want to mock us Ohio fans because you hail from Pittsburgh or Detroit (where your team could easily hit the endangered list of NHL teams too) Think that is crazy? Remember the Baltimore Colts, Cleveland Browns, and Houston Oilers of football? Oh yeah, they didn't support their teams either!

    Teams don't leave Quebec, Winnipeg, or Hartford because lack of fan support. They leave because the "brain trusts" in charge of creating and stabilizing the economic model for their franchises' success, have failed miserably. The Blue Jackets are in trouble right now, not because nobody supports the team, but because the team cannot keep up with the costs of maintaining the franchise (through leasing their arena, and collecting funds from concessions/parking, etc.).

    The Jackets are in Phoenix's position regarding paying to stay in an expensive building. Most of the southern cities you Canadians and others are complaining about are made up of northern transplants. True, some of these markets have a hard time building a "core" base of fans, because the transplants still identify with NY, Boston, or Chicago teams...but that is not the case with Columbus. It is a rabid fan base, who has put up with 9 straight years of crappy hockey, and is starting to see a good product on the ice. Reading the REAL article off the Columbus Blue Jackets, the report is not suggesting the team will move, but rather the team is looking to work with the city to create a solution for this problem. One final note about this: Ohio recently passed a casino bill that will help generate money for Ohio cities. This income wasn't not factored into the original report, but I think it will halp the team. I just am sick and tired of everyone complaining about small markets needing to go away b/c nobody cares. Watch a game or visit another city for once!
  21. <i>evmo21</i>
    109. Posted by evmo21 Fri Nov 6 7:45am EST

    Report Abuse

    if i were commisioner: get rid of all small market teams such as any team south of washington dc and move them all to canada or the northern states. theres more of a market and no one gives a crap about hockey in ohio or tennessee anyway
  22. Matt
    108. Posted by Matt Fri Nov 6 7:35am EST

    Report Abuse

    I mean, I'm from Minneapolis, and if the Wild were the "St. Paul Wild" yeah I'd cheer for them and take pride in their accomplishments, but given the bit of rivalry between the Twin Cities, I might eventually resent them when loud mouth St. Paul residents starting jabbering.
  23. Matt
    107. Posted by Matt Fri Nov 6 7:34am EST

    Report Abuse

    I don't see why they ever named them Columbus in the first place. Why openly exclude all Ohio markets?
  24. <i>captian142002</i>
    106. Posted by captian142002 Fri Nov 6 6:52am EST

    Report Abuse

    i have been reading most of the comments posted. i agree that the teams that are in any kind of trouble are all expansion teams under the miget bettman. he knows more about hockey as i know about needle point ( no offence to all that needle point ). i like indy boiler comments about how he travels from indy to see the games. that is great. Mr Profiler, hate to burst your bubble , but hamilton will never get a nhl team. that is prime area for the leafs and sabers. i live in toronto, but i am a die hard montreal fan. Quebec , well that is questionable. Remeber before tampa bolts moved into their digs, i think they played in a warehouse ( joke ) but it is true that they played in a small venue. Bettman believed that the sunny states, florida and arizona since there is many snow birds that is what he would draw on, problem is, is that the snow birds are all retired and are on fixed income. i attended ( last year ) a leaf game. me and my son saw leafs/habs. i recieved these tickets from my company. each ticket cost 184.00 bucks (canadian). Winnipeg would be more suited. But the big thing is if you add a new team, present teams should only be able to protect say 10 players. this will open up a whole entire pool of players that would make the team a competitive team right away. that is the key, i have more but i shall wait
  25. Le Tricolore
    105. Posted by Le Tricolore Fri Nov 6 6:47am EST

    Report Abuse

    A lot of people are blindly calling Nationwide the "bad guys" here saying they are the only ones making any money.

    What people do not realize is that Nationwide own the building and it cost them $150 million. Charging an annual rent of $5M represents a mere 3.33% return (excluding the operating costs that are the responsibility of the Jackets which is standard in any lease agreement). You cannot reasonable expect someone to give you $150M and not allow them to earn a "reasonable" profit (this is not a Communist economy). This is why the Columbus arena is the only arena that is privately financed...because no one in their right mind other than Nationwide would take a 4% pre-tax return on a $150M investment. (assuming the "free naming rights" would represent about another $1M annually that they benefit from).

    In my humble opinion, the only people making money is Franklin County (sorry it could be the city of Columbus, I am not sure on that but a municipality nonetheless) - "the city’s downtown Arena District has attracted various retail, restaurants and other businesses, increasing property values by 267 percent and employing thousands, the report says."

    So, the property tax revenues in the downtown have increased by 267% (an assumption) and wage tax revenues have significantly increased as a result of the increased jobs and then of course there is the effect of more people working and more tourists coming to watch the games which translates into more hotel sales, shopping, ... more spending, and yet, they do not want to kick in anything to help make the team more viable.

    The "corporate titan" is not the one to blame here people in this case.

    The people of Franklin County need to realize the positive impact of having the Jackets there and use their votes to make something happen to help their team otherwise...

    But those are just my thoughts, not yours.

    Cheers.
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Video Spotlight

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™