Puck Daddy - NHL

What did we think of Los Angeles Kings defenseman Rob Scuderi's(notes) hip check on Jason Chimera(notes) of the Columbus Blue Jackets, which sent the winger face-first onto the ice and cut him open during the first period of Sunday night's game?

First off, it was less a hip check than a chop block, to make a football comparison. Scott Stevens on Tie Domi ... now that's a hip check, and in the middle of the rink no less.

But Scuderi submarined Chimera, if not at the knees then near them; compare that with the very comparable (and controversial) Keith Ballard(notes) tilt-a-whirl check on Evgeni Malkin last season (video), and you'll see that Scuderi looks like Jorge Posada blocking an errant curveball by comparison.

Rich Hammond from Kings Insider saw it like this:

Chimera stayed on the ice for a couple minutes, and sustained a cut to his head. No penalty was called on Scuderi, but the Blue Jackets took offense, as Derek Dorsett(notes) went after Scuderi near the bench and drew a game-misconduct penalty. Chimera also attempted to go after Scuderi and got a 10-minute misconduct penalty.

The hit in question (if a higher quality video emerges, we'll update):

Was it illegal?

No penalty was called on Scuderi, and you're rarely going to see one on an attempted hip check like that. Is it technically tripping? Here's how the NHL defines it:

"A player or goalkeeper shall not place the stick, knee, foot, arm, hand or elbow in such a manner that causes his opponent to trip or fall."

Ah, no mention of the back or tailbone. So there you go.

Again, Scuderi comes in so low you almost have to believe it wasn't his intention; that he misjudged Chimera's approach or lost an edge or something of that ilk. But the claims by the announcers that Scuderi doesn't dabble in the dark arts of vicious hip checks near the boards? Ask Dainius Zubrus about that.

There will be outcry from the usual "protect the head!" punditry; it will get a look from Toronto; but it would surprise us to see any supplemental discipline for Scuderi, despite the gruesome Chimera contortionism chronicled by Erin Nicks on The Universal Cynic. It would be penalizing the acrobatics of the hit rather than the play itself.

UPDATE: Rich Hammond gets quotes from Scuderi ("I don’t have a reputation as a dirty player"), Kings Coach Terry Murray ("The hit is just a hockey hit"), and Chimera, who isn't exactly a happy camper:

"It was low. It was a dirty hit. I don't care what you call it. I've been hip-checked before, but it's a dirty hit. There's no room in the game for that kind of (stuff). When the guy takes your knees out, what are you supposed to do? It wasn't a hip check at all. It was a direct hit on the knees. They had no explanation, so I don't know what they (the referees) were thinking. I mean, I landed on my face on the ice and my neck was squished against the ice. I'm lucky I didn't come out with a concussion or something. It's a dirty play. There's no room in the game for that. There are too many guys that are carried out on stretchers because of dirty stuff. There's no room in the game for it. There's got to be a level of respect out there."

OK, but did you think it was a dirty hit, Jason?

UPDATE 2: Puck Buddy Chris D. corrects us that the call should have been "clipping" rather than tripping, according to NHL Rule 45:

Clipping is the act of throwing the body, from any direction, across or below the knees of an opponent.

A player or goalkeeper may not deliver a check in a "clipping" manner, nor lower his own body position to deliver a check on or below an opponent’s knees.

An illegal "low hit" is a check that is delivered by a player or goalkeeper who may or may not have both skates on the ice, with his sole intent to check the opponent in the area of his knees. A player or goalkeeper may not lower his body position to deliver a check to an opponent’s knees.

By the letter of the law, Scuderi could have been given a major for cutting Chimera. But intent to injure in this situation is a tougher call.

digg delicious
more

100 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. SweetTeen81
    1. Posted by SweetTeen81 Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:09 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Looked like a clean "face wash" to me!
  2. Adam
    2. Posted by Adam Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:11 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    That was a pretty low hit.
  3. Johnny Appleseed
    3. Posted by Johnny Appleseed Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:18 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    This looked like a misjudged angle by Scuderi, rather than a vicious hit.
    Compared to some of what we've seen so far this year, it's rather tame.
    Even so, a hit like that *could* cause a serious injury, but until it *does* there will be no rule change.
  4. akpghfan
    4. Posted by akpghfan Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:18 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    In slow mo it actually looked like he caught him above the knee on the side of his quad. Scuds is not a dirty player..
  5. hockeychick57
    5. Posted by hockeychick57 Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:18 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wow he's lucky he didn't seriously mess up his neck
  6. Shaun T
    6. Posted by Shaun T Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:20 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    looks like first contact is with his knee... that's low
  7. igtiger2
    7. Posted by igtiger2 Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:25 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Allowing that kind of hit will most definitely result in serious injuries that might not just end careers but ruin lives. I understand that Hockey is a contact sport but it doesn't take an athlete to undercut a guy running full speed by hit him low and flipping him over. It also doesn't matter how strong or tough the athlete is, that injury can be crippling.
    I am a huge hockey fan, I don't mind contact but I don't like seeing players get hurt especially from hits that will injure more often than not.
  8. Return2Sender
    8. Posted by Return2Sender Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:26 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    He was way too low. It might not be illegal now, but it should be. Look at how dangerous that is. There was no need to go that low.
  9. Brian
    9. Posted by Brian Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:26 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think you just about covered it, Wysh--thank you for the links to other video clips for comparison and also the quote from the rule book. I agree that this is less a hip check than a chop block. I love a good hip check, but this one is just too low. Maybe the NHL could consider a rule adjustment stating how low you can go (intentional or accidental). We'll just have to wait and see what the league says.
  10. trisrobg
    10. Posted by trisrobg Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:30 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    If you don't want to get hit then play tennis
  11. JP13
    11. Posted by JP13 Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:31 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Come on wysh you know Scuds is a clean player and one of the nicest guys your gonna meet. Don't try to make his out to be a dirty player with the Zubrus stuff. It was a legal hit by all accounts. Much more so than the Ovie slew foot or the Richards head shot on booth or the Ruutu boarding of Tucker. This was just a good demonstration of old fashioned hockey and while it wasn't perfect like Scott Stevens could pull off it was pretty damn nice. Keep it up Scuds!
  12. Trav
    12. Posted by Trav Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:32 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    cheap hit! where's the penalty? couldv'e killed him.
  13. Blake D
    13. Posted by Blake D Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:34 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    sick hit legal
  14. Billy
    14. Posted by Billy Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:40 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Cry baby. I guess no one remembers the real days of hockey when men played. This NHL is so woosified it's ridiculous, pretty soon the games will be scores of 30-27. Lame.
  15. Tom
    15. Posted by Tom Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:41 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    If a hit like the one Chimera took from Scuderi is OK in the rules of hockey, then the rules need a second look.
  16. cky3396
    16. Posted by cky3396 Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:42 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    jersey foul @ 3:25...
    ps, RIP jason chimera
  17. RELENTLESSFORECHECK
    17. Posted by RELENTLESSFORECHECK Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:43 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    There will be outcry from the usual "protect the head!" punditry
    Come on, Wysh, seriously? Take of your Scott Hartnell jersey and quit being a punk; there's a big difference between initiating contact with someone's head and landing on it.
    I do like Rob Scuderi, but that was a dangerous play. Looks to me like Scuderi mis-judged his approach, realized he was going to miss, and tried to close ground quicker by lowering his body. And, as is often the case when hits don't develop according to plan and the hitter tries to make something out of nothing, somebody ends up getting hurt. It should have been a penalty, but no suspension is warranted.
    Still, the right thing would be for Colin Campbell to send a memo to the players, coaches, and officiators with clarification that this type of hit is unacceptable.
  18. carter.rubin@...
    18. Posted by carter.rubin@... Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:45 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Way too low.
    No one seems to argue that, even the homers (like me).
  19. MaTT
    19. Posted by MaTT Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:45 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Scuderi got so low his knees were almost at the ice, That was a dirty hit. Id rather get an elbow to the face, a concussion is better than a surigicaly repaired knee. He may have not tried to go that low but it was a dirty hit.
  20. The Tank
    20. Posted by The Tank Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:46 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yeah, it was clean. He went in hard and he fell down hard. Simple as that. If he didn't have the puck, then it's an extreme version of an obstruction interference. Something about that Stevens hit on Domi didn't seem legal though because it was a 50-50 for the puck in open ice and only Domi seemed to have any intention in taking the puck. Stevens is dead red for the hit... well every time in his career. I would make the interference call because just getting a stick on the puck doesn't mean you have possession of it. It would make that shady routine of waiting til the guy touches the puck on a 50-50 hit illegal.
  21. thegoaltender82
    21. Posted by thegoaltender82 Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:11 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    the impact on the knee wasn't even that bad...he just flipped him,
  22. j v
    22. Posted by j v Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:21 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    scuderi used chimera's momentum against him....whats wrong with that?....might have been a bit low, but thats nothing compared to the crap phaneuf pulled....and it was pre-season.
    and i see nobody talking about the hit chimera put on frolov near the end of the game.....frolov shut him up with a goal on that penalty ;)
  23. SharksRedSoxFan
    23. Posted by SharksRedSoxFan Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:23 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    That's in the league of Tucker taking out Peca's knees. Bush league.
  24. Karine
    24. Posted by Karine Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:31 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    It was clean. Stop your crying!
  25. fender b
    25. Posted by fender b Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:31 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Chimera likes to whine a lot..............just ask Belanger. As for the hit, it might be a little low, it didn't look like knee, but thigh. Certainly way less dangerous than "Captain Leadership's" headshot on Booth.

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™