Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:09 am EST
Thanks to all of you who sent this clip over this weekend. For those who haven't had a peek yet, here's former Tampa Bay Lightning coach Barry Melrose with Ron MacLean from "Hockey Night in Canada."
We're all for coaches speaking their minds in a candid way after they're dismissed. It's their right, and there is nothing wrong with attempting to bring a different side of the firing to light.
That said: Melrose just added a new layer of embarrassment to the nadir of his hockey career. What delusion. What forced-cool. What an example of a general blaming his troops and his superiors for losing the war.
He blames management's counsel for cutting Vincent Lecavalier's ice time by nearly three minutes per game? And, Barry: Steven Stamkos was more than just a No. 1 pick the team wanted to play more than 11:59 per game; he was the team's No. 2 center, and a vital offensive cog. Getting him going, by any means necessary, had to be a priority rather than an anti-authoritarian stand.
Barry hangs his hat on the Lightning having the best first-period defense on the NHL. That and a token will get you on the subway. The real issue is goal-scoring, which the Lightning didn't do. And that's where Melrose, even if he refuses to self-evaluate this way, was an epic failure.
He changed the team's offensive philosophy. Either he misjudged the personnel or didn't allow the defense to get involved enough (the Bolts have three goals from their defense all season) or he didn't earn the team's trust in his circa-1995 system; whatever the case, it's his offense that failed to produce.
But hey, Barry: At least you can tell your buddies in the media all those tales about rampant dysfunction in Tampa. As if you didn't contribute to it.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Detroit 3, Montreal 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Dallas 5, New Jersey 3 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Chicago 5, Edmonton 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
177 Comments
1 - 25 of 177
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I bet he doesn't even know the lyrics to Kumbaya.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
This entire ordeal has been incredibly entertaining -- almost as good as Tort's post-game press talks.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
But who does he blame for cutting his mullet?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
All the same, that was a low blow to outsource all the blame on players and management. Melrose' coaching career could have just been remembered as awful, but now he will be remembered as an awful coach who couldn't accept responsibility for his actions.
Report Abuse
People don't like Barry Melrose because he has a cocky demeanor and that is up to the individual to judge. But I don't blame him at all for calling out the players for their failures. Why does everyone think that these guys need to be coddled even more then they already are? They get paid hundreds of thousands if not millions and they don't even wipe their own butts! Tampa Bay sucks and they will continue to suck because (this story exposes the fact that) they are more worried about their feelings then they are winning.
Report Abuse
Dan Boyle - SJ sharks 16 points (6 goals) in 18 games - oh yeah we traded that guy cause Melrose or the owners didn't like him
Worse trade ever.
Report Abuse
1. The GM and owners should have known what sort of system Barry was going to implement, and make a hiring decision partially on that. If they didn't like his system, it's really their own fault. As everyone has noted, it's not as if Barry plays his cards close to the vest on this one.
2. Is it really possible with rookie owners and a rookie GM to accurately evaluate how a coach is doing in just 16 games? Especially with the amount of turnover already mentioned?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I'm sure Gretzky leaving had nothing to do with that. Dude the reason Melrose lost his job was that he was no good after the massive player turnover happened in 94. Melrose was "good" cause of the talent he had on his team, not cause he was a good coach. That's why he got canned with the Kings.
1 - 25 of 177