Puck Daddy - NHL

No. 1 star: Ryan Getzlaf(notes), Anaheim Ducks

His minutes were down in Game 4 and his line was broken up in Game 5, but Getzlaf's unit stepped up big time in Tuesday's series-extending 2-1 victory over the visiting Red Wings. Reunited as expected with Corey Perry(notes) for the survival game, Getzlaf used a hard hit on Dan Cleary behind his own net to start a power-play rush, then converted a rebound of a Scott Niedermayer(notes) shot on the other end to give Anaheim a 1-0 lead in the second period. He'd add an assist on Perry's goal later that same period while dominating all night in the faceoff circle (16 of 24 draws won) and adding three hits.

No. 2 star: Patrice Bergeron(notes), Boston Bruins

If you worked yourself into a scoring position and put your stick on the ice, you probably wound up on the scoresheet Tuesday in Boston's 4-2 win in Carolina that forced a Game 7. All four Boston goals were the result of superb feeds, with Bergeron providing two of the best for the Bruins. His pass to Mark Recchi(notes) on a 2-on-1 led to Boston's first goal and his thread-the-needle dish to Chuck Kobasew(notes) provided some breathing room late in the second period. It was a complete effort for the centerman, who played in all situations while leading Bruins forwards in ice time.

No. 3 star: Corey Perry, Anaheim Ducks

There's always a tendency to give the goalie a nod after a 38-save effort (consider that an honorable mention, Mr. Hiller), but Anaheim's Game 6 win was really all about the reunion and revival of the Getzlaf-Perry line after a lackluster performance in Game 5. Like Getzlaf, Perry had a goal and an assist and like his centerman, Perry turned a play in the defensive zone into paydirt on the other end. It was his diving poke check that short-circuited a Valtteri Filppula(notes) scoring chance on Jonas Hiller's(notes) doorstep, and in the continuing action Perry set up in front of Detroit goalie Chris Osgood(notes) for a deflection goal that held up as the winner.

Major Penalty: The Ducks have proven that the most penalized team in the playoffs can win the Stanley Cup. They did it in 2006-07. But there's playing with edge and playing with fire, and Anaheim nearly crossed that line Tuesday. Rookie Andrew Ebbett(notes) was baited into a pair of late penalties that a road team trailing 2-0 is just begging to receive. Detroit converted on the second power play, setting the stage for 3 ½ anxious minutes that never had to happen. Then there's the business of that postgame melee. I'm sure we'll have more reaction on this later after the combatants (and possibly the NHL) weigh in, but it's hard to see what the Ducks can gain from having their heavies beat up Pavel Datsyuk(notes) and Brian Rafalski(notes) in advance of a road Game 7.

Minor Penalty: Let's just say when you have a chance to close out a series at home in a Game 6, you want to take advantage. If Carolina is going to avoid a collapse after leading the series 3-1, it needs to get some production out of Rod Brind'Amour(notes) (one point in playoffs after monster March), Erik Cole(notes) (two points in postseason, zero goals) or Ray Whitney(notes) (stuck on one point in series).

Conn Smythe Watch: (The Top 10) 1. Sidney Crosby(notes), Pittsburgh Penguins; 2. Johan Franzen(notes), Red Wings; 3. Patrick Kane(notes), Chicago Blackhawks; 4. Alexander Ovechkin(notes), Washington Capitals; 5. Tim Thomas(notes), Bruins; 6. Henrik Zetterberg(notes), Red Wings; 7. Ryan Getzlaf, Ducks; 8. Eric Staal(notes), Hurricanes; 9. Dave Bolland(notes), Blackhawks; 10. Simeon Varlamov(notes), Capitals.

digg delicious
more

85 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. HotStacey
    1. Posted by HotStacey Wed May 13, 2009 2:36 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    wings played a great 2 min. of hockey!
  2. Edmund D
    2. Posted by Edmund D Wed May 13, 2009 2:36 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wings fan here. Game six was the first game of this series I thought the Wings were outplayed. Im not sure if the Ducks can muster another preformance like that, but their D1 paring and PK was OUTSTANDING.
    On a side note, is it just me or does it seem like there has been a let down with our (WIngs) touted "defensive forwards"? Sometimes it feels like their cherry picking instead of getting back, lol.
  3. Edmund D
    3. Posted by Edmund D Wed May 13, 2009 2:37 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    P.S. Go Wings!
  4. HotStacey
    4. Posted by HotStacey Wed May 13, 2009 2:38 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    pavs 3% SP is gonna get 'em, yeah! all it takes is $14 million for two "elite" players to do NOTHING. homer is worthless as well. WTF? uh, wings, in order to win....you usually have to actually TRY TO WIN.
  5. Q-Stache Power
    5. Posted by Q-Stache Power Wed May 13, 2009 2:41 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Can I point out how hilarious it is that in today's Conn Smythe watch, Sidney Crosby jumped back up to no. 1 and Patrick Kane dropped to no. 3, and yet neither of them played? I thought that was kind of funny.
    http://thehockeywriters.com
  6. skapunknj
    6. Posted by skapunknj Wed May 13, 2009 2:43 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Still no Duncan Keith
  7. mwchad
    7. Posted by mwchad Wed May 13, 2009 2:51 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    You know, after both of the games in which the 'Wings lost in Anaheim, a brawl broke out. Babcock said that his team would not engage in after-the-whistle scrums, but I guess that did not count after-the-horn scrums. It makes it look like the 'Wings are poor losers, right?
  8. CUP#12
    8. Posted by CUP#12 Wed May 13, 2009 2:58 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wings til death!! hockeytown forever!! forever hockeytown!!
  9. K P
    9. Posted by K P Wed May 13, 2009 3:01 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Someday Lindsay Soto is going to make a pile of books a fine librarian. GEEEEZ her interviewing sucks, and we cant even get a peek.
  10. Hollywood
    10. Posted by Hollywood Wed May 13, 2009 3:04 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Not when the Ducks are the one instigating it. Also since when did we go back to pre-lockout hockey. There was so much clutching and grabbing by the Ducks I felt like I had been transported back to the mid-90's.
  11. Twig
    11. Posted by Twig Wed May 13, 2009 3:05 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    if the ducks play their best game in game 7, the wings can still win if they play a full 60 minutes. it's all on whether or not detroit shows up.
  12. timthenchant3r
    12. Posted by timthenchant3r Wed May 13, 2009 3:07 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Imagine no wings or pens in the playoffs. My life would be complete, but who's balls would VS suck? Ovie i guess
  13. FigsLee
    13. Posted by FigsLee Wed May 13, 2009 3:08 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hey Cup.. what did I tell you about that Ducks team... huh?
    Also, on the con smythe list, why is Crosby #1 but Ovechkin is #4 and outplaying him...? Don't get it.
    Looks to me like Rafalski didn't make that big a difference either, good call on that by the way.
  14. grinch
    14. Posted by grinch Wed May 13, 2009 3:15 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Scott Niedermayer is a heavy?
  15. FigsLee
    15. Posted by FigsLee Wed May 13, 2009 3:15 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Twig, you say that every time the Wings lose. "Oh they didn't play 60 minutes.. if only they played 60 minutes, they would have won." that's like saying "man, if only more pucks made it past the goalie into the net, we would win more games!" Give me a break, if the Ducks play 60 minutes and the Wings play 60 minutes, it will be a great game 7, and either one of them could come away with the win.
  16. Twig
    16. Posted by Twig Wed May 13, 2009 3:17 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    last time the wings were scored on in a game 7:
    Montreal was defending it's cup title.
    Chelios was less old.
    Hartford and Winnipeg still had teams.
    Messier hadn't guaranteed victory for the rangers, yet.
    1994! (and yes it was ozzie in an epic phail to the sharks)
  17. hk
    17. Posted by hk Wed May 13, 2009 3:19 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think Crosby is number 1 because overall he has been playing better in the playoffs,while Ovechkin didn't play too well vs. the Rangers but is tearin up the defenseless Penguins...
    How bout them wings?i was shocked last nite,i thought the wings were goin to tear the ducks apart...i guess i was wrong...are the wings fans worried or not?i'm not tryin to antagonize any1 i'm just wondering what they are thinkin rite now....and what bout u Pens fans?worried bout 2nites game?
  18. hk
    18. Posted by hk Wed May 13, 2009 3:20 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Oh yeah,and i think Getzlaf should be higher up on the list,he's been amazin in the playoffs
  19. Twig
    19. Posted by Twig Wed May 13, 2009 3:23 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    @Figs
    yes i do say that every time. i believe it to be true every time. they can't wait till the third period of an elimination game to start playing their game and win. same with game 3. pretty much a full 60 minutes in games 4 and 5 and they weren't even close. i guess we'll just have to wait and see.
  20. FigsLee
    20. Posted by FigsLee Wed May 13, 2009 3:58 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    @Twig
    In games 4 and 5 the Ducks didn't play 60 minutes. The Wings didn't play 60 minutes, they just played more than the Ducks did. The reason the Ducks beat the Sharks had nothing to do with skill, or being the "better" team. It was because they out worked the Sharks on just about every play they could. That's what I see happening to the Wings in this series. Of course they have better talent, they are pretty close to the same team as they were last year, and they won the cup, but the Ducks just disrupt tempo with their style of play. They fight for every inch, and the Wings aren't used to fighting for those inches ('cept in the locker room) lol sorry, bad joke, and honestly more power to the Wings if they win the series. You're right though, they have to play 60 minutes of hockey to beat the Ducks, but I think if they both play 60 minutes of hockey, it will be a close game, 3-2 or 1-2.. something along those lines. You just expect the Wings will win, instead of hoping they do, means you aren't a hockey fan, and you probably became a Wings fan during a year they won the cup.
  21. pickle
    21. Posted by pickle Wed May 13, 2009 4:21 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    figs 0wnz twig
  22. Twig
    22. Posted by Twig Wed May 13, 2009 4:28 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    sigh. figs, you had me until you labeled me a bandwagon fan. not even close. up until that point though, yeah it will probably be a close game. you say i expect them to win therefore i am not a hockey fan...
    been a fan since 93 when i got into hockey. we had a snow day at school and my mom rented Mario Lemieux Hockey for the sega genesis to pass the day. after playing that all day, i asked for a stick for christmas. i played in our driveway and was hooked. my family didn't follow sports at all so i knew little of the red wings, but seeing as how i lived in michigan, they were my team. that year, i saw them lose to toronto in the first round. the next year, i saw them become the first #1 seed to lose to a #8 seed. the next year, they lost to the devils in 4 very quick games. then, they set an NHL record for wins in a season only to lose to colorado in the conference finals.
    yup, i road that bandwagon of playoff success for 4 years.
  23. spectr17
    23. Posted by spectr17 Wed May 13, 2009 4:49 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Scotty Neidermayer = new little ball of hate. 5149 1/2 at the end of that game.
  24. Slazz
    24. Posted by Slazz Wed May 13, 2009 5:52 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why would they put Duncan Keith on there? I mean he has only helped shut down the Sedin twins, Saint Iggy, and has the second best plus minus in hockey? No one want a player like that on the MVP watch.
  25. Slazz
    25. Posted by Slazz Wed May 13, 2009 5:57 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why would he put Keith on there? I mean he only shut down Saint Iggy, then the Sedin twins and has a top five plus minus in the playoffs. Not too many points (which is what this is all based on anyways) but he is a D man that could play on ANY team, and probably be on the top two on 90% of the teams in this league.

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™