Wed May 13, 2009 2:26 am EDT

No. 1 star: Ryan Getzlaf(notes), Anaheim Ducks
His minutes were down in Game 4 and his line was broken up in Game 5, but Getzlaf's unit stepped up big time in Tuesday's series-extending 2-1 victory over the visiting Red Wings. Reunited as expected with Corey Perry(notes) for the survival game, Getzlaf used a hard hit on Dan Cleary behind his own net to start a power-play rush, then converted a rebound of a Scott Niedermayer(notes) shot on the other end to give Anaheim a 1-0 lead in the second period. He'd add an assist on Perry's goal later that same period while dominating all night in the faceoff circle (16 of 24 draws won) and adding three hits.
No. 2 star: Patrice Bergeron(notes), Boston Bruins
If you worked yourself into a scoring position and put your stick on the ice, you probably wound up on the scoresheet Tuesday in Boston's 4-2 win in Carolina that forced a Game 7. All four Boston goals were the result of superb feeds, with Bergeron providing two of the best for the Bruins. His pass to Mark Recchi(notes) on a 2-on-1 led to Boston's first goal and his thread-the-needle dish to Chuck Kobasew(notes) provided some breathing room late in the second period. It was a complete effort for the centerman, who played in all situations while leading Bruins forwards in ice time.
No. 3 star: Corey Perry, Anaheim Ducks
There's always a tendency to give the goalie a nod after a 38-save effort (consider that an honorable mention, Mr. Hiller), but Anaheim's Game 6 win was really all about the reunion and revival of the Getzlaf-Perry line after a lackluster performance in Game 5. Like Getzlaf, Perry had a goal and an assist and like his centerman, Perry turned a play in the defensive zone into paydirt on the other end. It was his diving poke check that short-circuited a Valtteri Filppula(notes) scoring chance on Jonas Hiller's(notes) doorstep, and in the continuing action Perry set up in front of Detroit goalie Chris Osgood(notes) for a deflection goal that held up as the winner.
Major Penalty: The Ducks have proven that the most penalized team in the playoffs can win the Stanley Cup. They did it in 2006-07. But there's playing with edge and playing with fire, and Anaheim nearly crossed that line Tuesday. Rookie Andrew Ebbett(notes) was baited into a pair of late penalties that a road team trailing 2-0 is just begging to receive. Detroit converted on the second power play, setting the stage for 3 ½ anxious minutes that never had to happen. Then there's the business of that postgame melee. I'm sure we'll have more reaction on this later after the combatants (and possibly the NHL) weigh in, but it's hard to see what the Ducks can gain from having their heavies beat up Pavel Datsyuk(notes) and Brian Rafalski(notes) in advance of a road Game 7.
Minor Penalty: Let's just say when you have a chance to close out a series at home in a Game 6, you want to take advantage. If Carolina is going to avoid a collapse after leading the series 3-1, it needs to get some production out of Rod Brind'Amour(notes) (one point in playoffs after monster March), Erik Cole(notes) (two points in postseason, zero goals) or Ray Whitney(notes) (stuck on one point in series).
Conn Smythe Watch: (The Top 10) 1. Sidney Crosby(notes), Pittsburgh Penguins; 2. Johan Franzen(notes), Red Wings; 3. Patrick Kane(notes), Chicago Blackhawks; 4. Alexander Ovechkin(notes), Washington Capitals; 5. Tim Thomas(notes), Bruins; 6. Henrik Zetterberg(notes), Red Wings; 7. Ryan Getzlaf, Ducks; 8. Eric Staal(notes), Hurricanes; 9. Dave Bolland(notes), Blackhawks; 10. Simeon Varlamov(notes), Capitals.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Detroit 3, Montreal 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Dallas 5, New Jersey 3 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Chicago 5, Edmonton 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
85 Comments
1 - 25 of 85
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
On a side note, is it just me or does it seem like there has been a let down with our (WIngs) touted "defensive forwards"? Sometimes it feels like their cherry picking instead of getting back, lol.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
http://thehockeywriters.com
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Also, on the con smythe list, why is Crosby #1 but Ovechkin is #4 and outplaying him...? Don't get it.
Looks to me like Rafalski didn't make that big a difference either, good call on that by the way.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Montreal was defending it's cup title.
Chelios was less old.
Hartford and Winnipeg still had teams.
Messier hadn't guaranteed victory for the rangers, yet.
1994! (and yes it was ozzie in an epic phail to the sharks)
Report Abuse
How bout them wings?i was shocked last nite,i thought the wings were goin to tear the ducks apart...i guess i was wrong...are the wings fans worried or not?i'm not tryin to antagonize any1 i'm just wondering what they are thinkin rite now....and what bout u Pens fans?worried bout 2nites game?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
yes i do say that every time. i believe it to be true every time. they can't wait till the third period of an elimination game to start playing their game and win. same with game 3. pretty much a full 60 minutes in games 4 and 5 and they weren't even close. i guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Report Abuse
In games 4 and 5 the Ducks didn't play 60 minutes. The Wings didn't play 60 minutes, they just played more than the Ducks did. The reason the Ducks beat the Sharks had nothing to do with skill, or being the "better" team. It was because they out worked the Sharks on just about every play they could. That's what I see happening to the Wings in this series. Of course they have better talent, they are pretty close to the same team as they were last year, and they won the cup, but the Ducks just disrupt tempo with their style of play. They fight for every inch, and the Wings aren't used to fighting for those inches ('cept in the locker room) lol sorry, bad joke, and honestly more power to the Wings if they win the series. You're right though, they have to play 60 minutes of hockey to beat the Ducks, but I think if they both play 60 minutes of hockey, it will be a close game, 3-2 or 1-2.. something along those lines. You just expect the Wings will win, instead of hoping they do, means you aren't a hockey fan, and you probably became a Wings fan during a year they won the cup.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
been a fan since 93 when i got into hockey. we had a snow day at school and my mom rented Mario Lemieux Hockey for the sega genesis to pass the day. after playing that all day, i asked for a stick for christmas. i played in our driveway and was hooked. my family didn't follow sports at all so i knew little of the red wings, but seeing as how i lived in michigan, they were my team. that year, i saw them lose to toronto in the first round. the next year, i saw them become the first #1 seed to lose to a #8 seed. the next year, they lost to the devils in 4 very quick games. then, they set an NHL record for wins in a season only to lose to colorado in the conference finals.
yup, i road that bandwagon of playoff success for 4 years.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 85