Puck Daddy - NHL

"Most teams don't come back from that ... We have to decide if we're going to be one of those special teams that does." - San Jose Sharks defenseman Dan Boyle, after his team went down 0-2 in its first-round series.

By "most teams," Boyle's talking about the 87.3 percent of teams that have lost the first two games of a series and then were eliminated. As fans from Washington to Calgary can quote like scripture these days, only 37 of the 291 teams that started in an 0-2 hole climbed out to win a series.

Are the President's Trophy winners done? Hard to say. One more game of the systemic problems that have people talking about the Sharks as playoff chokers again, and they are done. One more game of Anaheim Ducks goalie Jonas Hiller stopping every vital chance, infrequent as they are, and they are done.

The problems are many for San Jose. But here are five that, if addressed, could lead to the rally Boyle wants to believe can still happen.

1. Fix the power play, fix the power play, and when that's done, fix the power play.

The 0-for-12 mark for the Sharks' power play in the first two games, after finishing third in the League with the man advantage, is one of the most stunning numbers of the postseason. Especially when the Ducks were 23rd overall on the kill.

If they're going to break Hiller, it needs to start on special teams.

The struggles on the power play can be directly traced to the struggles of individual Sharks. Defenseman Christian Ehrhoff is second to Boyle in PP ice time, and he's had stretches of putrid hockey this series. Joe Thornton, Milan Michalek and Patrick Marleau are three of the top four forwards in power-play time; they have one assist between them in the series.

Granted, the work being done by Scott Niedermayer, Francois Beauchemin and Todd Marchant on the kill can't be overlooked. But the Sharks should be good for at least one tally by now.

Anything on the power play in Games 1 or 2 changes the dynamic of both Ducks' wins. Maybe it's time to give a Jonathan Cheechoo or Jeremy Roenick more time on special teams. Then again ...

2. Todd McLellan needs to stop getting outcoached

... Yes, the line changes for Game 2 yielded some results: Marleau-Travis Moen-Devin Setoguchi played well against the Ryan Getzlaf line; and Cheechoo-Thornton-Roenick combined for a goal. But a President's Trophy team reshuffling the deck in Game 2 seems a little reactionary; there's a case to be made for having the lines that got you here work their way out of it.

How much benefit is there for Setoguchi, going forward, not to play with Thornton? And as EJ Hradek pointed out, the untouched line of  Joe Pavelski, Ryane Clowe and Michalek accounted for a goal and a combined 14 shots.

3. Joe Thornton needs to get physical

From "Cheechew" at Battle of California:

I always defended Thornton when Boston fans criticized him for his lack of playoff success.  If you are one of the top players in the league you have to show it in the playoffs.  Joe has been invisible these 2 games.  Randy Hahn was on sportstalk radio a few days ago and made an interesting observation.  He mentioned how the Ducks were making a conscious effort NOT to hit Thornton since he plays better when he is physical.  What the hell?  Getzlaf and Perry are doing what Marleau and Thornton should be doing, controlling the play.

Indeed. Thornton's never exactly been a steamroller physically, but he recorded only two hits in the first two games. We take "invisible" to mean "nonassertive," and Thornton's been a pedestrian too often. A couple of nice passes in Game 2 doesn't do it. The label of playoff choker still doesn't fit as well as critics believe it does; but Joe has to join the party in Game 3 for that knock to wane.

4. Zero Heroes

The San Jose Sharks' fan boards have an award their voting on called the "Thornton Award" (Joe's not eligible to win) that goes to the Sharks forward who "exemplifies a need to choke, a playoff invisibility, and basically exemplifies a disbelief at their horrendous play."

Marleau leads the voting right now, because he's suddenly become Patrick Marleau in the playoffs again. Four shots in two games, and now playing off the Thornton line. In fact, of the nine players who had multiple game-winning goals this season, one (Cheechoo) has a goal in this postseason.

Had the Sharks rallied, Cheechoo would have been a hero of Game 2. But there wasn't another player who stepped up to complete the rally. They need Pavelski, Michalek or one of the defensemen to provide an unanticipated goal. Hell, maybe even Claude Lemieux comes through.

5. Finally, don't discuss being the Sharks with the media

From Ray Ratto of Sportsline:

Let us consider instead the Sharks, who are two games away from becoming the nation's new best example of the "F" word.

Fraud.

Other teams have disappointed in the playoffs, and not just the NHL version. Miami put up 64 points Sunday in being routed by Atlanta, and no, it doesn't matter who you're playing, 64 is ridiculous. Other teams have been persistently quick outs, especially in the NBA where the stratification of the league is so extreme that only a very few teams harbor legitimate title hopes in any given year.

But the Sharks, and we put it to you the Sharks alone, are the team that takes regular-season success, grand expectations and a fan base that until about 16 hours ago loved the team without reservation, and returned almost nothing.

With that, we mention another 'F' word: Fear.

Fear that it's all happening again. Fear that the rookie coach doesn't have the answers. Fear that geographic bragging rights are two wins away for a hated division rival. Fear that whatever weird voodoo that pervades this franchise is striking again. (We've always suspected Arturs Irbe sold his soul to beat the Detroit Red Wings and the Sharks are now forever doomed.)

Most of all, the Sharks need to deal with one very important fear: That the numbers aren't in their favor.

The one game at a time cliché notwithstanding, Boyle's right: It's time to decide whether San Jose's making history or joining the sad 87.3 percent of two-game losers-turned-golfers in NHL playoff history.

digg delicious
more

166 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Smooth As Butter
    1. Posted by Smooth As Butter Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Marleau, Moen, and Setoguchi played well? really? Every time Seto touched the puck yesterday he turned it over. The only players who performed were Jeremy Roenick, Ryan Clowe, and towards the end of the game Jonathan Cheechoo.
  2. HitThePost
    2. Posted by HitThePost Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Dan Boyle needs to resurrect this team
  3. Wyshynski
    3. Posted by Wyshynski Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ Smooth As Butter --
    As I said, I think Seto's offense will suffer not playing with Joe. But as a line, having watched the game, I thought they played pretty well.
  4. Sayles
    4. Posted by Sayles Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    " Jonas Hiller stopping every vital chance, infrequent as they are"? What are you talking about? 34 shots on Thursday and 44 shots on Sunday.
  5. HitThePost
    5. Posted by HitThePost Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Most of the shots were from the point and unscreened, especially in Game 1.
  6. Wyshynski
    6. Posted by Wyshynski Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ Sayles --
    I'm talking about quality, sir. Not stats.
  7. Wyshynski
    7. Posted by Wyshynski Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ Sayles --
    I'm talking about quality, sir. Not stats.
  8. LJ
    8. Posted by LJ Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i for one welcome another quick exit by the sharks. i find their jekyll-and-hyde hilarious and oddly satisfying.
    watching them play the ducks, its obvious that they don't know how to play playoff hockey. once april turns into may, the skill has to turn to will. okay, that sounded too much like pierre mcguire.... ummm, go ducks! you're making me look like a genius in my pool (though getzlaf and perry could put up some more points).
  9. Magnet-Crotch
    9. Posted by Magnet-Crotch Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Do the sharks actually skate out of that monstrous joke of a shark sculpture to start the game? That thing has Spinal Tap's Stonehenge written all over it.
  10. Jonny K
    10. Posted by Jonny K Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:57 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Am I the only person who seen this comming from miles away?! Anaheim in 4. Make sure theres a medic around.. someones gonna need to give these choking Sharks the Hemlich....
  11. Garth the Hoser
    11. Posted by Garth the Hoser Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Joe Thornton will never win a Stanley Cup. Don't know how it could be any plainer than that. Harry Sinden knew it. Mike O'Connell knew it. Jeremy Jacobs knew it. Everybody with fkn eyes knows it.
  12. Neil S
    12. Posted by Neil S Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:08 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @sayles-
    a shot is not the same as a chance. scoring chances have been woefully low for the sharks...unless you're a ducks fan, of course!
  13. Hazen
    13. Posted by Hazen Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:52 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    hahahahaha..#12 a comin to hockeytown!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  14. banginpanger.com
    14. Posted by banginpanger.com Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:04 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    How sad is it when you point out that Jeremy Roenick is one of the top performers on your President Trophy winning team? Or say, is this 1991?
  15. Ty-1
    15. Posted by Ty-1 Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I wonder where fin_fan is? i'd LOVE to hear his take on this topic, as i assume he's a Shark's fan, judging by his tag.
  16. Mandingo
    16. Posted by Mandingo Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @Magnet-Crotch
    Marleau: "Can I raise a practical question at this point? Are we gonna skate out of the shark's mouth tomorrow?"
    Thornton "No, we're not going to f*cking skate out of the shark's mouth!"
  17. Kohzlick
    17. Posted by Kohzlick Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Let's not forget this 'F' word: Flamingo
  18. Shaun
    18. Posted by Shaun Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I was at the game last night. The Sharks tried really hard, so I can't fault them for a lack of effort. But I see 3 issues that they haven't resolved, which is a big part as to why they're down 2-0 in this series.
    1) 0-12 on the power play in this series. This has to be fixed.
    2) They give the puck away far too often in the neutral zone. I think they gave the puck away 21 times last night.
    3) SJ can't get anyone in the way of Hiller - he sees the puck coming at him 90% of the time. At this level, a goalie will save the shot if he can see it coming at him most of the time. Anaheim has no issues creating screens in front of Nabakov, so SJ needs to find a way to create problems for Hiller.
    That's my two cents.
  19. Ty-1
    19. Posted by Ty-1 Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Like i said on another thread earlier today, it seems to me that most of the top teams fighting for first overall has nothing left for the playoffs. There's very few exceptions, like Detroit, as much as i hate to admit that, what with being a Pred's fan, but anyways... this scenario almost gets played out every d.amn spring. And, for some unknown reason EVERYONE is stunned and bewildered when it happens almost EVERY spring. The best example was a couple of seasons ago, there was a 3 way race for first overall... Detroit, Buffalo and Nashville... only one of those 3 made any noise in the playoffs... The Red Wings, the other two wore out after entering in that stupid first race, teams should just focus on making the playoffs, so first overall gets a banner, big freakin deal, like that's something to be proud of. Also, i'd be embarassed to accept any award or trophy with dipsticks name attached to it. Except the Cup, of course, but Bettman's name ain't attached to that 1, just his creepy old fingers.
  20. Dewman
    20. Posted by Dewman Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Most teams don't come back from that ... We have to decide if we're going to be one of those special teams that does." said Dan Boyle. If you have yet to decide this, then you are already doomed. This is actually one of the dumbest lines I've ever heard. By saying this, he seems to think there is option to choose not to win. I remember back in 2002, Detroit also lost the first two at home. They did not say we have to decide, Steve Yzerman said "We are going to win the next two games in Vancouver and then the series." Obviously they backed it up too. Whether or not they won that series... there was no talk about deciding to be a "special team". There was no other option. They have not been outplayed, but seriously the Ducks give 6 to 8 pps a night. Capitalize on them. Play physical. You have way more depth than Anaheim... use it. GO WINGS!!!
  21. Fox
    21. Posted by Fox Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ray Ratto has been crapping on SJ since the day it passed SF in population (that was so long ago the Chronicle and Examiner -- and even the San Mateo Times -- had separate sets of beat guys ... for the Giants and 49ers).
    One and two sound pretty reasonable to me. And since the article mentions Like Wall against the Wings, how did Detroit fare in 2002 down 0-2 to the Canucks? Bueller?
  22. Lew Ghost
    22. Posted by Lew Ghost Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    WHY?????
    Making life tough to be a sharks fan!
  23. puck lover
    23. Posted by puck lover Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Sharks just came into this as, we are number #1 and we will leave that way, well boys we have been and conquerred the Stanley and you can think what you like, but we will go on to play for Sir Stanley again, with are minds focussed and not think we are all it, and deserve to win as the Sharks came into the Playoffs.
  24. GT
    24. Posted by GT Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Here we go again for the Sharks...or am I too early to say that?
  25. Fox
    25. Posted by Fox Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Damn, Dewman, you are too fast for me.
    @Ty: That was 2006-2007; Preds lost in the first round ... to the Sharks, who were somehow still labeled chokers.

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™