Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:49 pm EDT
Every weekday in August, Puck Daddy presents "5 Ways I'd Change the NHL," in which a cross-section of sports media and hockey personalities offer solutions, suggestions and absurdities to remake the League to their liking. We're thrilled to have Stu Hackel, writer for the New York Times' Slap Shot blog, contributing his list today ... along with another list as told to him by, of all people, the late George Carlin.

By Stu Hackel
1. Bring back organ music. I'm a rock 'n' roller at heart. But 18 seconds of some arena rock anthem -- or any song -- blaring at 120 decibels during stoppages just detracts from the game, jolts your system and then frustrates you when it's turned down at the faceoff. More to the point, organ music in a big barn just feels right at a hockey game. It blends in perfectly. If you think deleting the noise for the organ would turn NHL game presentations into something less than state of the art, you're over thinking.
2. A better shootout format. Let's see the game decided by something more closely resembling the game. If the game is tied after overtime, the teams play two minutes of three on three. If no one scores, two minutes of two on two, Then two minutes of one on one (all with goalies, of course). Teams can change on the fly, but no changing on whistles. I've coached under these rules and it is absolutely terrific. And it's hockey, not a skills competition.
3. Penalize teams in the shootout. If the shootout rules don't change, there's an inequity that should be addressed: Let's say a player gets a good scoring chance with 30 seconds remaining in overtime. He gets tackled by an opponent, who gets what amounts to a 30 second penalty. But if no one scores, the game isn't over yet, they go to the shootout -- and the offending player could end up being a shootout hero who has escaped serving a full penalty because, chances are, the guy who committed the penalty is pretty good or he wouldn't be on the ice in that situation. So if a minor penalty occurs inside the last two minutes, the offending player and his team should still be penalized by making the fouling player be the last guy in line to take part in the shootout for his team.
4. More shorthanded play. The NHL isn't going to enlarge the size of the playing surface. Forget it; the owners are not taking out two rows of their most expensive non-suite seats. And let's not consider making the game a four on four contest. Besides ruining the symmetry of the spectacle, it would negate too much of the physical element from the game, and enough has vanished since the lockout. But here's a good compromise: End the substitution of players for coincidental majors and for when minors taken while a team is already shorthanded. Two guys fight? It's four on four for five minutes. A pair of fights? Three on three. Two guys get their sticks up during a power play? It's now four on three. Those were the NHL's rules for a long time and restoring them now would make sense.
5. End the guaranteed point for a tie. Coaches and managers love it because it makes teams look better than they really are, but it's ridiculous that 24 teams out of 30 had winning records last year. Beyond that, however, the guaranteed point makes for some sluggish third periods as teams hang on rather than press forward. The rationale for the bonus point when it was introduced in 1999 was that it would make the teams go harder in the four on four overtime so the game would have a decision. But with the adoption of a shootout, there's no longer that rationale. Scrap it. You lose the game, you don't get a point.

(As a special bonus, we present "5 ways I'd change the NHL that will never be considered but should," as told to Stu Hackel by the late comic genius George Carlin at a recent séance ... or so Mr. Hackel claims.)
By George Carlin (R.I.P.), as told to Stu Hackel
1. Institute the death penalty for diving. Everyone thinks embellishment is ruining the game, robbing it of its inherent sense of fair play and honest sportsmanship. The two-minute penalty hasn't worked, and what happened to the idea that the Hockey Operations Department in Toronto would watch games and tapes and fine chronic offenders? Clearly, these measures are inadequate and too soft. We need to keep hockey a man's game. So if you dive, you'll pay a man's price: You will be executed. The owners can decide if these executions should occur on the ice or if the player should be taken to a room under the stands. Firing squad, lethal injection, hanging or gas chamber will be determined by the prevailing laws of the state or province in which the game is played. For those venues where there is no death penalty, mandatory life imprisonment will be observed. It's that serious.
2. Hire ex-Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf as an NHL vice president. This man conned the US government for years, grabbing billions of our tax dollars and swearing he'd hunt down the Taliban and al Qaeda hiding out in the mountains but did nothing; Maybe he even gave them some of the money. He's the master salesman we've been waiting for to convince America that hockey is really the best sport on the planet. So what if he knows nothing about the sport? Neither do most of the other 428 NHL vice presidents. Plus, he clearly knows all the angles, so he can help screen potential NHL owners and root out the crooks.
3. Institute the 'Designated Fan Program.' Since many fans believe they know more about how to play for, coach or run an NHL club than the people currently doing it -- and who knows, maybe they do? -- let's try them out. Sponsored by the NHL's Official Adult Beverage Companies in both countries, in conjunction with their designated driver education programs (a natural tie-in), every home game will feature a designated fan who will assume the job of his choice for a 48 hour period. He or she must follow all applicable NHL regulations and nothing he or she does can be undone or reversed. The possibilities are endless.
4. Start a new number retirement tradition. When a great player's number is retired by a team, don't just hang an oversized bed sheet in the rafters with his name and number stenciled on it. Put the guy in uniform, hook him up to the ropes, pull him up there and leave him there. There's no better way to always have his spirit in the building.
5. Let the Leafs win the Stanley Cup. The benefits, both economic and sociological, really need no explanation, but this concept can be multi-faceted. The idea would be to create a special division with the current Maple Leafs and four classic NHL "expansion" teams using the exact same players today who were on their original rosters: The 1979 Winnipeg Jets, the 1979 Quebec Nordiques, the 1979 Hartford Whalers and the 1975 Kansas City Scouts. OK, the players are a bit older -- except for Gordie Howe -- but think of the good will engendered by returning the game to two more Canadian markets, helping to revitalize downtown Hartford and solving AEG's empty arena problem in KC. Now, in this division, the Leafs should make the playoffs (although you can't be sure), and once they do, since most fans are convinced the NHL instructs officials to favor some teams over others, it'll be a snap. I can hear it now: "Tomas Kaberle, your fans have waited an eternity for this: Come get the Stanley Cup!"
We seriously have our doubts as to whether Mr. Hackel actually contacted Mr. Carlin beyond the grave, because not one of his "5 ways" included the phrase "Didja ever notice?" Coming up on Friday: Puck Daddy's own Sean Leahy, followed by The Fourth Period's Dave Pagnotta on Saturday and the Wyshynski list on Sunday.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Detroit 3, Montreal 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Dallas 5, New Jersey 3 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Chicago 5, Edmonton 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
33 Comments
1 - 25 of 33
Report Abuse
1. Needs to be done within the start of the next season.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
it's two rows-worth of the cheapest priced seats that would be taken out. it's the common fan - not the dork in the suit who doesn't care either way - that gets pinched if they widen/lengthen the playing surface.
Report Abuse
People probably say that the owners won't take two rows of the most expensive seats out because that is the only place where the seats can be removed in order to make room for a larger ice surface.
How would they take out two rows of the cheap seats? Think about that one for a second and reply.
George Carlin was a genius. # 5 needs to happen.
Report Abuse
Let's say Cablevision made $30M on ticket sales last year for Rangers games. Then the league decides to increase the playing surface in such a way that they have to take the first two rows out. Let's say those two rows generated $15M out of that $50M last year (obviously all these numbers are made up).
Why in the world would Dolan Inc. "settle" for $35M in ticket sales revenue just because they had to take out two rows to accomodate a bigger ice surface? Wouldn't they just increase the ticket prices of the rest of the seats in the rink to off-set the "loss" of those other seats?
The glass seats are always going to cost the most. But EVERYTHING gets more expensive. So, if the seats in row 3 go from, I don't know, $125 last season to $150 this season, chances are better that XYZ Corp. will still shell out the dough to entertain their clients.
But if row LLL all the way at the back of the upper decks goes from $30 to $45 then Joey who works at ConEd just got priced out of his tickets.
I'm not talking about physically removing seats. I'm talking about how the pricing of all the seats in the house have to be adapted to make up for the loss of revenue from the rink getting bigger.
Think about THAT one for a second and reply.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Wyshynski you stink!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Wyshynski you stink!
Report Abuse
George Carlin did not regard hockey as a sport.
Therefore, I would rather doubt that he spoke from the friggin' AFTERLIFE to talk hockey, especially to some guy named Stu.
I hope that cigar smoke gets in your eyes and blinds you.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
http://worldhockeydaily.wordpress.com/
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
if you dont know about promotion and relegation, its a system of leagues that are stratified. the top league is the premier league and draws the television contracts. basically, the premier division would be composed of 20-25 teams and at the end of the year three would be relegated down, and three would be promoted up.
Report Abuse
hockey fans want great competition every game. promotion and relegation would ensure a playoff atmosphere all season long. the end of the season would also be enhanced as the relegation battle would be epic, perhaps even better than the league winner battle. ill go more into this, but imagine the spokane cheifs or the ottawa 67s (teams ive never seen play) working their way into the premier league and competing for supremacy, and even the stanley cup.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
wow that would be CUP12's five ways i'd change the nhl..
1st fire bettman hire bowman
2nd "promotion and regelation"
3rd no more shootouts play sudden death OT the tie it. no points maybe split but what i like is give 3 pts for OT wins only so the is incentive to play harder in the OT.
5th i like the idea of serving the entire penalty time IF you wanna open up scoring which i dont but if i had to deal with it better that way.
4th lose instigator penalty. i do think blatant cheapness should be dealt with harshly ala goons
5th
Report Abuse
5th is lose the draft ala article posted by cristobal originally on yahoo.
from the link again..
fourth - abolish the draft. this goes along with instituting promotion and relegation and is fairly straight-forward. allow teams to sign whomever they want if theyre not already under contract.
i dont care if they want 6 year olds under contract, let them start paying players and developing talent at the youth level. there are 16 year olds competing in the english premier league.
Report Abuse
http://worldhockeydaily.wordpress.com/2008/08/24/5-ways-id-change-the-nhl/#comment-8
In another sense, this idea also encapsulates club autonomy and instead of franchises, clubs would be clubs. The NHL premier league would control the Premier league and not the franchise system they currently operate. I really dont understand this idea that they control the Rangers website and marketing. Its the Rangers property, in my opinion.
1 - 25 of 33