Puck Daddy - NHL

Every weekday in August, Puck Daddy presents "5 Ways I'd Change the NHL," in which a cross-section of sports media and hockey personalities offer solutions, suggestions and absurdities to remake the League to their liking. We're thrilled to have Stu Hackel, writer for the New York Times' Slap Shot blog, contributing his list today ... along with another list as told to him by, of all people, the late George Carlin.

By Stu Hackel

1. Bring back organ music. I'm a rock 'n' roller at heart. But 18 seconds of some arena rock anthem -- or any song -- blaring at 120 decibels during stoppages just detracts from the game, jolts your system and then frustrates you when it's turned down at the faceoff. More to the point, organ music in a big barn just feels right at a hockey game. It blends in perfectly. If you think deleting the noise for the organ would turn NHL game presentations into something less than state of the art, you're over thinking.

2. A better shootout format. Let's see the game decided by something more closely resembling the game. If the game is tied after overtime, the teams play two minutes of three on three. If no one scores, two minutes of two on two, Then two minutes of one on one (all with goalies, of course). Teams can change on the fly, but no changing on whistles. I've coached under these rules and it is absolutely terrific. And it's hockey, not a skills competition.

3. Penalize teams in the shootout.  If the shootout rules don't change, there's an inequity that should be addressed: Let's say a player gets a good scoring chance with 30 seconds remaining in overtime. He gets tackled by an opponent, who gets what amounts to a 30 second penalty. But if no one scores, the game isn't over yet, they go to the shootout -- and the offending player could end up being a shootout hero who has escaped serving a full penalty because, chances are, the guy who committed the penalty is pretty good or he wouldn't be on the ice in that situation. So if a minor penalty occurs inside the last two minutes, the offending player and his team should still be penalized by making the fouling player be the last guy in line to take part in the shootout for his team.

4. More shorthanded play. The NHL isn't going to enlarge the size of the playing surface. Forget it; the owners are not taking out two rows of their most expensive non-suite seats. And let's not consider making the game a four on four contest. Besides ruining the symmetry of the spectacle, it would negate too much of the physical element from the game, and enough has vanished since the lockout. But here's a good compromise: End the substitution of players for coincidental majors and for when minors taken while a team is already shorthanded. Two guys fight? It's four on four for five minutes. A pair of fights? Three on three. Two guys get their sticks up during a power play? It's now four on three. Those were the NHL's rules for a long time and restoring them now would make sense.

5. End the guaranteed point for a tie. Coaches and managers love it because it makes teams look better than they really are, but it's ridiculous that 24 teams out of 30 had winning records last year. Beyond that, however, the guaranteed point makes for some sluggish third periods as teams hang on rather than press forward. The rationale for the bonus point when it was introduced in 1999 was that it would make the teams go harder in the four on four overtime so the game would have a decision. But with the adoption of a shootout, there's no longer that rationale. Scrap it. You lose the game, you don't get a point.

(As a special bonus, we present "5 ways I'd change the NHL that will never be considered but should," as told to Stu Hackel by the late comic genius George Carlin at a recent séance ... or so Mr. Hackel claims.)

By George Carlin (R.I.P.), as told to Stu Hackel

1. Institute the death penalty for diving. Everyone thinks embellishment is ruining the game, robbing it of its inherent sense of fair play and honest sportsmanship. The two-minute penalty hasn't worked, and what happened to the idea that the Hockey Operations Department in Toronto would watch games and tapes and fine chronic offenders? Clearly, these measures are inadequate and too soft. We need to keep hockey a man's game. So if you dive, you'll pay a man's price: You will be executed. The owners can decide if these executions should occur on the ice or if the player should be taken to a room under the stands. Firing squad, lethal injection, hanging or gas chamber will be determined by the prevailing laws of the state or province in which the game is played. For those venues where there is no death penalty, mandatory life imprisonment will be observed. It's that serious.

2. Hire ex-Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf as an NHL vice president. This man conned the US government for years, grabbing billions of our tax dollars and swearing he'd hunt down the Taliban and al Qaeda hiding out in the mountains but did nothing; Maybe he even gave them some of the money. He's the master salesman we've been waiting for to convince America that hockey is really the best sport on the planet. So what if he knows nothing about the sport? Neither do most of the other 428 NHL vice presidents. Plus, he clearly knows all the angles, so he can help screen potential NHL owners and root out the crooks.

3. Institute the 'Designated Fan Program.' Since many fans believe they know more about how to play for, coach or run an NHL club than the people currently doing it -- and who knows, maybe they do? -- let's try them out. Sponsored by the NHL's Official Adult Beverage Companies in both countries, in conjunction with their designated driver education programs (a natural tie-in), every home game will feature a designated fan who will assume the job of his choice for a 48 hour period. He or she must follow all applicable NHL regulations and nothing he or she does can be undone or reversed. The possibilities are endless.

4. Start a new number retirement tradition. When a great player's number is retired by a team, don't just hang an oversized bed sheet in the rafters with his name and number stenciled on it. Put the guy in uniform, hook him up to the ropes, pull him up there and leave him there. There's no better way to always have his spirit in the building.

5. Let the Leafs win the Stanley Cup. The benefits, both economic and sociological, really need no explanation, but this concept can be multi-faceted. The idea would be to create a special division with the current Maple Leafs and four classic NHL "expansion" teams using the exact same players today who were on their original rosters: The 1979 Winnipeg Jets, the 1979 Quebec Nordiques, the 1979 Hartford Whalers and the 1975 Kansas City Scouts. OK, the players are a bit older -- except for Gordie Howe -- but think of the good will engendered by returning the game to two more Canadian markets, helping to revitalize downtown Hartford and solving AEG's empty arena problem in KC. Now, in this division, the Leafs should make the playoffs (although you can't be sure), and once they do, since most fans are convinced the NHL instructs officials to favor some teams over others, it'll be a snap. I can hear it now: "Tomas Kaberle, your fans have waited an eternity for this: Come get the Stanley Cup!"

We seriously have our doubts as to whether Mr. Hackel actually contacted Mr. Carlin beyond the grave, because not one of his "5 ways" included the phrase "Didja ever notice?" Coming up on Friday: Puck Daddy's own Sean Leahy, followed by The Fourth Period's Dave Pagnotta on Saturday and the Wyshynski list on Sunday.

digg delicious
more

33 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Franki B
    1. Posted by Franki B Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:02 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    That was absalutley hilarious.
    1. Needs to be done within the start of the next season.
  2. # huit
    2. Posted by # huit Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    the last list was brilliant, especially #1
  3. miah
    3. Posted by miah Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:17 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I love #2! What a great idea for games that go to OT. I've also never liked the idea of coincidental penalties cancelling each other out. Let's see more 4 on 4!
  4. Geoffrey S
    4. Posted by Geoffrey S Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #3 is a bit silly; how often are the star skilled players the ones taking penalties late in the game. Better: if your team ends OT shorthanded, you get 1 less shooter in the shootout, and any players left in the penalty box at the end of the game can't shoot at all.
  5. Nick in New York
    5. Posted by Nick in New York Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i don't know why people insist on saying that the owners won't take out two rows of the most expensive seats to increase the size of the rink.
    it's two rows-worth of the cheapest priced seats that would be taken out. it's the common fan - not the dork in the suit who doesn't care either way - that gets pinched if they widen/lengthen the playing surface.
  6. Pension Plan Puppets
    6. Posted by Pension Plan Puppets Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @Nick in New York
    People probably say that the owners won't take two rows of the most expensive seats out because that is the only place where the seats can be removed in order to make room for a larger ice surface.
    How would they take out two rows of the cheap seats? Think about that one for a second and reply.
    George Carlin was a genius. # 5 needs to happen.
  7. Nick in New York
    7. Posted by Nick in New York Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Pension: oh dear...
    Let's say Cablevision made $30M on ticket sales last year for Rangers games. Then the league decides to increase the playing surface in such a way that they have to take the first two rows out. Let's say those two rows generated $15M out of that $50M last year (obviously all these numbers are made up).
    Why in the world would Dolan Inc. "settle" for $35M in ticket sales revenue just because they had to take out two rows to accomodate a bigger ice surface? Wouldn't they just increase the ticket prices of the rest of the seats in the rink to off-set the "loss" of those other seats?
    The glass seats are always going to cost the most. But EVERYTHING gets more expensive. So, if the seats in row 3 go from, I don't know, $125 last season to $150 this season, chances are better that XYZ Corp. will still shell out the dough to entertain their clients.
    But if row LLL all the way at the back of the upper decks goes from $30 to $45 then Joey who works at ConEd just got priced out of his tickets.
    I'm not talking about physically removing seats. I'm talking about how the pricing of all the seats in the house have to be adapted to make up for the loss of revenue from the rink getting bigger.
    Think about THAT one for a second and reply.
  8. Nick in New York
    8. Posted by Nick in New York Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    d'oh...sorry...it should say "Let's say Cablevision made $50M on ticket sales last year..." my bad.
  9. The Skate
    9. Posted by The Skate Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    There would be more seats on the glass that they could charge outrageous prices for
  10. BobBastard
    10. Posted by BobBastard Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:16 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    uh you guys didn't think too far did you.... remove the two first rows, and when the risk is made wider, you repaint the two new front rows the same color the first two old ones were. Redo your color sections. That way with the rink being wider, means you have MORE of those expensive red seats, it's just the nosebleeds who would suffer like that.
  11. Bubbabanjo
    11. Posted by Bubbabanjo Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Other than the last one not bad. You sir are not a dochebag. You leave the game alone.
    Wyshynski you stink!
  12. Chak
    12. Posted by Chak Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think they should do this: No f@#king shootout at all, make teams play until one wins, if it takes 5 overtimes so be it, this isn't soccer. Unless it's a break away in OT, shooter vs goalie one on one is a stupid gimmicky way to finish a game.
  13. Jeffrey S
    13. Posted by Jeffrey S Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    the chance of seeing a one on one OT, my god that would be amazing.
  14. Bubbabanjo
    14. Posted by Bubbabanjo Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Shootout is totally cool in regular season. Its a long season. OTs injure even more guys. Its entertaining. Its fine in the regular season. It gets audience and gives the league the scoring they want and they can promo the stars like they want. Playoffs are another story. Then its Rollerball man. Spiked glove time! But in the regular season sell the tickets and keep the TV and fans happy. Plus its fun and I think it makes the goalies even sharper for the playoffs. They see all the moves before the big games.
    Wyshynski you stink!
  15. Mike L
    15. Posted by Mike L Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Greg Wyshynski, you are a pansy.
    George Carlin did not regard hockey as a sport.
    Therefore, I would rather doubt that he spoke from the friggin' AFTERLIFE to talk hockey, especially to some guy named Stu.
    I hope that cigar smoke gets in your eyes and blinds you.
  16. A Yahoo! User
    16. Posted by A Yahoo! User Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I agree with the organ music. I'm a rangers fan and would much rather hear the organ at Madison Square Garden than any other song.
  17. Bluelander
    17. Posted by Bluelander Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    BRING BACK THE ORGAN!!! (Best suggestion yet!!)
  18. cristobal
    18. Posted by cristobal Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I gave up trying to change the NHL. I'm going with "5 ways I'd change the KHL."
    http://worldhockeydaily.wordpress.com/
  19. CUP#12
    19. Posted by CUP#12 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    cristobal you tell them!! "promotion and regelation"
  20. CUP#12
    20. Posted by CUP#12 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    step 1 institute “promotion and relegation” into north american hockey.
    if you don’t know about “promotion and relegation,” its a system of leagues that are stratified. the top league is the premier league and draws the television contracts. basically, the premier division would be composed of 20-25 teams and at the end of the year three would be relegated down, and three would be promoted up.
  21. CUP#12
    21. Posted by CUP#12 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    no more rebuilding in the nhl. if you’re not good enough to keep your spot at the premier level, go back down and fix things in the second division. the nhl is supposed to be the best hockey on the planet but i seriously doubt if the kings could defeat the calder cup winners in a series. or their aeg owned european cousins: sparta prague.
    hockey fans want great competition every game. ”promotion and relegation” would ensure a playoff atmosphere all season long. the end of the season would also be enhanced as the “relegation battle” would be epic, perhaps even better than the league winner battle. i’ll go more into this, but imagine the spokane cheifs or the ottawa 67’s (teams i’ve never seen play) working their way into the premier league and competing for supremacy, and even the stanley cup.
  22. Tardell Scorpion
    22. Posted by Tardell Scorpion Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    did that organ player borrow his wardrobe from the YES keyboardist Rick Wakeman? maybe he got it at this things RUMMAGE SALE, "In 1975, he released the concept album The Myths and Legends of King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table which was supported by a live show featuring ice skating theatrical performances accompanied by a large number of musicians, an orchestra and choirs. The cost of the show was extravagant and it caused Wakeman to declare bankruptcy. [and sell his CAPES AND VESTS to the fat dude at the top of the blog]"
  23. CUP#12
    23. Posted by CUP#12 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    posts #20 and #21 are from cristobals link. aside from losing bettman its the single best thing that could be done to improve the nhl! go from there to ties no shoot out bs anymore. its a team sport 100%. buhbye instigator penalty!
    wow that would be CUP12's five ways i'd change the nhl..
    1st fire bettman hire bowman
    2nd "promotion and regelation"
    3rd no more shootouts play sudden death OT the tie it. no points maybe split but what i like is give 3 pts for OT wins only so the is incentive to play harder in the OT.
    5th i like the idea of serving the entire penalty time IF you wanna open up scoring which i dont but if i had to deal with it better that way.
    4th lose instigator penalty. i do think blatant cheapness should be dealt with harshly ala goons
    5th
  24. CUP#12
    24. Posted by CUP#12 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    lol ooops its late i'm tired..
    5th is lose the draft ala article posted by cristobal originally on yahoo.
    from the link again..
    fourth - abolish the draft. this goes along with instituting “promotion and relegation” and is fairly straight-forward. allow teams to sign whomever they want if they’re not already under contract.
    i don’t care if they want 6 year olds under contract, let them start paying players and developing talent at the youth level. there are 16 year olds competing in the english premier league.
  25. CUP#12
    25. Posted by CUP#12 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    wow its really late because i swear i posted this already but it hasnt shown up for a while. so finally from the link
    http://worldhockeydaily.wordpress.com/2008/08/24/5-ways-id-change-the-nhl/#comment-8
    In another sense, this idea also encapsulates “club autonomy” and instead of “franchises,” clubs would be “clubs.” The NHL premier league would control the Premier league and not the “franchise system” they currently operate. I really don’t understand this idea that they control the Rangers website and marketing. Its the Ranger’s property, in my opinion.

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™