Puck Daddy - NHL

Paul McGannon knows that for his organization to achieve its dreams, someone else's are going to have to be crushed. And he's acutely sympathetic to that fact. "Because I had a team taken from me," he said.

McGannon is the president and owner of NHL 21, a private Missouri corporation that advocates for the return of the National Hockey League to Kansas City through the relocation of a current franchise, or through NHL expansion. He was a die-hard fan of the Kansas City Scouts, who spent a brief two seasons in the city (1974-76) before relocating to Denver as the Colorado Rockies; he's been fighting to give Kansas City another shot for decades.

"The lesson learned is: Hang on to your team," he said.

NHL 21's signature event is the annual preseason game it hosts in Kansas City. On Sept. 22, the St. Louis Blues will face off against the Los Angeles Kings at the Sprint Center, which is owned by the Kings' parent company AEG. "The idea is to draw big crowds, turn the heads of the NHL league offices and hopefully get a relocated or expansion team," said McGannon.

The success of these games has elevated Kansas City's status as a potential NHL city. In 2003 at Kemper Arena, a sellout crowd of over 17,000 watched the Blues beat the Chicago Blackhawks. The Blues and Predators sold 12,000 tickets just 59 days after the lockout. This month's game will be the first hockey game at the Sprint Center, so the lofty expectations and equally high stakes are firmly in place.

All of which led to some controversy recently about what the Kings would be contributing to this game. But when it comes to the NHL's potential return to Kansas City, controversy reigns.

Tickets for the exhibition game are available ($25.00, $50.00, $60.00, $75.00, $150.00), and the promoters are now aggressively beginning to market not only the matchup but some discount packages for families.

But will it be a marquee matchup? The Kings are actually scheduled for two preseason games on Sept. 22: One in Kansas City and another back in Los Angeles against the Phoenix Coyotes. While the Kings aren't exactly the 1980s Oilers when it comes to star power, the lack of players like Anze Kopitar, Dustin Brown or Jack Johnson could have put a damper on the exhibition game. The Kansas City Star bristled at the idea of a split-squad coming to town:

The Kings will bring about 60 players to training camp, which opens Sept. 19, but teams can suit up only 20 for a game. So having two games will enable the club, which has a new coach in Terry Murray, to give twice as many players ice time.

Split-squad situations are not totally unheard of in the NHL, but this is the only one scheduled this season. The NHL requires a minimum of eight veterans to appear in a preseason game, and players who were first-round picks qualify as veterans, so the Kings will meet that criteria in both Kansas City and Los Angeles.

The Kings' Luc Robitaille assured Kansas City fans that LA's top players would play against the Blues. McGannon said he received the same guarantees early in the process. "We were assured from day one that AEG wants to put their best foot forward," he said

The Kings and Kansas City are both linked via AEG's ownership; a relationship that has led to another uncomfortable controversy for the city's bid for NHL hockey. And his name is William "Boots" Del Biaggio.

After the Pittsburgh Penguins appeared close to moving to Kansas City in 2006 -- something team owner Mario Lemieux now claims was simply a bargaining ploy -- attention turned to another struggling franchise, the Nashville Predators. Owner Craig Leipold wanted to sell; among his suitors was William "Boots" Del Biaggio III, a California venture capitalist who publicly expressed a desire to relocate a team to AEG's arena in Kansas City.

Leipold, heavily courted by Canadian billionaire Jim Balsillie, decided to sell the Predators to a group of local owners. Local save for Del Biaggio, whose minority stake in the team gave the group enough capital to purchase the franchise.

Immediately, there was speculation that Del Biaggio would eventually attempt to achieve whatever Manifest Hockey Destiny he saw in Kansas City by moving the Predators there. This was all but confirmed in July, when word leaked that he was trying to gather investors that "could gain majority control [of the Predators], serving their agenda to buy a hockey team and locate it elsewhere" as early as 2010. Of course, by that time, Del Biaggio was exposed as an alleged fraud and faced a federal investigation. Which would make his future ownership of a team in Kansas City rather unlikely.

McGannon had been counting on Del Biaggio as a potential owner, telling Metro Sports in May that he thought Boots would "eventually end up in Kansas City once the Nashville situation either resolves itself and (the Predators) stay or it doesn't resolve itself and they move."

McGannon now says that Del Biaggio wasn't a necessary component to hockey's return to Kansas City. "I think it's fair to say that he had an exclusive arrangement with AEG. They're the owners of the building. You'd probably have to talk with them," he said. "We're turned the page on all that, because we had nothing to do with that. The deal was concluded in Nashville. Our understanding was they were going forward in Nashville."

Is he confident there's still enough local money to own an NHL franchise, without a cash infusion from an AEG ally like Del Biaggio?

"I don't know if it would be local," he said. "The Chiefs and the Royals are not owned locally. Where we are is that I'm very confident that ownership, local or otherwise, would have interest in Kansas City."

Why Kansas City, again? That's a question Evan Weiner of the New York Sun asked last year when analyzing KC and the other often-mentioned future home of NHL hockey, Las Vegas:

Kansas City is a different kettle of fish. The market may have reached its saturation point in terms of economic strength even though the mayor, Kay Barnes, and the city council went ahead and partnered with AEG in constructing a new downtown arena that will open this fall. Most of the dollars earmarked for sports spending in the Kansas City market go to the NFL's Chiefs. Jackson County, Mo., taxpayers approved a sales tax hike in 2006 to renovate Arrowhead and Kauffman stadiums, which should already bring the city's NFL and MLB teams more revenue.

Kansas City is a small TV market as well and will not get the cable TV dollars that even Minnesota, St. Louis, and Pittsburgh generate. But with customers now paying big prices for tickets, an NHL or NBA team would get most of the revenue generated in the arena from luxury suites, club seats, and concessions instead of the city, which put up funding for the building. It's the only way a team could survive in Kansas City.

Indeed, the premium ticket story in Kansas City is one McGannon's eager to tell.

"We were waiting these last two years with the Pittsburgh Penguins and Nashville Predators scenarios playing out. But really we have gotten on the map with the new Sprint Center, which opened in October of '07. The 72 suites are all sold out. There's a Founders' Club for premium events and premium seating, and those have sold out," he said. "What's left is to find either a relocated team or an expansion team, and that's going to be up to the Board of Governors."

NHL 21's case to the NHL is rather clear: That Kansas City deserves a second chance at professional hockey, just like the ones Denver and Atlanta have earned. McGannon explained that facet of the case to Metro Sports:

Dallas was like Kansas City. It had Central Hockey League for many years and drew 2,000-3,000 people. Now they sell out the Dallas Stars. Then you look at Nashville, which had a team before the Predators, and they're a city with a million fewer people than Kansas City. Kansas City is a major-league market. We have the National Football League here. We have Major League Baseball here. To get casual hockey fans, you need to be a major-league city. Sprint Center is a major-league facility. To me it begins and ends with a NHL team. That's all we're focused on.

Then there's the geographic argument. "You can go up to our airport in Kansas City, and in an hour or an hour and a half be in seven different NHL cities," said McGannon, citing potential division rivalries with teams like the Blues, Predators and Blackhawks. "The players would love that, we would love that, and the fans, as you know, travel."

Expansion may seem the likeliest option for Kansas City, but there are those who believe the fan culture in the town wouldn't have the patience for the foundational building process that goes with it.

Relocation talk will turn up the usual suspects like the much-maligned Florida Panthers. But I decided to throw McGannon a curveball when it came to finding a current NHL team for the Sprint Center:

Have you guys ever given any pie in the sky thought that if a team doesn't come down the pike in the near future, the Los Angeles Kings might split their home schedule between Kansas City and Los Angeles?

The silence that followed was a measurable one; the kind of dead air you hear on C-SPAN in the morning when a caller on the independent voter hotline claims that both presidential candidates are being controlled by an army of fascist hamsters.

I had either just given this man an overwhelming spark of inspiration ... or the hockey equivalent of a fascist hamster.

"No," he said, sternly. "That ... that ... no. What you're talking about would all be league matters, and strictly up to the league. We would probably like our own team. But we don't care how we get there -- we just want to get there."

digg delicious
more

42 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Tacks
    1. Posted by Tacks Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    As long as the change the name to the Kansas City Cloggers I'd be happy. The concession food would be outstanding!
  2. Whale4ever
    2. Posted by Whale4ever Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yada yada yada.
    The Kings could just as "easily" split the season between LA and London at the O2, in a bizarre transatlantic NHL, which is also owned by Anschutz.
    Nice on cornering the guy at the end.
    Must've sucked as a "die-hard fan" of the Scouts for those long two years when they up and left. Two years. Oh the humanity.
    Greg: We, the illustrious twelve, have been elevated to "Much Maligned"? Makin progress!
  3. John O
    3. Posted by John O Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:39 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'd vote for having the Panthers relocate to KC.
    - the potential KC fanbase can't be much worse than the Panthers is right now
    - KC would have a natural in-state rival with St.Louis
    - KC wouldn't have to compete with an NBA team (as the Panthers do with the Miami Heat)
    - the Chief's season is far shorter than the NHL season, so there is little competative overlap
    - wouldn't the ice just be better in KC than it would be in Miami (especially come playoff time)?
  4. Duk
    4. Posted by 'Duk Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'd LOVE to see a team in Kansas City.
    However, when I lived there, every time I brought up the possibility with "common folk," I was always met with at least 10 reasons at why it wouldn't work. I've always admired Mr. McGannon's efforts, but that'd be a huge uphill battle to maintain the success after the initial novelty wore off. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think I am.
  5. # huit
    5. Posted by # huit Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    stop changing things and keep the teams where they are
    but the most important thing: where i can buy a fascist hamster?
  6. Blackcapricorn
    6. Posted by Blackcapricorn Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    My vote is for fascist hamster.
  7. Wilf
    7. Posted by Wilf Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I always figured the AEG ownership might pave the way to an eventual relocation of the Kings to KC. There'd even be Royals-Kings logo-theme synergy. Plus, Chiefs are like royalty in another cultural context.
    And that all would pave the way for the Los Angeles Ducks of Anaheim.
  8. Jon A
    8. Posted by Jon A Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    My vote is for hockey season to start soon!
  9. RudyKelly
    9. Posted by RudyKelly Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Split time between LA and Kansas City? The hell is wrong with you?
  10. Wyshynski
    10. Posted by Wyshynski Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ RudyKelly --
    And what's stunning is that I *wasn't* drinking during this interview.
    In all seriousness, it's a question I was wondering about because AEG has this thing about using the Kings to spread the joy to other AEG-owned arenas. It's a little like the Predators idea from "5 ways," but more like making them the AEG Kings.
  11. knucklehead
    11. Posted by knucklehead Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    There's only 2 things that come from Kansas, steers and.........NCAA basketball championships.
  12. bostonblueline.blogspot.com
    12. Posted by bostonblueline.blogspot.com Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    how exactly is kansas city an improvement over nashville?
    - the assertion that kc has a "million more people" than nashville is factually incorrect -- its metro is only 400k larger and nashville proper is actually a larger city by half.
    - kc is not any more central or convenient to other league markets than nashville, despite insinuations to the contrary.
    - its demographics don't favor a hockey "culture" any more than do nashville's. if anything it is composed of significantly fewer northern/canadian transplants.
  13. bostonblueline.blogspot.com
    13. Posted by bostonblueline.blogspot.com Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    (previous post cut off)
    The bottom line is that the only thing KC has going for it is a tenant-less arena and some guys who want a team. That doesn't mean it's a wise decision to pull yet another franchise up by its roots to move there, especially not one that has made large strides in developing a permanent fanbase and needs only to sort out its issues in the business community. Move them to KC and the process goes all the way back to square 1.
  14. The Layt Show
    14. Posted by The Layt Show Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I live in Kansas City. Do not bring hockey here. Trust me. I do not know a single person who watches the NHL. The closest thing I've found is a buddy of mine's uncle apparently watches it all the time, and he lives in the area. All the while, I'm surrounded by people (like me) who would kill for an NBA team.
  15. CUP#12
    15. Posted by CUP#12 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    kc beats the hell out of florida, tampa bay, carolina, nashville, atlanta, phoenix, los angeles or san jose all of which do have ice naturally BUT way more important than that are losing money!! cup or no cup contract the 6-10 biggest money losers including nyi and njd the two biggest money losers at -11.6 and -15.3 disrespectively!
  16. Rusty
    16. Posted by Rusty Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No!
    The Kings were 17th in attandance last year with the 2nd worst record.
    Uncle Phil knows you don't move your team to fill one arena while the other goes dark.
  17. Doogie
    17. Posted by Doogie Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "That Kansas City deserves a second chance at professional hockey, just like the ones Denver and Atlanta have earned."
    The Bay Area also got a second chance when the merger between the Seals/Barons and North Stars was dissolved, creating the Sharks.
  18. Tardell Scorpion
    18. Posted by Tardell Scorpion Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    do not move to Milwaukee or Kansas City. stop trying to bring the circus to people who DONT WANT IT. you IDIOTS. "we spend close to a billion dollars (once the crap compounds) on a dumb arena. . we need a circus! ANY CIRCUS. college doesnt offer enough revenue over the year. please, help us for our mistakes." die.
  19. Tardell Scorpion
    19. Posted by Tardell Scorpion Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    ps - i brought up Milwaukee because people think "cold" places automatically have hockey fans. they dont. its a bunch of fat, beer sucking bowlers who sit on couches on their vans outside of lambeau field and puke on their blaze orange coats. every sports talk outlet in the area talks junk on hockey. move - teams - to - CANADA
  20. Wingin It
    20. Posted by Wingin It Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:02 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I live in KC and I, for one, would love to see an NHL team here. Growing up in Detroit and then moving here really makes you miss the sport. Anyways, I know plenty of people who, while they may not go for season tickets, would at least attend a few games a season. I'd like to see either the Predators or Panthers...I wouldn't be picky.
  21. Phillyjkkk
    21. Posted by Phillyjkkk Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Kansas City officials and AEG need to contact Ted "Zeitgeist" Leonsis, owner of the perennial money losing Washington Capitals. Acccording to Ted, he has lost more than $100 million dollars since gaining control of the Capitals in 1999. Also the Capitals don't control revenue streams at the Verizon Center, that's controlled by the NBA Wizards ownership and in the KC Sprint Center that obviously wouldn't be the case. So if KC really wants a NHL team they don't need to look any further than the nation's capital with its overstretched local sports dollar, lack of interest in hockey by local DC media and population and losing tradition of the Capitals. Alexander Ovechkin could be skating for the future Kansas City Capitals.
  22. DP
    22. Posted by DP Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:39 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #22 PhillyMan16,
    Most of that 100 million that Ted lost came in the first few seasons. The worst of that appears in the past and there are now many more teams in far worse shape as things appear to be looking up for the Capitals.
    Furthermore, Leonsis owns 44% of the Wizards and Verizon Center so he'd be hurting himself.
    As for overstretched sports dollar, you are talking about one of the top 3 or 4 wealthiest markets in the country. Philly is probably much worse off.
    The DC sports media is negligible but fan interest is growing.
    SO DON'T JUST THROW ***** OUT THERE.
  23. vivaep78
    23. Posted by vivaep78 Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Only somebody from Philly (...possibly Pittsburgh...)would have the audacity to think that the Washington Capitals would be good transfer bait for the NHL to Kansas City. Once upon a time the Flyers sucked, then the Flyers got Briere and Biron and that vaulted the Flyers so somebody should not be talking about transfers.
    Granted, Kansas City could be a good option for an NHL franchise, Seattle would be a better option. You have the natural rivalry with the Canucks across the border, you have some pissed off Sonics fans who need something in the winter time other than hoping the Seahawks make it to the Super Bowl, a huge TV market and some group of investors hidden in the Space Needle who needs to set a spark to the city besides the Seattle Sounders FC and an arena that is the home of the Storm who only plays during the summer. How about it Seattle?
  24. Stars TSC 59
    24. Posted by Stars TSC 59 Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Save the WHALE!
  25. Wyshynski
    25. Posted by Wyshynski Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ PhillyMan16
    C'mon, man! We just made our peace with Leonsis! You're as bad as Leahy talking smack on our new best friend Stan Fischler.

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™