Puck Daddy - NHL

Through the first 35 games last season, Tampa Bay Lightning center Steven Stamkos(notes) scored just four times. Shackled to the bench and not seeing much ice time under then-Lightning coach Barry Melrose, it wasn't the type of start the 2008 No. 1 overall pick was looking for, especially after a summer of hype by the Lightning through their "Seen Stamkos" promotion. 

When Rick Tocchet replaced Melrose in November, it wasn't until mid-February when Stamkos began to be 'seen'. In his final 28 games, the Sarnia Sting alum potted 17 goals and finished with 23 on the year, six behind Vincent Lecavalier(notes).

With five minutes of added ice time this season compared to last, Stamkos is maturing before our eyes into a goal scorer and paying off the Lightning, who were on the verge of embarrassment last season watching their prized pick watch more hockey than play. Through Tampa's first 14 games, Stamkos is leading the team in scoring with 12 goals (six on the power-play) and five assists, including a goal in seven of his last eight games. His coming out party is helping Lightning fans from completely freaking out about Lecavalier and Martin St. Louis(notes) low goal totals.

So, why is Stamkos flourishing this season?

There's confidence, as teammate Ryan Malone(notes) explained, as well as the fact that he has a coach in Tocchet that is willing to allow his talent to grow, even through all of the growing pains that he may experience:

"He's a leader, a young leader for us,"

...

"He has his ups and downs, but he has bounce-back," Tocchet said. "He doesn't have a long period of bad games or bad shifts. He can bounce back and that's what I like about him. He can have a tough night, but he bounces back. He's resilient."

Stamkos' quick start is also making waves through Hockey Canada as Team Canada GM Steve Yzerman is trying to fill out his 23-man roster. Not invited to the orientation camp in Calgary this past August, Stamkos has put himself on the radar, but he's not ready to let himself think about Vancouver as he told Fanhouse's Susan Slusser:

"I wasn't thinking about it at the start of the season," Stamkos said of Vancouver 2010. "But with the start I've had and people talking about it, if I keep it up, a long-shot (selection) is a possibility. I'd love the opportunity to represent my country, but obviously my main focus right now is on this team and winning every night here."

Winning is something that Tampa's been doing a little better of this season. Currenrtly sitting ninth in the Eastern Conference with 15 points thanks to Stamkos and solid goaltending Antero Niittymaki(notes). If Lecavalier and St. Louis can find the back of the net again on a regular basis, the Lightning, the butt of jokes a year ago, could themselves valuable strides towards long-term success.

digg delicious
more

15 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Peter D
    1. Posted by Peter D Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:43 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    ii think hes a better fit for the team than eric staal or big joe. could be a good 13th forward and be good to step into the lineup if some one goes down
  2. habs1rule
    2. Posted by habs1rule Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:47 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    We have to remember that unless you're a Mario Lemieux type megastar, coming out of the draft, these kids are 18 years old, still havent developed their game, skill or maturity yet. even first overall picks are often termed "busts' because they wind up being rushed into the league too soon. I have always been a proponent of moving the draft age up to 19-20 years old. You get a more developed player, both physically and mentally, scouting becomes less of a 'crap shoot'. and we keep the lifeline of hockey, namely the Junior Leagues and Colleges strong.
  3. KZ
    3. Posted by KZ Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:32 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    God your blog is such horse [profane].
    Stamkos was shackled to the bench because the Pilsbury Doughboy could bench more than he could. He underwent a hell of a lot of strength training, which is why he picked it up later in the year. It had nothing to do with coaches and playing time.
  4. KZ
    4. Posted by KZ Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:36 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    That was unreasonably harsh. My apologies. But still, you should have mentioned it, instead of implying that Melrose Sux and Tocchet Pwns.
  5. Guy F
    5. Posted by Guy F Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:13 am EST

    Report Abuse

    @ KZ : Actually, your post was bang-on. Stamkos' strength numbers at the 2008 combine were a joke. Same thing this year with Evander Kane. Personally, I think Kane should be back in junior. At least Kadri was sent back. Six foot and 167 pounds (which is probably an exaggeration as it is). Kadri needs to add about 15-20 pounds and double his strength. Tavares, however, is ready physically, so is Ryan O'Reilly. Duchene is also reasonably stocky.
  6. habs1rule
    6. Posted by habs1rule Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:09 am EST

    Report Abuse

    @2...Love your comment about players staying in the Juniors longer to develop both PHYSICALLY and Mentally, yet your comment was the one over looked by other fans commenting here. And too bad the Canucks folded like a wet blanket vs Chicago in last years playoffs.
  7. &rea
    7. Posted by &rea Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:20 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Ok, so KZ is Melrose's boyfriend in a tizzy. Go stroke the mullet and take a few deep breaths. But you have to face the fact that your boy was spinning his wheels last year. Is he as bad a coach as he looked through that lengthy 16-game preview? Nah, but since when are coaches judged fairly? After all, you have some hatred for Toc, who seems to be getting something out of Stamkos besides urine, so you are not exactly objective here. I'm sure the new coach saw the need for strength training so try to give him some credit for working on this year's team last year.
    And of course, 10 hours after this was published we must note that with Montreal's loss to Tampa, and Ottawa's to New Jersey, Tampa has crept up and is tied for 7th. They controlled that game last night. Ok, Montreal is looking rather mediocre last year, but the Bolts were not even beating mediocre teams. The confidence is building and eventually the wins over GOOD teams will follow. Stamkos is stepping up every night. And if Nitty stays in net, the wins will begin to rack up. These guys could sneak into the playoffs. Of course, there will still be people who will say Toc has nothing to do with that. Fact is, getting something out of the guys and knowing what to do when they don't perform is part of coaching. Get a weakling strength training, banish the hot captain the the checking line, start the back up goaltender. Send messages, focus on positives, and mentor. And Tocchet learned from some of the best - Mike Keenan, Scotty Bowman (neither of whom I actually LIKE but cannot deny their impact on the game!). And yes, even Barry Melrose. He had some success in LA.
  8. hhuevonn
    8. Posted by hhuevonn Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:31 am EST

    Report Abuse

    for a sec i thought this article was about rick tocchet thanks to &rea.
    nobody gets credit for stamkos except steve himself. im sure getting stronger was common knowledge shared with him by everyone in the game. you don't think he learned from the other players? even his agent probably told him he needed to get physically stronger. and melrose did the right thing by keeping him on the bench. he wasn't ready last year for regular minutes and needed to earn them through hard work in practice and sound play during games.
    stamkos for team canada? thats a joke right? crosby, iginla, nash, thornton, lecavalier, heatley, doan, marleau, e. staal, st.louis, richards, morrow, smyth, carter...you're going to omit one of these names for a 19 year old stamkos? stamkos instead of thornton!?!? where is the logic in that peterD?
  9. Guy F
    9. Posted by Guy F Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:14 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    @ hhuevonn : Why is Stamkos on Team Canada a joke? In 2006, Gretzky left Crosby and Eric Staal of the team because they were "too young". Meanwhile both of them went on to record 100 points in the 2005-2006 season! Hmm....kinda could have used that offense, oh, I don't know, maybe when being beaten by Switzerland 2-0.
    Who knocked the Canadians out? Oh, right, Russia. Who scored the winning goal? Oh, right, there youngest player...Ovechkin. Joe Thornton had his chance in 2006 and SUCKED! Ryan Smyth? Are you serious? His time has passed. That 2006 team was a disgrace. Lecavalier? Lecavalier???? Have you been following the NHL whatsoever this season? No way Vinnie makes the team. No heart at all.
    Morrow-yes, absolutely
    Crosby-duh
    Iginla-yes
    Heatley-yes
    Nash-yes
    Marleau-no, not a big game player
    Eric Staal-I like him, but he's having a HORRIBLE season
    Mike Richards-yes, Brad, no thanks
    Carter-yes
    Doan-yes
    Smyth-please, it's 2010 not 2002
    St. Louis-maybe
    That's nine/ten forwards. That means there are another two/three spots open. You're saying Stamkos has no chance at all of snagging one of those spots? Did you see him in the World Championships last year? He and Derek Roy were the best forwards on Team Canada. Some other guys that could make the team that you omitted ; Getzlaf, Perry, Toews, Sharp....and Steven Stamkos. He should be in the mix for sure. Having him in the conversation is not a joke, well, at least not to Steve Yzerman when asked about it this weekend...but what does he know. When asked if players who were not at the evaluation camp could still make the team, Yzerman responded, "Yes". He then added, "A player like Steven Stamkos has obviously caught our attention and put himself in that scenario".
    @ Habs : Yes, your comment at number #2 was also bang-on and insightful.
  10. pc_matthews15
    10. Posted by pc_matthews15 Sun Nov 08, 2009 3:03 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    @GUYF. Agreed. Only guys who know hockey understand what a beast line Morrow, Richards, and Doan would be.
  11. TomB
    11. Posted by TomB Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:23 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    The addition of Tanquay and already having other speedy wingers onboard in St Louis et al adds another dimention. Not to mention Downie being quick and coming into his own this year. This team definatly has chemistry this year. Good on ice product. Lots of guys who can move the puck up the ice. This creates alot of chances for everybody, not just Stamkos. Hedman/Mez on the point on the pp? fuggedaboudit
    Just need an enforcer. A named one
  12. hhuevonn
    12. Posted by hhuevonn Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:14 am EST

    Report Abuse

    @guyf...stamkos is not in crosby or ovechkin's class so i don't know why you would bring up sid's omission nor ovie's game winning goal. in terms of staal, i think, at the same age, he was definitely a far more polished player than stamkos.
    world championships? please. that's supposed to be some kind of barometer as to how he'll do in the olympics!? you do understand the difference between the 2 right? yeah he performed really well against belarus (twice), latvia and norway!! WOW! where was he for the final against russia?(by the way, martin st.louis performed better than stamkos at the world championships)
    in terms of taking him over someone else because they are not big game players, stamkos did nothing in the final of the wjc, nothing in last years wc final and could'nt even lead his junior team past the second round! and in the nhl?
    smyth and marleau are both having excellent years and have plenty of experience not to mention talent.
    i don't see anything in stamkos' resume to tell me he deserves a spot on the national team over established players like smyth and marleau, whom are both having excellent seasons.
    also, why not brad richards? he's having a very good year, has the experience, has "big game" experience and has produced in them, has "heart" and skill. he's definitely proven much more to me than stamkos. richards x 2 before stamkos.
    really? you're going to leave thornton off the team!? REALLY!?
    come on. lets be serious here.
  13. Guy F
    13. Posted by Guy F Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:04 am EST

    Report Abuse

    @ hhuevonn : That is the same mentality that lead the 2006 team to go with a bunch of veterans as opposed to going with younger players. In 2002, Canada went with the likes of Gagne and Brewer, not to mention Iginla (who was not even invited to the orientation camp but was an injury replacement - like Speeza this year in place of Getzlaf). Many felt Iginla, Gagne and Brewer did not belong there, they wanted Primeau, Brind'amour and Stevens. Sure, they could go with a stiff like Thornton and he'll do nothing just like he did in Boston in the post-season and every year in San Jose. Further, if the centres are Crosby, Getzlaf, Richards then that leaves Toews and Thornton fighting for the last spot. Carter is a centre, but can move to wing. Staal is a centre but can move to wing. Jumbo Joe has to play centre as he is a pass first guy. Thornton had his chance in Turin, they built the team around him (just like Lindros in Nagano). Unfortunately, unlike Lindros in 2002, I do not see Thornton accepting a dimished role. I guess if Heatley and Thornton are lighting it up then having them on a line together is prudent but that means no Toews. They will regret that decision if any crucial games go to a shootout. That has to be considered as well. It's a numbers game here...who do you leave off the team to put Brad Richards (who did nothing in Turin) on the team? He's soft and plays centre and is also a pass-first guy. Move him to the wing? He's not physically suited to play wing but let's examine it for sake of argument. Okay, the left shooting wingers are Nash, Staal and Morrow. Richards is nowhere near Morrow's league. Plus if Toews is out as a centre (if you include Joe to centre Heatley) then he (Toews) shoots left and would make a better winger than Brad Richards. I'd take Toews over Brad Richards. Young guys, guys that are hungry is what this teams need. Not overpaid vets who would rather be on vacation.
    Further, Steven Stamkos has more goals this year than any other Canadian. That deserves consideration (as Yzerman noted). Hey man, you're probably going to be right about this whole thing, I know that, I just feel they should wash their hands of 2006 and take the 2002 approach. Smyth's time has come and gone, so has Brad Richards', so has Thornton's, so has St. Louis' (although I do really respect Marty). It's time for some new blood IMO. If you pick a lot of the same guys, the greater the chance of getting a similar result...
  14. hhuevonn
    14. Posted by hhuevonn Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:39 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    guyf...i dont have a problem with toews being considered or getzlaf being mentioned. stamkos however still has a lot to prove. something to consider: if you've got morrow as a shoo-in, why not pencil st.louis as the other winger and have richards (both morrow's present linemate and st.louis ex teamate) center them. now we have a line that has grit, skill, leadership, the ability to play in all situations and with excellent credentials! you dont think that trio will be hungry in the olympics!?
    by the way, the 2002 team was on average, about 1.5 years OLDER than the 2006 team.
  15. Guy F
    15. Posted by Guy F Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:53 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    @ hhuevonn : I meant "younger" moreso as not yet experienced representing Canada in the Olympics as well as chronological age. Lemieux, Yzerman and Macinnis drove the 2002 average up. Go with some new blood. Now, the line you propose is solid, no doubt about it. I'm just not sure about Richards. He was so awesome in winning the Conn Smythe and also at the World Cup but since then...I realize injuries have slowed him and Tampa, as a team, pretty much imploded. Still, he doesn't seem to be quite the same guy. As mentioned, I'm a big Morrow fan and I do like St. Louis. However, the inclusion of St. Louis re-opens the whole Stamkos thing as they have some good chemistry going.
    That said, that line of Morrow, Richards and St. Louis could be great. Grit, skills and excellent skating. Yeah, maybe Stamkos has to wait. Canada is just to deep. Now, if he is still leading all Canadians in goals come Christmas, I think he needs to be there
    Clearly, Yzerman should call us...
    GO CANADA!

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™