Puck Daddy - NHL

The eagle eyes of our friend Steve Lepore of Puck The Media scanned a recent NBC press release and discovered a bombshell, since confirmed by the network: NBC will broadcast Games 1 and 2 of the Stanley Cup finals; Games 3 and 4 will be on Versus; and then the action shifts back to NBC for Games 5, 6 and 7 if necessary.

In other words: If there's a sweep, the Stanley Cup would be awarded on the buck huntin'/cage fightin'/Sports Soup network. Of course, if it's a sweep, then the finals may have royally sucked anyway, which makes their conclusion on Versus rather appropriate, no?

Since 2000, Games 1 and 2 of the finals have been on either ESPN or Versus, before the action shifted to the broadcast network partner. The benefits and drawbacks of that scheme have always been apparent: Games 1 and 2 are usually the scene-setters rather than the games casual fans make time to watch; but on the other hand, how many network shows can you count that have a third of their plotlines start on cable before moving to prime time?

As for this new plan, Lepore's a fan:

We're totally okay with VERSUS getting two games of the Stanley Cup Final. Unlike NBC, they pay a significant amount of money to broadcast the National Hockey League, and should be rewarded for being the only network to do so.  However, I've never liked the idea of the series beginning on cable, because it automatically makes it so the series has to build itself up from the bottom (Alas, the first two games of last year's huge finals NHL-wise couldn't crack 2 million viewers). This is a huge coup for VERSUS, as they'll likely benefit from tons of cross-promotion from the NHL and NBC, who will beg viewers to stick with the series to basic cable.

This is also a good move for NBC.  FOX typically used to air Game 1 of the Stanley Cup Finals from 1995-99, and did pretty well ratings wise, whereas the league struggled to gain momentum with Game 1 airing on cable.

We'd offer that it's also good for the NHL to have the fanfare and excitement of Game 1 in broadcast prime time. It gives NBC a chance to hype the hell out of the first game of a championship round, which greatly enhances the rest of the momentum for the series. 

Now, about Versus: Yes, they're paying more money than the NHL ever dreamed a network would after the lockout, so they deserve something. But beyond their financial stake, what has that network done to deserve this incredible concession? Provided auditory Nyquil for the nation with its D.O.A. studio show? Poorly chosen games? Broadcasted something called "Turkey Revolution" while the hockey world celebrated the trade deadline?

Again, there are benefits and drawbacks. So we put it to you, dear readers:

Pass or Fail: The new Stanley Cup finals TV schedule for NBC and Versus.

digg delicious
more

163 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. jesters_13
    1. Posted by jesters_13 Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Fail. Of course, any deal that allows VS to broadcast ANY games gets a fail.
  2. GT
    2. Posted by GT Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yeah, maybe Versus pays more money, but ESPN SHOWED more hockey. They often had double headers, especially on ESPN 2 on Thursday nights. I rarely see double headers on VS, so the only time I get to see a West Coast team is when they travel eastward against opponents they do not know well, making for lackluster hockey....oh, yeah, FAIL, because hockey coverage on NBC is a joke and VS is not much better.
  3. GT
    3. Posted by GT Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Oh, and besides, how can NBC show Stanley Cup finals games? It an Eastern Conference team vs a Western Conference team....that means that there will never be a matchup of Flyers vs Rangers...I think that's the only matchup they are allowed to broadcast.
  4. beer_man_beer_here
    4. Posted by beer_man_beer_here Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Well it looks like we are going to see the Wings win the cup on VS.
  5. onmyown
    5. Posted by onmyown Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:18 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    FAIL.
    I want ESPN Play-off games and coverage to return. A big F Versus.
  6. JohnB
    6. Posted by JohnB Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yeah, this is a fail. NBC doesn't have great broadcasts and Versus is just terrible, oh plus the fact Versus isn't a basic cable channel so a lot of people won't get the oppurtunity to see it. I also give a pass though as this is about as good as the NHL can do with the options at hand.
  7. Kevin
    7. Posted by Kevin Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:16 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ignore. Which games are on Vs and NBC doesn't make a real difference to me.
  8. BobBastard
    8. Posted by BobBastard Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:16 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Personally inconsequential. I'll be fine watching the playoffs on TSN and CBC. Honestly, Versus and NBC have been broadcasting them for a few years now, and the quality has never improved. What would it take to get a couple VS producers to sit down, watch Hockey Night in Canada, and take a few notes..
    FAIL for the quality itself.
    FAIL for not giving their 'flagship' network all the games. NBC has a broader audience I know, but VS was supposed to be the NHL's network of choice.
  9. GM
    9. Posted by GM Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I actually say Pass. I mean what are the better options?? Sure ESPN would be good but they don't show hockey so why discuss it. Versus does an okay job...at least hockey is on cable in HD. And they get to 75 million homes now. And I like that NBC can hype the first two games for a couple weeks ahead of time. If the series is 2-0 after those two no one is going to watch anyway. But if the first two games are close, physica, and come out split 1-1 I think Versus will get plenty of viewers.
    And all of that means that this is better for the NHL. The best would be all 7 on NBC but I don't think NBC wants to do that.
  10. dh
    10. Posted by dh Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    another case of bettman shooting the nhl in the foot, their really isnt a casual hocky fan that is going to pay for vs to get 2 games of the finals, most people either love hockey ,or hate it and dont watch it anyway, { they cant help it they have no class] the only people that will pay are already doing it , not letting people see the best of the best play the championship games for free does not endear people to become fans and try to understand the sport for the rest of the season. the biggest problem i run into with people who dont like hockey is they dont understand the rules. they dont understand the rules because the dont get enough exposure. shot in the foot
  11. Jon A
    11. Posted by Jon A Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think it's safe to overlook a network's financial stake in the NHL when they pick a game like Avs vs. Islanders on the same night the Sharks are in Detroit. FAIL.
  12. knucklehead
    12. Posted by knucklehead Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Brian Engbloms' wings should be back in full flight by then....
  13. dh
    13. Posted by dh Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    and by the way the pic above is the way the cup should be shown, with the red wings hoisting it, beautiful
  14. Josh T
    14. Posted by Josh T Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Fail... look, I have nothing for or against Versus... when ESPN dropped NHL coverage Versus picked it up... BUT I don't see how having a possible Stanley Cup deciding game on a cable network many people don't get is going to "help grow the game"
  15. Josh T
    15. Posted by Josh T Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I do like Versus "Doe Eyed Girls in Heat" show... oh wait... that wasn't Versus....
  16. Hans Gruber
    16. Posted by Hans Gruber Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    NBC and Versus are very similar. It will be Doc and Eddie calling the game. Versus has its crew at the desk and NBC has Milbury and the Bald Turd. It is really indifferent what network it is on. Maybe they should try to get the Food Network or QVC to pick it up. Maybe more households will have it available.
  17. Hans Gruber
    17. Posted by Hans Gruber Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    On second thought, big time props to Food Network as a destination. Think of it, they can show clips of Giada in low cut shirts during commercial breaks. Maybe even let her take Pee-ers job. Probably be an improvment.
  18. wutwut
    18. Posted by wutwut Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    fail fail fail. i liked how they did it last year if versus had to be involved in any way
  19. Mat
    19. Posted by Mat Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    FAIL, when it was the Outdoor Life Network it was in my tv package, then it got all uppity and priced itself in the top tier.
    I'm not paying extra to see Wings & Rangers games, even if that means 2 games of the Stanley Cup Finals.
    Time for the NHL Network to buy the rights from VS and put that channel on EVERY providers' basic packages. Show the NFL Network how to do it right.
  20. Alive again on Madison
    20. Posted by Alive again on Madison Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    VS is a train wreck.NBC does not think the US has a population outside New England. The NHL shot themselves in the foot for more money for far less coverage. How can anybody get pumped up about the league if it's easier to find reruns of the Jeffersons, than quality games [from a national standpoint],on basic cable or network TV? Not to mention competent coverage. Bettman needs to get on the same flight Bill Wurtz took.
  21. Scott
    21. Posted by Scott Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    First of all, Versus is the NHL's cable broadcast partner. Whinging about that is pointless. People are glorifying the way the NHL was promoted by ESPN. Those broadcasts weren't any better, and hockey got little to no recognition overall on the "Worldwide Leader."
    Having Game 1 on NBC is a better move than having it on Versus; better promotion for the sport. I'd prefer to see Games 2 and 3 then on Versus, and leave the last 4 possible clinching games on NBC. But Wysh is right, if it is a sweep, it probably wouldn't make much difference. Either way, starting it on NBC allows NHL to promote the games that will be on Versus, and probably lead to higher ratings overal. Probably.
  22. MONKEY MAN
    22. Posted by MONKEY MAN Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    fail.
    the only station with worst coverage than Versus is NBC.
    if I want to hear Doc's high-pitched squeals, I'll just release a live pig in my living room.
  23. Shyster
    23. Posted by Shyster Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    FAIL!!!!! I hate Vs. even more than NBC. I say broadcast all the games online without any blackouts.
  24. Scotty Hockey
    24. Posted by Scotty Hockey Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:22 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Complete fail. They should not limit coverage of the premier event in our sport to those who get the hunting network. No matter how many households they claim they have, Versus doesn't have the reach or promotional ability of ESPN so you just can't compare the two. And NBC is a national network that everyone gets. To put any Cup Final games on a niche network does a disservice to the sport. And that isn't even talking about the absolutely horrid coverage of said niche network. The only way it would be acceptable would be if they simulcast TSN or CBC's coverage. The Versus crew, simply said, is incompetent. Week after week their camera work is terrible, their directing misses key parts of the action, their production is a joke and as Greg said, their studio show is DOA. No talent talking heads who have opinions no one cares about. Wow, Brian Engblom, a terrible former player who lucked himself into a Stanley Cup ring can barely put together cohesive sentences and looks like a tool. And Keith Jones? Well, let's just say that those concussions clearly have taken their toll. Any games on Versus is a fail but why not two and three rather than three and four? Neither the start of the series nor a possible Cup deciding game should be on Versus, where the lead in is sure to be Holy S%$& or PBR or MMA garbage.
  25. Leafsfan1967
    25. Posted by Leafsfan1967 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The NHL gets a passing grade for this, but the Versus product is a problem and always has been. They are not helpfing hockey in the States at all. The NHL would be much better off to simulcast Hockey Night in Canada...

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™