Thu May 01, 2008 12:19 am EDT
After the dust settled on Sean Avery's newly-vented spleen this afternoon, my prayers for Avery faded but my thoughts did not; specifically, thoughts about what kind of reaction the belligerent New York Ranger might have for the New York Daily News, which misreported that Avery was unconscious, had stopped breathing and was in cardiac arrest early Wednesday morning.
This is, after all, a player that already has one libel claim to his credit this season. Avery went after a Toronto radio reporter who claimed that Avery make derogatory references about Jason Blake's cancer, inciting a skirmish before a game against the Toronto Maple Leafs. Reporter Howard Berger later retracted the report and apologized on FAN 590 to end the ordeal.
In speaking to some friends in the newspaper and legal businesses Wednesday, the Daily News shouldn't have reason for concern. It quickly corrected its reporting, scrubbing its original story of any reference to "cardiac arrest" after the Rangers and other media outlets reported that Avery has instead suffered a lacerated spleen. There's also an absence of malice here ... unless the newspaper's refuted report that Avery was in the little black book of a high-end Manhattan madam can somehow indicate a pattern.
After a full day of silence on his Blueshirts Blog, Daily News writer John Dellapina -- who shared a byline on the "cardiac arrest" report -- addressed the situation at the end of a blog post previewing Game 4 of the Rangers' series against the Pittsburgh Penguins. His defiant comments seem to indicate he believes there's some truth to the original story -- and that tales of lacerated spleens were concocted for easy consumption by his gullible peers in the mainstream media.
Dellapina wrote:
Finally, for all those from other media outlets and newspapers who have sarcastically dismissed our initial web story about Sean Avery's hospitalization since the Rangers refuted it Wednesday afternoon, I wonder:Was your initial reaction that the story couldn't have been correct or did you simply race up to the MSG Training Center to get player reaction? And, did you call the hospital and/or Avery's representatives to get the real story or did your "reporting" simply consist of taking the team's word for what happened?
Fortunately, the intrepid men an women of the press who have exposed baseball's steroid problems didn't similarly regurgitate what they were told by people who understandably want their businesses viewed as beyond reproach.
So is Dellapina simply slamming his peers for lazy reporting on a story the Daily News stuck its neck out to break? Or does "taking the team's word for what happened" seem to indicate he thinks that the "lacerated spleen" is a conspiratorial cover for something much more sinister, despite the denials that Avery had any heart problems?
And if it is a cover story ... what does Dellapina know that he isn't sharing? What does he believe the Rangers, and Avery, are hiding?
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Vancouver 5, Colorado 2 (Nov. 20)
Posted Nov 19 2009
Montreal 3, Washington 2 (Nov. 20)
Posted Nov 19 2009
Chicago 7, Calgary 1 (Nov. 19)
Posted Nov 18 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
34 Comments
1 - 24 of 34
Report Abuse
Go Pens!
Report Abuse
Go Habs Rags or Flyers.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
GO pens, bring on whoever thinks they can take us out, you will fall to our knees.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
When a newspaper prints or reports a story containing a factual error, the preferred way to correct the error is to 1) Print a separate correction with a referrence to the original inaccurate article. Alternatively, the paper can weasel and 2) Print an article with the corrected information. The article should, however, contain mention of the original innacurate report. The same standard should be applied to online/blog reporting. Since I don't read the Daily News, (or The New York ComPOST), I can't say whether this was done, but from your blog and the comments above, I'd say the News and their reporters failed to demonstrate any integrity or accuracy here.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
go pens
Report Abuse
I've met John and I like John. Liked him since his days covering the Devils.
"Dellapina's byline was for providing background info on Avery and checking with Ranger sources on the stories the other reporters got. His blog item is not a hint that there's more to the story, but should be taken at face value that there's more to reporting than just getting the official story from the team."
If that's what you read into it, and that's what John intended, it's just another case of MSM blogs needing a little editorial oversight. Bringing the steroid investigation into the conversation completely clouds his point, because the MSM reaction to steroids was to swallow the company line and not dig for the "real" story. In Avery's case, it seems to indicate that the rest of the media accepted what the Rangers had to say while the NYDN was the SF Chron on the steroid beat.
I understand he didn't drive the story. I know how these Metro desk/Sports desk mash-ups work. But then just let it die on the vine; for Dellapina to address it on his blog, he's pouring salt in the NYDN's self-inflicted wound.
Report Abuse
look heres the scoop...
Avery is and idiot and has been since juniors, talented but classless...amazing how he tried to play the Broduer thing as having Marty the one who lacks class, so basically he can act like a total goof towards someone, on and off the ice, and as soon as someone disrespects him, they are the ones who lack class? honestly if Broduer punched him out during handshakes id respect him even MORE. Im very sure that most of his own teammates dont like him either, just like the flyers felt about Bobby Clarke back in the day.
As for Crosby...of all the players to call him out..Jagr does it? Jagr was the biggest diver in the 90's during his 'hayday' and for some reason now he finds it wrong? wonder why that is. After watching that apparent 'dive' ive come to the conclusion that Crosby was impeded but over did it a bit. I also wonder why some fans dont like Crosby either, theyre the same fans who wouldnt have liked Gretzky when he started out, they got a problem with young good looking kids who are immensely talented. Im not saying Crosby doesnt get special treatment, but if Jagr thinks he wasnt getting special treatment back in the 90's he needs to watch those videos of him with that ridiculous haircut and see how generous the refs were to him.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Justin B - Clearly you have no clue. If the NHL wanted ratings, they would be pushing for a NY - LA matchup.....think about it.....think a little more.....the bigger the market.....the more ratings....something called math, as as you may spell it MAFF. As far as the officiating, Rangers had 2 (5-3) power plays, the PENS have had 0. Otherwise, the penalties have been even. The problem for you is that the Rangers CAN NOT score on the power play - not the REFS. You are one of those morons you talk about, and its no great loss if you leave.
As far as Avery goes, obviously no one wants to see anyone hurt in sports. Play hard, but play fair. I don't believe what Avery was doing to Brodeur was fair. I do believe in something called Karma. Without getting too metaphysical - here are the basics. If you act like a BIT*H, the universe will smack you like a BIT*H, to put you back in line. Balance things out. Thats what happened to Avery. Who cares what was reported - in the heat of the moment, anything can be reported or mistakenly heard.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 24 of 34