Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:45 pm EST
It almost reads like a headline from The Onion, doesn't it?
But rather than take the draconian road with a ban on hits to the head or other legislative measures, the NHL has decided to issue a stern warning to its players about the number of controversial head shots this season. With a letter posted in the locker room.
"Recently, we have had two (2) supplemental discipline incidents involving direct elbow blows to the head. This is a play that we have been trying to remove from our game for a number of years. In one case there was no injury and in the other incident the elbowed Player received a concussion. Both Players delivering the elbows had never before been involved in supplemental discipline.
"We cannot and will not tolerate blows to the head that are deliberate, avoidable and illegal. Furthermore, both the history and status of the offender (first time versus repeat) and the nature of the injury caused (if any) will be taken into consideration as they have been in the past. The length of suspensions for illegal blows to the head will be increased if these incidents persist across the League. Taking steps to maintain the safest on-ice environment possible for the Players remains our most important priority."
Once again, we see how bafflingly inept the supplemental discipline system is for the NHL. Should the injury that did or did not occur, or the rap sheet of the offender, have anything to do with the swift, harsh punishment that should fall on an offending party if the NHL is truly trying to rid its product of these illegal hits?
We all remember the recent Chris Pronger hit on Pavel Datsyuk. Right there you have a play that didn't result in an injury but a hit that was delivered by one of the League's most notorious repeat offenders.
But what about this hit from Alexei Kovalev of the Montreal Canadiens on Simon Gagne of the Philadelphia Flyers from this weekend?
After the game, Gagne was enraged:
Gagne said after tonight's game he believes Kovalev targeted his head and should have been penalized on the hit, which opened up cuts on his chin and cheek.
"If you look at it, the puck's not even there," Gagne said. "Is he coming to take the puck away from me? I don't think so. I think he's coming to hurt me. I got some marks on my face, so you can tell the hit was to the head."
Why did Kovalev escape without a penalty? "I don't know if it's because we are the Flyers," Gagne said. "I don't want to start anything, but if it was us doing a hit like that, then it definitely would have been at least two minutes."
"It was sneaky. It was senseless. He wasn't going for a puck. He wasn't trying to prevent a scoring chance. It was senseless." You know who said that about Kovalev?
Brian Burke. In 1993.
That's when the then-NHL senior VP suspended Kovalev five games for injuring Dale Hunter on a tripping play.
On this Gagne hit, we have a player who has suffered through concussions and a player hitting him in the head that has a rap sheet stretching back 15 years; and potentially hitting him with the intent to injure.
So of course there won't be a suspension ...
Look, we're no fans of this absurd system of justice, that's arbitrary to the point of parody. It's a system too easily manipulated by the media, and one that appears unable to hand out suspensions with any semblance of uniformity or consistency.
But it's completely unacceptable, given the discipline parameters established by the League, to think that both the Pronger hit and the Kovalev hit were not penalized during the game; yet had either of their targets been injured, both players would have probably been suspended.
How does that clean up the League?
As the memo quoted above claims: "Taking steps to maintain the safest on-ice environment possible for the Players remains our most important priority."
Shouldn't the first step be getting rid of the dangerous plays that can potentially lead to these serious injuries? Or is this "priority" reserved only for those with blood on their hands?
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Philadelphia 3, New Jersey 2 (Feb. 8)
Posted Feb 7 2010
San Jose 3, Toronto 2 (Feb. 8)
Posted Feb 7 2010
Phoenix 6, Edmonton 1 (Feb. 8)
Posted Feb 7 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
58 Comments
1 - 25 of 58
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Interesting Statement, there Wysh.
Should fore-checking be banned to protect the player with the puck from being hit resulting in a player skating freely from end to end with no obstruction to allow him a 100 mph shot at the goalie?
Why not ban any type of defensive play, then?
Report Abuse
Why choose the first picture? From that view, it is hard to tell if Niedermayer is getting elbowed or trying to keep his eye on the puck.
Report Abuse
Like I said, I'm playing within the NHL's system here. I don't think every hit is dangerous, and I don't think every suspension is warranted. Don't confuse me with Gagne.
That said, and for clarification -- if the League is going to use its supplimental discipline system to attempt to get head shots out of the NHL, then it needs to do more than just penalize those players whose actions resulted in injuries. The comment you quoted is strictly a head-shot related comment.
Report Abuse
+1 if you know what movie that is from
Report Abuse
BTW What happens when one of these guys kills someone, does he get a lifetime ban as well?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
As the great Strother Martin(of Slap Shot fame) once said: "Morons, I have morons on my side" --
+1 if you know what movie that is from
Bingo!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
We're not talking about only elbows to the head, and we're not talking about checking in general.
As for how the league handles hits to the head and enforcement of the rules in general, consider this:
If traffic laws were applied the way the league applies the rules (especially when considering suspension), you could drive as fast and recklessly as you wanted provided no property damage was done and no one was hurt.
You may receive a ticket for driving this way, depending on if a cop saw you or not and how bad his day has been (i.e. a penalty), but you'd never have to worry about having your license suspended (i.e. a suspension).
If you ask me, people drive badly enough as it is without having this type of free reign to be an idiot.
It should be a basic discipline structure for all intent to injure suspensions (hits to the head or otherwise):
First offense = 3 games
Second offense = 5 games
Third offense = 10 games
Fourth offese = 41 games (half the season)
etc, etc
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
that said, nothing's concussion proof. the stats are good, but I dare you to prove to me anything on their website saying otherwise. I am trying to figure out why no player has gone to one yet, though the styling is a little different and probably fit (not to get into endorsements, if one wants to play the conspiracy angle)
don't forget guys like Gretzky and Tikkanen who went around the rink skating with a collander on their heads for all those years, with no obvious ill effects (especially in Tikkanen's case, he was already cuckoo). rules are rules, and you can lead a horse to water but can't make him drink.
bottom line: good helmets or not, still need to eliminate the headshots.....
Report Abuse
Possession is 9 10ths of the law(hockey).
A natural reflex of bumping a guy with the puck while on skates is with the upper body(shoulders, elbows). It just so happens that the shoulder bone is connected to the neck bone, and the neck bone is connected to the head bone.
I'm not saying I want to see players get destroyed out on the ice, but let them police themselves. It makes for bigger rivalries, more action, better hockey.
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 58