Puck Daddy - NHL

It almost reads like a headline from The Onion, doesn't it?

But rather than take the draconian road with a ban on hits to the head or other legislative measures, the NHL has decided to issue a stern warning to its players about the number of controversial head shots this season. With a letter posted in the locker room.

From a memo obtained by TSN: 

"Recently, we have had two (2) supplemental discipline incidents involving direct elbow blows to the head.  This is a play that we have been trying to remove from our game for a number of years.  In one case there was no injury and in the other incident the elbowed Player received a concussion.  Both Players delivering the elbows had never before been involved in supplemental discipline. 

"We cannot and will not tolerate blows to the head that are deliberate, avoidable and illegal.  Furthermore, both the history and status of the offender (first time versus repeat) and the nature of the injury caused (if any) will be taken into consideration as they have been in the past.  The length of suspensions for illegal blows to the head will be increased if these incidents persist across the League.  Taking steps to maintain the safest on-ice environment possible for the Players remains our most important priority."

Once again, we see how bafflingly inept the supplemental discipline system is for the NHL. Should the injury that did or did not occur, or the rap sheet of the offender, have anything to do with the swift, harsh punishment that should fall on an offending party if the NHL is truly trying to rid its product of these illegal hits?

We all remember the recent Chris Pronger hit on Pavel Datsyuk. Right there you have a play that didn't result in an injury but a hit that was delivered by one of the League's most notorious repeat offenders.

But what about this hit from Alexei Kovalev of the Montreal Canadiens on Simon Gagne of the Philadelphia Flyers from this weekend?

After the game, Gagne was enraged:

Gagne said after tonight's game he believes Kovalev targeted his head and should have been penalized on the hit, which opened up cuts on his chin and cheek.

"If you look at it, the puck's not even there," Gagne said. "Is he coming to take the puck away from me? I don't think so. I think he's coming to hurt me. I got some marks on my face, so you can tell the hit was to the head."

Why did Kovalev escape without a penalty? "I don't know if it's because we are the Flyers," Gagne said. "I don't want to start anything, but if it was us doing a hit like that, then it definitely would have been at least two minutes."

"It was sneaky. It was senseless. He wasn't going for a puck. He wasn't trying to prevent a scoring chance. It was senseless." You know who said that about Kovalev?

Brian Burke. In 1993. 

That's when the then-NHL senior VP suspended Kovalev five games for injuring Dale Hunter on a tripping play.

On this Gagne hit, we have a player who has suffered through concussions and a player hitting him in the head that has a rap sheet stretching back 15 years; and potentially hitting him with the intent to injure.

So of course there won't be a suspension ...

Look, we're no fans of this absurd system of justice, that's arbitrary to the point of parody. It's a system too easily manipulated by the media, and one that appears unable to hand out suspensions with any semblance of uniformity or consistency.

But it's completely unacceptable, given the discipline parameters established by the League, to think that both the Pronger hit and the Kovalev hit were not penalized during the game; yet had either of their targets been injured, both players would have probably been suspended.

How does that clean up the League?

As the memo quoted above claims: "Taking steps to maintain the safest on-ice environment possible for the Players remains our most important priority."

Shouldn't the first step be getting rid of the dangerous plays that can potentially lead to these serious injuries? Or is this "priority" reserved only for those with blood on their hands?

digg delicious
more

58 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. SJ Sharkie
    1. Posted by SJ Sharkie Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Suspend a star player? Don't be silly Wysh, rules are for scrubs.
  2. onmyown
    2. Posted by onmyown Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:18 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "getting rid of the dangerous plays that can potentially lead to these serious injuries?"
    Interesting Statement, there Wysh.
    Should fore-checking be banned to protect the player with the puck from being hit resulting in a player skating freely from end to end with no obstruction to allow him a 100 mph shot at the goalie?
    Why not ban any type of defensive play, then?
  3. Fox
    3. Posted by Fox Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Good thing Dale Hunter never did anything to anyone away from the puck that might make them want to get even, otherwise I would wonder about the context.
    Why choose the first picture? From that view, it is hard to tell if Niedermayer is getting elbowed or trying to keep his eye on the puck.
  4. Wyshynski
    4. Posted by Wyshynski Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ onmyown --
    Like I said, I'm playing within the NHL's system here. I don't think every hit is dangerous, and I don't think every suspension is warranted. Don't confuse me with Gagne.
    That said, and for clarification -- if the League is going to use its supplimental discipline system to attempt to get head shots out of the NHL, then it needs to do more than just penalize those players whose actions resulted in injuries. The comment you quoted is strictly a head-shot related comment.
  5. The Bog
    5. Posted by The Bog Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    As the great Strother Martin(of Slap Shot fame) once said: "Morons, I have morons on my side" --
    +1 if you know what movie that is from
  6. jtb3rd
    6. Posted by jtb3rd Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    He's a Canadien and hit a Flyer, of course nothing was going to be done to him.
    BTW What happens when one of these guys kills someone, does he get a lifetime ban as well?
  7. Shots of Fury
    7. Posted by Shots of Fury Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:31 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Not that I don't get your point, but can you really blame Kovalev for wanting to injure Dale Hunter? Never mind the suspension, I would have bought him a beer.
  8. jtb3rd
    8. Posted by jtb3rd Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    6. Posted by The Bog Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:15 pm EST Report Abuse
    As the great Strother Martin(of Slap Shot fame) once said: "Morons, I have morons on my side" --
    +1 if you know what movie that is from
    Bingo!
  9. beer_man_beer_here
    9. Posted by beer_man_beer_here Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Killing people is allowed...As long as it isn't done by a hit to the head...Sharpening the end of your stick and using it as a shank to stab someone is only 2 minutes...I'm not kidding...Read the rule book...
  10. G
    10. Posted by G Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I would be so pissed off if Kovalev injured Gagne, and all the other Flyers fans and players would too. I mean come on, the puck was nowhere in sight. I know we've had more than our share of suspensions, but that doesn't mean we should be punished by other players taking out our best player and not even getting a penalty. I sometimes find the league pathetic, I mean there are more superstars than just Crosby and Ovechkin. If Gagne were to get seriously injured say, 20 games or so, I would want to see Kovalev out for 20 games also, even if it means he doesn't get to play in the all star game.
  11. tehchico
    11. Posted by tehchico Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    How do you police elbows when players are not extending elbows to hit? That's why there is such a gray line here.
  12. tune433
    12. Posted by tune433 Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Here's the solution to the whole matter of "hits to the head". Let the players sort it out. There is a place in hockey for enforcers and this it. But I would still enforce the rules about the "third man in". Do any of us think that these guys delivering these cheap shots would do so, knowing they might have to go toe to toe with Donald Brashear. I don't think so. I think Kovalev would crawl up into a ball and cry uncle.
  13. tune433
    13. Posted by tune433 Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Oh I forgot. We're trying to take fighting out of the game also. Shame on me.
  14. Fr. Orange and Black
    14. Posted by Fr. Orange and Black Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Looking for that "legal" "shoulder check" on Kovalev and Koivu next time Philly plays the favored anniversary year wonders. Then we'll see all of Canada rise up in righteous indignation against the Bullies form Philly. Give me break. The Candiens ended Keith Primeau's career with a cheapshot elbow to the head. The only way they will learn is when their start players are caried off the ice and spend a year recovering from concussions. Carboneau is an eternal hypocrite.
  15. carl_vs_mastershake
    15. Posted by carl_vs_mastershake Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:18 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Every player should be outfitted a Master Blaster helmet and shoulder pads that double as saddle for a little person, droid, or muppet jedi. This way the head is protected and any hit to the head could carry extra penalites for the hurting the passenger. Players may take the helmet off for the shoot out. BTW goalies don't get a shoulder partner but a conjoined twin. I'm just working out the cap numbers it will be ready for the next BOG meeting.
  16. Robert G
    16. Posted by Robert G Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    the memo is a classic example that the league has no interest in protecting the players so long as they can sell tickets. big open ice hits where bodies go flying make great highlight reels. other examples include lack of no touch icing (unlike every other hockey league), and no mandatory visors (unlike every other hockey league). in addition, the great interference/holding calls that happen so frequentyl prevent defensement from defending their goalie from that forward crashing into their goalie.
  17. G
    17. Posted by G Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    And how about that cheap sucker punch that Timonen received during last seasons playoffs against the canadiens. Everyone knows it would be a automatic suspension had it been a Flyers player did that. How about some consistent calls, is that too much to ask for? I hate these hypocritic habs fans. I'll gaurantee you 1 thing, habs won't win the cup this year, mark my words, they won't. Take your stupid ole chants to the soccer field.
  18. knucklehead
    18. Posted by knucklehead Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @22. OK put your son in it and let him take one to the dome.
  19. Spencer
    19. Posted by Spencer Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    To be clear we're talking about all hits to the head and how the league refuses to address the problem.
    We're not talking about only elbows to the head, and we're not talking about checking in general.
    As for how the league handles hits to the head and enforcement of the rules in general, consider this:
    If traffic laws were applied the way the league applies the rules (especially when considering suspension), you could drive as fast and recklessly as you wanted provided no property damage was done and no one was hurt.
    You may receive a ticket for driving this way, depending on if a cop saw you or not and how bad his day has been (i.e. a penalty), but you'd never have to worry about having your license suspended (i.e. a suspension).
    If you ask me, people drive badly enough as it is without having this type of free reign to be an idiot.
    It should be a basic discipline structure for all intent to injure suspensions (hits to the head or otherwise):
    First offense = 3 games
    Second offense = 5 games
    Third offense = 10 games
    Fourth offese = 41 games (half the season)
    etc, etc
  20. The Legend
    20. Posted by The Legend Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think they should just drop the enforcer rule as mentioned above and start fining players for cheap hits. Players like their money and will do almost anything to keep it.
  21. Big Ern
    21. Posted by Big Ern Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Unless of course, it's Ovie flying, leaping, and charging Malkin... Those are all okay.
  22. Brian S (brianguy)
    22. Posted by Brian S (brianguy) Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    next action from the league front office: a tersely-worded Post It, sent by carrier pigeon. all teams should be checking their highest ledge for any updates by (U.S.) Thanksgiving.
  23. Brian S (brianguy)
    23. Posted by Brian S (brianguy) Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    cascade helmet is certainly good... my next dome will almost surely be one, but I'll continue wearing my ccm a few more years til it's too old and crusty.
    that said, nothing's concussion proof. the stats are good, but I dare you to prove to me anything on their website saying otherwise. I am trying to figure out why no player has gone to one yet, though the styling is a little different and probably fit (not to get into endorsements, if one wants to play the conspiracy angle)
    don't forget guys like Gretzky and Tikkanen who went around the rink skating with a collander on their heads for all those years, with no obvious ill effects (especially in Tikkanen's case, he was already cuckoo). rules are rules, and you can lead a horse to water but can't make him drink.
    bottom line: good helmets or not, still need to eliminate the headshots.....
  24. onmyown
    24. Posted by onmyown Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:18 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I completely understand that the message is related to head shots, but with hockey being such a quick game, and with trying to knock the puck free from your opponent and gain possession things happen in a split second decision.
    Possession is 9 10ths of the law(hockey).
    A natural reflex of bumping a guy with the puck while on skates is with the upper body(shoulders, elbows). It just so happens that the shoulder bone is connected to the neck bone, and the neck bone is connected to the head bone.
    I'm not saying I want to see players get destroyed out on the ice, but let them police themselves. It makes for bigger rivalries, more action, better hockey.
  25. bleedorangenblack
    25. Posted by bleedorangenblack Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    My seats were in a clear view of Kovalev's Cheap, head hunting shot on Gagne, the puck was gone and he had his sights on Gagne's head from the time he skated passed the net. he never even looked for the puck. The last thing I expected to see was a no call, I even thought he would have a game misconduct, but the last thing I thought was with the supposed crack down on head shots at least the skirts in the Toronto war room would react to the tape of the hit. Maybe Cote will get a free pass when he puts Alex Kovalev through the glass head first.

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™