Tue May 05, 2009 1:59 pm EDT
When we last left San Jose Sharks GM Doug Wilson, he was ranting and raving about character and responsibility and winning and how this offseason "had better be the worst summer all of us have had." So it's safe to assume there will be some significant changes for the Big Teal Machine.
The focus already is on captain Patrick Marleau, who (rightly or wrongly) has become the poster boy for the franchise's lack of leadership and failure in the clutch. The notion that the Sharks' personality transplant begins with his relocation to another NHL team isn't exactly in the minority.
So here's an idea that we've been kicking around the Puck Daddy braintrust lately (not a rumor, just a thought): Marleau to the New York Rangers for center Chris Drury.
First, a comparison for the 2008-09 season:
Player | GP | G | A | +/- | PPG | SHG |
Marleau | 76 | 38 | 33 | 16 | 11 | 5 |
Drury | 81 | 22 | 34 | -8 | 10 | 1 |
Marleau has been fantastic in the regular season in three of the last four campaigns. As Blueshirt Banter notes in giving Drury at "B-minus" for the season, his point total dropped for the fourth straight season but he continues to do some little things right for the Rangers.
Marleau, 30 next season, has one year left at $6.3 million before becoming a UFA. Drury, 33 next season, is signed through 2012 at a robust $7.05 million cap hit.
The deal would make financial sense for the Rangers, jettisoning a contact that -- in hindsight -- is regrettable, in exchange for a pending UFA. You don't like losing a character guy like Drury; but Marleau in a John Tortorella system could be a revelation, if the pressure of playing in New York doesn't crush his soul.
Drury is a player that Wilson's already pursued before as a general manager. He's captain material; he's a different kind of offensive center than Marleau; and when he's healthy, he's been a dependable playoff performer.
Just to make this clear: Not a rumor, just a bit of hot stove League banter we wanted to toss out there. Maybe this trade makes more sense in theory than in practice. Chances are one or both fan bases won't be happy with it. But on its surface, it makes some sense for both teams.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Ottawa 4, Washington 3 (Nov. 23)
Posted Nov 22 2009
Colorado 5, Philadelphia 4 (Nov. 23)
Posted Nov 22 2009
Boston 4, St. Louis 2 (Nov. 23)
Posted Nov 22 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
112 Comments
1 - 25 of 112
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Actually, I was hoping it would hit the HF Boards, where it will be expanded to Marleau and Claude Lemiuex for Drury, Staal and Lundqvist.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I'd take it though, although Marleau has a no trade clause, so he isn't going anywhere.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
for a shoe with a hole in it.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I like Marleau, but if the Avs are going to trade Smyth, I want either prospects or high draft picks for him. It's time to rebuild, not re-tool.
Report Abuse
But the Rangers would be getting the sock in the deal (cheaper of the two).
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 112