Sun Apr 12, 2009 1:40 pm EDT
Jacques Lemaire, who stepped down last night as the only bench boss the Minnesota Wild have ever known, is a brilliant coach. To that point, there can be no debate.
He's one of the smartest hockey men alive; he demands excellence; and with the right mix of personnel and chemistry, he's taken teams to greater heights than anyone could have predicted they'd soar. (And from a selfish journalistic point of view, he was a hell of a quote.)
Yet it's to Lemaire's credit and also to his detriment that his defense-first coaching philosophy has a transformative effect on the franchises that employ him.
The New Jersey Devils found their identity under Lemaire -- and with a backbone of Stevens, Niedermayer and Brodeur -- but by 1997 they needed a personality transplant. The franchise would find its footing again in 2000 with a very non-Jacques-like offense that ranked second in the NHL.
Eight seasons into their existence, it's time for the Wild to craft their own personality, absent Lemaire's ideology. Save the arguments about entertainment value and the hockey aesthetics of Lemaire's teams for the fan boards; Minnesota's task is to figure out whether to simply modify and build on a philosophy that's produced three playoff teams in eight seasons, or to sharply turn the franchise in another direction in search of loftier success.
Michael Russo of the Star Tribune offered several candidates for Le Heir to Lemaire: Houston Aeros coach Kevin Constantine has been considered the frontrunner, but names like Wild assistants Mario Tremblay and Mike Ramsey and deposed coaches like Peter Laviolette to Guy Carbonneau to Tom Renney are also mentioned.
(Flipping Jacques Lemaire for Tom Renney is a bit like replacing William Hurt in a movie with Ben Stein.)
Constantine spoke about the vacancy last night, according to The Third Intermission:
Constantine -- "My life is such a one-day-at-a-time thing, and that is really not a concern of mine right now. That is a concern for other people. My job right now is to get this team (Aeros) ready to play every day, and I have never had a problem staying on task, so I will just stay on task."
Russo's best work in the article is in explaining why Lemaire's time may have needed to end:
In recent days, players stood up to Lemaire in the locker room. At one point during a practice huddle Thursday, one veteran actually cursed at him in front of his teammates.
Players were disenchanted he didn't use Marian Gaborik on a 4-on-3 overtime power play in a must-win vs. Vancouver on March 31. In Dallas in March, players were furious the coaching staff took the bus back to the hotel while a dozen of them were left at the arena.
He has been in a rift with 20-year-old James Sheppard, one that came to a head in February when Sheppard asked Lemaire to loosen his grip.
There's plenty more in Russo's terrific dissection of Lemaire's legacy; 18,568 Reasons Why and Hockey Wilderness also have substantial takes on the coach's departure.
After eight seasons in lock-step with one man's coaching doctrine, it's both an exciting and completely frightening time to be a Wild fan. They're a franchise that just woke up in the nest and discovered the eagle has flown away. It's up to them what direction they follow.
One other coaching note: Buffalo Sabres Coach Lindy Ruff will be behind the bench for Team Canada at the world championships. What that means for the Olympics, only Steve Yzerman knows for sure.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Ottawa 2, Columbus 1 (Nov. 26)
Posted Nov 25 2009
Vancouver 4, Los Angeles 1 (Nov. 26)
Posted Nov 25 2009
Chicago 7, San Jose 2 (Nov. 25)
Posted Nov 24 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
52 Comments
1 - 25 of 52
Report Abuse
If only he could read that compliment.
Report Abuse
Sure, players don’t always like what the coach say’s or does, hell, I don’t always agree with my boss, but we get the job done. If you let you players take over and run things, guess what, they do turn into alot of “L’s”. How many time have people seen this in other sports let alone hockey? The “popular” coach, who let them have many day’s off, wind’s up getting fired because of lack of leadership and crappy record’s?
If I went to my boss and cursed him if front of everyone else, think I would still have that job? Hell no, none of us would. To me, that tell’s me the player/players have massive lack of discipline and respect. No matter who it is, perhaps they should no longer be on the team. Players were upset when the team buss left players behind? Why? Where they screwing around? Talking to reporters to get their faces in the paper or in S.I.? Hell, if I know that there is a time deadline to get to a buss, plane or whatever, damn right I am gonna make sure I am there. Doubt Southwest Airlines is going to delay a flight 30 minutes so I can get on there if I’m running late no matter the reason. Again, lack of discipline, respect and crappy attitude.
Let’s say Lemaire did throw Goldbrick……Gaborik, into the game and, God forbid, he got his little pinky sprained and had to miss the rest of the season. Guess who would have been vilified still? You guessed it, Lemaire. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. While I do believe it’s time for someone new in coaching, I definatly think it’s time for alot of new faces playerwise as well. My hat’s off to Lemaire for getting the Wild off to a great start franchisewise! After all, took Columbus 8 years to get to were we were in our 3rd year. Some teams have been around alot longer then we have and still a laughing stock. We have done good and think we will do great in the future.
Thanks Lemaire.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Take your 2-1 games elsewhere.
Report Abuse
He makes the playoffs 3 times in 8 seasons while employing the most stultifying system in the history of hockey. He ruins the first decade of what should by now be a celebrated career of a franchise talent.
Jake Lemaire has been dining out on that one Stanley Cup - in the fake season, I might add - for more than a decade.
If there is a hockey god, he will never set foot behind a bench ever again.
Jake Lemaire is bad for hockey in a way that even Gary Bettman can't contemplate.
Good profane riddance.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
How a guy who gave away Doug Gilmour for a sack of beans ever got another job in the NHL is beyond me, but here he is, ruining another franchise.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Defense is what you depend upon in the brutal marathon that leads to the Stanley Cup. His effective use of a neural zone trap (before the rules were changed) was what swept the Red Wings out of the finals when the Russian 5 seemed to keep the puck on a string. Even Gordie Howe commented after that finals that the trap was what every team of his day had to contend with.
Sure that type of hockey might seem boring now, but it is "old time hockey."
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I don't know if Minnesota will stick to Lemaire's legacy or not, but I am quite sure that in the next several years, the neutral trap will win a Cup. Lemaire's trap system will do for hockey what Patrick Roy's butterfly did for goaltending.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Either your knot tying skills aren't on par with what I imagine is the MD norm, or your infamous Tweet has revealed itself to be as accurate as the (e5) Garrioch-to-the-Citizen rumour I paid for.
(White guys in D.C. live in MD, don't they?)
Washington Post Style editors....you stink!!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 52