Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:51 am EDT

Most of Snapshots blogger George James Malik's latest take on the KHLNHLPA's challenges to the current Collective Bargaining Agreement plays like Mark Warner's speech at the DNC: Informative, enlightening but also a bit exhausting for the non-wonk crowd.
The real eye-opener comes near the end of the piece, when Malik hits on something rather underplayed in this entire NHL/KHL burgeoning cold war: The new Russian league's impact on minor league hockey. From Snapshots:
The de-facto $95,000 AHL salary cap (players who are paid over $95,000 in the AHL who aren't on entry-level deals are subject to re-entry waivers both on the way up and the way down) is driving minor pro hockey's top players not just to the KHL, but also to the rest of Europe's top leagues, leaving a league that's more and more dependent upon entry-level players to carry the mail, and more and more of those players are Europeans. For every European star who makes the NHL, more end up in the AHL for a year or two, and individually-negotiated transfer fees would reduce their participation in North American hockey by a dramatic margin, because players who weren't Ovechkins-to-be could become too expensive to bring over, making the AHL's brain drain that much worse, and, ultimately, hurting NHL teams that don't want to pay, say, $800,000 because that's how much Djurgardens IF says that it will cost for them to release Dick Axelsson.
Malik's points about European talent deciding not to play in North American minor leagues is an important one. But what about locals heading overseas? Taking a gander at some of the names that have bolted from the NHL to the KHL, and you'll see what I referred to in yesterday's rumors chat as 'Tweeners: Players who may have, in the past, signed with an AHL team in the hopes of getting called back to the NHL during the season. Now they're opting for the Russian league. Two players who appeared with the Calder Cup champion Chicago Wolves went KHL: Joel Kwiatkowski and Jason Krog, although his status is obviously in doubt.
What makes this situation even more interesting are the restrictions the AHL has in place in regards to playing veteran players. Teams can only dress five (sometimes six) players who have more than 260 games played in any hockey league internationally. Limited jobs and a new potential employer throwing money and contracts around in Russia? Talk about a ‘Tweener dream.
The AHL isn't just a place for young future NHL stars to incubate. It's a business, one with its own set of attendance concerns and pressures to win. The departure of veteran minor league players to Russia or other overseas destinations could have a sever impact on the AHL; and, in many ways, its parent league as well.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Philadelphia 3, New Jersey 2 (Feb. 8)
Posted Feb 7 2010
San Jose 3, Toronto 2 (Feb. 8)
Posted Feb 7 2010
Phoenix 6, Edmonton 1 (Feb. 8)
Posted Feb 7 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
15 Comments
1 - 15 of 15
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Wyshynski you stink!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Remember the 1994 season for the NHL? The IHL tried to expand, and killed themselves off in the process, dying a slow death earlier this decade.
Besides, isn't the point of having veterans on an AHL team two-fold? (#1 being to aid the youngsters, #2 as emergency players). The typical lifespan of a veteran in the AHL isn't long, though career players do occur. I don't see that as detrimental at all. It's natural and I don't see it hurting the AHL in the long run.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
While I don't totally disagree with you, I don't think having any of the players you listed not on an AHL hurts. Honestly, it does the contrary - it forces the development of younger players earlier. If I'm Hartigan, I have next to nothing of a chance of a regular spot on the Wings. Of all the ones you list, only Letwoski rings a bell in terms of serious time. Pierre Dagenais? Hasn't been in the NHL in 2 years. He sounds more like the 23rd forward than the 13th.
Report Abuse
Ohh ... it really explains your Russian fetish.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
How can this article have any merit? The AHL is in no danger to the KHL...c'mon Wishneskovich, don't just write what you hear, have the nerve to write about your true emotions for a change.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I gave up trying to change the NHL. I'm going with "5 ways I'd change the KHL." We'd totally dominate.
http://worldhockeydaily.wordpress.com/
Report Abuse
1 - 15 of 15