Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:23 am EDT

Follow the bouncing B.S. ...
A hockey rumor "blogger," whose hit-to-miss ratio rivals that of a visually impaired Imperial stormtrooper, reported that the New York Rangers are going to trade center Scott Gomez in order to open up cap space to sign free agent Mats Sundin. The Vancouver Canucks were named as the likely destination.
This naturally sent places like the HF Boards into a speculative tizzy, because really why else would they exist? (Well, besides potentially being the original source for the Gomez-to-Vancouver rumor, that is.)
Around the same time, Greg Caggiano, a writer for the open-source sports blogging community The Bleacher Report, penned a post with this breathless headline: "Scott Gomez Deal Imminent: Los Angeles, Vancouver, Minnesota Destinations."
This created a cottage industry of Gomez speculation on that blogging network, from debating Sundin's contributions to the Rangers with Gomez's to potential deals involving Gomez around the NHL. (Our favorite: Scott Gomez and Michal Roszival to Minnesota for Marian Gaborik and Kurtis Foster. Because, you know, Gomez really, really, really loved playing in the Devils' defensive system. Uh-huh.) The Bleacher Report coverage soon spread to sites like The Dark Ranger for further rumor dispersal.
Blogger Farhan Devji had been following this fun, and decided to reach out to Caggiano because something about the "imminent" trade of Gomez to Vancouver struck him as curious: The notion that "the Rangers would get one of the Sedin twins" in the deal. Considering how, you know, they're sort of inseparable.
And here's what Caggiano, who also hosts a Rangers radio show, had to say in his defense:
"I have an inside source with the organization that says the Rangers are actively shopping Scott Gomez and the Canucks long with the Kings and Wild are the three most probable destinations. I was informed that the Rangers would receive (sic) one Sedin in exchange for Gomez and two Sedins if the Rangers included Petr Prucha in the deal. But now, the deal looks to be flat out; Scott Gomez for Ryan Kesler. I'm surprised by this as everyone else and a rumor is a rumor but I'm telling you it's valid. It may not come to fruition, but something is in the works.
How all of this specificity occurred when most of the NHL's executives are fishing near their mountain cabins ... well, who knows? Maybe Sather and Gillis bumped into each other on the beach or something and started talking about Ryan Kelser.
Gradually, the New York media has begun its debunking. It started with the New York Times, and today continued with Larry Brooks of the New York Post writing: "Contrary to falsehoods circulating on the Internet, the Rangers have never considered trading Scott Gomez to clear cap space for Sundin. Nor will they."
Case closed? Someone forgot to tell Ottawa Sun writer Bruce "Malkin to the Kings" Garrioch, who writes today that "there's a strong belief that either Scott Gomez or Chris Drury could be dealt to the Canucks to make room for Sundin's salary."
He follows that by saying, "Right now, there's a lot of balls in the air." You ain't kiddin'.
Gomez just completed the first year of a seven-year contract, with a cap hit of $7.357 million per season. Last year was a struggle for Gomez and Drury, who both couldn't find any chemistry with Jaromir Jagr. That the Rangers went out and acquired Markus Naslund and Nikolai Zherdev would seem to indicate they hope one (or both) becomes the sniper Gomez needs to activate his game. He's entering his prime, and he still put up 70 points in a crappy season. If you can find a better open-ice skater at center in the Eastern Conference, let us know. He's a special talent, and not exactly a salary dump after one underwhelming campaign.
Oh and, like Drury, Gomez also has a No-Trade Clause, limited as it is: According to NHLSCAP, after every season Gomez provides the Rangers a list of three teams to which he will not accept a trade.
We imagine this list is not available in the New York Public Library, but the fact that Gomez has some control over his future destinations is public knowledge -- though curiously absent from the recent "rumors" about his "imminent" trade.
Adding to absurdity: The formerly anonymous blogger that started spinning this tale recently acquired NHLSCAP's services for his own Web site. Perhaps he should read it occasionally. You know, just for clarification.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Vancouver 5, Colorado 2 (Nov. 20)
Posted Nov 19 2009
Montreal 3, Washington 2 (Nov. 20)
Posted Nov 19 2009
Chicago 7, Calgary 1 (Nov. 19)
Posted Nov 18 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
53 Comments
1 - 25 of 53
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Seriously, Tickets are still available.
http://www.gomeztheband.com/gigs/
Report Abuse
Speaking of the Wild, why haven't they been bigger players in the Sundin flea market? They clearly need center help. If that live blog rumor chat thingy happens today or soon I am copy+pasting the long complex question I saved to Word about the topic.
Frankly the Rangers could use both Gomez and Sundin. There must be other people they can move, or hell maybe Sundin would chosoe winning at minimum money rather than $8 million per year.
A source I trust very much told me the Rangers would be moving Lundquist to the Kings for Frolov, Labarbera, and two of their 9 million young defesemen.
Report Abuse
Wait, I thought Gomez was leaving the Rangers to star in his own Disney Channel series?
Oh, that's SELENA Gomez. So wait, Scott Gomez isn't feuding with Miley Cyrus?
Report Abuse
And by good, I mean human wasteland.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Now that is just an insult to Imperial Bucketheads everywhere, Wysh.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
timmy@wickedpissadude.com
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Also, Bleacher Report blows. SBNation for life.
p.s. Wyshynski, you stink. This entire mess is somehow your fault.
Report Abuse
-SAL
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I agree with you. It's very difficult to find what this Wyshynski idiot has done in the past, to see if he has any credibility. I mean it's not like any idiot can find that stuff by typing "Wyshynski" into Google.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Wyshynski&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
Report Abuse
Hey, that was actually sort of nice. Appreicated.
If you're serious about trying to get a little more background on me, check out this Q&A with The Hockey News:
http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/17505-Rangers-Blog-Interview-with-a-puck-daddy.html
And an interview I did with Mirtle back when Puck Daddy first started:
http://mirtle.blogspot.com/2008/05/meet-your-new-puck-daddy-yahoo-makes.html
And again, for the record: The cigar photo was. not. my. idea.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Puck Daddy is awesome.
Report Abuse
My wait continues.....
Report Abuse
And Wysh, to be fair to the visually impaired, you really don't need any more than a normal storm trooper in that analogy. The regular guys are bad enough as it is.
Report Abuse
www.nyrnation.com
Report Abuse
I think he does a good job for a 15-16 year old so lets not all get on his case for making one bad rumor. Remember many professional wrighters throughout there careers have major blunders.
Alex
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 53