Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:55 pm EDT
In between the controversies about his tax records and his position as a creditor owed $9.3 million in the Phoenix Coyotes bankruptcy, it's just nice to hear Wayne Gretzky talk hockey again -- if only for a segment.
Gretz appeared on Fox Sports Radio with JT The Brick (audio) during the American Century Championship golf tournament in Lake Tahoe, and reminisced a bit about ending the New York Islanders dynasty (he put over Billy Smith as a money goalie) and talked about how the two things a player remembers most are his first NHL game and winning the Stanley Cup for the first time.
That led to an interesting observation from The Great One about the current hockey culture, via Fox Sports Radio:
"I think the game has changed a little bit. Sometimes we don't put as much pressure on winning championships as we used to. I can remember all the years I played, all people talked about was, 'Yeah, they're a good team ... but they haven't won yet.' When you become a champion, it's a crowning moment. It's something you don't forget -- the realization of all the hours you put in to lift the Stanley Cup."
Does he mean the players don't put pressure on themselves to win? Or is this an indictment of the whole of NHL culture? One that's more concerned with payroll and playoff revenue than with demanding a name on the Cup?
It sounds like an indictment of teams that are too content with placing in, rather than winning, the race. There's no question, for example, that the Pittsburgh Penguins were driven to win the Stanley Cup last season because they failed to win it in the previous campaign; hell, Marian Hossa(notes) made his summer plans based on his opinion that the Detroit Red Wings ever more Cup-worthy.
Pittsburgh's sole intention last season was winning the Cup. Every team's players will say the same thing ... but how many teams demand that to be the goal? How many locker rooms make that their sole focus? Coming from one of hockey's greatest champions, Gretzky's take was interesting.
Speaking of the Penguins, Gretzky evoked them when discussing how to bring a winner to the desert. And that's where things got a little goofy in his interview.
From SportsRadioInterviews.com, which hipped us to the interview, a transcript of Gretzky's Coyotes/Penguins analogy:
"It's a nice thing for all of us because obviously you look at the Phoenix situation, you hope it all gets worked out and we've gone through a tough couple months. And, people forget that a few short years ago, Pittsburgh was in the same situation; there was this talk of them maybe leaving Pittsburgh.
"And Mario, not only as management but as a player, has built up hockey so strongly in the area of Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania. It's a nice, positive reaction that we can see that if you do things properly, and business is run properly and you draft well and you do the right things, you can stabilize a franchise. So we're hoping to follow in those footsteps."
First off all, the comparison falls apart when you consider Mario was using places like Kansas City as a negotiating ploy; there's no way the same can be said for Jerry Moyes's desire to hand the Coyotes to Jim Balsillie and Hamilton.
More importantly: When, exactly, does the whole drafting well thing start happening for a team that hasn't seen the playoffs since 2002? Granted, they've been just good enough to miss out on the top choices; and who knew Blake Wheeler(notes) would be a Boston Bruin and Al Montoya(notes) would be a Phoenix Coyotes back in 2004?
Still, when do those Penguins footsteps start getting followed? And where will the franchise be when it happens?
One more bone to pick with Gretz, who also argued for a Winter Classic in the Los Angeles area that he said could draw 60,000 people: His take on big market teams.
"It's always important for any league to have the New Yorks and the LA's and the Chicagos do well. It would be great for the game if the LA Kings continue on this up-rise."
We could argue the basic virtues of this statement for hours -- it actually harkens back to the old "the NHL should fix the draft and get Sidney Crosby(notes) on the New York Rangers" meme -- but specifically: Is the NHL a dramatically better League if the Los Angeles Kings are a Cup contender? It matters that Chicago is good. It matters that the Rangers are strong. But the Kings?
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Detroit 3, Montreal 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Dallas 5, New Jersey 3 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Chicago 5, Edmonton 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
139 Comments
1 - 25 of 139
Report Abuse
Here's an idea. Get on top, and stay on top for 14 or so years. Sincerely: The Detroit Red Wings
Report Abuse
The Yotes are in a can't win situation. They need a few consecutive years with top 3 draft picks that actually pan out immediately, but need to win some games next season to keep the fans showing up at their rink. Both ain't gonna happen.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Of corse if thats what he ment, although PHX is the only other club Buttmen has a full chub for.
Report Abuse
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Report Abuse
I think between the NHL, NFL, MLB and NBA, players/owners in the NHL are the most likely to put Cup first and everthing later.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Most markets only have so much room to grow before they hit their limit. LA is limitless in potential. The only issue (and it is a big one) is that outside of basketball and baseball, the city is known to be completely apathetic towards sports.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
LA is Dodger and Laker-land and Chicago fell off the major hockey market map once they left Chicago Stadium.
You go to New York to play hockey now to get away from the spotlight.
Gretzky put over Billy Smith as a money goalie? Gretzky did nothing for the first three games in the that series after Smith won nineteen playoff series in a row, went to five straight finals and beat Gretzky twice before that. To this day no team in any sport has matched New York since.
Good thing Kevin McLelland scored a fluke goal in game one (and the Oilers got three home games in a row) or it would have been five straight cups for Smitty and New York, no way Gretzky comes back down 2-0, trailing at home in game three in the second period after again going scoreless in New York and no way that team wins the Stanley Cup in the Nassau Coliseum.
I think the Coyotes mess is getting to Gretzky.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
To make a comparison - Curt Schilling could buy into the Red Sox, threaten to move the team to Buffalo unless a new stadium was built, and charge exhorbitant ticket and concession prices under the guise of getting enough money to sign big-name players...and you know what? We'd have half of Roxbury leveled for Fenway 2 and the stands would be full nightly for double the current cost, because, dammit, he's Curt Schilling and he bled for the team to win a World Series. Meanwhile, Cal Ripken could be put in as GM and manager, and recieve a humungous paycheck, and promise the world and the fans wouldn't trust him one bit. Why's he suddenly so concerned about the Red Sox? Same thing here - is anyone in Phoenix really proud of Gretzky coaching? Wouldn't you rather have someone who actually can win some games?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
When he was traded here from Edmonton, hockey in Los Angeles became popular and proved that an NHL franchise could actually be successful in the Southern and Western United States. Within five years, teams popped up in San Jose (1991), Tampa Bay (1992), Anaheim (1993), Miami (1993), and Dallas (1993). Teams in Denver, Phoenix, Raleigh, Nashville, and Atlanta would follow a few years later. If anyone is credible to argue the effect that the success of the Kings has on the NHL, it's Wayne Gretzky.
If anyone here acutally lived in Southern California, you would know that the Ducks don't have many true fans. If the LA Kings were the Lakers of hockey, then the Ducks would be the Clippers. The Kings have been in the top half of NHL team attendance in 3 of the last 6 seasons (in none of which did they make the playoffs), while the Ducks have only cracked that threshold once, while being considered one of the best teams in the NHL (they ranked 15th overall in attendance the year after they won the cup) - http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/attendance. They couldn't even sell out their home playoff games for each of the two years after they won the cup. The Ducks are the ultimate example of a fair-weather fan team. When they make the playoffs, out come all the Ducks' car window flags, license plate holders, baseball caps, and t-shirts. When their run is over, you couldn't find one if you tried.
I think it is uninformed and unfair to question the importance of Los Angeles to Hockey. To Greg, I think the NHL is definitely a better league because the Kings are strong. To Phoenix fans, you say that you don't care about the Kings...you should. Without them, you wouldn't have a team at all. To everyone, look back at the Kings situation in 3-4 years. I guarantee you they will be among the most successful and most attended teams in the NHL.
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 139