Puck Daddy - NHL

In between the controversies about his tax records and his position as a creditor owed $9.3 million in the Phoenix Coyotes bankruptcy, it's just nice to hear Wayne Gretzky talk hockey again -- if only for a segment.

Gretz appeared on Fox Sports Radio with JT The Brick (audio) during the American Century Championship golf tournament in Lake Tahoe, and reminisced a bit about ending the New York Islanders dynasty (he put over Billy Smith as a money goalie) and talked about how the two things a player remembers most are his first NHL game and winning the Stanley Cup for the first time.

That led to an interesting observation from The Great One about the current hockey culture, via Fox Sports Radio:

"I think the game has changed a little bit. Sometimes we don't put as much pressure on winning championships as we used to. I can remember all the years I played, all people talked about was, 'Yeah, they're a good team ... but they haven't won yet.' When you become a champion, it's a crowning moment. It's something you don't forget -- the realization of all the hours you put in to lift the Stanley Cup."

Does he mean the players don't put pressure on themselves to win? Or is this an indictment of the whole of NHL culture? One that's more concerned with payroll and playoff revenue than with demanding a name on the Cup?

It sounds like an indictment of teams that are too content with placing in, rather than winning, the race. There's no question, for example, that the Pittsburgh Penguins were driven to win the Stanley Cup last season because they failed to win it in the previous campaign; hell, Marian Hossa(notes) made his summer plans based on his opinion that the Detroit Red Wings ever more Cup-worthy.

Pittsburgh's sole intention last season was winning the Cup. Every team's players will say the same thing ... but how many teams demand that to be the goal? How many locker rooms make that their sole focus? Coming from one of hockey's greatest champions, Gretzky's take was interesting.

Speaking of the Penguins, Gretzky evoked them when discussing how to bring a winner to the desert. And that's where things got a little goofy in his interview.

From SportsRadioInterviews.com, which hipped us to the interview, a transcript of Gretzky's Coyotes/Penguins analogy:

"It's a nice thing for all of us because obviously you look at the Phoenix situation, you hope it all gets worked out and we've gone through a tough couple months.  And, people forget that a few short years ago, Pittsburgh was in the same situation; there was this talk of them maybe leaving Pittsburgh.

"And Mario, not only as management but as a player, has built up hockey so strongly in the area of Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania.  It's a nice, positive reaction that we can see that if you do things properly, and business is run properly and you draft well and you do the right things, you can stabilize a franchise.  So we're hoping to follow in those footsteps."

First off all, the comparison falls apart when you consider Mario was using places like Kansas City as a negotiating ploy; there's no way the same can be said for Jerry Moyes's desire to hand the Coyotes to Jim Balsillie and Hamilton.

More importantly: When, exactly, does the whole drafting well thing start happening for a team that hasn't seen the playoffs since 2002? Granted, they've been just good enough to miss out on the top choices; and who knew Blake Wheeler(notes) would be a Boston Bruin and Al Montoya(notes) would be a Phoenix Coyotes back in 2004?

Still, when do those Penguins footsteps start getting followed? And where will the franchise be when it happens?

One more bone to pick with Gretz, who also argued for a Winter Classic in the Los Angeles area that he said could draw 60,000 people: His take on big market teams.

"It's always important for any league to have the New Yorks and the LA's and the Chicagos do well. It would be great for the game if the LA Kings continue on this up-rise."

We could argue the basic virtues of this statement for hours -- it actually harkens back to the old "the NHL should fix the draft and get Sidney Crosby(notes) on the New York Rangers" meme -- but specifically: Is the NHL a dramatically better League if the Los Angeles Kings are a Cup contender? It matters that Chicago is good. It matters that the Rangers are strong. But the Kings?

digg delicious
more

139 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. knucklehead
    1. Posted by knucklehead Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Oh, so now we follow the footsteps of the Penguins....dismal=draftpicks. Do you really want to go there?
    Here's an idea. Get on top, and stay on top for 14 or so years. Sincerely: The Detroit Red Wings
  2. SharksRedSoxFan
    2. Posted by SharksRedSoxFan Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:18 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The big drafting thing that helped the Pens was Crosby.
    The Yotes are in a can't win situation. They need a few consecutive years with top 3 draft picks that actually pan out immediately, but need to win some games next season to keep the fans showing up at their rink. Both ain't gonna happen.
  3. Five Hole
    3. Posted by Five Hole Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I suspect Gretzky is still owed money by L.A. That's probably why he made that comment about L.A.
  4. Runnin up on ya !
    4. Posted by Runnin up on ya ! Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Sorry Wayneeee, but I don't think Phx can handle tanking the next 4 seasons to stockpile some top 3 draft picks.
    Of corse if thats what he ment, although PHX is the only other club Buttmen has a full chub for.
  5. Bubbabanjo
    5. Posted by Bubbabanjo Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wayne is da man!!
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
  6. george
    6. Posted by george Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Does he mean the players don't put pressure on themselves to win? Or is this an indictment of the whole of NHL culture? One that's more concerned with payroll and playoff revenue than with demanding a name on the Cup?"
    I think between the NHL, NFL, MLB and NBA, players/owners in the NHL are the most likely to put Cup first and everthing later.
  7. akpghfan
    7. Posted by akpghfan Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:31 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @1. Is that REALLY what you learned from the article? Last I looked, the Wings were not on top of anything....
  8. robert p
    8. Posted by robert p Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    THE GREAT ONE again says the wrong things. We the fans of the COYOTES dont give a dam about the L.A. KINGS . Please someone make him just go away . A season ticket holder for 2009 , 2010
  9. coley s
    9. Posted by coley s Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ 1... better to be on top rite now than to be a has been... signed... da pens.your current Stanley Cup Champs
  10. Deker
    10. Posted by Deker Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Janet is not the young wippersnapper she used to be....I still think chicks that bet on football are hot!
  11. Celtic
    11. Posted by Celtic Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    wow! i cant imagine being envious of the L.A. kings. do u actually think the wife is really the one with the gambling problems i mean seriously.
  12. RoShaCla
    12. Posted by RoShaCla Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The NHL would not be better off gameplay wise (well, outside of more parity) if LA was better, but having a strong franchise drawing interest to the sport in the second biggest media market in the US would certainly strengthen the sport.. In terms of fan base size and revenue, a strong and interesting team in LA would add another safe financial pillar to the NHL joining the Canadian teams and the NYR as consistently safe revenue generators. I don't see any reason to take issue with that statement.
    Most markets only have so much room to grow before they hit their limit. LA is limitless in potential. The only issue (and it is a big one) is that outside of basketball and baseball, the city is known to be completely apathetic towards sports.
  13. Woekie
    13. Posted by Woekie Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wayne talking up the Kings, eh? Was it about the championships when you begged out of Edmonton?
  14. habs1rule
    14. Posted by habs1rule Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    So Gretzky wants his team to Tank it for a decade, disappoint their fans, then hope those years produce a few stars in the draft..Why not build a winner you can admire like Detroit, one for the ages, strong and consistant. OK Pens fans..Go!!
  15. habs1rule
    15. Posted by habs1rule Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @1..I gotta start reading ALL the posts before I post mine...Genius!!
  16. habs1rule
    16. Posted by habs1rule Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:04 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yotes Fans, Didnt Yahoo have an article about how Gretzky and his assistant make like $10 million dollars in salary..Wouldnt some of that money be better used for some players?? Guess you are paying for his name!1
  17. nyifancentral
    17. Posted by nyifancentral Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why would the NHL want Crosby on any New York hockey team vs the Yankees and Mets, even come playoff time baseball owns the town and hockey is buried with no backpages.
    LA is Dodger and Laker-land and Chicago fell off the major hockey market map once they left Chicago Stadium.
    You go to New York to play hockey now to get away from the spotlight.
    Gretzky put over Billy Smith as a money goalie? Gretzky did nothing for the first three games in the that series after Smith won nineteen playoff series in a row, went to five straight finals and beat Gretzky twice before that. To this day no team in any sport has matched New York since.
    Good thing Kevin McLelland scored a fluke goal in game one (and the Oilers got three home games in a row) or it would have been five straight cups for Smitty and New York, no way Gretzky comes back down 2-0, trailing at home in game three in the second period after again going scoreless in New York and no way that team wins the Stanley Cup in the Nassau Coliseum.
    I think the Coyotes mess is getting to Gretzky.
  18. The Hippomaster
    18. Posted by The Hippomaster Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I dont think la would have reacted very differently if the kings not the ducks won the cup. Anahiem is la's team right now. Gretzky was a long time ago and since then the duck slowly but surely established themselves as number one in so-cal not only on the ice, but also in the media.
  19. Ben D
    19. Posted by Ben D Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Boy, Janet is looking a bit like Iraq these days - bombed out and depleted. Yeah, I went there!
  20. never-to-return and not enough of a loser 2 be 1st
    20. Posted by never-to-return and not enough of a loser 2 be 1st Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why can't we comment on the Erin Andrews piece? I just wanted to thank them for verifying the vids I downloaded were actually of her. Thanks !!
  21. Cale P
    21. Posted by Cale P Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I like how Gretzky talks up what Lemieux did for Pittsburgh. There's a big difference between the two of them and the teams they currently are in the front office for, that being Mario actually won a couple of Stanley Cups playing for the Pens, whereas Gretzky's just been a name and a money suck for Phoenix. Of course people are going to trust Mario when he's trying to rebuild the team, since he's led them to success before. Gretzky's just tried to rely on being Gretzky as justification for retaining his job and paycheck.
    To make a comparison - Curt Schilling could buy into the Red Sox, threaten to move the team to Buffalo unless a new stadium was built, and charge exhorbitant ticket and concession prices under the guise of getting enough money to sign big-name players...and you know what? We'd have half of Roxbury leveled for Fenway 2 and the stands would be full nightly for double the current cost, because, dammit, he's Curt Schilling and he bled for the team to win a World Series. Meanwhile, Cal Ripken could be put in as GM and manager, and recieve a humungous paycheck, and promise the world and the fans wouldn't trust him one bit. Why's he suddenly so concerned about the Red Sox? Same thing here - is anyone in Phoenix really proud of Gretzky coaching? Wouldn't you rather have someone who actually can win some games?
  22. Almost Lewboski
    22. Posted by Almost Lewboski Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm sure that the fine people of LA are grateful for the Great Ones' concern about there hockey well being and hope that in that vein he continues to "coach" the Yotes regardless of there location.
  23. kearyl
    23. Posted by kearyl Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I am a huge Coyotes fan. Have been since they moved to Phx. And we all know, that to keep the fans in the seats, they need to start winning. Well, the only way they will do THAT, is for everyone to get over The Great One-itis, and hire a new coach! There, I said it! Come on now, let's all admit the truth. Gretzky is NOT a good coach. GREAT player, lousy coach. Any other market, he would have been gone two seasons ago. Phoenix has had PLENTY of talent come, AND GO, under his watch! I don't even like to think of the talent that has been traded away, "so we can have a better draft next year, and capitalize on top picks." Come on, Gretz! The fans are getting tired of the rhetoric! There is only one way to start winning, can you say Barry Melrose?
  24. Colin
    24. Posted by Colin Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Los Angeles is not only a great hockey town, it's the town that proved that hockey could succeed outside of the Northern US and Canada. Gretzky played in Los Angeles, and knows that the Kings have true and loyal fans (Los Angeles is one of the largest emigration locations for Canadian ex-patriates). Before he came to LA in 1988, no one ever dreamed of a NHL team succeeding in the Southern or Western United States. The California Seals, Atlanta Flames, Kansas City Scouts, and Colorado Rockies all failed within 10 years of joining the NHL. The Kings, St. Louis Blues, and Washington Capitals were the only teams south of New York to stick around.
    When he was traded here from Edmonton, hockey in Los Angeles became popular and proved that an NHL franchise could actually be successful in the Southern and Western United States. Within five years, teams popped up in San Jose (1991), Tampa Bay (1992), Anaheim (1993), Miami (1993), and Dallas (1993). Teams in Denver, Phoenix, Raleigh, Nashville, and Atlanta would follow a few years later. If anyone is credible to argue the effect that the success of the Kings has on the NHL, it's Wayne Gretzky.
    If anyone here acutally lived in Southern California, you would know that the Ducks don't have many true fans. If the LA Kings were the Lakers of hockey, then the Ducks would be the Clippers. The Kings have been in the top half of NHL team attendance in 3 of the last 6 seasons (in none of which did they make the playoffs), while the Ducks have only cracked that threshold once, while being considered one of the best teams in the NHL (they ranked 15th overall in attendance the year after they won the cup) - http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/attendance. They couldn't even sell out their home playoff games for each of the two years after they won the cup. The Ducks are the ultimate example of a fair-weather fan team. When they make the playoffs, out come all the Ducks' car window flags, license plate holders, baseball caps, and t-shirts. When their run is over, you couldn't find one if you tried.
    I think it is uninformed and unfair to question the importance of Los Angeles to Hockey. To Greg, I think the NHL is definitely a better league because the Kings are strong. To Phoenix fans, you say that you don't care about the Kings...you should. Without them, you wouldn't have a team at all. To everyone, look back at the Kings situation in 3-4 years. I guarantee you they will be among the most successful and most attended teams in the NHL.
  25. zamboni
    25. Posted by zamboni Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:44 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm tired of hearing about how smart the Pittsburgh braintrust is. Mario didn't build anything, they were just the most godawful team in hockey at the exact time that two of the best players in the game were available to draft. That's it. It was blind, random, coincidental luck; there was nothing smart about it. Mike Milbury could have made those draft picks. (FWIW I think the Caps fall into this category as well. Ovechkin was a gimme pick that the Caps lucked into.)

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™