Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:00 pm EDT
The American Hockey League is the official NHL guinea pig (or canary in a coal mine for the pessimists) when it comes to rules changes. That's where the overtime skills competition got its trial run, before it started bastardizing the notion of "team sports" in the NHL regular season.
Now, upon the NHL's suggestion, the AHL will be the testing ground for one-minute minor penalties in overtime during the regular season.
The Toronto Star reported earlier this year that "39 percent of the penalties in OT that have resulted in a 4-on-3 power play have produced the winning goal in NHL games." A two-minute minor penalty can literally leave a team shorthanded for 40 percent of overtime when the same call would eat up about 3 percent of regulation.
So empirically, this rule change experiment is worth a shot. That is until you hear the potential details of the AHL overtime amendment. According to Jason Chaimovitch, Vice President of Communications for the AHL, a minor penalty called in regulation whose time carries over to OT will have its remaining time cut in half, under one proposed form of the new rule.
His example: A minor penalty that carries over 50 seconds into overtime will actually only result in a 25-second power-play during sudden death.
What this does, in effect, is reduce the punishment for a desperation minor penalty at the end of regulation. Raise your hand if you think a defensive player might kill or maim to prevent a goal knowing that his team would only be shorthanded for, at most, under a minute in the OT?
No sir, I don't think I like it. Chaimovitch said the rule still needs to be finalized, which means these details could change.
The AHL also adopted NHL standards on icing, high-sticking, face-off location and finally came around to the "over the glass" delay of game penalty for defensive player. They held out as long as they could on that one; rejecting the rule after a test in 2002-03 and making the penalty for that kind of delay a simple loss of a line change.
But the AHL must keeps its rules in line with the NHL. Somewhere, Don Cherry weeps into a Technicolor suit jacket.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Detroit 3, Montreal 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Dallas 5, New Jersey 3 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Chicago 5, Edmonton 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
47 Comments
1 - 25 of 47
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
The idea of a 1min 'embelishment' penalty to offset a 2 min minor of the actual offense could be considered too. In cases in which a penalty has occured but the player embelishes to make sure the ref sees it *cough* Osgood Finals*cough* It would cut back on alot of the acting thats been infesting ALL pro sports.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Do you guys think refs will call more penalties in OT with a one-minute minor? Because that could seriously mess with the flow.
Report Abuse
oh i forgot, "Wyshynski, you suck" etc.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I can't believe there's actually an Etc. after "Wyshynski, you suck." I thought that was a rather emphatic statement.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
You forget I used to write on Deadspin...
Report Abuse
any thoughts?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1. The act is likely to cause injury. (high sticking, checking from behind, etc.)
2. The act gives one team an unfair or unsporting advantage in play. (tripping, hooking, etc.)
I am sick of hearing that refs need to "let players play" in overtime or anytime. This favors teams and players that are in effect cheating or engaging in acts that are likely to cause serious, unwarranted injury. I loathe seeing a team win because they were holding, tripping, etc. on a play that resulted in them winning. I have seen it, and so have all hockey fans at some point in time. The rules are there for a reason, letting them go for "continuity's sake", only sets the example that breaking the rules is ok, when it gives you a chance to win. Exactly what kids don't need to be influenced by, and a few adults (Enron, etc.)
Nope, if you can't do the time, don't do the crime. Here is to keeping full penalties and calling them regardless of the time in the game.
Thoughts?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Goals are down because of various reasons.
Solution: Call more penalties so players aren't clutched or grabbed and they have more room to skate.
Now goals are supposedly up and teams are losing in overtime because teams are scoring goals on
powerplays....
Solution: Lessen the time they are in the box by halving the penalty time.
Did I get this right? Does this sound completely asinine to anyone else?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 47