Puck Daddy - NHL

One of the true joys of this gig is interaction; the constant exchange of ideas between hockey fans.

For us, this interaction primarily occurs in one of two ways. The first is through the comments section (when systemic posting problems or HTML errors don't ruin your messages). Which is why beginning next month, we're going to have Puck Daddy comment awards on the first and fifteenth of every month; honoring everything from the best hockey insight to the most offensive joke to the cleverest takedown of the ridiculous headshot on this blog. Good times.

The other interaction is via e-mail, where each day we receive everything from petty complaints about the NHL to well-thought-out diatribes about the Game. Keep them coming at puckdaddyblog@yahoo.com.

Two e-mails this week focused on the presentation of the NHL on television, and both offered rather interesting takes: One from a guy watching a Los Angeles Kings/Anaheim Ducks game, about what makes TV coverage of hockey "unwatchable"; and the other wondering when the hockey helmet will actually become part of the overall uniform aesthetic, for the sake of HDTV. 

First up is Bob Kennedy, who wonders if the NHL on television will ever improve:

"I have a serious concern regarding television broadcasts of hockey games, and I don't know who to turn to with it. First, let me make clear I know how to watch the game and love it more than any other sport, by leaps and bounds. I would gladly watch any two teams play, at any level of competition.

"But I have really grown to dislike watching hockey on TV, for the sole reason of the camera direction. Every game I watch, the director cuts from the traditional high center view to rink level cameras while the action is live. Sometimes the camera zooms in on the goaltender's face, perhaps five seconds after a scoring chance, while the defense is moving the puck to the neutral zone out of view. Sometimes the camera follows a puck-handling defenseman in his own zone. Sometimes the camera watches a power play from behind the net. These angles are great for replay shots, but I think they're horrible when the shot is live.

"Tonight I had one of the worst experiences: Fox Sports Prime Ticket in California is televising a Los Angeles Kings-Anaheim Ducks matchup in which the primary camera is rink level. I turned it off because it was making me motion sick.

"I think it's no wonder that casual fans can't watch the game - it's unwatchable with this kind of direction. I suspect that if it's this hard for somebody who knows and plays the game to follow what's happening, then it must be impossible for an introductee. Who knows how many sports fans have been turned off by the same problem, but it doesn't need to be this hard to watch?

"All I want is one camera, up high, at the red line. No changes when the clock is running. I have emailed networks before (Versus and NBC) but with no response.  Let me add that I am not the kind of cynic who objects to the fact that the NHL's national TV contract is with Versus rather than ESPN.  As far as I can tell, all hockey broadcasters (Canadian networks included) have this love of alternative camera angles. I wonder if they ever actually tested it with audiences.

"I don't know what to do about this - it seems like hockey fans are upset about so many aspects of the league that this particular issue does not bubble to the top very often, if at all. I would have considered a boycott even, but ironically, my cable provider recently dropped Versus.

-- Bob Kennedy"

Mark Pargas of the New York Times Slap Shot blog also offered a take on the FSW camera angles, and his verdict was, "It was different, but I'll mark it down as an early effort and note that there is room to improve."

Thanks for the note, Bob. Keep an open mind when it comes to TV producers trying out new things. As long as nothing is glowing, we could be OK.

Up next is Puck Daddy reader James W. Burrows with a rather interesting argument about how to improve the aesthetics of hockey on HDTV. He says it starts at the top ... with the helmet:

"Hockey COULD BE great in HD, but the look of the game needs work. White ice, white boards and invariably one team in white helmets. My question is: When can we make the helmet a part of the hockey uniform?

"Why pray tell are the home team skaters required to wear a plain white helmet? How come no team is allowed to put a stripe or design on their helmet ... other than a logo the size of a quarter visible from the front row only? Can you imagine where the NFL would be if they had taken the same approach? Imagine attending a Bears-Packers game in Green Bay with the Pack wearing a white helmet with a tiny little G and no stripe. Imagine the Colts playing away with a blue helmet with a little tiny horseshoe and no stripe! 

"The helmet is central to the brand in football. It could be in hockey, as it is in college hockey ... see the University of Michigan ... see Notre Dame. In the NHL, it would afford the opportunity to contrast clubs. If the Blue jackets wore a white helmet all the time, we could tell them from the Rangers! Last year three out of the four Cup finalists wore all black at home, with black helmets naturally... in fact all the teams that wear black at home ... wear black helmets. You really don't even need a color TV to watch the NHL right now

"My suggestion: A contest in every NHL city to choose the single helmet to be worn by the club, with one alternate if necessary but without design or color restrictions. It'll improve the brand identity of each club and the look of the game, both live and on HDTV. Goalies could still do what they have been allowed to do with their own individual design.

"Frankly, the league's Neanderthals won't do it unless Versus forces their hands. Versus could sponsor the bloody contests ...

-- James W Burrows"

Should the freedom of expression, when it comes to headgear, be limited to goalies? It's an intriguing argument, although the hockey traditionalist in us wonders if it's a good argument.

That said: Michigan does have some bitchin' lids.

Thanks for the feedback, sirs. Keep those e-mails coming.

digg delicious
more

87 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. 5 4 fighting
    1. Posted by 5 4 fighting Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Cool
  2. 5 4 fighting
    2. Posted by 5 4 fighting Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    did my comment win:)
  3. Whale4ever
    3. Posted by Whale4ever Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Stylized helmets? I dunno. Isn't it all about the crest on the chest?
    Wouldn't more than a helmet-applied wordmark or small logo deviate from the purpose, or hopefully clean lines, of having a giant logo on the front of the sweater?
    I remind that none of the lesser sports - football, basketball, baseball - go the big-crest-on-the-front route, which is but one more example of why hockey freakin' rules.
  4. Wyshynski
    4. Posted by Wyshynski Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ 5 4 fighting --
    Yes, it did. Check's in the mail.
  5. Cody/DieselPhotos
    5. Posted by Cody/DieselPhotos Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:04 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hockey Helmet cam? Would go well with the Mic'd segment channels have been doing. With Technology now a days, helmet cams are getting better in quality, and smaller in size. I think it would be neat to have that section with in a broadcast w/ a defensemen, maybe a goalie?
  6. bostonblueline.blogspot.com
    6. Posted by bostonblueline.blogspot.com Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Whale - I agree that a huge logo might come off badly (unless the shape of the helmet changes), but it would make sense to at least have a little color and striping.
  7. Al S.
    7. Posted by Al S. Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I have to agree with Bob. That goal judge camera is rather annoying. I can't stand watching the game with that camera angle. I've actually found myself cheering for a breakout so that it forces the tv broadcast to switch to a normal camera. Think about this in terms of football. Where are the cheapest lower level seats? Behind the endzone. People want the fifty yard line.
    Now, if the behind the goal line camera was raised to say, the nosebleeds, then it might be good. I've always had seats behind the goalie but on the upper deck, and I enjoy that view.
  8. JDPhi
    8. Posted by JDPhi Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Who really cares about the helmets? There are so many vents and movable/adjustable parts on a skater's helmet that stripes and gaudy logos would just look bad. Each skater has sponsorship with different companies, and each helmet is designed with different ridges, vents, and channels. The Michigan stripes might look good on a Nike/Bauer helmet , but it may look terrible on a RBK or Mission helmet. Besides, football and baseball helmets are essentially flat, so big logos and stripes look good- they just look messy on a hockey helmet!
    Let the goalies be the creative ones!
  9. RC
    9. Posted by RC Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    If we're gonna make any helmet changes, it begins with bringing back the JOFAs....
    Dale Hunter FTW
  10. RC
    10. Posted by RC Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Although I do hear some guys in the league are fans of the Roman War Helmet
  11. Louie
    11. Posted by Louie Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I figured Michigan would be a prime example of why we SHOULDN'T decorate helmets. Please leave the helmets alone. Helmets are too contoured to support designs anyway. Plus nothing caps off a dark Habs or Rangers jersey better than the crisp blue bucket.
  12. Brian M
    12. Posted by Brian M Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    they should take a page from the NASCAR playbook and pick one game a week and mic both goalies, both refs, both coaches and both captains and have the game broadcast on TV with a separate channel on Sirius/XM that plays the mic feed from each mic live with the game so you could watch the game and listen to whichever player/coach/official you want on the radio.
  13. hockeytown blood
    13. Posted by hockeytown blood Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm all for integrating helmet designs into the uniform, but for God's sake leave the goalies out of the decision making process. If I see one more D&D inspired snaggle-toothed gaping maw or some jail-house airbrush that no-self-respecting cholo would go near on a goalie mask I'm gonna puke.
  14. David
    14. Posted by David Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:19 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    one word: espn
  15. puck it dano
    15. Posted by puck it dano Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Rinkside cameras: FSN first tried it with the Ducks opener last Sunday, and I ended up turning the TV off and listening to it on the radio. It was an interesting at the start, but the quick camera pans to follow play from just down below the camera to a corner (for example) are what made my head swim. I think people, for the most part, are use to sitting stationary in a seat and viewing a game with a defined “horizon,” if you will, and not down on top of the action like what the camera angles were trying to give us. The game is too fast for such a camera angle and the eye cannot adjust accordingly. That is also why I wish the NFL would get rid of those wire cameras they have suspended over the field. Those also make me dizzy (albeit at a much slower pace).
  16. Dave
    16. Posted by Dave Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I like Pesonen's solid gold Finnish number. Bring that bad boy stateside.
  17. GT
    17. Posted by GT Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What about the stupid commentators going on and on about god knows what while there is action on the ice? (I'm looking at you Olzyck). Also, I am so sick of the perpetual hard ons the commentators will have for one player the entire game. This is espacially true when Crosby is playing. "Look at the way Crosby taped his stick....wow, this guy is a true professional." I long for the days of the old school hockey commentators with the nasally voices doing what they should be doing...describing the freaking game!
  18. Steven
    18. Posted by Steven Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Bob, I agree, that rink level camera in the corner was awful. Not only did it make me motion sick, it ignored the other 90% of the action going on away from the puck. Stick with the high level camera at center ice. As the viewer, I'll chose what part of the action I'll focus on, not some video director.
  19. crunch
    19. Posted by crunch Thu Sep 03, 2009 11:02 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Boston Bruins channel is great(NESN). i watched preview of nhl center ice all week since it was free and man some of these channels are awful. Like the Anaheim channel, AWFUL camera angling. Plus every announcer on every game i had a chance to watch SUCKED, so boring. And im glad i dont live in buffalo cuz i cant stand their announcer.
  20. cm
    20. Posted by cm Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Agree #18...there's so much other stuff going on away from the puck. I want to see a play develop and anticipate where the puck might go. That kind of puts you in the game. I want to see the hacking in the crease, etc. Keep the shots up and the replays low or isolated.
  21. cm
    21. Posted by cm Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The other crap angle is not being able to get the overhead higher than the crowd.
  22. Varant K
    22. Posted by Varant K Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Kings-ducks game was annoying...Another stupid non-hockey fan trying to think outside the box and ends up ruining it for the true fans...FSN stinks.
    Another note...Sharks used to be on FSN and they had an annoying behind the net angle that half the time you missed the goal....now that they are on comcast, you don't see that angle as much....Producers need to get a clue!
  23. D-Ro
    23. Posted by D-Ro Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I was also watching a Ducks game last week. It was on my Centre Ice Package, so I wasnt sure which boradcaster it was through. Other than it saying DucksTV. It was really unwatchable due to the camera work. It was so bad I spent the time to fidn out wehre to email then to let them know. Maybe being Canadian and brought up with traditional camera work had something to do with it. I really dont think that is the case.
  24. D-Ro
    24. Posted by D-Ro Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I was also watching a Ducks game last week. It was on my Centre Ice Package, so I wasnt sure which boradcaster it was through. Other than it saying DucksTV. It was really unwatchable due to the camera work. It was so bad I spent the time to fidn out wehre to email then to let them know. Maybe being Canadian and brought up with traditional camera work had something to do with it. I really dont think that is the case.
  25. Billkamm
    25. Posted by Billkamm Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I agree 100%. Something needs to be done about the camera angles and I also would like to see the helmets stand out more as they do in the NFL. When I flip on a random NFL game I immediately know who is playing based on the helmet. When I turn on an NHL game I frequently have to look at the scoreboard to figure out what teams are playing.

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™