Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:07 am EDT
We were having tasty pints at the Dogfish Head Alehouse in Falls Church, Va. last night during the Washington Capitals/Pittsburgh Penguins game. Capitals veteran grinder Matt Bradley and Penguins rookie forward Paul Bissonnette dropped the gloves off the face-off, and a buzz filled the room.
As we've said for years: Casual sports fans may not understand off-sides or icing, but there are certain universal languages spoken in hockey that elicit a response. Like, for example, a nasty punch in a fight that sends a guy down on his rump and bleeding from the face:
Bradley is, as you know, a Friend of Puck Daddy. We imagine banning that YouTube clip might make his next "5 Ways I'd Change the NHL."
As for the game, it provided ample evidence that the Capitals and Penguins are fundamentally different teams than last season. The Capitals feel behind 3-0 by taking too many penalties and the continued shaky goaltending of Jose Theodore early on in games. The difference is that last season, you could knock out out the Caps with a three-goal lead, or at least expect them to cough up one late after that four-goal rally.
Not last night.
To close the deal like that, and without Alexander Ovechkin scoring a single point, left a major impression. Coach Bruce Boudreau put together a line of Tomas Fleischmann-Michael Nylander-Alexander Semin that blew up, and moved Sergei Fedorov to defense when Tom Poti went out with an injury. These are the adjustments to adversity that win big games, especially on the road.
As for the Penguins, their deficit on defense was apparent in the third period, when the Capitals dominated at even strength. If that's Gonchar and Whitney leading the team's D-men in TOI rather than Hall Gill and Rob Scuderi, who knows what the third period looks like.
Bottom line is that team defense suffered mightily as the game wore on. One can only assume that's part of what Coach Michel Therrien was referring to when he said the blown lead was "immature, and unacceptable."
The Pensblog, in their singular fashion, nails it for Pittsburgh:
Its only one game, so no one here is ladling out almond flavored koolaid, but it's half a year from when we're looking at the standings and think back to games like this one. You can't have a 3-goal lead and skate off the ice without a point.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Vancouver 5, Colorado 2 (Nov. 20)
Posted Nov 19 2009
Montreal 3, Washington 2 (Nov. 20)
Posted Nov 19 2009
Chicago 7, Calgary 1 (Nov. 19)
Posted Nov 18 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
65 Comments
1 - 24 of 65
Report Abuse
Also, Malkin is a bastard...that hit on Semin in the first period was inexcusable and I hope the league sits him down for a couple.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Now if anyone can explain how Malkin didn't get 5 and a game for boarding I'm waiting.....
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
@ demondg1: The likable face of the game? Are you high? You can't even look cross eyed at Syd without the ref raising his arm so don't even try it. The Caps played miserable the first period but how the hell do the Pens get a 5 on 3 when Erskine's clear attempt is deflected but it's called delay anyway? Because the Pens get those kinds of calls, not the Caps or what you claim to be "the likable face of the game"
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Went Punkin Ale, then Brown Ale, and then ... hmmm. Nope, can't recall.
Report Abuse
And yes AO was headhunting, but he didn't charge or leave his feet, so other than it being a bit odd to keep going at malkin like that, he wasn't really doing anything wrong
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
What caused these goals was stupid turnovers by the rest of the team. You could point out anyone else from the team for the defensive letdown and I wouldn't argue for a second, but Scuder and USS Gill played solid from start to finish.
Report Abuse
The point is that you could have Gonchar and Whitney AS WELL AS Scuderi and Gill, which could have certainly changed the 5-on-5 domination of the Capitals in the third. This wasn't meant to be a slag on those two, but 21 minutes a night is a lot to ask from what is a second-pairing at best.
Report Abuse
Also, anyone notice at the end of the game OV and Crosby jawing at each other? I can't wait 'til the East Finals when OV gets to bury that little b*tch for good.
What a game last night. Fleischmann! WTF!?!?!
Report Abuse
@ Dynamo-- Malkins hit was frustration manifesting itself. Ovechkin took his head out of the game and was doing nothing but gooning Malkin. It was still a cheap hit that deserved 5 minutes.
Report Abuse
Read the box score genius, then tell me again how Ovechkin dominated Malkin... maybe you should stick to Ultimate fighting Championships hockey is sort of complicated. The object is to put this little black cylinder into one of the nets on either side of the rink. Malkin did that, Ovechkin did not. Malkin also helped somebody else do it, again, OV didn't.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
"Ovechkin dominates Malkin in every way" --- notice how I use the present tense. Currently, as hockey players, Ovechkin dominates Malkin. He is a better scorer, leader, and clearly the engine that drives the Caps, even when he doesn't score. Leaving aside the fact that OV knocked Malkin around like a rag doll all day, he was better and his team was better last night, especially in the third period when it mattered most. But feel free to point to statistics to make you feel better if you like. I dunno, you love numbers so much, maybe stick to accounting. Hockey is a little more complicated.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 24 of 65