Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:54 pm EDT
As the Stanley Cup Playoffs continue, we're bound to lose some friends along the journey. Gone but not forgotten, we've asked for these losers to be eulogized by the people who knew the teams best: The fans who hated them the most. Here's Alanah McGinley from the Vancouver Canucks blog Canucks and Beyond, fondly recalling the soon to be former Stanley Cup champion Ducks.
Time for an autopsy.
Sunday, April 20th. A sad day. A tragic day. The day the Ducks died.
I'm not sure I'm the perfect person to eulogize the Anaheim Ducks with snarky little cracks -- after all, I'm a Vancouver Canucks fan, and clearly Canucks' fans have no business trashing anyone these days. But I can still enjoy their demise just a little bit (err... a lot) and Ducks fans can take heart by just reminding me how your guys dismantled my team a year ago, alrighty? Alright then.
Meanwhile, let's consider the question of the hour: What happened to those once-great waterfowl? The reigning Stanley Cup champions which inspired so many other rosters after they took home the Cup home last summer? Who single-handedly killed off the Disney jokes that were once such a fond past-time for us all?
The answers (at least a couple) would be: Scott Niedermayer happened. Teemu Selanne happened. Chris Pronger happened. And Andy McDonald didn't happen.
Does that about sum it up?
Two players who needed half a season (and more) to decide if they even wanted to be part of the team; one guy who's three bricks shy of reaching the lofty plateau of "freakin' head-case" on his best day; and another -- the Stanley Cup Champion's leading scorer from 2007 -- shipped out of town like so much dead weight.
About Niedermayer & Selanne: I like the guys fine, but c'mon. As Bob McKenzie remarked on Monday, "let me pull out a hanky for how poor Scott Niedermayer has been treated." Yes, let's. And Selanne? At least Nieds seemed to want to play hockey this season; Selanne could barely get a heartbeat going at the idea of playing this year. With all his humming and hawing, why did the Ducks even want him back?
Does that mess with team chemistry? Well no kidding. You have a roster full of talented, hard-working players, whose very identity celebrates that work ethic above all else. But then two guys arrive at the party late, and everything is adjusted to them. Not a big deal if it happened a couple weeks into the season, but by December and into the new year, it's got to have been a problem.
And then there's Pronger. No matter where he plays, fans of his teams always like to say "But you'd love him if he played for you!" Uh, no. Pronger is a tool; even I can't be polite about Pronger. The image of him sitting in the penalty box as the empty net goal sealed the deal is the stuff poetry should be written about.
About McDonald, yes I can do the math. I understand Brian Burke couldn't afford his entire roster while bringing his wayward superstars back into the lineup. But wasn't this situation sorta predictable? I always thought Burke was reasonably competent at using a calculator back in his Vancouver Canucks days...
(And if you want to ponder the salary cap crunch even further, start wondering about Todd Bertuzzi. Somehow it seemed like a good idea to sign the Watuzzi [audio link] for $4 million, and not just for one season, but for two?)
I'm one of the people that actually likes Bertuzzi -- and Burke, for that matter -- but even I thought that deal was half-cracked.
So ultimately, why the early exit at the hands of the Turco Stars?
Well, perhaps Thugs-R-Us hockey has its limits. Or maybe it's just that karma is a dog. Or maybe, just maybe, if you plan on taking a whack-load of penalties every night, you might want to have a defensive plan to deal with them first.
The Ducks didn't play like a team, they played like a speeding train looking for a wall to crash into. Penalties, turnover, penalties... and kaboom.
But take heart, Ducks fans, there are plenty of things lovable about your team. (I'm a big fan of the fighting majors, for one thing.) And if my little autopsy on the corpse of the Ducks isn't 100% accurate, I'm sure you'll correct me.
Even better, just tell me what in God's name happened to your team this year. Perhaps you've got some entirely different theories than my own.
Regardless, don't take it all too personally: we never hate teams we beat, only the ones that kick our butts.
And on that note, hopefully I'll hate you a lot less next year. :)
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Detroit 3, Montreal 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Dallas 5, New Jersey 3 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Chicago 5, Edmonton 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
25 Comments
1 - 24 of 25
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And I agree with most of what you had to say.
Mostly you were right on!
When the Ducks signed Bertuzzi for that ridiculous amount I knew they were done for. Burke has tried to blame the Andy McDonald trade on Neidermeyer and Selanne's return, but, as you pointed out, that would have been a moot point if not for that gawd awful $4mil a year for a guy who had back surgery, hasn't played well since Steve Moore and etc. etc.
BTW, they re-signed Brad May for $2mil. It is a well known fact that Bertuzzi and May are good buds with Burke. But he should forget the buds and just manage the team.
However, speaking about Selanne ... the Ducks wouldn't have even made the playoffs if he had not come back. When the Ducks signed Pronger, Selanne was not exactly ecstatic. He and Prongs had, let's just say, history. But he dealt with that.
Then the Ducks sign Bertuzzi!! Selanne was playing for the Avs when the whole Steve Moore thing went down. You gotta wonder if Selanne waiting so long to make up his mind had something to do with that. "Can I actually play a game on the ice with BOTH of these cheap shot, goons?" I think there was a lot of begging and pleading behind the scenes to get Selanne back. Getzlaf, Perry, Kunitz, etc probably called him 10 times a day.
Anyway, even though the Ducks were the defending Stanley Cup Champs, this was NOT the Stanley Cup TEAM that won last year.
Report Abuse
I think Getzlaf got his bell rung when he got checked face-first into the glass; he played like he was shell-shocked the rest of the game. Missing his spark and energy was a big reason why the Ducks lost that decisive game.
Questioning the roster seems a bit silly : they went over 100 points during the regular season. That's nothing to sneeze at. The playoff collapse wasn't a roster problem at all; they were playing as if they didn't want to play anymore. The "I'd rather be golfing" license plate frame on the team bus was a dead giveaway.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Number of Stanley Cups won by the Canucks: 0
For this reason you can not make fun of the Ducks. However you may say a few nice words regarding the Los Angeles Kings if you feel the need to make fun of a dead hockey team in California.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
You sound as if we had a forgettable season this year. Despite all the distractions with the holdouts and possible retirements, starting the season early in London, and having to deal with the league labeling the team as a "goon squad" (which warrants more calls by the refs in some cases), I'd say finishing 4th in the West (3rd points-wise) isn't too bad at all.
Sure we took a disappointing early exit in the first round to an unworthy Dallas team, but we sure had a better season than your Canucks.
Btw. This is a retarded column heading. Team eulogies? Did I miss something? Is this the last NHL season ever to be played?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I wasn't very clear in the post, but I want to say that my remarks about Niedermayer and Selanne weren't meant to be personal criticisms of the players or their talents. My only intent was to say that I think the situation itself couldn't have helped the cohesion of the team. Just a difficult situation in my opinion. Regardless, a 102 point season is nothing to sneeze at, it's just too bad that playoffs ended so quickly given the accomplishments last year.
But at least your team made the playoffs -- I promise you, missing the post-season altogether is much worse. :-)
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
The epitome of the under performance was the 9 shots on goal the ducks took into the third period. I'm no expert but few teams are going to outscore opponents with 9 shots on goal.
Lastly, could the ducks have been any more relaxed during the game 6 defeat. At no point did they look like a team that wanted to play hockey, never mind win a game.
I don't buy off on the summer activities made them tired excuse. They get paid to play hockey. They play for the ability to lift that cup and take it to their home towns to show it off. Ask any player if he'd rather spend the summer celebrating the cup or have a few extra weeks of rest and you know what they would say. That's like saying you wouldn't want to win the lottery because you would have to spend too much time counting your money. Any player would kill to spend time with the cup during the summer.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 24 of 25