Puck Daddy - NHL

Devils overlord Lou Lamoriello said every general manager at yesterday's meeting in Detroit was in support of limiting the flow of information to the media and fans about player injuries. The reason, he said, is safety of the players: Opponents know someone has a few broken ribs, and the next thing you know he's getting skewered by sticks like a kabob all game.  

Not that League management needed some approval to stonewall the media on injuries. Tarik El-Bashir of the Washington Post deals with General Manager George McPhee and crew throughout the season, and they're a rather tight-lipped management group when it comes to injuries:

When a Capital goes down, we get "upper body injury", "undisclosed" or simply that he will not return to the game. Occasionally we are told what exactly is ailing the player, particularly if the injury was obvious to anyone watching. But other times we are told nothing at all and must track down the details from a source. That is, if anyone is willing to talk about it, which is rare because players and team officials aren't allowed to divulge their injuries to reporters per team rules.

In my experiences covering the Capitals, I've also found this to be the case, especially when it comes to potential concussions. That's where this deception on the part of some NHL teams gets rather dicey: How does one justify keeping head injuries quiet when some in the media believe the League is doing whatever it can to downplay a concussion epidemic?

Unlike in football, where injury information has a monetary value amongst gamblers, hockey's lack of injury disclosure has always involved a sense of player safety. But El-Bashir makes this salient point: Some players wouldn't mind injury info going public, because at least then fans would know why they're on a 0-for-20 goal-scoring skid.

He asks this question on his Capitals Insider blog, and I'll repeat it here: "As a hockey fan and a paying customer, do you feel NHL teams should be more forthcoming about injuries?"

digg delicious
more

11 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. J.P.
    1. Posted by J.P. Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    There's no reason the NHL can't require teams to report their injuries to the League - especially head shots, which need to be reported but aren't sufficiently - but keep the information out of the hands of the media and opponents. It's frustrating for us fans not knowing, but private reporting to the League accomplishes the goal of documenting injuries while addressing the GMs' concerns - both of which ultimately serve to maximize player safety.
  2. Wyshynski
    2. Posted by Wyshynski Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ JP -
    It still doesn't answer whether or not a paying customer deserves to know if a player's injured.
    I have $200. I want to buy four great seats for a Caps home game, to see Ovechkin at his best. He plays like poop, and we're disappointed. Later, it comes out the team failed to disclose he had broken ribs. Don't the customers deserve to know about false goods?
  3. J.P.
    3. Posted by J.P. Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    If you have $200, you ain't getting four great seats for a Caps home game.
    And I prefer the way DS phrased it - it was all-capsier.
    Disclosing and hiding injuries is as much a part of strategy as line combos or just about anything else. You, as the paying customer, have the right to have the home team put forth its best effort to win the game, and if it's deemed that Alex Ovechkin with broken ribs gives them a better chance to do so than a healthy Tomas Fleischmann (fact, btw) and that that chance is increased by not letting the other team know that AO's got the injury, you've gotten your money's worth. If you can't accept that, don't buy the ticket - that's sports.
  4. hooksorpik
    4. Posted by hooksorpik Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Some players wouldn't mind injury info going public, because at least then fans would know why they're on a 0-for-20 goal-scoring skid."
    Hello, Evgeni Malkin.
    I think for the most part the players in a seven game series get to know each other really well (especially given the commonality of most matchups) and it's pretty tough to hide injuries from one another when they're playing every other night for almost two weeks. Might as well just disclose, I'd say.
  5. Brodie30
    5. Posted by Brodie30 Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think the bad outweighs the good. I don't want some cheapshot artist taking specific liberties with my star player because he read the injury report. I'd rather not know than let that happen. The only reason there are injury reports in the NFL is for gamblers. And gambling on hockey sucks anyways.
  6. JohnB
    6. Posted by JohnB Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I say report it to the league, but keep it under raps other then that. Some injuries should be reported solely for the purpose of protecting the players (i.e. concussions). But other then that, we have no right to know someones personal medical information. Also what if the player report comes out that a guy has a bum knee. Now if unintentionally one of your player gives a knee to knee and really does damage, then does he get a lengthy suspension because people think "he knew he had a bad knee... intent to injure". And for the "non-unintentional" hits, you don't think someone like an avery, or ruutu, or someone else of that nature might use it to get an edge on the other team?
  7. Todd S.
    7. Posted by Todd S. Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Must be a slow news day, who cares.
  8. Todd S.
    8. Posted by Todd S. Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #8
    Good point bad example, scary Gary is one of the post seasons best player.
  9. Todd S.
    9. Posted by Todd S. Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #3
    Knowing injuries for players is not a right. What a tard.
  10. HotStacey
    10. Posted by HotStacey Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #10 eh, "player" ......" total washed-up hack"......either one;) how is that a bad example? that's an absolutely perfect example in that it never would've happened if they hadn't disclosed his injury.
  11. Graywolf
    11. Posted by Graywolf Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:36 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The perfect example for non-disclosure. Johan Franzen misses six games in this year's playoffs for "concussion like symptoms". His first game back in the Cup finals and what happens? He receives a cheap shot elbow to the head by Gary Roberts. A coincedence? Yeah, Right!

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™